235 réponses à ce sujet

[N7 Panda]

Just get used to it. It works fine, just headshot all the things.

Edit: at the time of posting, it appears your poll needs the delay removed as well...

Modifié par Nope2.1, 01 février 2013 - 02:16 .

[HolyAvenger]

Crusader with no delay will get nerfed. No thanks.

[Computron2000]

I came for the poll but saw nothing. I was saddened

Modifié par Computron2000, 01 février 2013 - 02:16 .

[IxMerc04]

I've been hip firing it with good success on my Havoc.

[megabeast37215]

Why can't people use this gun? My circle of friends has been using it more and more... and they're all really happy with the weapon's performance.

Go ahead... remove the delay... but the gun is already quite awesome. 4-5 buffs will do that...

[Feneckus]

They could buff its damage, get rid of the delay, make it shoot several pellets so it's not affected by shield gate, I would still not  use it.

I will never cheat on my Claymore 

[Titus Thongger]

I just use it as a club to stick an omniblade on

[HolyAvenger]

Air Quotes wrote...

HolyAvenger wrote...

Crusader with no delay will get nerfed. No thanks.

 

What's to nerf? It has sub-par damage, ROF is garbage, weights more than a Krogan in armor with a Claymore and unwashed ears. 

Weight doesn't matter, I use it on my weapon kits. Super accurate, easy to snipe with and get headshots. Damage is good (subpar relative to what?).

The fact is the firing delay adds a learning curve that is part of its balance. If you remove it you'd have to rebalance it somehow.

[Blind2Society]

I don't dislike the gun at all but I would be all for them removing the delay.

[megabeast37215]

Air Quotes wrote...

HolyAvenger wrote...

Crusader with no delay will get nerfed. No thanks.

 

What's to nerf? It has sub-par damage, ROF is garbage, weights more than a Krogan in armor with a Claymore and unwashed ears. 

Sub-par damage? WTF?

That thing slaughters... well... everything. Even Platinum bosses fear my Crusader. I outscored Ashen Earth with a Crusader for christ's sake...

[Old Books]

You clearly know much more about the game than I do but it surprises me when anyone says the damage is sub par. It absolutely murders bosses and mooks alike on Gold, and that is without any kind of amps. Like others have said, I fear if the firing delay is removed now, it will be seen as overpowered but I guess the weight might save it from being nerfed.

Short answer, leave it as it is IMO.

[megabeast37215]

Air Quotes wrote...

megabeast37215 wrote...

Why can't people use this gun? My circle of friends has been using it more and more... and they're all really happy with the weapon's performance.

Go ahead... remove the delay... but the gun is already quite awesome. 4-5 buffs will do that...

 

Wraith is better in every way. Claymore is better too. 

My GI with a Crusader will kill an Atlas faster than you can with a Claymore OR a Wraith... hands down.

[Blind2Society]

megabeast37215 wrote...

I outscored Ashen Earth with a Crusader for christ's sake...

From the context I assume that means something, yes?

Still, I don't agree with Quotes as to how bad the gun is, but without the delay nothing would need to be nerfed.

Modifié par Blind2Society, 01 février 2013 - 02:25 .

[BridgeBurner]

I was in a game with Jay about a week ago.

Jay got a crusader in his commendation pack so he decided to use it for lawlz.

I got sync killed by a praetorian, so i got to spectate Jay until the end of wave 9.

Jay missed an abomination at virtually point blank range a grand total of 4 times.

Yes, the gun needs its firing delay removed, when even a player as good as jay can't hit something 2 feet infront of him, the gun definitely needs its hit system improved.

[Astreon]

My guess is they would've fixed it a while ago if they could... not everything can be easily patched.

Balancing a weapon with what amounts to artificial aiming lag makes about as much sense as balancing an OP gun with a proc chance to die on shooting: both can statistically stop a weapon from being overpowered, but there are better avenues.

[joker_jack]

Air Quotes wrote...

megabeast37215 wrote...

Why can't people use this gun? My circle of friends has been using it more and more... and they're all really happy with the weapon's performance.

Go ahead... remove the delay... but the gun is already quite awesome. 4-5 buffs will do that...

 

Wraith is better in every way. Claymore is better too. 

[Jay_Hoxtatron]

If it wasn't for that delay, the damage output of the Crusader would be superior to the Claymore/Wraith.

[HolyAvenger]

Air Quotes wrote...

HolyAvenger wrote...

Air Quotes wrote...

HolyAvenger wrote...

Crusader with no delay will get nerfed. No thanks.

 

What's to nerf? It has sub-par damage, ROF is garbage, weights more than a Krogan in armor with a Claymore and unwashed ears. 

Weight doesn't matter, I use it on my weapon kits. Super accurate, easy to snipe with and get headshots. Damage is good (subpar relative to what?).

The fact is the firing delay adds a learning curve that is part of its balance. If you remove it you'd have to rebalance it somehow.

 

To other UR Shotguns or even Pistols or Sniper Rifles. That extra range rarely comes into play and Wraith does it better. There is no need to reblance it. You already pay enough. 

I disagree. I don't have DPS numbers on hand, but I find it competitive at taking down bosses (if not mooks, shieldgate does hurt there).

And I find the range does come into play for me a lot- heck I even zoom in to hit heads.

I like the Wraith, but I prefer the Crusader on kits that care less about weight.

[UnknownMercenary]

The delay is pretty annoying, even with a character who has overload/energy drain to stagger enemies.

I hipfire it with a Destroyer to get the challenge done then go back to my Claymore on him.

[Blind2Society]

Jay_Hoxtatron wrote...

If it wasn't for that delay, the damage output of the Crusader would be superior to the Claymore/Wraith.

But it would weigh more and be much harder to hit with.

I know, I know.