EpicBoot2daFace wrote...
Allan Schumacher wrote...
Yes. (Kaboom!)
I'm about as biased of a source as there possibly can be on the game, however.
Good point.
It's important to note that how a developer looks at his own work is going to be different than a fan. While a fan may look at something and say "That was lazy/poor/whatever" there's a good chance that the dev that worked on it looks at it and goes "Look at all those flaws. I could have done better."
By a counterpoint, while a fan may look at something and say "That was awesome!" there's a good chance that the dev that worked on it looks at it and goes "Look at all those flaws. I could have done better."
DA2 has its flaws for sure. It's not a perfect game. What some may see, as an outside observer, as intrinsically poor, I'll more often see as "issue with execution" because I'm privy to the concepting, enthusiasm, and so forth behind a particular idea that can influence how I look at something. Fans don't have this perspective, so they can only judge purely based on what is actually delivered (which is entirely fair).
But despite DA2's flaws, and some other extra incentives (such as it being my first full game), I'm still proud of my contribution and the work we did on DA2. I recognize there was a fair bit of negative reception, however, and would love to make a game that turns skeptics/doubters into full on fans of DA3. It's a challenge and helps keep enthusiasm.