"The reason why Mass Effect was the best trilogy was because after playing Mass Effect 1 and 2 your heart was so attached to the game, but to have such an emotional ending with the best soundtracks every made the ending very dramatic. The series felt like it was ripped from your heart, to have nothing left to continue."
Everyone judges ME3 because of the ending.
#1
Posté 01 février 2013 - 08:33
"The reason why Mass Effect was the best trilogy was because after playing Mass Effect 1 and 2 your heart was so attached to the game, but to have such an emotional ending with the best soundtracks every made the ending very dramatic. The series felt like it was ripped from your heart, to have nothing left to continue."
#2
Posté 01 février 2013 - 08:34
Mr.Antihero wrote...
"People forget it's not the ending that matters, it's the journey that brought you to the end that counts. The Mass Effect trilogy is one of the best sagas of all time."
"The reason why Mass Effect was the best trilogy was because after playing Mass Effect 1 and 2 your heart was so attached to the game, but to have such an emotional ending with the best soundtracks every made the ending very dramatic. The series felt like it was ripped from your heart, to have nothing left to continue."
Well the Titanic and Hindenburg had great journies, but if you crash and burn in the end, it's still going to suck.
#3
Posté 01 février 2013 - 08:35
#4
Posté 01 février 2013 - 08:36
#5
Posté 01 février 2013 - 08:36
Ticonderoga117 wrote...
Mr.Antihero wrote...
"People forget it's not the ending that matters, it's the journey that brought you to the end that counts. The Mass Effect trilogy is one of the best sagas of all time."
"The reason why Mass Effect was the best trilogy was because after playing Mass Effect 1 and 2 your heart was so attached to the game, but to have such an emotional ending with the best soundtracks every made the ending very dramatic. The series felt like it was ripped from your heart, to have nothing left to continue."
Well the Titanic and Hindenburg had great journies, but if you crash and burn in the end, it's still going to suck.
They can't be compared...
#6
Posté 01 février 2013 - 08:36
Brhino wrote...
Apart from that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?
Lol
#7
Posté 01 février 2013 - 08:37
#8
Posté 01 février 2013 - 08:39
#9
Guest_Arcian_*
Posté 01 février 2013 - 08:39
Guest_Arcian_*
#10
Posté 01 février 2013 - 08:40
TristanHawke wrote...
They can't be compared...
So why is a game being compared to a journey?
The start was cool, the traveling was fun, but then at the end, horrible things occured and you can't look back at how fun it was because the end leaves a bitter taste in your mouth.
Modifié par Ticonderoga117, 01 février 2013 - 08:47 .
#11
Posté 01 février 2013 - 08:41
wright1978 wrote...
Both Journey and destination matter. Sadly ME3's destination was a trainwreck.
As was It's journey.
Modifié par Seboist, 01 février 2013 - 08:41 .
#12
Posté 01 février 2013 - 08:41
Arcian wrote...
People go on a journey to get somewhere. That is literally the ENTIRE point.
This needs to be framed and hung on every wall in Bioware's office.
#13
Posté 01 février 2013 - 08:43
#14
Posté 01 février 2013 - 08:43
I am struggling with the desire to replay the trilogy again solely based on the fact that I know I am stuck talking to the Intelligence no matter what.
In this case, it's even worse than a binary ending choice, because at least in that case, the endings are completely different.
Modifié par futurepixels, 01 février 2013 - 08:47 .
#15
Posté 01 février 2013 - 08:45
Asch Lavigne wrote...
It wasn't just the ending that made ME3 a poor ending to the trilogy. It was also what they did with decisions, auto-dialogue, making ME2 completely pointless, etc.... I could go on and on.
I don't disagree with your other points, but ME2 itself created a large problem by taking the story off on (essentially) a tangent, creating way too many squadmates (thus forcing the writers to find a way to stuff them all into ME3), and introducing more than a few wacky elements (the whole dying and resurrected thing still annoys me).
ME3 definitely has issues (although I still enjoy playing most of it), but I think at least some of the issues were - if not unavoidable - brought on from ME1 and (especially) 2, and there wasn't necessarily a 'good' way to get around them.
#16
Posté 01 février 2013 - 08:48
I agree. I have seen many people who praised the game while playing it for the first time totally do a 360 after the ending, then start claiming it was a horrible game and then start nitpicking at every detail. I understand how the ending could do that, I'd be lying if I said that the ending hasn't soured my feelings on playing multiple Shepards through all 3 games (Same ending really, no matter her/his alignment or decisions). But overall, it was still a great trilogy, even if it went out with a....well...bang (and not a positive bang imo).OperatingWookie wrote...
Mass Effect 3 was a wonderful game. Some things may not have impressed the most hardcore of fans, but it in general was quite good.
The endings left a bitter taste in my mouth, but I still love the game and the 2 before it.
#17
Posté 01 février 2013 - 08:49
Mr.Antihero wrote...
"People forget it's not the ending that matters, it's the journey that brought you to the end that counts. The Mass Effect trilogy is one of the best sagas of all time."
"The reason why Mass Effect was the best trilogy was because after playing Mass Effect 1 and 2 your heart was so attached to the game, but to have such an emotional ending with the best soundtracks every made the ending very dramatic. The series felt like it was ripped from your heart, to have nothing left to continue."
If there is no destination why would anyone Journey anywhere?
Also Journey
Plus why am I answering your thread, all your threads are trolls.
#18
Posté 01 février 2013 - 08:51
Belisarius25 wrote...
Asch Lavigne wrote...
It wasn't just the ending that made ME3 a poor ending to the trilogy. It was also what they did with decisions, auto-dialogue, making ME2 completely pointless, etc.... I could go on and on.
I don't disagree with your other points, but ME2 itself created a large problem by taking the story off on (essentially) a tangent, creating way too many squadmates (thus forcing the writers to find a way to stuff them all into ME3), and introducing more than a few wacky elements (the whole dying and resurrected thing still annoys me).
ME3 definitely has issues (although I still enjoy playing most of it), but I think at least some of the issues were - if not unavoidable - brought on from ME1 and (especially) 2, and there wasn't necessarily a 'good' way to get around them.
I agree. Shepard being resurrected serves no narrative purpose, except for some "funny" one-liners here and there. Project Lazarus is also the biggest space magic ever
But despite its myriad flaws, I enjoyed the journey....
Modifié par Barquiel, 01 février 2013 - 08:52 .
#19
Posté 01 février 2013 - 08:53
#20
Posté 01 février 2013 - 08:53
#21
Posté 01 février 2013 - 08:53
#22
Posté 01 février 2013 - 08:56
#23
Posté 01 février 2013 - 08:58
Brhino wrote...
Apart from that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?
you sir, just won the internet
#24
Posté 01 février 2013 - 08:58
Brhino wrote...
Apart from that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?
It was an excellent piece of theatre.
I was upset that I didn't get to see the whole thing.
Joking aside. I don't think the Lincoln assassination, Titantic disaster and Hindenberg disasters are good analogies.
A video game doesn't need to have a good ending to be worth while. Though it helps.
#25
Posté 01 février 2013 - 09:00
noobcannon wrote...
calling the ending of mass effect 3 the most important part of the entire trilogy is a monumental understatement.
Who cares about ending a million year old cycle when you can remember having gay sex on board the normandy?
Why is BSN so homophobic?





Retour en haut




