Aller au contenu

Photo

Quarians to once again control the Geth


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
354 réponses à ce sujet

#76
Dunabar

Dunabar
  • Members
  • 961 messages

DeinonSlayer wrote...

Wrote this up back in the day - an alternate Rannoch campaign. Dunabar, it incorporates your Control idea, growing out of what was foreshadowed in ME2, while portraying both the positive AND the negative aspects of the Geth at the same time.

*Snip to avoid massive pyramid*


I tried to be balanced to both sides. You ultimately have to make BOTH sides see the error of their ways for the best outcome to be achieved. The schism allows the nobler aspects of the Geth shine through, while simultaneously not giving them a free pass on their history. Thoughts?


I liked it, it definitly plays to both sides. Thats my main thing is to allow both sides some moment to have a feeling of victory. I love the Rannoch mission as it is, but I think its slightly too "Pro-Geth" hence why I like the idea of having that option to rewrite/enslave the geth. Yeah Pro-Geth would hate it but who cares? They wouldn't need to select the option and if they want to get bent out of shape about it, thats their problem to deal with. Its not something my main Shep would do, but hey the option still being there would have been nice.

#77
Dunabar

Dunabar
  • Members
  • 961 messages

JesseLee202 wrote...

DirtySHISN0 wrote...

Dunabar wrote...
I don't value synthetic life, so to me its destruction of both my enemies. Only difference between my prefered path now and that of this "wishful path" is that one at least offers the option to get the benefit of keeping the Geth around just long enough to be useful to me. However not feed into the Geth supporter phase of "They deserve free will!" Because I honestly don't believe they do deserve it.

Now, seeing as you don't play beyond chrono station anything beyond this point is pointless. So whatever your choice or opinions may be. I will respect them and most likely disagree with most of them.

You highlighted the question and missed the point.

You choose destroy to stop the big bad reapers (who dont value organic life) from enslaving and destroying organics while at the same time advocate enslavement and destruction of synthetics (because you dont value synthetic life).

What part of "renegade" option do you not understand? There are plenty of hypocritical moments in Mass Effect, why should it be any different here? Dunabar simply would like more options, no one has to choose them. Control ending has the same ammount of hypocrisy you are trying to throw on this issue. Oh wait, you don't play after Chronos station because it's not what you wanted...  :crying:


Because that would make too much sense and the Geth lovers don't like the idea that there are some people who refuse to accept the Geth as "living creatures", "equals", or whatever. I respect they don't like it, I respect they love the Geth, and I respect they wouldn't choose to "enslave" the machines. But to me they're no more than computers that went haywire and I believe its time to destroy or fix these computers to be used as tools for the cause once more.

#78
sentinel_87

sentinel_87
  • Members
  • 278 messages
It would have been a great option; and help set up the control ending. My main Shepard I use the most would still blow them all up though.

My Renegade Shepard was going to go this route in ME3 should the option present itself. I really thought that Admiral Xen was a set up for this being a possible solution to the quarian/geth conflict in ME3.

Overall though this would not be the smartest move; it did not work well the first time.

#79
Cyrax86

Cyrax86
  • Members
  • 243 messages

Red Dust wrote...

Hazegurl wrote...

I harbor no sympathizes for the Geth or Quarians but if I can't broker peace between then I opt to destroy the Quarians. Why? Cause they blew up a ship with me on it. That simple. I could careless about their home world. I sure as heck don't want to die for it. Also, the Quarians don't deserve to control the Geth. They did before and look what happened to them. I don't mind the option being there for fans who do but I think that would be a stupid thing to do. Would you plan to fight the Geth to save the Quarian's butts once the Geth attack again? I sure don't. I say close their mass relay and let the Geth finish what they started if that's the case.


The Geth have been activly trying to kill you for three games. The Quarians attack a ship with you on it, confident that you'd escape (and you do).

Seems legit.

Its not like when Adm. Hackett was shooting at the cerburus base a few missions later, or anytime during ME1.

#80
CynicalShep

CynicalShep
  • Members
  • 2 381 messages

Dunabar wrote...

If the Geth were organic, I would be annoyed with the Quarians greatly.
however, the Geth are not organics and I personally don't deem them as
living creatures (Disagree if you like as I don't seek anyones approval
on my opinion). You say you don't hate the quarians which is fine, but they have a terrible government. Well I would say that no government is perfect and go on a bit of a rant about how people love to blame the many for the few, but that is very possible to stumble into politics which I rather just avoid getting into for obvious reasons. Quarians are actually far from spineless but I believe this will just come down to a matter of opinion vs. opinion. I personally don't deem them spineless, I feel they have been forced to take steps needed to avoid being wiped out. Now before someone jumps on the "lolol like starting a war during the reaper invasion" bandwagon, where would you propose the quarians to house their civilians so their military can go fight the reapers like you want?


Yeah, that's a matter of opinion. What I'm saying is that organics would have ended the war there and then. Geth, on the other hand let the Quarians walk (or fly, w/e). And I don't think you've read half of what I wrote. I specifically said that I do not hate Quarian people, I just think their governing system is flawed and their admirals look and act more like a high school reuinion than a real admiralty board. 
About the housing - are you serious? Reapers are systematically obliterating everything in the Galaxy and you're butchering a potential ally and suffering loses so that you can have a house Reapers could destroy? They just took Earth, Palaven and Thessia. For Rannoch they would need a couple Destroyers with spatulas if Geth are dead. Instead, the genius admirals strapped huge guns on liveships (instead of added armor) and made them primary targets. "Oh, noez, the evil robots are atacking the live ships!!!11". Well, what did you expect, really?

Dunabar wrote...

If you were forced to live on a old ship that was constantly needing repairs, sharing space with many different families, living in a galaxy where you're treated like a second class citizen, and living in a galaxy where overpowering forces are making it next to impossible to gather resources to make these needed repairs, wouldn't you want a better life and chance to survive against this overpowering force? If you don't then by all means stay the course. Of course to also state the obvious, the quarians and Gerrel are not human.


They brought this upon themselves. It's not like somebody attacked their homeworld and forced them to leave. They attacked the Geth, lost, and 17 millions were spared. Of course I would like a better life but I wouldn't have messed up priorities like some of the Quarians do. In my book a good life will always be more important than destroying an enitre race because my ancestors screwed up. 

Dunabar wrote...

What Quarian has shown any degree of hostility to another organic without being provoked? I'm sure the quarians have tempers just like any organics and I'm sure like any organics would go to war with anyone they felt was needed to. The Geth already let the so called "Heretics" walk away and the heretics left a blood trail in their wake that all organics suffered. I'm surprised people haven't tried to pin that one on the quarians, wouldn't be surprised if they did however. Should we also ensure Hackett gets punched in the stomach? I mean he left a whole fleet to be destroyed and nobody questions his move. Han'Gerrel makes one call to fire on a dangerous target thats been threatening his people and people want to scream "Death to the quarians!" because of it, Seriously? Lol.
[smilie]http://social.bioware.com/images/forum/emoticons/angry.png[/smilie]


I'm not saying they show a degree of hostility to other organics - I said that they have a knack for self-destroying "accidents". They attacked the Geth once and lost, they ran test on Alarei and screwed up and they attack Geth again and lose (if you don't shoot Legion). I see them like a race of scientists: brilliant minds and little common sense (kind of like Salarians). Well, the lack of common sense is bound to cause another screw up - be in it 10, 100 or 500 years. Heretics were Geth with messed up priorities. Quarians weren't guilty that they attacked Eden Prime but none of that would have happened if "the Creators" didn't fail in the first place. 
And don't you dare compare that suicidal revenge-driven "Admiral" with Hackett. Hackett had to choose between losing his entire fleet in minutes and losing one of his fleets in fewer minutes. He is a real Admiral. Shepard offered to help Gerrel, cause he was getting mauled and specifically told him (in my case) to retreat to safety. Instead he attacked a disabled ship (which could have helped with the war that really mattered) while another Admiral, Humanity's de-facto ambassador and another good soldier (the Shadow Broker, in my case) were still on board. Not only is that back-stabbing - he also willingly attacked Humanity's representative (which could have well caused another war if not for the Reapers). And you're obviously over-reacting. I never said "Death to the Quarians!" but I would gladly lock Gerrel up for the rest of his days (after shooting his knee-caps).

Dunabar wrote...

I'm a bit on the fence if I would trust them again to control the Geth. On one hand I rather just see the geth turned into scrap and not risk seeing more quarians die, on the other hand I think the quarians wouldn't underestimate them a second time around and would take greater steps to ensure such wouldn't happen again. This would have still been an interesting option to see, even if pro-geth hate it with every fiber of their organic bodies.


I agreed that it would be an interesting option, although it's one I would never consider taking (for reasons explained above). Pro-Geth people obviously hate the option, just like you would hate if Geth took control of Quarians through their suits and made them organic batteries. As about not underestimating them the second time - they already did it 3 times (Morning War, Alarei, ME3 war). I am almost sure they'll screw up again, it's only a question of how soon that will happen and whether any of the Quarians will survive.

Modifié par CynicalShep, 04 février 2013 - 04:17 .


#81
Hazegurl

Hazegurl
  • Members
  • 4 927 messages

Belisarius25 wrote...

One thing that would be interesting would be to see what people would think about the Geth/Quarian situation if neither Tali nor Legion were ever in the games to skew their feelings.


I played ME3 first without ever playing the first two. Still picked Geth. Didn't know Tali to care and I got fake Leigon I believe.  The Quarians were still too stupid to live.

#82
Hazegurl

Hazegurl
  • Members
  • 4 927 messages

Cyrax86 wrote...

Red Dust wrote...

Hazegurl wrote...

I harbor no sympathizes for the Geth or Quarians but if I can't broker peace between then I opt to destroy the Quarians. Why? Cause they blew up a ship with me on it. That simple. I could careless about their home world. I sure as heck don't want to die for it. Also, the Quarians don't deserve to control the Geth. They did before and look what happened to them. I don't mind the option being there for fans who do but I think that would be a stupid thing to do. Would you plan to fight the Geth to save the Quarian's butts once the Geth attack again? I sure don't. I say close their mass relay and let the Geth finish what they started if that's the case.


The Geth have been activly trying to kill you for three games. The Quarians attack a ship with you on it, confident that you'd escape (and you do).

Seems legit.

Its not like when Adm. Hackett was shooting at the cerburus base a few missions later, or anytime during ME1.


Hackett warned Shepard and Shep gave permission to fire. I hate Hackett but he didn't spring that on shep out of the blue.

#83
JesseLee202

JesseLee202
  • Members
  • 1 230 messages

CynicalShep wrote...

About the housing - are you serious? Reapers are systematically obliterating everything in the Galaxy and you're butchering a potential ally and suffering loses so that you can have a house Reapers could destroy? They just took Earth, Palaven and Thessia. For Rannoch they would need a couple Destroyers with spatulas if Geth are dead. Instead, the genius admirals strapped huge guns on liveships (instead of added armor) and made them primary targets. "Oh, noez, the evil robots are atacking the live ships!!!11". Well, what did you expect, really?

To be fair, the Quarians would have beaten the Geth with no major casualties because of Xen's flashbang. Saying they are dumb for arming ships is very shortsighted. The entire fleet is needed when they attack, they cannot be seperated. Each fleet has a major role when in conflict.

What good would armor do if they have no weapons for defense? Armor doesn't last forever, and it doesn't help at all when the entire flotilla is engaged in combat.

In regards to the housing; Their fleet stands less chance than a planet from a Reaper attack. Just look at the "oh so powerful" alliance ships orbiting Earth in the opening of ME3. The Quarian fleet needed a safe haven, and Rannoch was the most logical choice.

They brought this upon themselves. It's not like somebody attacked their homeworld and forced them to leave.

Morning War ring any bells? The Geth forced them to leave, and attacked every single world the Quarians had, slaughtering billions in the name of "self-defense".

They attacked the Geth, lost, and 17 millions were spared.

Yet billions were killed for no other reason than "But they attacked first!!!11". Geth did not need to kill 99% of the Quarians. The Geth had no reason to stay in the Quarian system when the conflict began, they don't even deserve to be near Rannoch by the end of ME3 after everything they were responsible for.

Shepard offered to help Gerrel, cause he was getting mauled and specifically told him (in my case) to retreat to safety. Instead he attacked a disabled ship (which could have helped with the war that really mattered) while another Admiral, Humanity's de-facto ambassador and another good soldier (the Shadow Broker, in my case) were still on board. Not only is that back-stabbing - he also willingly attacked Humanity's representative (which could have well caused another war if not for the Reapers). And you're obviously over-reacting. I never said "Death to the Quarians!" but I would gladly lock Gerrel up for the rest of his days (after shooting his knee-caps).

I guess you don't realize that retreating would take longer than a entire galactic day. And that is a mistake on your part to even suggest it to the admirals.

And you honestly believe that you could have used that ship? Really? The Geth were still hostile after you disabled it. That ship was not an asset in the Reaper war, you have nothing to back up this claim. If Gerrel did not act as he did, the Quarians could have lost thousands of lives, maybe even more.

#84
Cyrax86

Cyrax86
  • Members
  • 243 messages

Hazegurl wrote...

Cyrax86 wrote...

Red Dust wrote...

Hazegurl wrote...

I harbor no sympathizes for the Geth or Quarians but if I can't broker peace between then I opt to destroy the Quarians. Why? Cause they blew up a ship with me on it. That simple. I could careless about their home world. I sure as heck don't want to die for it. Also, the Quarians don't deserve to control the Geth. They did before and look what happened to them. I don't mind the option being there for fans who do but I think that would be a stupid thing to do. Would you plan to fight the Geth to save the Quarian's butts once the Geth attack again? I sure don't. I say close their mass relay and let the Geth finish what they started if that's the case.


The Geth have been activly trying to kill you for three games. The Quarians attack a ship with you on it, confident that you'd escape (and you do).

Seems legit.

Its not like when Adm. Hackett was shooting at the cerburus base a few missions later, or anytime during ME1.


Hackett warned Shepard and Shep gave permission to fire. I hate Hackett but he didn't spring that on shep out of the blue.

the Geth dreadnought was coming back online, it would have continued firing on the Quarians while trapping Shep inside. Any way are you going to attack the alliance or doom humanity to extinction because Hackett shot at you?

#85
CynicalShep

CynicalShep
  • Members
  • 2 381 messages

JesseLee202 wrote...

To be fair, the Quarians would have beaten the Geth with no major casualties because of Xen's flashbang. Saying they are dumb for arming ships is very shortsighted. The entire fleet is needed when they attack, they cannot be seperated. Each fleet has a major role when in conflict.

What good would armor do if they have no weapons for defense? Armor doesn't last forever, and it doesn't help at all when the entire flotilla is engaged in combat.

In regards to the housing; Their fleet stands less chance than a planet from a Reaper attack. Just look at the "oh so powerful" alliance ships orbiting Earth in the opening of ME3. The Quarian fleet needed a safe haven, and Rannoch was the most logical choice.


Well, if they would have beaten the Geth why was Shepard's help needed? Saying they are not dumb for arming 3 liveships is shortsighted. We are talking about 3 ships. Not 10, not 20 - just 3. Those 3 ships contain the bulk of Quarian civilians. If those ships didn't have guns Geth wouldn't have perceived them as a target, or, at the very least, would've put them much lower in their list of priorities. Earth's population is 11.5 billion, Thessia's is 5.5 and Palaven's is 6 billion. All of them fell almost instantly. All of these planets lost several millions inhabitants per day. In space they could at least play cat and mouse with FTL jumps for a while. On Rannoch they would be annihilated in a couple of days. It was pointless. 
 

JesseLee202 wrote...

Morning War ring any bells? The Geth forced them to leave, and attacked every single world the Quarians had, slaughtering billions in the name of "self-defense".


Geth didn't attack, they retaliated. Quarians imposed martial law and butchered all Geth AND Quarians who tried to defend them. They bit more than they could chew, however, and barely escaped because they were spared. Head-canon =/= viable proof.

JesseLee202 wrote...

Yet billions were killed for no other reason than "But they attacked first!!!11". Geth did not need to kill 99% of the Quarians. The Geth had no reason to stay in the Quarian system when the conflict began, they don't even deserve to be near Rannoch by the end of ME3 after everything they were responsible for.


The Geth didn't go anywhere. They didn't pursue the fleeing quarians, they chose to isolate themselves. Quarians didn't need to attack them, there was no sign of hostility or aggression from the Geth. Some Quarians had enough sense to understand that. They were mercilessly butchered by their own people. If there's anyone who doesn't deserve to be on Rannoch it's the Quarians. The only reason Geth are there is because that's where their "Creators" made them. If they weren't lazy and trigger-happy said war would have never happened. 

JesseLee202 wrote...

I guess you don't realize that retreating would take longer than a entire galactic day. And that is a mistake on your part to even suggest it to the admirals.

And you honestly believe that you could have used that ship? Really? The Geth were still hostile after you disabled it. That ship was not an asset in the Reaper war, you have nothing to back up this claim. If Gerrel did not act as he did, the Quarians could have lost thousands of lives, maybe even more.


I don't remember hearing anything about it taking more than a day. Even if that was the case - you are assuming that Geth would have pursued and finished them. Like I said, headcanon shouldn't be used in an argument. 
And of course Shepard could have used that ship. He used all the rest when Geth allied themselves with him. 
The only reason why that ship is not an asset is because an idiot ordered that it be destroyed. All Geth forces were sent to help in the War, there is no reason to believe that ship would have been left back at Rannoch. In fact, it's an illogical claim. 
If Gerrel didn't act as he did no Quarian would have lost his life. Their casualties stop when Shepard talks some sense into him. 

#86
JesseLee202

JesseLee202
  • Members
  • 1 230 messages

CynicalShep wrote...

Well, if they would have beaten the Geth why was Shepard's help needed? Saying they are not dumb for arming 3 liveships is shortsighted. We are talking about 3 ships. Not 10, not 20 - just 3. Those 3 ships contain the bulk of Quarian civilians. If those ships didn't have guns Geth wouldn't have perceived them as a target, or, at the very least, would've put them much lower in their list of priorities.

Except those guns gave them heavy firepower and I quote from the codex...

"even going so far as to fight with Blue Suns mercenaries on Korlus to obtain the materials necessary to build dreadnought-scale Thanix weaponry for the liveships"

Yeah your right, just three little guns, what good do they even do anyway... :whistle:

Earth's population is 11.5 billion, Thessia's is 5.5 and Palaven's is 6 billion. All of them fell almost instantly. All of these planets lost several millions inhabitants per day. In space they could at least play cat and mouse with FTL jumps for a while. On Rannoch they would be annihilated in a couple of days. It was pointless.

Again, you are wrong. The entire flotilla takes too long to travel FTL and play "cat and mouse" with the Reapers. Rannoch was the only logical option. I will give you my source for the FTL.
 

Geth didn't attack, they retaliated. Quarians imposed martial law and butchered all Geth AND Quarians who tried to defend them. They bit more than they could chew, however, and barely escaped because they were spared. Head-canon =/= viable proof.

There is only one example of one Quarian being killed by another Quarian. Headcanon =/= viable proof.

Please tell me you aren't actually trying to say that the Geth were right to kill billions of innocent people. I at least agree the Quarians acted out first in a wrong way, but only because the Council has that ban on AI. That ban caused this.

The Geth didn't go anywhere. They didn't pursue the fleeing quarians, they chose to isolate themselves. Quarians didn't need to attack them, there was no sign of hostility or aggression from the Geth. Some Quarians had enough sense to understand that. They were mercilessly butchered by their own people. If there's anyone who doesn't deserve to be on Rannoch it's the Quarians. The only reason Geth are there is because that's where their "Creators" made them. If they weren't lazy and trigger-happy said war would have never happened.

Heretics ring any bells? The Geth did indeed go somewhere. The "true" Geth sat around and watched heretics butcher thousands for the Reapers.

I don't remember hearing anything about it taking more than a day. Even if that was the case

It is the case...

"The Fleet is so large it can take days for all the ships to pass through a mass relay"

From the codex.

you are assuming that Geth would have pursued and finished them. Like I said, headcanon shouldn't be used in an argument.

It's not headcanon. The Geth fleet was under Reaper control, and they would have destroyed them (it takes a long time for them to retreat...).

And of course Shepard could have used that ship. He used all the rest when Geth allied themselves with him.

What was that you said about headcanon? Shepard had no plans to even use the Geth at all in the conflict. The entire goal was to get the Quarian fleet (Hackett and Shepard both agree on this.). That Geth ship was going to keep destroying Quarian ships, it was only disabled for a short time.

The only reason why that ship is not an asset is because an idiot ordered that it be destroyed. All Geth forces were sent to help in the War, there is no reason to believe that ship would have been left back at Rannoch. In fact, it's an illogical claim.

See above.

If Gerrel didn't act as he did no Quarian would have lost his life. Their casualties stop when Shepard talks some sense into him.

Um, no they don't... He actually saved lives by shooting at the ship with you on it.

It is getting late... -_-

#87
CynicalShep

CynicalShep
  • Members
  • 2 381 messages

JesseLee202 wrote...

Except those guns gave them heavy firepower and I quote from the codex...

"even going so far as to fight with Blue Suns mercenaries on Korlus to obtain the materials necessary to build dreadnought-scale Thanix weaponry for the liveships"

Yeah your right, just three little guns, what good do they even do anyway... :whistle:


They also gave them food, supplies and housed most of the Quarian population. They also had crap armor and shields. Making them a primary target was careless and suicidal. Sure, they had big guns but they would have gone down like tissue paper under concentrated fire. In that instant Quarians would have lost almost everything. 

JesseLee202 wrote...

Again, you are wrong. The entire flotilla takes too long to travel FTL and play "cat and mouse" with the Reapers. Rannoch was the only logical option. I will give you my source for the FTL.


Rannoch was not logical. An Admiral that implements logic (not many of those in the Quarian Admiralty Board) would have spread out the fleet (in case they had to leave). This way Reapers would have a significantly harder time finding and destroying each and every one of them. If those Admirals were half as competent as Hackett is they would have left a token force to hold the Reapers and buy time for the other ships to escape. In the end, if the war was lost it wouldn't have mattered. They would have just died faster on Rannoch. 
 

JesseLee202 wrote...

There is only one example of one Quarian being killed by another Quarian. Headcanon =/= viable proof.

Please tell me you aren't actually trying to say that the Geth were right to kill billions of innocent people. I at least agree the Quarians acted out first in a wrong way, but only because the Council has that ban on AI. That ban caused this.


Depends on how it happened. That war IS headcanon. All we know is what we see in-game doesn't match what's on the wiki. There are no details about the Morning War. You say Geth killed every single Quarian, I say Quarians killed each other and tried to kill the Geth. We have no evidence that suggests otherwise. The Geth weren't right to kill 99% of the Quarians. That example is the only think we have. Do you think one single Quarian thought attacking the sapient Geth was a bad idea? We only have proof of what happened to those who opposed the aggression, not of how many did. What if I told you about a quarter of the Quarian population disagreed with the Martial Law? There is no evidence to prove it but there is also no evidence to prove it wrong. 

Once the now-sentient geth realized what the quarians were doing, they retaliated. Initially only some geth began to take up arms in order to protect other units that could not defend themselves. The quarians placed their worlds under martial law, hunting down even those geth not participating in the hostilities, which was opposed by a large portion of the quarian people. They sheltered geth from the authorities, and were detained or killed as a result. Eventually, the opposition became an outnumbered minority unable to prevent the outbreak of all-out war in 1895 CE.

This ^ is all we have. 

JesseLee202 wrote...

Heretics ring any bells? The Geth did indeed go somewhere. The "true" Geth sat around and watched heretics butcher thousands for the Reapers.


The whole galaxy sat and watched heretics butcher thousands for the Reapers untill they were attacked. Geth were never attacked by Heretics. 

JesseLee202 wrote...

It's not headcanon. The Geth fleet was under Reaper control, and they would have destroyed them (it takes a long time for them to retreat...).


Because of a signal Shepard was asked to stop. And he did. And Gerrel decided to repay him by killing him. 

JesseLee202 wrote...

What was that you said about headcanon? Shepard had no plans to even use the Geth at all in the conflict. The entire goal was to get the Quarian fleet (Hackett and Shepard both agree on this.). That Geth ship was going to keep destroying Quarian ships, it was only disabled for a short time.


At that point in the game Shepard doesn't know he'll be able to use them, that is correct. I suspected I would when I saw Legion but prior to that getting the Quarians were priority. How did Gerrel know it was only disabled for a short time? He saw it disabled and ordered an attack instantly, in spite of what Raan and Tali told him. Nobody told him that the dreadnought will "restart". The fact that Shepard doesn't know that he will work with the geth doesn't prove that the ship wouldn't have been an asset. In fact, I explained you why it WOULD have been one. You just didn't know about it yet, just like you didn't know if you will manage to get help from any of the other races. 

JesseLee202 wrote...

Um, no they don't... He actually saved lives by shooting at the ship with you on it.

It is getting late... [smilie]http://social.bioware.com/images/forum/emoticons/sleeping.png[/smilie]


Lives that wouldn't have been lost if he never attacked. But I digress, I was talking about the end of the war. If you choose to make peace you talk him down and he stops firing on the Geth. Otherwise either Geth or Quarians go extinct. That's what I meant.

#88
Lady Abstract

Lady Abstract
  • Members
  • 1 574 messages

JesseLee202 wrote...


Morning War ring any bells? The Geth forced them to leave, and attacked every single world the Quarians had, slaughtering billions in the name of "self-defense".

FALSE

Yet billions were killed for no other reason than "But they attacked first!!!11". Geth did not need to kill 99% of the Quarians. The Geth had no reason to stay in the Quarian system when the conflict began, they don't even deserve to be near Rannoch by the end of ME3 after everything they were responsible for.

FALSE the geth retreated when they saw the Quarians were no longer a threat they didnt kill 99% of their race and dont forget about the Quarians who were killing their own people during the war. Also the geth formed their own civilization away from organic life

.



#89
Lady Abstract

Lady Abstract
  • Members
  • 1 574 messages
Just face it guys the Quarians are morons and idiots ok??

Idiotic move #1: They create machines to do manual labor that they themselves couldve done

Idiotic move #2: They slowly add intelligence to the geth to dumb to realize that by making machines smarter they could potential come up with abstract ideas

Idiotic move #3: the now intelligent geth due to the stupidity of the Quarians questions its existence. this is a normal reaction a group of people would have they juts want to know what their purpose is. Just like the first humans when they became self aware they questioned their existence its something normal. But the idiocy of the Quarians decide hey lets TRY and beat these geth to a pulp for wanting to know what their purpose is.

Idiotic Move #4: They kill their own people for disagreeing with their methods against geth already seeing that the their people need to stand together more than anything to fight this war that they started. They almost become extinct and lose their homeworld to the geth they created and didnt even want to fight against their creators in the first place (and if you payed attention to the legion mission on me3 you wouldve seen that they didnt want to fight the Quarians they were forced to defend themselves) In mass effect 2 if you bring legion to the tali loyalty mission he will state that the geth would have been willing to make peace with the quarians thus preventing the morning war. The geth instead of finishing the Quarians off like they should have leaves to go find a purpose for themselves which was the only question they ever wanted answered before brutally attacked.

Note: Many say the geth sides with the reapers yes just like everyone else who got indoctrinated did. DOnt try to use that as a basis to prove a point because that isnt a basis. The only reason they left the veil was because of indoctrination other than that they wouldeve still been peacefully alone on their world not bothering anyone while the Quarians stay but hurt somewhere for messing themselves over

Idiotic move #5: They were about to exile Tali as if she and her father had put so much time and work into building the quarians over a huge misunderstanding it goes to show you that they have NO loyalty. Tali is the only acceptable quarian in this series and the quarian who agreed that them attacking first was wrong (i forget his name)

Idiotic Move #6: During a reaper invasion where the Quarians need to once again stick together the most set all of their personal butt hurt feelings aside that they put on themselves and refuse to accept the reality of how stupid they are and have been still want to continue this war. THE GETH WANT TO HELP FIGHT THE REAPERS THEY ARE NOT THINKING ABOUT DESTROYING THEIR CREATORS. Yet they still insist on dragging out this pointless war on the brink of galactic extinction. Once again attack the geth WHO DONT WANT TO REALLY FIGHT...ultimately leading to the Quarians final idiotic decision ever..the extinction of their pathetic race. And a big geth army finally free of constant attacks and is now able to aid in killing the reapers and successfully do so

AND THAT MARKS THE END OF THIS THREAD

#90
DirtySHISN0

DirtySHISN0
  • Members
  • 2 278 messages

Dunabar wrote...

Because that would make too much sense and the Geth lovers don't like the idea that there are some people who refuse to accept the Geth as "living creatures", "equals", or whatever. I respect they don't like it, I respect they love the Geth, and I respect they wouldn't choose to "enslave" the machines. But to me they're no more than computers that went haywire and I believe its time to destroy or fix these computers to be used as tools for the cause once more.


Don't care what you think about the Geth. Questioning your logic and/or moral compass.



The reapers see organics as nothing but flesh and bone gone mad. They use us as tools until they can liquidise us.

↑ that is exactly the same as your proposition for the Geth, use them and then destroy them. How can you claim this is for a good cause when you are acting exactly the same as the very thing you want to destroy.


Don't make me use xzibit

Modifié par DirtySHISN0, 04 février 2013 - 12:06 .


#91
Dunabar

Dunabar
  • Members
  • 961 messages

sentinel_87 wrote...

It would have been a great option; and help set up the control ending. My main Shepard I use the most would still blow them all up though.

My Renegade Shepard was going to go this route in ME3 should the option present itself. I really thought that Admiral Xen was a set up for this being a possible solution to the quarian/geth conflict in ME3.

Overall though this would not be the smartest move; it did not work well the first time.


Different paths have different impacts, seeing as how the Geth had already been beaten down to a state where they could have easily of been rewritten to serve the quarians once more. The difference however this go around would be that the quarians are more aware of the network and have clearly shown that between the two races, the quarians advanced the most to the point that the only way to geth had a chance to remain active was to side with the reapers.

My main Shepard would still blow them up as well, I mean the plot was set up pretty nicely in ME2 during Tali trial with Xen, its a shame the idea was never actually put in. Still my favorite priority mission even without the ability to rewrite the geth.

#92
N7Gold

N7Gold
  • Members
  • 1 320 messages
Just because the quarians were made out to be the aggressors doesn't mean they should be made out to be the villains. The way I see it, the cause of the conflict between the quarians and geth points out that the it is usually an organic race's irrational fears of sentient machines that lead to the organic synthetic conflict. Also, OP, being renegade does NOT mean being evil, it just means doing things for the right reasons using questionable methods.

#93
JesseLee202

JesseLee202
  • Members
  • 1 230 messages
[quote]CynicalShep wrote...

They also gave them food, supplies and housed most of the Quarian population. They also had crap armor and shields. Making them a primary target was careless and suicidal. Sure, they had big guns but they would have gone down like tissue paper under concentrated fire. In that instant Quarians would have lost almost everything.[/quote]The firepower given to the ships did more for the entire fleet than any armor would. The only reason they can loose the war is because Shepard lets the Geth keep the Reaper code and neglects telling the Quarians about it.

[quote]Rannoch was not logical. An Admiral that implements logic (not many of those in the Quarian Admiralty Board) would have spread out the fleet (in case they had to leave).[/quote]*sigh* Again, you are wrong. The Quarians cannot seperate the fleet during the operation to retake Rannoch, nor could they without a place to dock the Civilians safely. They could not just leave the Civilian Fleet floating around and awaiting the Reapers without a planet to keep them safe. As you said, all the other planets were getting destroyed by Reapers, Rannoch only had Geth at the time of their initial assault.

[quote]This way Reapers would have a significantly harder time finding and destroying each and every one of them.[/quote]That is not accurate, seperating a decaying fleet and spreading them out has to be the worst tactical decision one could make. The Quarians needed a safe place for the Civilian fleet so they could help humanity take back Earth. Leaving their civilians floating around in space waiting to be outgunned, outraced, and ultimately destroyed is incompetent as a leader.

Reapers travel much faster than any ship our galaxy has, why do you keep insisting that the Quarians could just outrun them with ships that are decades old?

The Quarian ships =/= SR2 Escaping from Reapers in persuit.

[quote]If those Admirals were half as competent as Hackett is they would have left a token force to hold the Reapers and buy time for the other ships to escape. In the end, if the war was lost it wouldn't have mattered. They would have just died faster on Rannoch.[/quote]So your solution, is, to sacrifice the Heavy Fleet or the Patrol Fleet, while the civilians are left ultimately defenseless and doomed anyway?

Sounds to me like Rannoch makes much more sense than that.
 
[quote]Depends on how it happened. That war IS headcanon. All we know is what we see in-game doesn't match what's on the wiki. There are no details about the Morning War.[/quote]Exactly, so don't go parading around claiming the Quarians butchered millions of their own people when that is larger logical jumps than I make.

[quote]You say Geth killed every single Quarian,[/quote]I said no such thing. Go back and look.

[quote]I say Quarians killed each other and tried to kill the Geth. We have no evidence that suggests otherwise.[/quote]The Quarians did not kill any large number of their own to even mention it in history. After all the people the Geth were killing, it was only a matter of time before the Quarians helping the Geth changed their minds, and realized they were on the wrong side. This is headcanon. Opinion. This little arguing is pointless here on both our parts.

[quote]The Geth weren't right to kill 99% of the Quarians. That example is the only think we have. Do you think one single Quarian thought attacking the sapient Geth was a bad idea?[/quote]I think they acted as they did because the Council had a ban on AI, and would have came down with very harsh punishment on the Quarians. Just look how they treat them on Ekuna. If I did something bad by accident, I would try to fix my mistake. They were merely turning off the Geth at first, the Geth could have been easily turned back on.

[quote]The whole galaxy sat and watched heretics butcher thousands for the Reapers untill they were attacked. Geth were never attacked by Heretics.[/quote]Agreed. But the "true Geth" did nothing to stop them. If a famliy member said to you that they were going to worship some god that promotes melting organics into goo, and mass murder, would you try to stop them? The true Geth say "Oh hey, sure, yeah, we totally understand. Go on and worship those Reapers."

[quote]Because of a signal Shepard was asked to stop. And he did. And Gerrel decided to repay him by killing him.[/quote]You try to make it sound as if Gerrel was coming at you with a knife trying to slice your face off. He was trying to destroy the Geth's biggest ship. The only problem I have with this is the lack of warning for incoming fire. He still did the right thing by taking out the Dreadnought.

[quote]How did Gerrel know it was only disabled for a short time?[/quote]The Quarian sensors showed them they were "completely vulnerable.".

[quote]He saw it disabled and ordered an attack instantly, in spite of what Raan and Tali told him.[/quote]It was not instantly. He first spoke with Raan, they then agreed to take it out. Shepard and Tali got off that ship in the end anyway, if you can metagame, so can I.

[quote]Nobody told him that the dreadnought will "restart".[/quote]It was a logical outcome. No one told him it would "stay disabled" either. Geth VI only disabled it, assuming that the Geth would not be able to reactivate it is a bad assumption.

[quote]The fact that Shepard doesn't know that he will work with the geth doesn't prove that the ship wouldn't have been an asset.[/quote]That is pure metagaming. In the end Shepard and Tali get off the ship in the end, so why does it make you mad at all that Gerrel made a move to take out a ship that would have destroyed the entire fleet.

[quote]In fact, I explained you why it WOULD have been one. You just didn't know about it yet, just like you didn't know if you will manage to get help from any of the other races.[/quote]More metagaming. Shepard and Tali were never harmed when he fired on that ship, so what is the problem? They make it out alright (This is why you don't metagame for this argument, it goes no where).

[quote]I was talking about the end of the war. If you choose to make peace you talk him down and he stops firing on the Geth. Otherwise either Geth or Quarians go extinct. That's what I meant.[/quote]The only reason Gerrel backs down, is because you inform him that they have the code. Other than that, the Quarians have no idea that you allowed the Geth to keep the Reaper code, which would make Xen's flashbang useless.

Eh, this is getting very off topic. I would like to apologize to Dunabar. I will not derail this thread any longer, sorry.

#94
DirtySHISN0

DirtySHISN0
  • Members
  • 2 278 messages
Image IPB

This thread is great.

So much i want to pipe up with, but realise it isn't worth the effort. So i might aswell enjoy the carnage.

Modifié par DirtySHISN0, 04 février 2013 - 04:54 .


#95
Dunabar

Dunabar
  • Members
  • 961 messages
Edit note: Quote issue for some odd reason is being stubborn, will see how to fix it when I wake up.

Breaking up the quote pyramid

[quote]CynicalShep wrote...

Yeah, that's a matter of opinion. What I'm saying is that organics would have ended the war there and then. Geth, on the other hand let the Quarians walk (or fly, w/e). And I don't think you've read half of what I wrote. I specifically said that I do not hate Quarian people, I just think their governing system is flawed and their admirals look and act more like a high school reuinion than a real admiralty board. 
About the housing - are you serious? Reapers are systematically obliterating everything in the Galaxy and you're butchering a potential ally and suffering loses so that you can have a house Reapers could destroy? They just took Earth, Palaven and Thessia. For Rannoch they would need a couple Destroyers with spatulas if Geth are dead. Instead, the genius admirals strapped huge guns on liveships (instead of added armor) and made them primary targets. "Oh, noez, the evil robots are atacking the live ships!!!11". Well, what did you expect, really?

[quote]

I knew you didn't hate the quarian people and that you just thought they had a terrible government, to which I mentioned was fine and that I would avoid getting into the government talk, mainly to avoid this convo from some how magically stumbling into irl politics (Not saying you would either which way, but never doubt the ability of people to turn things into an irl political talk). Also yes I have read everything you've wrote.

Quarian housing now - Yes I'm serious and there is a reason for it, which I thank you for taking it exactly where I wanted it to go. The Quarians had nowhere to house their civilians, they may have been able to avoid this war with the geth had the council not stepped in going "No you can't settle here" when the quarians did find certain worlds that offered things that were close to that of Rannoch. Now yes its true all these other homeworlds are getting their teeth kicked in, but these other races who have better funding, established planets, upgraded military tech, etc etc... are also losing in space to the Reapers. Quarians don't have these things like the Humans, Turians, Asari, and other races. They have no embassy on the citadel, they're not even wanted in systems do to what their fleet, and so much more.

So the council races have blocked the quarians x amount of times on settling on worlds, the Geth still have Rannoch the one world they know for sure they can live on, and to put a cherry on top of it all the Reapers are turning the galaxy every which way but loose.

So risk going to war with the council races by just taking a planet and call it good or go to war with the Reapers with the civilians riding behind them the whole time or attack the geth in hopes of retaking their homeworld to house their civilians?

Well people are already cursing the quarians for going to war with the geth, couldn't imagine the hate if the quarians went to war with the council races just to settle on a world that isn't even their homeworld to begin with. Don't want to bring your civilians into a war with the reapers, more so since the reapers are whoopin' everyone except you. Not to mention that the Reapers are burning up the galaxy, so stopping for repairs for ships, strip mining, jumping the whole fleet through a relay to avoid the reapers, and etc, will be next to impossible and will only get harder the longer they try to do it. Quarians don't want to die out just like everyone else, quarians also actually never made peace with the geth to begin with so their war with one another actually never truly ended, it simply was left unsettled between the two. Yeah they had an agreement with the council, but the council isn't the geth.

So council to their right, Reapers to the left, Geth straight ahead, and the Quarians are in the corner. Don't want to fight a war with the Council races just to get a world, can't fight the Reapers, and even they are stomping on the four council races. So, that leaves only one choice. Take out the enemy you know for sure that you have been planning for, that has resources that you can use, has a world you know you can survive on, and offers a place to shelter your civilians so you don't need to take them into combat with the reapers.

Now the quarians are not frontline fighters, but this doesn't mean they can't fight. When you're against an enemy who is stronger than you, you need to fight in a way that takes away the enemy strength. So guerrilla warfare would have to be the fighting style the quarians would need to use to fight the Reapers on Rannoch. I know they would rather do it from orbit, but as we seen the Reapers are just as deadly there as they're on the ground. At least on the ground the quarians can scatter and use the natural layout of Rannoch to move around. Better than drifting through space in lifepods if their ships were destroyed by the reapers.


Ultimatly I forsee "Well if they had not made the geth they would
not be in this position" or something close to that. While it is true,
they also didn't exactly plan for this thing to happen, and of course
organic emotion kicks in when things go sideways (We're all guilty of
this, anyone who says they haven't acted on emotion before is full of
it.)

[quote]CynicalShep wrote...
They brought this upon themselves. It's not like somebody attacked their homeworld and forced them to leave. They attacked the Geth, lost, and 17 millions were spared. Of course I would like a better life but I wouldn't have messed up priorities like some of the Quarians do. In my book a good life will always be more important than destroying an enitre race because my ancestors screwed up. [/quote]

Now I will break this into two parts

Part 1
[quote]CynicalShep wrote...
They brought this upon themselves. It's not like somebody attacked their
homeworld and forced them to leave. They attacked the Geth, lost, and
17 millions were spared[/quote]

This will all come down to opinion once again, but I would say this was an unavoidable event. Again the Quarians didn't intend to make an A.I. If anything they were trying to upgrade their tools basically, the upgrades just went haywire on them sadly when it came to more forceful means of deactivating them. Now the Geth were already inside their homes pretty much, so in truth this is the quarian military nightmare. They cannot use their tactics because those tactics may very well kill their own people and once again the quarians are not frontline fighters. Now it's all well and good that the Geth made some calculation in their processors that came out to allowing those millions to leave, but surely the quarians didn't have a standing military in the billions to warrent the Geth to inflict a speculated 99% species destruction on the quarians (I know some of this is on the hands of the quarians as well, I'm not ruling that out. Its just not clear what percent of quarians were killed by Geth and what percent were killed by their own people.)

Part2
[quote]CynicalShep wrote...
Of course I would like a better life but I wouldn't have messed up
priorities like some of the Quarians do. In my book a good life will
always be more important than destroying an enitre race because my
ancestors screwed up.[/quote]

I would agree entirely, but. The thing is that the quarians didn't want to take their civilians into battle with the reapers, hell if they had the option I'm sure they would have left them somewhere else to avoid taking them into combat with the geth, which if they already had that place to begin with they wouldn't actually need to go to war with the geth in the first place to have somewhere to shelter their civilians. Now once more these two species never made peace with one another, if they had made peace before hand this whole thing may have never happended. The Quarians may have already been back on Rannoch before the last building on fire fell, but the two were never at peace with one another. Yeah Legion says "Oh the Geth don't want to fight" to Shepard, but Shepard is not the one that Legion needed to convince of this. This would be like Wrex being ticked off with Garrus for the genophage, but asking Tali to convince Garrus to give Wrex a cure for peace between them. Neither side should have needed Shepard to play middle ground, also lets face it that none of our Shepards honestly brought anything to prove peace could be achieved for either side. Shep only brought words, nothing of solid proof.

[quote]CynicalShep wrote...
I'm not saying they show a degree of hostility to other organics - I said that they have a knack for self-destroying "accidents". They attacked the Geth once and lost, they ran test on Alarei and screwed up and they attack Geth again and lose (if you don't shoot Legion). I see them like a race of scientists: brilliant minds and little common sense (kind of like Salarians). Well, the lack of common sense is bound to cause another screw up - be in it 10, 100 or 500 years. Heretics were Geth with messed up priorities. Quarians weren't guilty that they attacked Eden Prime but none of that would have happened if "the Creators" didn't fail in the first place. 
And don't you dare compare that suicidal revenge-driven "Admiral" with Hackett. Hackett had to choose between losing his entire fleet in minutes and losing one of his fleets in fewer minutes. He is a real Admiral. Shepard offered to help Gerrel, cause he was getting mauled and specifically told him (in my case) to retreat to safety. Instead he attacked a disabled ship (which could have helped with the war that really mattered) while another Admiral, Humanity's de-facto ambassador and another good soldier (the Shadow Broker, in my case) were still on board. Not only is that back-stabbing - he also willingly attacked Humanity's representative (which could have well caused another war if not for the Reapers). And you're obviously over-reacting. I never said "Death to the Quarians!" but I would gladly lock Gerrel up for the rest of his days (after shooting his knee-caps).[/quote]

[quote]CynicalShep wrote...
"All I'm saying is that for all their smarts and tech-prowess Quarians are a ticking bomb [/quote]
The way you put it, it kind of sounded like you were implying open hostility, I think bomb and I think explosion that hits everything around it. I was also tired when I replied the first time, so it could have been just simple misunderstanding on my part.

The first conflict the Geth were already inside the homes of the quarians, I don't believe this war would have actually been avoided because sooner or later someone or something was going to do something. However first war stuff is mainly opinion and can be filled with "what if's". So Yes the quarians struck first and sadly lost.

The Alarei however was a small group of quarians. It was believed (If I remember correctly) that they were testing weapons on deactivated geth parts. Tali herself even said she sent deactivated geth parts, so nobody but this small group of quarians knew what was really going on. The small group should have informed the whole fleet and not kept it hidden, they did in fact pay the price for it. To me this would be at first like testing weapons on dead animals and then testing them on live animals (I wouldn't condone the testing of weapons on living animals just fyi nor do I consider the geth animals or anything organic to begin with). This last tid bit to this will come down to the philosophical opinion of the whole quarian-geth conflict, what do we as individuals consider alive and not alive.

I would argue that it took the reapers involvement to turn the tide of this recent conflict (turn the tide, not win the war.) So the quarians don't actually win or lose till Shep steps in to do their thing.

Now i will also say Eden Prime may have also not happened if the Geth didn't allow the heretics to walk away. But the Geth dropped the ball

As for Han'Gerrel and Admiral Hackett. I respect Hackett greatly, but I also respect Gerrel greatly. I know why Hackett did what he did, but I also see why Gerrel did what he did (However you told him to retreat, my shep told him to counter-attacker. So anything beyond this point is pretty much a stalemate because both sides are justified through orders to Gerrel.) I will be flat out honest right here, but I really don't think the Geth supporters give the Geth enough credit for their ability to fix their own ships. I'm confident (Me, the Anti-Geth person here) that the Geth could have gotten that dreadnought back at full fighting strength before Shep, Tali, and crew member got off the thing. It's also a Dreadnought, that thing is going to take awhile to be destroyed. In one sense it does suck to be shot at while on the ship, but yet at the same time I respect the Geth as an enemy enough to say that you shouldn't give them a chance to recover.

I didn't mean you directly when I made the "Han'Gerrel makes one call to fire on a dangerous target thats been
threatening his people and people want to scream "Death to the
quarians!" because of it, Seriously? Lol.
" comment. I fully acknowledge exceptions to the rules and I would count you as the exception. However that Dreadnought was a threat and if they can use the Geth VI as an amp for the reaper signal, which the Geth VI is not suppose to be legion. I'm fairly certain they could have used any other geth as an amp. Either which way Han'Gerrels call comes down to personal opinion. You thought it was dumb and went against your orders. I thought it was smart and went with my orders. However the Dreadnought was fired upon when both our sheps were aboard, one reminded Gerrel of his place, the other one took the professional soldier stance. It was Liara as well in my case, her being the shadow broker though would have been an unknown to pretty much everyone except a highly select few. If Gerrel knew she was the shadow broker, there -may- have been a change of plans. Also its unknown how much Quarians know about Human military protocols, Shepard doesn't do much to inform them "By the way im the Ambassador, so watch what you do" or whatever.

[quote]CynicalShep wrote...
I agreed that it would be an interesting option, although it's one I would never consider taking (for reasons explained above). Pro-Geth people obviously hate the option, just like you would hate if Geth took control of Quarians through their suits and made them organic batteries. As about not underestimating them the second time - they already did it 3 times (Morning War, Alarei, ME3 war). I am almost sure they'll screw up again, it's only a question of how soon that will happen and whether any of the Quarians will survive.
[/quote]

And once again we come to personal opinions. I respect that you don't think they can do it and like I said my main shep wouldn't do this anyways. So its all good in the end, however as we both show in our words that it would have been an interesting option had it been allowed to happen in the game.

As for Geth supporters not liking the idea. I respect they don't like it and by no means think that if the option -was- put in the game, that they should feel like a gun is held to their head to select the option (Not saying that you said that just FYI).

Rather tired now, so I think I will end this reply here for the time being. May do one more small reply to another post, but overall I'm going to crash into my bed.

B)

Modifié par Dunabar, 04 février 2013 - 06:18 .


#96
Dunabar

Dunabar
  • Members
  • 961 messages

N7Gold wrote...

Just because the quarians were made out to be the aggressors doesn't mean they should be made out to be the villains. The way I see it, the cause of the conflict between the quarians and geth points out that the it is usually an organic race's irrational fears of sentient machines that lead to the organic synthetic conflict. Also, OP, being renegade does NOT mean being evil, it just means doing things for the right reasons using questionable methods.


I agree but the problem is that they didn't seem to do a whole lot to make it appear 50/50 in terms of both sides being innocent. However if it could be confirmed that the Quarians started their war 17 days before the Reaper invasion started, that would be a big step in helping with that. I see faults on both sides of the spectrum, but I feel the quarians have the most justified reasons (This is only my opinion, not speaking for anyone else)

If I felt the Geth were alive, I would definitly deem enslaving them to the quarians as a questionable method to ending the war between the two races.

#97
Dunabar

Dunabar
  • Members
  • 961 messages

JesseLee202 wrote...
Eh, this is getting very off topic. I would like to apologize to Dunabar. I will not derail this thread any longer, sorry.


The idea of giving the players the option to bring the Geth back under Quarian control could have played hand in hand with the mission itself anyways. Really cannot discuss one without the other.

I mean heck, I think with Xen's flashbang and the quarians attack that left the geth scrambled could have been enough to rewrite them. But noooo dang Reapers got to be showing up and stuff, oh well...I get what I want one way or another for my Sheps just like everyone does for the most part. Except I don't get this rewrite option...Bioware magic up a rewrite option please lol.

B)

#98
JesseLee202

JesseLee202
  • Members
  • 1 230 messages

Dunabar wrote...

JesseLee202 wrote...
Eh, this is getting very off topic. I would like to apologize to Dunabar. I will not derail this thread any longer, sorry.


The idea of giving the players the option to bring the Geth back under Quarian control could have played hand in hand with the mission itself anyways. Really cannot discuss one without the other.

I mean heck, I think with Xen's flashbang and the quarians attack that left the geth scrambled could have been enough to rewrite them. But noooo dang Reapers got to be showing up and stuff, oh well...I get what I want one way or another for my Sheps just like everyone does for the most part. Except I don't get this rewrite option...Bioware magic up a rewrite option please lol.

B)

Same, so glad I got to send the Geth straight to the daedric realm of Oblivion. :devil:

#99
Cyrax86

Cyrax86
  • Members
  • 243 messages
@QU33N_ANG3L

LOL, serious or just trolling?

Indoctrination usually happens slowly over time, with either the person not knowing, being forced or just being around Reaper tech.

Geth willing chose to side with the Reapers, they weren't forced. The Reapers extended the offer the Geth accepted.

The rest of your argument is borderline nonsense and or irrational hatred toward the Quarians, I can't take it seriously.

On topic: The Quarians regaining their creations would be a nice addition to Renegade, but still i consider the Geth more trouble than their worth

#100
Smeffects

Smeffects
  • Members
  • 555 messages

Dunabar wrote...

So to me it clearly comes down to this.

Talk the quarians down peacefully - Geth get free will
Threaten the quarians with death - Geth get free will
Destroy the quarians - Geth get free will
Quarians survive - Geth are destroyed

Seems a little unfair to me.


Im not sure you are thinking straight. Quarians are the one attacking the Geth, how exactly would you threaten the geth into peace with the quarians, when legion/geth told you they want peace, kind of a waste to threaten people or talk down people for things they already want. The quarians are the people you need to convince of peace on rannoch, not the geth. You dont have to talk the geth away from attacking, they are only reacting to quarians attacks. The Quarians are also gaining exactly what they wanted in 3 of the conclusion (except when they are destroyed), their homeworld back. So its 3 for 3.

Talk the quarians down peacefully - Geth get free will - Quarians gets their homeworld back.
Threaten the quarians with death - Geth get free will - Quarians gets their homeworld back.
Destroy the quarians - Geth get free will - Quarians dont get their homeworld back.
Quarians survive - Geth dont get free will - Quarians get their homeworld back.

Modifié par Smeffects, 04 février 2013 - 06:50 .