Aller au contenu

Photo

Quarians to once again control the Geth


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
354 réponses à ce sujet

#176
CynicalShep

CynicalShep
  • Members
  • 2 381 messages

Dunabar wrote...

Yeah politics are like the Quarian-Geth conflict, messy business with one side yelling at the other.


Or discussed in a civilized matter. The topic matters not, the participants make the difference.

1. I agree that the Council should've given them the world. Sure, Quarians broke the law by settling a lot of their own there before asking but it would have saved some trouble. I don't agree with the "priority list", however. Quarians, generally, had two big dreams. One was getting a home and anoher was destroying the Geth. One comes true - there's only one left to fulfill.
And there is nothing wrong with feeling Rannoch is their "spiritual home". I'm just saying both their methods and their timing were bad.

2. Well, I don't think Hackett meant that the flotilla passed by with boomboxes. Hackett is a pragmatic leader, he wouldn't mention it if it was something trivial. And they did both sign it. That treaty was signed after the first Geth war. I'm not surprised they chose to ignore it either but that doesn't help their already shaken trustworthiness.

3. The same applies to the true Geth. they have been shot on sight by everybody except one man. Organics didn't trust them, Quarians wanted them gone. Legion's cooperation was more than anybody deserved at that point and it still happened.
The quality of the ships doesn't quite matter in the circumstances. Reapers made no difference between Turian dreadnoughts and regular shuttles - they had an easy time destroying either of the two.  Quarians could have had a bunch of Destiny Ascension's and they would have been still destroyed. Mobility is what ultimately made the difference, not the age or the specs of the ship.

4. What I meant is staying airbourne. We keep arguing about this but there are Reapers everywhere in the galaxy. On the ground liveships are a sitting duck. In the air - they have mobility and an escort who is ready to die to buy them time. As soon as a Reaper touches down on Rannoch their non-combatants are toast. I would have understood their reasoning if they did it before the war. During the war it's just causing extra trouble.

5. Most Asari don't live in a suit and know how to hold up a biotic barrier. Their ground forces were actually quite successful (or at least that's what the codex says). I still believe every single Quarians would have been dead or processed in a matter of hours (depends on how many Reapers were sent to Rannoch).

6. But that doesn't change the fact. The way they waged war was both careless and ultimately wrong. If they were to first take care of the Geth that took up arms their people wouldn't have had to defend non-hostile Geth. When the biggest threat is down you can decide what to do with the rest of the Geth. Instead they went in blindly with guns blazing and lost. It's "divide and conquer", except the Quarian Admiralty must be one of the first military leaderships that did that to themselves. 

7. I haven't argued about arming the ships. I questioned making the liveships a top firing priority. It's one thing to arm them for self-defense purposes and a whole other thing to strap the biggest guns you have on them so that Geth will go out of their way to destroy them. Our playthroughs might have been different but at the very least Tali spoke with Legion(if you have both).
About the Dyson sphere - the game says Geth sided because of getting stupider after the attack in combination with being backed in a corner. Legion isn't a leader for the Geth, he is just a platform smart enough to interact with people. He was captured by his own and crucified "Overlord" style. If Quarians never attacked Geth would have never been in that position. 

8 Raan followed through because the alternative was Gerrel's fleet getting destroyed in an instant. She was kind and somewhat smart but ultimately spineless. Gerrel took advantage of that. Regardless of what you told them he acts rashly and that's unbecoming of a military leader. What if the dreadnought is down for good? Why assume that Shepard pressed the "snooze" button? Why not ask a simple question: "I see the dreadnought is down. What happened, Shepard? Oh, and THANK YOU for saving our asses again". Even if you told him to attack the dreadnought he could have at least make sure he's making the right call. No, "Kill Shepard, Tali and the SB!!!" to save a couple civilians! Pity he wasn't on the ground in Koris' place.

9. It still says that it's a special platform with 1183 programs. Just like Legion. No other platform would have cut it as a signal booster.

10. I didn't say that all Quarians knew about Liara. In fact, I'm sure most didn't. I said that the admiralty board could have known, since Tali does. Civilians don't matter anyways, they have absolutely no power in the Quarian Flotilla.

I didn't say anybody had to abide by Shepard's wishes but that doesn't make him/her any less important. He is empowered by the SA to talk on their behalf. At that point he is arguably the most important human in the galaxy. If it wasn't for the Reaper war that would have been quite the diplomatic incident, to put it mildly. And Gerrel knew that all too well. That's all I was trying to say

Modifié par CynicalShep, 07 février 2013 - 12:25 .


#177
silverexile17s

silverexile17s
  • Members
  • 2 547 messages

justafan wrote...

silverexile17s wrote...

If anything, that the geth could possibly roll over the quarians at any time beggs the question of why the Reapers didn't direct them to do just that. After all, geth casualties shouldn't matter to the Reapers.
It's almost as if the entire point of the Reaper's battle plan is to simply contain the quarians, and prevent them from even helping the other races, until the Reapers can harvest them. An alternitive to how, normally if the Citadel trap hadn't failed, they would have simply locked down the relays to pick off races one by one. Now, they have to spread their foces to suppress everyone at once. Even the Reapers have to be strained by that.
So they seem to want the quarians isolated, but not killed off en masse, until harvest time.


The Quarians are in an odd position when it comes to harvesting.  So far, it appears that there is no such thing as boarding parties when it comes to ship to ship combat outside of stealth craft insertions ala Geth Dreadnought.  Unless the Reapers possess such craft, they would be unable to harvest the Quarians in their ships, since the Quarians in all likelyhood would be actively fighting the reapers.  The reapers would be forced to destroy the migrant fleet in that case.  Also, indoctrination is a no-go, they would be too far away in their ships and it would be impossible to get sleeper agents inside.

Similarly, assuming the reapers had a 100% harvest rate, would that even be enough to construct a new destroyer?  Since that is about the only thing the Quarians would be good for for them, since they are not really all that usefull as husks.  We know millions are being harvested every day on Earth and Palaven and no destroyer are coming out of there that we know of, and there are only 17m Quarians in existence.  It seems to me that the only use the reapers could have with the Quarians is to destroy them, something they seem like they're trying to use the geth for.

Ironically enough, the best way for the reapers to harvest them would probably be to simply let them unload on Rannoch and come back later to indoctrinate everyone.  In every other scenario, they would be forced to simply wipe them out rather than harvest.

Tens of thousands were needed to make the Human Reaper that we saw. Not even past the hundreds of thouands. Imagine the progress millions would have made on it. And these are only the core being inside the Reaper shell. The cephalopod/crustacean shell we see is the battle armor of the actual inner Reaper, and I think that outter shell is made more conventonally then the how the core being is grown from liquid DNA. Destroyer core beings would be likely smaller then the Sovergien-class core beings. So 17 mil should be more then enough for  a Destroyer. The race that woud have the most problems would likely be the drell, as theire numbers are even smaller then the quarians, numbering in the hundreds of thousands compaired to the 17 million quarians.
So harvesting them should be quite easy.
And Reapers do indeed have ships that are spicifically designed to be processers, and they presumibly can dock with other ships.

Modifié par silverexile17s, 07 février 2013 - 12:22 .


#178
CynicalShep

CynicalShep
  • Members
  • 2 381 messages
@ silverexile17s

TIMMY said hundreds of thousands. And that reaper was far from being completed, or at least that's what EDI says

#179
Hazegurl

Hazegurl
  • Members
  • 4 928 messages

Auld Wulf wrote...

@Hazegurl

Exactly. It's obvious who the observant ones who paid attention were in this thread. How completely unobservant some people must be to miss out on these somewhat important elements is beyond me. Probably too busy dragging their bloody knuckles.


I just wonder how many players even bothered to talk to Leigon in game or they just ignored him cause of their bias for the Quarians. I got Leigon and Tali to work together in ME2 and I destoryed the Heretics so it kinda ticks me off that I have to go through another Quarian/Geth conflict because of the Quarians. I could careless about a bunch of people who willingly die because of one person. Gerrel refuses to follow orders and get his entire fleet to not follow them too which makes him more of a liability than asset. Nope, don't freaking need him in a war calling the shots. Especially since his direct actions can cause the death of his entire race, that's 17 million lives lost because of him. Can you imagine having this idiot on Earth in the middle of a reaper fight? But according to some posters that makes my Shep selfish. :huh:

#180
silverexile17s

silverexile17s
  • Members
  • 2 547 messages

CynicalShep wrote...

@ silverexile17s

TIMMY said hundreds of thousands. And that reaper was far from being completed, or at least that's what EDI says

EDI says tens of thosuands. Millions were needed to complete it. That was a larger Reaper. The one made from quarians would be smaller, and therefore need less.

Modifié par silverexile17s, 25 février 2013 - 08:05 .


#181
BleedingUranium

BleedingUranium
  • Members
  • 6 118 messages
Oh look, another "I support slavery" thread.

#182
Hazegurl

Hazegurl
  • Members
  • 4 928 messages

silverexile17s wrote...

The GETH knew about that Reaper. They let it in before the quarians ever arrived....(cut the rest of the post cause I don't care to repeat myself)


Dude. You are totally using your own headcannon right now. I don't mind headcannon. I'm a huge fan of using it but you are using it in a debate as a fact.

The Quarians attacked the Geth and was winning. Even the Quarians mention this.
The Geth only were able to fight back because of the reaper signal. Which was the main problem with the Quarians when you meet up with them again in ME3.
Later on you discover that the reaper signal was not just a signal but a live reaper.

So this is where comprehension skills come into play.

The Quarians were kicking the Geth's a** and could have won which means that there were NO reaper signal (aka Reaper) on Rannoch.

The Reaper signal (aka Reaper) does not play a part until after the Quarians attack.

There were no reaper on Rannoch prior to the Quarians attacking them.

This is not head cannon. It's simple fact. Now if you want to head cannon a huge Geth betrayal and say that Leigon was lying to you about why they turned to the Reapers then go for it. it's your game. But don't come on a forum to argue that as a fact when its not.

NITHER side deserved what happened to them, and I am truly sorry that you can't see that. NO ONE shoule ever say that what the quarians got was justified. That's simply curel, as it was no more justified then the geth's vilinization as boogymen.
And if you can't broker peace, it's no different then tossing them the gun and forcing one to pull the trigger.
If anything, your Shepard is both callous and cruel, and I rather not meat them anytime soon.


LOL! wow talk about being overly sensitive here. The Quarians got what they deserved just like the Krogan did. I can careless if you think that makes my Shep Satan incarnate. I won't change my opinions on the Quarians for you or no one else. I play the game however I please and its most certainly not to please some person over the internet. If Bioware gives me the options then I'll pick what I believe fits my Shep. So glad I could call the Quarians dumb for their stupid decisions. Btw, I also let the factory workers burn so Zaeed can get his revenge, told a kid where to sign up to become a mercenary which got him killed, allowed Morinth to kill her mother than recruited her without batting an eye. My shep also would have protected her if she had come to him for aid instead of allowing her to turn into a banshee. Oh yeah and he typically shoots Mordin in the back. I'm guessing you're a paragon Shep. ;)

Modifié par Hazegurl, 07 février 2013 - 01:25 .


#183
justafan

justafan
  • Members
  • 2 407 messages

BleedingUranium wrote...

Oh look, another "I support slavery" thread.


Not "support" necessarily.  More of, "If I can commit genocide why not slavery".  I believe players should have the choice of what war-crime they want to commit.  Outside of the endings of course, they covered the whole range of warcrimes there quite efficiently.

#184
Hazegurl

Hazegurl
  • Members
  • 4 928 messages

DeinonSlayer wrote...

justafan wrote...

Great Scott, Silverexile, you almost have me thinking that Gerrel is a competent leader. How dare you!

Like any military commander, he acts with the information he has. People like to call him an idiot because they don't think about the dreadnought situation beyond "I got shot at!" They do the same because of the outcome where the Quarians are destroyed, even though the only reason it happens is because Shepard neglects to mention that the upload is happening in the first place. For all they know, another Reaper backup came online, in which case ceasing fire wouldn't have saved them anyway.


That's odd, considering the fact that he never bothers to properly assess the reason why one of the admirals on Rannoch was trying to get him to hold fire before committing genocide against his own race. :P

#185
BleedingUranium

BleedingUranium
  • Members
  • 6 118 messages

justafan wrote...

BleedingUranium wrote...

Oh look, another "I support slavery" thread.


Not "support" necessarily.  More of, "If I can commit genocide why not slavery".  I believe players should have the choice of what war-crime they want to commit.  Outside of the endings of course, they covered the whole range of warcrimes there quite efficiently.


Oh look, another "Destroy is genocide" comment.

#186
justafan

justafan
  • Members
  • 2 407 messages

BleedingUranium wrote...

justafan wrote...

BleedingUranium wrote...

Oh look, another "I support slavery" thread.


Not "support" necessarily.  More of, "If I can commit genocide why not slavery".  I believe players should have the choice of what war-crime they want to commit.  Outside of the endings of course, they covered the whole range of warcrimes there quite efficiently.


Oh look, another "Destroy is genocide" comment.


In a sense, but one could also consider refuse the option to allow genocide to continue.

As Obi-Wan would say, it's all "from a certain point of view".

#187
CynicalShep

CynicalShep
  • Members
  • 2 381 messages
@ silverexile17s 

1. Full strength is full strength. Full strength is what was annihilating Quarians in space. 

2. I didn't hear about Reaper pirate boarding parties. They destroyed ships in space, nothing more, nothing less.
Suit ruptures would still be deadly and Rannoch isn't defensible. You could argue that Quarians could repurpose whatever defenses Geth had but they would have to take those down in order to beat said Geth. I don't see how Rannoch is defensible at all. The planet isn't easier to hold, especially when Reapers have orbital advantage. Council races were still harassing Reapers in space, otherwise Krogan and Turian would be helpless against big squids shooting at them from space. Destroyers on the ground - sure. If all capital ships come and start hitting them they're gone. The only difference is that Reapers take their sweet time to harvest. Which they wouldn't need to do with a mere 17 million Quarians.

3. London wasn't glassed. Many other big cities were, however. It would make no sense to destroy them all, Reapers need humans to build a new bro. Quarians don't have the numbers to be that important.
Both humans and turians mentioned having millions of casualties per day. The speed at which Quarians go down only depends on how many Reapers are sent to do the job. And I repeat, Quarians don't have any infrastructure or defensible positions. Hell, they don't even know the terrain, none of them ever stepped on Rannoch.

4. That was accomplished by general Coronati. In space. The ones destroyed on the ground were only made possible because several Turian dreadnoughts lures the Reapers away, giving time to Krogan commandos to hand off the bombs they brought with them. Nothing would have been accomplished without the fleet. Also, Quarians didn't have the resources Turians had. Neither did they have Krogan commandos aiding them.

5. We have no idea. For all I know there could have been 30% of the Quarians opposed to the war. There is no data that gives exact details about it. We only know that Quarians don't mind sacrifices in a war.

6. Again, you're speculating. We just have no idea. What I know is that roughly 2 billion Quarians died. How can you explaain 17 millions easily walking over a force far superior to the one that killed more than 100 times their current numbers 300 years ago?

7. It was also partly Quarian's fault because they created them in the first place. USSR once consisted of 15? states. If Ukraine was to attack Poland now would Russians be responsible?

8. Again, you're speculating. I don't doubt that Geth have repair bots. I also know that the Geth flagship is much bigger than an Alliance dreadnought (it's mentioned by EDI in game). So no, I don't think they'll fix the ship instantly. Also, you're comparing situations that in no way similar. Sovereign was about to open a relay that would have destroyed all known intelligent organics. Gerrel risked having extra losses. Ultimately one ship, however big, doesn't win a war. A military leader who is getting all nations together under one banner does. Raan was angry because Gerrel forced her to take a decision. You're right, this is war. In war, admirals coordinate their forces towards a common goal. Gerrel went on a power trip, disregarding everybody else. We're talking about seconds here, not hours or days. "What just happened, Shepard?" would have taken less than 10 seconds. "Raan, I need your fleet's support" would have taken another 5. They fought for days. And Hackett had to choose between losing 3 fleets and losing one. Gerrel's choice was in no way similar. He just broke formation (in hindsight, probably an old habbit). This is bravado, not a military operation. 

9. I get the feeling you're angry. If you are trying to have a normal conversation I'm in. If you're going to talk to me about BS there are at least 10 instanes where I can call you on that. Keep it civil or don't talk at all.
They had many choices. Attacking before Reapers arrived, making peace, staying in space. They attacked the Geth, not the way around. They had more choice than you think. 
And Gerrel's only thought is destroying the Geth. Don't try to make him sound smarter than he is. There is no safe place for the Quarians in the entire galaxy. You seem to forget about the Reapers that fly around. Also Shepard was the only one who was trying to make a sense of that mess and unite the galaxy. Gerrel clearly wasn't bothered enough to think about that. Some true leader he is.

10. Valued military leaders risk it all when they have no alternative. Gerrel was never put in such a position. And I repeat, Rannoch was NOT defensible. Especially not by 17 millions, of which the majority was non-combatants. 
And the treaty was signed after they were kicked out of by the Council, not before.

11. You should check the definition of a head-start. "We're killing you" is hardly one. It would have taken seconds to reason before acting. After all, Shepard had knowledge Gerrel didn't. He was in the ship and caused whatever happened. I think it would be logical to at least ask about it. I'm not saying Gerrel should have asked Shepard for his opinion, although given their positions tactical appraisal would have made perfect sense. And again, "but he survived before" is a poor argument. So did Ashley before she got blown on Virmire or the coup. 

12. Jokingly - yeah. In a situation that wasn't very humorous - no.

13. You interrupt a conversation between Tali and Xen about stuff that Xen does. If you go by what Tali told you - nobody in the admiralty board is worthy of his title. 
Second - that doesn't mean he waltzed through it. And we don't know if Gerrel knew that. 
Third - that doesn't change the facts. Legion did more to help them than they did by themselves. And closing the comms is cowardice. Either man up and own up to your decision or don't make that decision. What was accomplished by that, exactly? Silencing Shepard? What if he had useful additional intel? If you can't take the heat get out of the kitchen.
Fourth - Shepard and Tali knew. Maybe the flotilla would have known as well if they didn't close the comms. And everybody left the Earth burn, including Quarians. It was the most logical move in the circumstances.

There is only one problem with that. If you leave the many without a leader then you have accomplished nothing. A good leader is worth more than thousands of civilians. In Shepards case - more than an entire race. Who would have continued his effort if he got killed? Gerrel? Xen? Tali? Maybe Raan?
Gerrel was focused on anything but the bigger picture. He saw Rannoch and saw the Geth he hated so much. Everything else was peripheral.
Did you save Koris or the civilians?

#188
DeinonSlayer

DeinonSlayer
  • Members
  • 8 441 messages

Giantdeathrobot wrote...

DeinonSlayer wrote...


1.Putting them on a planet which can feed them alleviates the strain on the liveships. The food they produce can then be stockpiled on military vessels for extended journeys away from the fleet, instead of remaining within shuttle distance at all times for daily food shipments. Military needs to eat too - without offloading their civilians, they'd have to bring a liveship with the military ships along with the 1/3rd of the civilian fleet dependent on that liveship. Dragging 1/3rd of their entire population into that final fight or ensuring their military goes in with no rations is not a favorable prospect.

2. Delivering that food requires daily shuttle shipments, even in peacetime. They can't divide the fleet so long as they depend on the liveships.

3.She was referring to how long it would take them to adapt to life without suits - for their immune systems to recover - not about food. It would take (likely illegal) genetic engineering to eliminate their physiological dependency on their native plant life. Living on the flotilla for them is like if a human were denied vitamin D for their entire lives. Offloading their civilians on a world where they could survive in the event that the Fleet never comes back for them, where a suit breach won't be fatal, frees up the fleet to assist the rest of the galaxy.

The Migrant Fleet is eighty years from extinction. They were barely hanging on before the Reaper invasion. As long as the Quarians live in space, they're the equivalent of subsistence farmers. Nothing to spare - and if you've noticed in previous titles, it's in their character to take care of their own problems. They learned that was the only way they'd survive when the Council sat back and watched their civilization burn to the ground three centuries earlier. The Council threatened to bomb them off of the last world they tried to settle. Really, given the way they've been kicked around by everyone as long as any of them can remember, I'm amazed that they offer to help at all. No Turian colony is going to be willing and able to accept an influx of millions of refugees with finicky diets, even in exchange for the fleet. You'd be hard-pressed enough to find a Turian world which isn't already under attack. The Quarians manage on Rannoch just fine without the Geth, so evidently they knew they'd be able to before committing to that course of action.


1. I don't see how that solves the issue. That still leaves 1/3 of their fleet completely defenseless, along with all their civilians static. It's no easy task to feed the entire Fleet logistically, but it beats splitting it in two and leaving one third at the mercy of the first hostile fleet that shows up.

They're going to be vulnerable anywhere they go, that's a given. If the Reapers caught them in space, they'd be dead - block relay access and whittle them down to nothing. What they really gained was the freedom to move; to split up their ships to assist others across the galaxy, instead of everyone having to stay within shuttle delivery distance of a Liveship at all times just to have enough to eat.

2. But one the liveship is orbiting a planet, everything is a-OK because...? They never could tell the Geth had Quarian food grown. Even assuming optimal conditions (and they aren't optimal), I'd wager it would take some time for food to grow on Rannoch for all the civilians, millions of people remember. They would still depend on the liveships for quite some time. Again, given how short-term the situation is, retaking Rannoch makes little sense.

I'm simply pointing out what's depicted in the scene. They managed to feed themselves on Rannoch. Perhaps they stripped some of the food-production equipment out of the ships themselves before they went to Earth. Tali in ME2 did say the Quarians anticipated they'd have to cannibalize their fleet in order to settle permanently. Geth assistance lets them settle in easier, but they otherwise manage on their own just fine.

3. If the Fleet never comes back, they are dead no matter what. They are completely defenceless against the Reaper armada that has devastated the combined Citadel fleet and countless civilizations before them. There is no surviving this conflict unless the Reapers die. Might all well bring the civilians along and leave them close to a Mass Relay, no need to send them with the front lines.

The idea is that, if the Crucible works, the war will end in weeks, not decades. They went into it knowing they were buying themselves a limited amount of time - hopefully enough that the Reapers wouldn't get around to Rannoch. The important thing is that their ships are freed up to actually be of use.

4. Eighty years is a very long time. The Reapers will anihilate both the Fleet and Rannoch way before then. It's a complete non-issue.

It seems your suggestion was that they hide their civilians in deep space and hope the Reapers don't find them. If the Quarians stay in space, they have to huddle together around the liveships just to keep everyone fed. Offloading the civilians on a planet which can feed them gives them the mobility they need to actually be of assistance to the wider galaxy.

As for the Council races not helping, the situation is wholly different. In peacetime, they had no need for the Quarians. The worst threat was the Terminus looking over their shoulder, and only crisis they had to cope up with is some stray Geth and one annoying human who won't shut up about some silly ''reapers''. Now that the Reapers have smashed their fleets and have them in danger of extinction, there is absolutely no reason to believe they wouldn't welcome the biggest armada in the galaxy with open arms. To say otherwise is silly. The Council may be pig-headed, but there's no way they would turn down the Flotilla when they need ships more than anything.

What I'm saying is that by the time the Turians could have helped the Quarians, any colony worlds that might have been able to support them were already under Reaper assault. They refused to help the Quarians before; now it's simply too late for the Council to help them even if they wanted to. However badly they need the ships, the Council has too much on their plate to find housing for seventeen million high-maintenance refugees.

And the Quarians retook Rannoch because Shepard bailed their asses out an uncounth number of times. No Shepard would not only have meant exterminated Quarians, but the entire Geth collective siding with the Reapers.

The Quarians didn't anticipate that the Geth had housed a Reaper on Rannoch, waiting to give the Geth code upgrades that the Heretics never had. It was a risk, yes, but a lot less risky than the alternative.

#189
Dunabar

Dunabar
  • Members
  • 961 messages

BleedingUranium wrote...

justafan wrote...

BleedingUranium wrote...

Oh look, another "I support slavery" thread.


Not "support" necessarily.  More of, "If I can commit genocide why not slavery".  I believe players should have the choice of what war-crime they want to commit.  Outside of the endings of course, they covered the whole range of warcrimes there quite efficiently.


Oh look, another "Destroy is genocide" comment.


Oh look another person who thinks everyone shares the same opinion.

Are Geth alive yes or no? - To some its yes, to some its no.

To those that deem the geth alive its genocide or slavery

To those that deem the geth as not alive its destruction or rewrite.

Opinions are like ***holes, everyone has one and if you don't like someones opinion get your nose out of their ***
B)

#190
silverexile17s

silverexile17s
  • Members
  • 2 547 messages

CynicalShep wrote...

Dunabar wrote...

Yeah politics are like the Quarian-Geth conflict, messy business with one side yelling at the other.


Or discussed in a civilized matter. The topic matters not, the participants make the difference.

1. I agree that the Council should've given them the world. Sure, Quarians broke the law by settling a lot of their own there before asking but it would have saved some trouble. I don't agree with the "priority list", however. Quarians, generally, had two big dreams. One was getting a home and anoher was destroying the Geth. One comes true - there's only one left to fulfill.
And there is nothing wrong with feeling Rannoch is their "spiritual home". I'm just saying both their methods and their timing were bad.

2. Well, I don't think Hackett meant that the flotilla passed by with boomboxes. Hackett is a pragmatic leader, he wouldn't mention it if it was something trivial. And they did both sign it. That treaty was signed after the first Geth war. I'm not surprised they chose to ignore it either but that doesn't help their already shaken trustworthiness.

3. The same applies to the true Geth. they have been shot on sight by everybody except one man. Organics didn't trust them, Quarians wanted them gone. Legion's cooperation was more than anybody deserved at that point and it still happened. The quality of the ships doesn't quite matter in the circumstances. Reapers made no difference between Turian dreadnoughts and regular shuttles - they had an easy time destroying either of the two.  Quarians could have had a bunch of Destiny Ascension's and they would have been still destroyed. Mobility is what ultimately made the difference, not the age or the specs of the ship.

4. What I meant is staying airbourne. We keep arguing about this but there are Reapers everywhere in the galaxy. On the ground liveships are a sitting duck. In the air - they have mobility and an escort who is ready to die to buy them time. As soon as a Reaper touches down on Rannoch their non-combatants are toast. I would have understood their reasoning if they did it before the war. During the war it's just causing extra trouble.

5. Most Asari don't live in a suit and know how to hold up a biotic barrier. Their ground forces were actually quite successful (or at least that's what the codex says). I still believe every single Quarians would have been dead or processed in a matter of hours (depends on how many Reapers were sent to Rannoch).

6. But that doesn't change the fact. The way they waged war was both careless and ultimately wrong. If they were to first take care of the Geth that took up arms their people wouldn't have had to defend non-hostile Geth. When the biggest threat is down you can decide what to do with the rest of the Geth. Instead they went in blindly with guns blazing and lost. It's "divide and conquer", except the Quarian Admiralty must be one of the first military leaderships that did that to themselves. 

7. I haven't argued about arming the ships. I questioned making the liveships a top firing priority. It's one thing to arm them for self-defense purposes and a whole other thing to strap the biggest guns you have on them so that Geth will go out of their way to destroy them. Our playthroughs might have been different but at the very least Tali spoke with Legion(if you have both). About the Dyson sphere - the game says Geth sided because of getting stupider after the attack in combination with being backed in a corner. Legion isn't a leader for the Geth, he is just a platform smart enough to interact with people. He was captured by his own and crucified "Overlord" style. If Quarians never attacked Geth would have never been in that position. 

8 Raan followed through because the alternative was Gerrel's fleet getting destroyed in an instant. She was kind and somewhat smart but ultimately spineless. Gerrel took advantage of that. Regardless of what you told them he acts rashly and unbecoming of a military leader. What if the dreadnought is down for good? Why assume that Shepard pressed the "snooze" button? Why not ask a simple question: "I see the dreadnought is down. What happened, Shepard? Of, and THANK YOU for saving our asses again". Even if you told him to attack the dreadnought he could have at least make sure he's making the right call. No, "Kill Shepard, Tali and the SB!!!" to save a couple civilians! Pity he wasn't on the ground in Koris' place.

9. It still says that it's a special platform with 1183 programs. Just like Legion. No other platform would have cut it as a signal booster.

10. I didn't say that all Quarians knew about Liara. In fact, I'm sure most didn't. I said that the admiralty board could have known, since Tali does. Civilians don't matter anyways, they have absolutely no power in the Quarian Flotilla.
I didn't say anybody had to abide by Shepard's wishes but that doesn't make him/her any less important. He is empowered by the SA to talk on their behalf. At that point he is arguably the most important human in the galaxy. If it wasn't for the Reaper war that would have been quite the diplomatic incident, to put it mildly. And Gerrel knew that all too well. That's all I was trying to say

1. But when the galaxy is on the verge of ending, there's a chance that they never WILL get their homeworld back if they don't act now.

2.  That was before the Heretics raged bloody hell across the Attican Traverse. I doubt the Council was goint to willingly support an anti-provocitation agreement on the geth, when they seemingly already attacked unprovoked. The Heretics already broke any agreement the quarians made, so Koris' statement about the Council agreement is already redundant, given that the Council never recinded the "State of War" decree they had on the geth, and the "Reaper allies" idea that the rest of the gelaxy sees them from, thanks to the Heretics. So no, that statement Koris made about the Council agreement, and not provoking the geth, has been a redundant topic for going on three years.

3. They in turn did nothing to alter that opinion of them. They just resigned themselves. They GAVE UP on organics, and let that hatred fester. Look what their isolation brought them. Had they at least kept trying to be more open, they could have changed public opinion of them over time.
Those ships need to be constantly supported by each-other, compaired to a self sufficant warship. They are also slower then normal, as it normally took days to move the entie quarian fleet through a relay safely.
Tali herself says that most of the ships are patch-jobs that are always on the verge of falling apart. That REALLY doesn't sound like how most military ships would work, especally when many of the quarians ships are packed with civilians.
And specs DO matter, as the quarian ships are near outdated. Look at how the cutting-edge geth dreadnought cut through the quarian afttackers.
And they don't have the firepower to take on Reapers without backup. Especally while they have to split between attacking the enemy and defending the liveships at the same time, EVERY time they fight.

4. UGH.
THE LIVESHIPS THEMSELVES AREN'T STAYING. JUST THE PEOPLE. WHERE THE HELL DID YOU GET THAT?
Only the civilians are staying, as well as all the food production equipment, and at least one liveship left behind to canabalize into a makeshift town/city for them. The now hollowed-out liveships would then be fully converted into full-time combat ships.
And they CAN'T EVER split up. The whole REASON the Migrant Fleet IS the Migrant Fleet is becauset they CAN'T be divided. The military ships need constant re-supply from the liveships, and likewise, the military ships must always be close to the liveships, because they hold the core of their race.
No one else is going to accept them, and empty space is where they will either run out of resources, since the fleet needs to constantly mine, repurpose, and scavage to survive. Also, empty space si where no one will be able to aid them if the Reapers DO find them.
The risk of staying mobile, and taking the last of their species into battle where, unlike the other races, the loss of the majority of their ships WILL be the end of their race, is FAR too high, compaired to giving them a stable power base.

5. Not true for the volus, whose world was attacked, yet the population was still fighting quite well.
Not true for Dekunna, where the elcor are still wageing a greulla war.
Not true for Earth, despite the damage.
Not true for the hanar, whose world seems to be somehow too much trouble to take with it's auto-defenses active.
If the volus can last months on end, the quarians should be just fine. Especally since they won't head for the Veil that quickly,

6. The geth are networked. When one group made the decision, they all did. All geth were moving to the same path, because they ALL shared networked information. And look at rebellions in our own hsitory. Simply killing the ringleaders didn't always garuntee the end of rebellion. With the conciousness-sharing geth, even MORE so.
And after all, the quarians initally had hopes of recovering the geth. The geth were the ones that killed 99% of the quarians. The quarians that resisted that - small fry compaied to how many the geth killed. They DIDN'T do it to themselves. The people's fears did. It wasn't anything the leadership did.

7. The geth would have gone out of their way to destroy them anyway, because now they think it was a mistake to let them go, as their decendants came back to kill them, so now, they won't show any mercy.
They would have destroyed the liveships regardless of being armed or not, and regardless of Reaper upgrade or not. And because that Reaper couldn't have gotten past the Migrant Fleet without anyone knowing, it seems likely that the Reaper was there well before the quarian attack. They were still on the fence. Legion never specified when the Reapers made the offer. Just that they took it after the quarian attack. If anything, it seems to indicate that the Reapers made the offer to the geth before the attack ever took place.
After all, seeing how the Reapers handled the other races, the geth were probably wondering of they could win.

8. He acted when no one else WOULD. Look at the Council. The did squat while at least Hackett and Anderson were prepping. Raan is a diplomat and politicion. Gerrel is a proactive military man. You either act first, or take the hit in War, and the quarians couldn't afford to take hits.
Gerrel knew that if they left the dreadnought, it would be repaired and used against them, and potentally all the OTHER races, if the geth got past them and aided the Reapers. The quarians had the geth's attention, but if that changed, the geth would potentoally send forces after the other races and reinforce the Reapers.
At this point, either the quarians run, and the geth spill out into the galaxy at large, or the make their stand here and now. That dreadnought couls cause problems for the quarians, and if the geth remain under Reaper control, could be a threat to other races. Gerrel made the safest choice, and I believe it was the right call.

9. But it's also much colder then Legion. An indication of the way the geth turn out without interaction with Shepard - cold and uncaring of anyone else's problems but their own. Legion is the one that starts to change the geths view of organics.

10. If anything, Gerrel had the highest respect for Shepard.

#191
BleedingUranium

BleedingUranium
  • Members
  • 6 118 messages

Dunabar wrote...

BleedingUranium wrote...

justafan wrote...

BleedingUranium wrote...

Oh look, another "I support slavery" thread.


Not "support" necessarily.  More of, "If I can commit genocide why not slavery".  I believe players should have the choice of what war-crime they want to commit.  Outside of the endings of course, they covered the whole range of warcrimes there quite efficiently.


Oh look, another "Destroy is genocide" comment.


Oh look another person who thinks everyone shares the same opinion.

Are Geth alive yes or no? - To some its yes, to some its no.

To those that deem the geth alive its genocide or slavery

To those that deem the geth as not alive its destruction or rewrite.

Opinions are like ***holes, everyone has one and if you don't like someones opinion get your nose out of their ***
B)


You can choose to view the Geth as not being people, but that's doesn't make it so. Some people believe that dark-skinned humans aren't people, this is no different. Some people believe the Earth is flat.

Having an opinion doesn't make you right.

#192
Dunabar

Dunabar
  • Members
  • 961 messages

BleedingUranium wrote...

Dunabar wrote...

BleedingUranium wrote...

justafan wrote...

BleedingUranium wrote...

Oh look, another "I support slavery" thread.


Not "support" necessarily.  More of, "If I can commit genocide why not slavery".  I believe players should have the choice of what war-crime they want to commit.  Outside of the endings of course, they covered the whole range of warcrimes there quite efficiently.


Oh look, another "Destroy is genocide" comment.


Oh look another person who thinks everyone shares the same opinion.

Are Geth alive yes or no? - To some its yes, to some its no.

To those that deem the geth alive its genocide or slavery

To those that deem the geth as not alive its destruction or rewrite.

Opinions are like ***holes, everyone has one and if you don't like someones opinion get your nose out of their ***
B)


You can choose to view the Geth as not being people, but that's doesn't make it so. Some people believe that dark-skinned humans aren't people, this is no different. Some people believe the Earth is flat.

Having an opinion doesn't make you right.


Works for both sides of the fence.

#193
DeinonSlayer

DeinonSlayer
  • Members
  • 8 441 messages

Hazegurl wrote...

DeinonSlayer wrote...

justafan wrote...

Great Scott, Silverexile, you almost have me thinking that Gerrel is a competent leader. How dare you!

Like any military commander, he acts with the information he has. People like to call him an idiot because they don't think about the dreadnought situation beyond "I got shot at!" They do the same because of the outcome where the Quarians are destroyed, even though the only reason it happens is because Shepard neglects to mention that the upload is happening in the first place. For all they know, another Reaper backup came online, in which case ceasing fire wouldn't have saved them anyway.


That's odd, considering the fact that he never bothers to properly assess the reason why one of the admirals on Rannoch was trying to get him to hold fire before committing genocide against his own race. :P

And if Tali had actually said what was happening, instead of the vague warning, that might have made a difference. But, as with everything else in the MEU, The Shepard has to step in to save the day.

I'd advise you do a Geth VI playthrough at some point. That's a more accurate depiction of what the Quarians were up against historically. The VI plainly states its intention to kill the Quarians if you choose to upload the code - no mercy, no quarter. Shepard can't talk the Quarians into a ceasefire when the Geth won't honor it.

Historically, the Geth offered the Quarians no quarter (and before you say it, yes, I'm aware the Geth didn't make the effort to comb the Terminus for stragglers - they still killed everyone who couldn't secure passage off-world). Is the wider Quarian fleet even aware of Legion's existence? Do they have any reason to believe they'll survive if they let up on the attack? Not unless Legion is around to make the offer, and Shepard communicates it to them. As I said before, if the Geth regain full strength without warning, for all the Quarians know, the Reapers seized control of them again - ceasing fire would not spare them.

If you choose not to tell them about the upload you sanctioned, not to tell them that this time the Geth will only fire in self-defense, their blood would be on your hands.

Modifié par DeinonSlayer, 07 février 2013 - 01:58 .


#194
BleedingUranium

BleedingUranium
  • Members
  • 6 118 messages

Dunabar wrote...

BleedingUranium wrote...

Dunabar wrote...

BleedingUranium wrote...

justafan wrote...

BleedingUranium wrote...

Oh look, another "I support slavery" thread.


Not "support" necessarily.  More of, "If I can commit genocide why not slavery".  I believe players should have the choice of what war-crime they want to commit.  Outside of the endings of course, they covered the whole range of warcrimes there quite efficiently.


Oh look, another "Destroy is genocide" comment.


Oh look another person who thinks everyone shares the same opinion.

Are Geth alive yes or no? - To some its yes, to some its no.

To those that deem the geth alive its genocide or slavery

To those that deem the geth as not alive its destruction or rewrite.

Opinions are like ***holes, everyone has one and if you don't like someones opinion get your nose out of their ***
B)


You can choose to view the Geth as not being people, but that's doesn't make it so. Some people believe that dark-skinned humans aren't people, this is no different. Some people believe the Earth is flat.

Having an opinion doesn't make you right.


Works for both sides of the fence.


I just explained that is doesn't, not when dealing with facts. The only times all opinions are equal is when discussing morality, as morality itself is subjective.

#195
silverexile17s

silverexile17s
  • Members
  • 2 547 messages

Hazegurl wrote...

silverexile17s wrote...

The GETH knew about that Reaper. They let it in before the quarians ever arrived....(cut the rest of the post cause I don't care to repeat myself)


Dude. You are totally using your own headcannon right now. I don't mind headcannon. I'm a huge fan of using it but you are using it in a debate as a fact.

The Quarians attacked the Geth and was winning. Even the Quarians mention this.
The Geth only were able to fight back because of the reaper signal. Which was the main problem with the Quarians when you meet up with them again in ME3.
Later on you discover that the reaper signal was not just a signal but a live reaper.

So this is where comprehension skills come into play.

The Quarians were kicking the Geth's a** and could have won which means that there were NO reaper signal (aka Reaper) on Rannoch.

The Reaper signal (aka Reaper) does not play a part until after the Quarians attack.

There were no reaper on Rannoch prior to the Quarians attacking them.

This is not head cannon. It's simple fact. Now if you want to head cannon a huge Geth betrayal and say that Leigon was lying to you about why they turned to the Reapers then go for it. it's your game. But don't come on a forum to argue that as a fact when its not.

NITHER side deserved what happened to them, and I am truly sorry that you can't see that. NO ONE shoule ever say that what the quarians got was justified. That's simply curel, as it was no more justified then the geth's vilinization as boogymen.
And if you can't broker peace, it's no different then tossing them the gun and forcing one to pull the trigger.
If anything, your Shepard is both callous and cruel, and I rather not meat them anytime soon.


LOL! wow talk about being overly sensitive here. The Quarians got what they deserved just like the Krogan did. I can careless if you think that makes my Shep Satan incarnate. I won't change my opinions on the Quarians for you or no one else. I play the game however I please and its most certainly not to please some person over the internet. If Bioware gives me the options then I'll pick what I believe fits my Shep. So glad I could call the Quarians dumb for their stupid decisions. Btw, I also let the factory workers burn so Zaeed can get his revenge, told a kid where to sign up to become a mercenary which got him killed, allowed Morinth to kill her mother than recruited her without batting an eye. My shep also would have protected her if she had come to him for aid instead of allowing her to turn into a banshee. Oh yeah and he typically shoots Mordin in the back. I'm guessing you're a paragon Shep. ;)

1. Huge fan of headcannon? No wonder...

FIRST off, Legion NEVER specifies when the Reapers made their offer. Just that it was accepted when the quarians pushed them back to Rannoch. NEVER was there any indication of when exactally the offer was put on the table.

Second, teh entire point OF the Dreadnought was to make the geth signal accessible to all geth. When the Dreadnought, all other geth outside Rannoch's system lost the upgrades.

THAT is simple fact.

2. Actually, NO. I'm more gray. I's someone that actually stoped and thought about the Choices. Paragon anr Renagade are just bigitory ways of labaling dicidions in a good and evil Star Wars way, which  I HATE if the game isn't Star Wars.
I'm someone that actually debated weather or not saving the Council was the right thing.
If I save them, the galaxy has a stable power base to rebuild from, but the human fleet will probably have a  harder time stopping Sovergien, and there might not BE a tommorow if they aren't able to stop it.
If I let them die, we have a much better chance at bringing down Sovergien, but the galaxy will be broken because the central balacne of power between factions will have a major power void.
Pros AND cons. That's ALL there is to me in this. I'm not like you - I don't SEE "Paragon" or "Renagade." I simply see "side 1" and "side 2." Just simple choices, each having similar amounts of black, white, and gray, with the statius qoe shifting in only certin circumstances.

So NO. I am NOT a "Paragon." Nor am I "Renagade." I see things from both sides. Do that, and ANYONE can see that NO race deserved their respictive tragidies. That's just callous, cruel, uncaring, unsensitive, and downright nhilistic.
Again, I respectfully hope to never meet your Shepard.

#196
JesseLee202

JesseLee202
  • Members
  • 1 230 messages

BleedingUranium wrote...

Dunabar wrote...

BleedingUranium wrote...

justafan wrote...

BleedingUranium wrote...

Oh look, another "I support slavery" thread.


Not "support" necessarily.  More of, "If I can commit genocide why not slavery".  I believe players should have the choice of what war-crime they want to commit.  Outside of the endings of course, they covered the whole range of warcrimes there quite efficiently.


Oh look, another "Destroy is genocide" comment.


Oh look another person who thinks everyone shares the same opinion.

Are Geth alive yes or no? - To some its yes, to some its no.

To those that deem the geth alive its genocide or slavery

To those that deem the geth as not alive its destruction or rewrite.

Opinions are like ***holes, everyone has one and if you don't like someones opinion get your nose out of their ***
B)


You can choose to view the Geth as not being people, but that's doesn't make it so. Some people believe that dark-skinned humans aren't people, this is no different. Some people believe the Earth is flat.

Having an opinion doesn't make you right.

The reason I don't view them as "people", is because I do not believe a machine is capable of ever having a "soul". You cannot prove or disprove the metaphysical. The whole issue about whether the Geth are alive or not, is a matter of opinion.

Do not compare this to skin color.

Modifié par JesseLee202, 07 février 2013 - 02:01 .


#197
BleedingUranium

BleedingUranium
  • Members
  • 6 118 messages

JesseLee202 wrote...

The reason I don't view them as "people", is because I do not believe a machine is capable of ever having a "soul". You cannot prove or disprove the metaphysical. The whole issue about whether the Geth are alive or not, is a matter of opinion.

Do not compare this to skin color.


The Geth are philisophically alive, but not biologically alive.

Starfish are biologically alive, but not philisophically alive.


Being a person is defined as being sapient. The Geth are sapient, therefore they are people.

Modifié par BleedingUranium, 07 février 2013 - 02:12 .


#198
Giantdeathrobot

Giantdeathrobot
  • Members
  • 2 945 messages

DeinonSlayer wrote...

1. They're going to be vulnerable anywhere they go, that's a given. If the Reapers caught them in space, they'd be dead - block relay access and whittle them down to nothing. What they really gained was the freedom to move; to split up their ships to assist others across the galaxy, instead of everyone having to stay within shuttle delivery distance of a Liveship at all times just to have enough to eat.

2. I'm simply pointing out what's depicted in the scene. They managed to feed themselves on Rannoch. Perhaps they stripped some of the food-production equipment out of the ships themselves before they went to Earth. Tali in ME2 did say the Quarians anticipated they'd have to cannibalize their fleet in order to settle permanently. Geth assistance lets them settle in easier, but they otherwise manage on their own just fine.

3. The idea is that, if the Crucible works, the war will end in weeks, not decades. They went into it knowing they were buying themselves a limited amount of time - hopefully enough that the Reapers wouldn't get around to Rannoch. The important thing is that their ships are freed up to actually be of use.

4. It seems your suggestion was that they hide their civilians in deep space and hope the Reapers don't find them. If the Quarians stay in space, they have to huddle together around the liveships just to keep everyone fed. Offloading the civilians on a planet which can feed them gives them the mobility they need to actually be of assistance to the wider galaxy.

5. What I'm saying is that by the time the Turians could have helped the Quarians, any colony worlds that might have been able to support them were already under Reaper assault. They refused to help the Quarians before; now it's simply too late for the Council to help them even if they wanted to. However badly they need the ships, the Council has too much on their plate to find housing for seventeen million high-maintenance refugees.

6. The Quarians didn't anticipate that the Geth had housed a Reaper on Rannoch, waiting to give the Geth code upgrades that the Heretics never had. It was a risk, yes, but a lot less risky than the alternative.



1. Better scatter and (maybe) reform than be caught and killed no matter what on Rannoch, I say.

2. But they had no idea prior to launching the attack that food would be so readily available. It's also already readily available in the Fleet. So the food argument doesn't work for me.

3. The ships were already of use. They threw everything at the Geth, remember? Why be picky and want to hold back against the Reapers then? It's the last battle for the galaxy. You win or you die. Hiding yur civilians on Rannoch won,t change a thing, hell each loss taken from the Geth is a ship that won,t face the Reaper. Also I'm not certain they know about the fine details of the Crucible before the attack, it's an understandably fairly hush-hush project.

4. My suggestion is that they all stick together and help the galaxy win this war instead of throwing their lives at the Geth. If they really want to hold the civilians back, then let them do so I guess, leave them near a Relay just before the final battle. But I maintain the civies are safer at the heart of the biggest fleet in the galaxy than bunched up on a defenseless planet, so long as you don't do something stupid like send them on the front lines.

5. I'm talking post-war for the colony. The Migrant Fleet needs to be as strong as it can to help the Council; after the War, there is no way they won't repay the favor by aiding the Quarians finding another world. Or maybe, if the Quarians help enough to relieve the pressure and want to shield the civilians, they could make sure a Turian detachement protects them at a suitable colony. I'm certain the Turians can come up with something helpfull once a big armada helps them with their war effort. The Quarians don,t need babysitting, they need a home, a home which can very well be provided once the war is over and the galaxy is no longer in danger of being turned into hors-d'oeuvres.

6. I'm saying it's the contrary; they took a massive risk by invading a species previously know for cooperating with the Reapers while the Reapers are invading. Rather, going to help the Council seems much more risk-free. Having a home world won't save the Quarians if the Council is defeated.

#199
Auld Wulf

Auld Wulf
  • Members
  • 1 284 messages
@JesseLee202

There was a time when persons of certain ethnicities weren't considered to have a soul, thus they weren't people. As such, slavery was A-OK! because they weren't really people. I mean, hey, back then, black people weren't real and proper beings because they didn't have a soul. How do you think that attitude would be taken in today's slightly more progressive world?

Here's a thought exercise: Compare that to enslaving the geth due to them not having a "soul." Chew it over for a bit. Let it percolate. Realise you're kind of a horrible person for thinking that way.

Having a "soul" or not has always been nothing more than an excuse for the mistreatment of anything that religious people deem to not have a soul. Whether that's animals or people. And now it extends to the geth, apparently.

Edit: Here's another interesting observation - often those who support controlling the geth, also support destroy. These are both right wing solutions to a problem. Diplomacy is never an option, just shoot at it until it dies, or bend it to your will. It's a very fascist outlook on life. You fear it, therefore it deserves to die or live under your thumb. Then you have people of a more left wing inclination who understand the values of empathy, peace, personal rights, and diplomacy. I was raised in the UK, so naturally I'm more than a little socialist. In my view, providing everyone with good health (synthesis) is a good thing, and not enslaving things I don't understand is also a good thing.

The interesting part of this is that I'm sure that these are viewpoints that the quarian civilians would be fine with, but they're also living under the thumb of Gerrel, they're terrified of the nasty bugger. Koris would agree that enslavement and destruction are both unviable options, and would result in a future where everyone is worse off. That's because Koris is left-leaning himself, and realises that just because a person isn't like him, just because they're strange and exotic, they don't deserve to die.

Basically, Koris isn't a fascist or a racist. I love that guy. But racism--nay, xenophobia--is common amongst the quarians. Gerrel clearly has no love for Shepard, or he wouldn't fire on him whilst he's in a ship whilst that ship's shields are down. I'd honestly say that the quarian military isn't that far away from the batarians, except with the batarians it's kind of thrust down your throat. You're beat over the head with it to make it obvious.

A batarian would fire upon a ship with an ally in it without a second thought if it meant supporting the hegemony, and so would someone of the quarian military. They're not really that different. And I'm not a fan of slavery or genocide. It surprises me that so many people are, but you can't expect all people to be good and ethical. That's too much to ask.

Modifié par Auld Wulf, 07 février 2013 - 02:32 .


#200
GethPrimeMKII

GethPrimeMKII
  • Members
  • 1 052 messages

JesseLee202 wrote...

BleedingUranium wrote...

Dunabar wrote...

BleedingUranium wrote...

justafan wrote...

BleedingUranium wrote...

Oh look, another "I support slavery" thread.


Not "support" necessarily.  More of, "If I can commit genocide why not slavery".  I believe players should have the choice of what war-crime they want to commit.  Outside of the endings of course, they covered the whole range of warcrimes there quite efficiently.


Oh look, another "Destroy is genocide" comment.


Oh look another person who thinks everyone shares the same opinion.

Are Geth alive yes or no? - To some its yes, to some its no.

To those that deem the geth alive its genocide or slavery

To those that deem the geth as not alive its destruction or rewrite.

Opinions are like ***holes, everyone has one and if you don't like someones opinion get your nose out of their ***
B)


You can choose to view the Geth as not being people, but that's doesn't make it so. Some people believe that dark-skinned humans aren't people, this is no different. Some people believe the Earth is flat.

Having an opinion doesn't make you right.

The reason I don't view them as "people", is because I do not believe a machine is capable of ever having a "soul". You cannot prove or disprove the metaphysical. The whole issue about whether the Geth are alive or not, is a matter of opinion.

Do not compare this to skin color.


You think the geth should not be viewed as people because they're not organic like ourselves. This thinking is not too far off from viewing someone with a different skin color as lesser. BleedingUranium's example makes more sense than you'd think.