bobbydarko wrote...
Halo 2 played great. it was a great game even. I just didn't care about arbitor. I didn't want to humanize the covenant. I wanted to kill them.RZIBARA wrote...
bobbydarko wrote...
I agree.
God of war trilogy was good, just never really evolved.
Metal Gear was just too all over the place.
Uncharted is 3 awesome games, but really no connectivity whatsoever other than Nathan, Elana and Sully being in all 3.
Gears of war. Admittedly, im a pretty big gears fan. All 3 games were great. The story was underwhelming however. Gears of war 3 ends when a certain character meets his/her demise IMO, but the game gores on for another few hrs. Overall gears just felt like it was going somewhere and never got there. wtf was the point of the queen?
Halo was good. Halo 2 was dumb though.
Overall, ME is the only trilogy that truly told a story throughout all 3 games. Its one of the only 'planned' trilogies in gaming. Most of the others i mentioned only became trilogies because the first sold so well. regardless of the endings, the ME trilogy should be looked at as the benchmark of how to do a trilogy going forward.
Oh and the whole carrying your saves over from one game to the next? When are others companies gonna start doing this...
i agree with everything here. except for halo 2 being dumb. LOL no offense but halo 2= best halo ever created, best story IMO.
And yeah i thought gears trilogy was really good with great moments, but the ending to GoW 3 wasnt as epic as i thought it would be, but it was good none the less
the arbiter was one of the better characters in halo IMO. Tarturus, shipmaster, and the prophets were well done (although i find ME's characters much better done than ANY halo character). I liked seeing the covie side of things. i was a big fan of halo before reach and 4, but ME trilogy destroys halo easily





Retour en haut







