RedJohn wrote...
Harrier
Javelin
Claymore
Guest_Air Quotes_*
RedJohn wrote...
Harrier
Javelin
Claymore
ndw542 wrote...
Oh, good, Gallows is here. Now we can watch another thread devolve into a ****ing retarded argument about reload canceling.
ndw542 wrote...
Fortack wrote...
1. Falcon
2. Scorpion
3. Are there other weapons that make the screen shake?
You hate explosive weapons? Your namesake would eat you, fool.
JohnBes wrote...
So, people debating what to REMOVE now? Oh my...
When I woke up, weapon variety was a good thing.
Feneckus wrote...
Reegar. Ridiculously OP.
Acolyte. Easy weapon to use and to master, but the problem is it's very inneficient so most people who use that thing stick with it, never get better and don't realize how slowly they're killing stuff.
Annomander wrote...
Feneckus wrote...
Reegar. Ridiculously OP.
Acolyte. Easy weapon to use and to master, but the problem is it's very inneficient so most people who use that thing stick with it, never get better and don't realize how slowly they're killing stuff.
Reegar can kill platinum bosses in 6-8 seconds.
Yet, the typhoon which could do the same was deemed "op" and was nerfed. Biower and their stupid ideas of balance.
lktalon22 wrote...
1. csmg
2. shuriken
3. striker (all show no go)
N7-RedFox wrote...
Annomander wrote...
Feneckus wrote...
Reegar. Ridiculously OP.
Acolyte. Easy weapon to use and to master, but the problem is it's very inneficient so most people who use that thing stick with it, never get better and don't realize how slowly they're killing stuff.
Reegar can kill platinum bosses in 6-8 seconds.
Yet, the typhoon which could do the same was deemed "op" and was nerfed. Biower and their stupid ideas of balance.
I think that's more to do with the Typhoon having a much longer range than Reegar. You only get about 15ft range with a Reegar so you have to get in close and risk being slapped around. Plus its ammo count is quite low.
N7-RedFox wrote...
I think that's more to do with the Typhoon having a much longer range than Reegar. You only get about 15ft range with a Reegar so you have to get in close and risk being slapped around. Plus its ammo count is quite low.
Modifié par Zjarcal, 31 janvier 2013 - 03:11 .
Guest_Air Quotes_*
Lucifuture wrote...
This thread is full of stupid. Don't like a gun? Don't use it.
Man you know what this game really needs? Less content. pls fix dis bioware.
GallowsPole wrote...
JohnBes wrote...
So, people debating what to REMOVE now? Oh my...
When I woke up, weapon variety was a good thing.
There are a TON of weapons in this game. Id even consider replacing, but it would be unnecessary.
Zjarcal wrote...
Agreed on Reegar and Krysae... horribly designed weapons that were totally broken (and in the case of the Reegar, still is).
I wouldn't remove the Acolyte, I would just double the shield/barrier multiplier and nerf the base damage by half, making it strictly a shield stripper, not something you could ever efficiently kill anything with.
Krysae should be treated like Falcon instead of nerfing to the ground. Or make it a love-child of Scorpion and Harpoon.Air Quotes wrote...
Lucifuture wrote...
This thread is full of stupid. Don't like a gun? Don't use it.
Man you know what this game really needs? Less content. pls fix dis bioware.
Some things like Krysae should've never existed. Instead something like Punisher or Executioner should've been used instead.
Deerber wrote...
Zjarcal wrote...
Agreed on Reegar and Krysae... horribly designed weapons that were totally broken (and in the case of the Reegar, still is).
I wouldn't remove the Acolyte, I would just double the shield/barrier multiplier and nerf the base damage by half, making it strictly a shield stripper, not something you could ever efficiently kill anything with.
What, people are using it for something else than shield stripping?
Modifié par Annomander, 31 janvier 2013 - 03:19 .