Aller au contenu

Photo

Acolyte should remain chargeless


216 réponses à ce sujet

#26
born2beagator

born2beagator
  • Members
  • 3 082 messages

LoboFH wrote...

You don't get it, the weapon is more effective with the charge feature, you can run with it ready, it doesn't break the cloak, more powerful (BioWare wiuld nerf its punch to balance the easier handling), the reload time is annoying.

Yes, it's not so noob friendly, but make a small effort, if you get used to it you will understand why is better this way

exactly.  To use a overused cliche: L2P

#27
Guest_MasterReefa_*

Guest_MasterReefa_*
  • Guests

rlucht wrote...

MasterReefa wrote...

The charge gives it somewhat of a challenge to use. I haven't seen a single acolyte in pugs since the change. So I think it should be charged so not everyone and their mother can make the game EZ mode.


Yes lets all be elitist pricks who want to make the good weapons so annoying to use that most people won't bother, that's the solution to everything!

Also, its MORE powerful as a charge up, thus even more of easy-mode. Assuming one is willing to put of with the annoyance of running around with the extra button held down. (Now that's what I call fun!)

With the chargeless acolyte phantoms were harmless. Cerberus' biggest threat neutralized with a weightless, shield stripping, ammo applying gun that any class had no excuse to not bring shouldn't have somewhat of a learning curve? Alright then..

#28
Reaper_prime

Reaper_prime
  • Members
  • 186 messages
So many clueless people and profound elitism.Saying acolyte is used by anyone is like saying reegar and claymore are not.

If acolyte needs to be balanced to remain chargeless add it weight-nerf it so it needs ultra light materials without weight mods.

Edit: Now you add "it's noob friendly" arguments?Preposterous!

Modifié par Reaper_prime, 01 février 2013 - 01:05 .


#29
Grammaton Dryad

Grammaton Dryad
  • Members
  • 1 126 messages

LoboFH wrote...

You don't get it, the weapon is more effective with the charge feature, you can run with it ready, it doesn't break the cloak, more powerful (BioWare wiuld nerf its punch to balance the easier handling), the reload time is annoying.

Yes, it's not so noob friendly, but make a small effort, if you get used to it you will understand why is better this way



#30
STRANGE10VE

STRANGE10VE
  • Members
  • 749 messages
My fury and drell adepts can't wait for the charge to come back.

#31
Lucky

Lucky
  • Members
  • 2 677 messages

LoboFH wrote...

You don't get it, the weapon is more effective with the charge feature, you can run with it ready, it doesn't break the cloak, more powerful (BioWare wiuld nerf its punch to balance the easier handling), the reload time is annoying.

Yes, it's not so noob friendly, but make a small effort, if you get used to it you will understand why is better this way


Your argument is invalid, it is better with the charge and therefore more deserving of a nerf than if it was charge-less. Also, the charge benefits tanky classes that can afford to take a few hits while charging and not the squishy characters who can't (and who the gun was intended for).

I'm with grumpy old wizard on this one the charge makes it less friendly to its intended users, the poor squishy casters.

#32
BloodClaw95

BloodClaw95
  • Members
  • 1 538 messages
Isn't it made for casters?

How are squishy casters supposed to use it when you have to spend a half hour to charge it up?

#33
oXTheReverendXo

oXTheReverendXo
  • Members
  • 1 199 messages

Grumpy Old Wizard wrote...

Sadly the "caster" pistol is predetermined by Bioware to be caster unfriendly apparently.  The charge is great for vangods but sucks for squishy casters.  Oh well, the game is all about run and gun and guns and grenades now and I don't see that changing.  Switching back to weekend challenge mode for ME3 and moving on to other games for main play.  It is sad though that space magic in the Mass Effect series is very subordinate to shooty classes and tech classes. :crying:


I lol'd. The only characters I use it on are "squishy casters."

#34
born2beagator

born2beagator
  • Members
  • 3 082 messages

BloodClaw95 wrote...

Isn't it made for casters?

How are squishy casters supposed to use it when you have to spend a half hour to charge it up?

I use it on every caster without issue.  The charge is really, really not a big deal.

#35
FlashAK

FlashAK
  • Members
  • 746 messages
I'm glad that they're keeping it as a charged weapon. Those who appreciate the weapon will learn to compensate for the charge if they haven't already. For those that aren't willing to adjust, well you'll just have to suck it up and deal with it.

#36
Reaper_prime

Reaper_prime
  • Members
  • 186 messages

born2beagator wrote...

BloodClaw95 wrote...

Isn't it made for casters?

How are squishy casters supposed to use it when you have to spend a half hour to charge it up?

I use it on every caster without issue.  The charge is really, really not a big deal.


On silver?

#37
UnknownMercenary

UnknownMercenary
  • Members
  • 5 547 messages
Cons of the charge less Acolyte:
- it runs out of ammo eventually


Wouldn't get nerfed at all, nope

#38
Grammaton Dryad

Grammaton Dryad
  • Members
  • 1 126 messages

rlucht wrote...

LoboFH wrote...

You don't get it, the weapon is more effective with the charge feature, you can run with it ready, it doesn't break the cloak, more powerful (BioWare wiuld nerf its punch to balance the easier handling), the reload time is annoying.

Yes, it's not so noob friendly, but make a small effort, if you get used to it you will understand why is better this way


Your argument is invalid, it is better with the charge and therefore more deserving of a nerf than if it was charge-less. Also, the charge benefits tanky classes that can afford to take a few hits while charging and not the squishy characters who can't (and who the gun was intended for).

I'm with grumpy old wizard on this one the charge makes it less friendly to its intended users, the poor squishy casters.


ROFLMAO fail.

It's called soft cover. Squishy characters can use it charged just fine. The charge benefits classes that are on-the-move.

You clearly have no clue how to use the weapon.

#39
BloodClaw95

BloodClaw95
  • Members
  • 1 538 messages

born2beagator wrote...

BloodClaw95 wrote...

Isn't it made for casters?

How are squishy casters supposed to use it when you have to spend a half hour to charge it up?

I use it on every caster without issue.  The charge is really, really not a big deal.

If it's not a big deal, who cares if it's gone? :P

#40
Grammaton Dryad

Grammaton Dryad
  • Members
  • 1 126 messages

Reaper_prime wrote...

born2beagator wrote...

BloodClaw95 wrote...

Isn't it made for casters?

How are squishy casters supposed to use it when you have to spend a half hour to charge it up?

I use it on every caster without issue.  The charge is really, really not a big deal.


On silver?


On platinum.

#41
born2beagator

born2beagator
  • Members
  • 3 082 messages

Reaper_prime wrote...

born2beagator wrote...

BloodClaw95 wrote...

Isn't it made for casters?

How are squishy casters supposed to use it when you have to spend a half hour to charge it up?

I use it on every caster without issue.  The charge is really, really not a big deal.


On silver?


Gold and Platinum.  I play very little silver and bronze.  if you are hoping to use the acolyte as a damage weapon on a caster class, you are using it wrong.

#42
GallowsPole

GallowsPole
  • Members
  • 4 216 messages
Negative. There's always the TGI and Harrier though.

#43
oXTheReverendXo

oXTheReverendXo
  • Members
  • 1 199 messages

BloodClaw95 wrote...

Isn't it made for casters?

How are squishy casters supposed to use it when you have to spend a half hour to charge it up?


Hold down the charge while you're moving to the enemy. Use soft cover (which is better than hard cover 99% of the time anyway).

IIRC, the charge up time is actually a bit faster than the forced 1-second refire on the chargeless variant, so your second shot will be quicker if you need it.

#44
BloodClaw95

BloodClaw95
  • Members
  • 1 538 messages

UnknownMercenary wrote...

Cons of the charge less Acolyte:
- it runs out of ammo eventually


Wouldn't get nerfed at all, nope

Rate of Fire says hello.

#45
Bryan Johnson

Bryan Johnson
  • BioWare Employees
  • 4 043 messages
Simply put we have every intention to return it to being a charge up weapon

#46
born2beagator

born2beagator
  • Members
  • 3 082 messages

BloodClaw95 wrote...

born2beagator wrote...

BloodClaw95 wrote...

Isn't it made for casters?

How are squishy casters supposed to use it when you have to spend a half hour to charge it up?

I use it on every caster without issue.  The charge is really, really not a big deal.

If it's not a big deal, who cares if it's gone? :P


Becuase the last time they took it off, it was nerfed shortly after and Fagnan said that the first nerf wasn't enough

#47
Lucky

Lucky
  • Members
  • 2 677 messages
Of course I know what soft cover is and I use the weapon fine when its charged my point is that the charge benefits characters who can take a hit moreso than those that can't. Are you arguing that squishy casters shouldn't be allowed to use hard cover effectively?

#48
born2beagator

born2beagator
  • Members
  • 3 082 messages

Bryan Johnson wrote...

Simply put we have every intention to return it to being a charge up weapon


:D:D:D:D:D


Bioware:wub:

#49
Reaper_prime

Reaper_prime
  • Members
  • 186 messages

Grammaton Dryad wrote...

rlucht wrote...

LoboFH wrote...

You don't get it, the weapon is more effective with the charge feature, you can run with it ready, it doesn't break the cloak, more powerful (BioWare wiuld nerf its punch to balance the easier handling), the reload time is annoying.

Yes, it's not so noob friendly, but make a small effort, if you get used to it you will understand why is better this way


Your argument is invalid, it is better with the charge and therefore more deserving of a nerf than if it was charge-less. Also, the charge benefits tanky classes that can afford to take a few hits while charging and not the squishy characters who can't (and who the gun was intended for).

I'm with grumpy old wizard on this one the charge makes it less friendly to its intended users, the poor squishy casters.


ROFLMAO fail.

It's called soft cover. Squishy characters can use it charged just fine. The charge benefits classes that are on-the-move.

You clearly have no clue how to use the weapon.


Lol,so caster are always on the move.

I agree valkyrie and fury benefit the most.

Now what about drell,asari and human/phoenix adepts?

#50
painforest

painforest
  • Members
  • 1 475 messages
I prefer it without the charge. I've yet to see anyone give a reason as to why charge is superior to charge-less that doesn't sound like code for "it's more difficult to use aka it's not a noob tube anymore".