Aller au contenu

Photo

Why the obsession with female characters?


404 réponses à ce sujet

#1
IllusiveManJr

IllusiveManJr
  • Members
  • 12 265 messages
This isn't a thread for fem-bashing, I just want to ask why some people are adamant about ME3 MP getting more female characters. I don't understand why some are pushing for this to happen so much. 

#2
mumba

mumba
  • Members
  • 4 997 messages
To stare at the booty.

#3
Catman Assuming Direct Control

Catman Assuming Direct Control
  • Members
  • 201 messages
There is ZERO. NONE. NATTA. NEGATORY. reasons for female turians, female humans is understandable

#4
Arctican

Arctican
  • Members
  • 2 265 messages
Why not? They already have the in-game models for a lot of the females so resource isn;t a problem.

#5
GHOST OF FRUITY

GHOST OF FRUITY
  • Members
  • 715 messages
Choice and variety. The more the better.  In terms of Turians, the request for female versions has been pretty high since Nyreen and Omega.  Turians have no adept/vanguard kits in multiplayer.  The character model is there.  There seems little reason not to include them. 

Modifié par GHOST OF FRUITY, 01 février 2013 - 08:06 .


#6
Titus Thongger

Titus Thongger
  • Members
  • 6 086 messages
Mass Effect 3 has some mighty fine mass in it

#7
Catman Assuming Direct Control

Catman Assuming Direct Control
  • Members
  • 201 messages

Arctican wrote...

Why not? They already have the in-game models for a lot of the females so resource isn;t a problem.


Why make the same class only as a female?

#8
Dracian

Dracian
  • Members
  • 1 607 messages
Sex ? Hormons ? Xenophilia ?

#9
Kalas Magnus

Kalas Magnus
  • Members
  • 10 344 messages

GHOST OF FRUITY wrote...

Choice and variety. The more the better.



#10
darkpassenger2342

darkpassenger2342
  • Members
  • 6 944 messages

Catman Assuming Direct Control wrote...

Arctican wrote...

Why not? They already have the in-game models for a lot of the females so resource isn;t a problem.


Why make the same class only as a female?


What do you have against women in video games?!

Modifié par darkpassenger2342, 01 février 2013 - 07:59 .


#11
Doommarine23

Doommarine23
  • Members
  • 1 231 messages

IllusiveManJr wrote...

This isn't a thread for fem-bashing, I just want to ask why some people are adamant about ME3 MP getting more female characters. I don't understand why some are pushing for this to happen so much. 


For the sake of equality.

#12
AresKeith

AresKeith
  • Members
  • 34 128 messages
Because people want the game to be diverse, and what's the harm in adding them?

#13
Tokenusername

Tokenusername
  • Members
  • 11 157 messages
Jiggly Quarian bum bum replication experiments.

#14
IllusiveManJr

IllusiveManJr
  • Members
  • 12 265 messages
So... Fornax Character Pack DLC for MP?

#15
Catman Assuming Direct Control

Catman Assuming Direct Control
  • Members
  • 201 messages

darkpassenger2342 wrote...

Catman Assuming Direct Control wrote...

Arctican wrote...

Why not? They already have the in-game models for a lot of the females so resource isn;t a problem.


Why make the same class only as a female?


What do you have against women in video games!!



Nothing.

But please. Why make the same exact class with the same exact powers only as a female.

#16
Doommarine23

Doommarine23
  • Members
  • 1 231 messages

Tokenusername wrote...

Jiggly Quarian bum bum replication experiments.


Mother of god.... :?


Catman Assuming Direct Control wrote...
Nothing.

But please. Why make the same exact class with the same exact powers only as a female.


Because women play video-games too and should feel equal. They should be able to feel equal in representation.

Modifié par Doommarine23, 01 février 2013 - 08:00 .


#17
soulstriker09

soulstriker09
  • Members
  • 3 209 messages
variety

#18
darkpassenger2342

darkpassenger2342
  • Members
  • 6 944 messages

Catman Assuming Direct Control wrote...

darkpassenger2342 wrote...

Catman Assuming Direct Control wrote...

Arctican wrote...

Why not? They already have the in-game models for a lot of the females so resource isn;t a problem.


Why make the same class only as a female?


What do you have against women in video games!!



Nothing.

But please. Why make the same exact class with the same exact powers only as a female.

was just kidding anyway, youre pretty much right.

#19
Arctican

Arctican
  • Members
  • 2 265 messages

Catman Assuming Direct Control wrote...

Arctican wrote...

Why not? They already have the in-game models for a lot of the females so resource isn;t a problem.


Why make the same class only as a female?


Same class? Female turians could fufill the role of an Adept or Vanguard, something that the Turians don;t have ATM.

#20
tjbearpig

tjbearpig
  • Members
  • 792 messages
Who's rear end would you like to look at for ~20 mins in a match? FQE wins the cake, but my BatSol has got some moves~

#21
Zazzerka

Zazzerka
  • Members
  • 9 532 messages

Tokenusername wrote...

Jiggly Quarian bum bum replication experiments.

Turian bum bums don't jiggle, surely.

Modifié par GT Zazzerka, 01 février 2013 - 08:01 .


#22
Doommarine23

Doommarine23
  • Members
  • 1 231 messages

darkpassenger2342 wrote...
was just kidding anyway, youre pretty much right.


There is nothing wrong with equaltiy and equal representation.

Modifié par Doommarine23, 01 février 2013 - 08:01 .


#23
Catman Assuming Direct Control

Catman Assuming Direct Control
  • Members
  • 201 messages

Doommarine23 wrote...

darkpassenger2342 wrote...
was just kidding anyway, youre pretty much right.


There is nothing wrong with equaltiy and equal representation.


Its a video game. Not RL. And don;t get me started on female equality. They only want it on half the **** anyway.

#24
darkpassenger2342

darkpassenger2342
  • Members
  • 6 944 messages

Doommarine23 wrote...

darkpassenger2342 wrote...
was just kidding anyway, youre pretty much right.


There is nothing wrong with equaltiy and equal representation.


Dead or alive is your equality!

#25
AresKeith

AresKeith
  • Members
  • 34 128 messages

Catman Assuming Direct Control wrote...

darkpassenger2342 wrote...

Catman Assuming Direct Control wrote...

Arctican wrote...

Why not? They already have the in-game models for a lot of the females so resource isn;t a problem.


Why make the same class only as a female?


What do you have against women in video games!!



Nothing.

But please. Why make the same exact class with the same exact powers only as a female.


Why make the Earth DLC, which has the same classes with Humans?

Its all about Variety, whether its the same class or not doesn't matter in that case