Aller au contenu

Photo

Could a competitive multiplayer work in the next Mass Effect game?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
85 réponses à ce sujet

#26
sy7ar

sy7ar
  • Members
  • 1 089 messages
make it unique to other shooters, you know having powers, shields and all that ME good stuff. Balance, more balance, especially between powers and weapons, make each power (and weapon) unique and tactical.

#27
Happy Shepard

Happy Shepard
  • Members
  • 2 607 messages
Co-op should be the priority. And if there's a way to do a PvP gamemode, why not?

#28
AjaxDuo

AjaxDuo
  • Members
  • 386 messages
No thanks.

#29
Chrxna

Chrxna
  • Members
  • 137 messages
It would be the final step away from an RPG. In my opinion. At which point I might as well play lolhalo.

#30
Parallax Demon

Parallax Demon
  • Members
  • 406 messages
Please don't do it BW.

If I want to play PvP there're about 100 games I could try.

Making ME4 with a PvP gamemode, would mean you'll have no powers (how OP will Stasis or Biotic Slash will otherwise be), and will render the game into shooter no. 101 released that year.

#31
Rebel_Raven

Rebel_Raven
  • Members
  • 2 326 messages

Boog_89 wrote...

Co-op will always be better than competitive to me.
PVP brings out the worst in people - camping, rage, only using the easiest guns, trash talk in lobbies.

More co-op please.

This. We already see the symptoms and we're not even fighting eachother! Spawn management, spawn nuking, glitching, harrier humping, taking advantage of things that may or may not be working as intended, ad nauseum.

I'd really rather have co-op with less compedtitive edge than ME3's MP. <.<

Not saying the next ME can't have PVP, but if it's the end all and be all, I'll be ignoring it.

#32
ollpet

ollpet
  • Members
  • 640 messages
Its a stupid idea and i hate it.

#33
Simba501

Simba501
  • Members
  • 2 292 messages

AjaxDuo wrote...
No thanks.


Leland Gaunt wrote...

I hope they don't do this... It would be the next step towards making ME the next generic shooter game and that would be really sad.



#34
FatalionPanic

FatalionPanic
  • Members
  • 345 messages

Descy_ wrote...

take out powers, add perks, add killstreaks, make it first person.

killstreaks as in making it easier to kill someone who is already losing?
lolnopls

Powers would work, ever played Magicka? I guess it'd be like that. Powers mustn't be balanced when they make it player skill based.

Modifié par FatalionPanic, 03 février 2013 - 10:37 .


#35
jcamdenlane

jcamdenlane
  • Members
  • 599 messages
Not interested at all in it, but curious if ME4 will need it to be competitive.

#36
luciox

luciox
  • Members
  • 369 messages
How many times this issue has been brought?
NO~!!!!!!!!!!!!!
NONONONONONONONONONONONONONO
And changing the word from PVP to competitive does not make any difference.

#37
LoboFH

LoboFH
  • Members
  • 873 messages
It could work with the concept of Left 4 Dead, Natural Selection, Primal Carnage: one team plays with the "enemies", fast respawn.

equal teams?, it never would work if they don't nerf powers to oblivion, the game would be boring and lackluster.

#38
Atheosis

Atheosis
  • Members
  • 3 519 messages
I don't really care if it could work or not. There are way too many competitive shooters anymore, and Mass Effect MP balance shouldn't be compromised in an attempt to be yet another team deathmatch snorefest.

#39
MaxShine

MaxShine
  • Members
  • 2 160 messages
A lot of people already play this game like it was competitive (which is ridiculous, just go and play a real competitive game instead...). They could just as well make a PvP mode. This would require a complete rebalancing of all powers for PvP mode however, so I doubt it will happen.

Modifié par 100RenegadePoints, 03 février 2013 - 10:59 .


#40
StrawHatMoose

StrawHatMoose
  • Members
  • 3 125 messages

FatalionPanic wrote...

Descy_ wrote...

take out powers, add perks, add killstreaks, make it first person.

killstreaks as in making it easier to kill someone who is already losing?
lolnopls


Powers would work, ever played Magicka? I guess it'd be like that. Powers mustn't be balanced when they make it player skill based.


woosh.

#41
Battlepope190

Battlepope190
  • Members
  • 2 279 messages
Stop suggesting this people. Seriously.

#42
Atheosis

Atheosis
  • Members
  • 3 519 messages

jcamdenlane wrote...

Not interested at all in it, but curious if ME4 will need it to be competitive.


Tacking on competitive MP in an attempt to get a bit of the COD market never seems to actually work for most games.  ME3 MP avoiding that pitfall has been the primary reason it's been relatively successful.  But EA is involved, so I won't be shocked if ME 4 replaces the coop horde mode thing with team deathmatch and kill streaks (God help us all).   

#43
ROBOTICSUPERMAN

ROBOTICSUPERMAN
  • Members
  • 2 658 messages
if it was pvp wouldnt everyone use drell, and use acolyte, reave, cluster grenades?
or krogan vanguard, BC reegar?

it would just come down to who has the best connection, and going by all the threads about connection issues and origin servers, most of the target audience would not play it.

maybe a score based verses would work, it would have to be either 1v1v1v1 or 2v2 playing against AI as the multiplayer is now. 
all objectives give credits depending on how much you/your team helped to complete the objective
the team with the highest score at the end gets a credit bonus
the team who helped more with all the objectives at the end of the game gets bonus credits
using consumables would have a negative effect on your score, missiles etc would be minus a set amount, ammo powers etc would be minus a percentage of total weapon score.

#44
NorGSV

NorGSV
  • Members
  • 11 messages
I'm all in, but only if Bioware made it as an alternative, I must say though Co-op Campaign sounds alot better, I mean ALOT ;)

#45
Atheosis

Atheosis
  • Members
  • 3 519 messages

ROBOTICSUPERMAN wrote...

if it was pvp wouldnt everyone use drell, and use acolyte, reave, cluster grenades?
or krogan vanguard, BC reegar?


Nope.  I'd use a Batarian Soldier with Grenade Capacity V.  It would be so easy it wouldn't even be funny...

#46
FatalionPanic

FatalionPanic
  • Members
  • 345 messages

StrawHatMoose wrote...

woosh.


Context: PvP, asking for adding it = not the killstreaks we already have -> means you PK someone and get a kill streak to PK him even easier again.

lolnopls.
 -_-

#47
sandboxgod

sandboxgod
  • Members
  • 1 457 messages
It can be done. I dont have time to go into detail but I can later.

Boog_89 wrote...

Co-op will always be better than competitive to me.
PVP brings out the worst in people - camping, rage, only using the easiest guns, trash talk in lobbies.

More co-op please.


lol all that happens already.

Camping - FBWGG, firebase giant
Rage - wiping before extraction. Nothing is more scary than a loot **** that is not getting his credits. Trust
Only easiest guns - do we need to elaborate...

#48
StrawHatMoose

StrawHatMoose
  • Members
  • 3 125 messages

FatalionPanic wrote...

StrawHatMoose wrote...

woosh.


Context: PvP, asking for adding it = not the killstreaks we already have -> means you PK someone and get a kill streak to PK him even easier again.

lolnopls.
 -_-



You do realise that he was being sarcastic right?

#49
FatalionPanic

FatalionPanic
  • Members
  • 345 messages

StrawHatMoose wrote...

FatalionPanic wrote...

StrawHatMoose wrote...

woosh.


Context: PvP, asking for adding it = not the killstreaks we already have -> means you PK someone and get a kill streak to PK him even easier again.

lolnopls.
 -_-



You do realise that he was being sarcastic right?


No I didn't - I assume that's because I don't play PvP shooters. :wizard:

#50
Miclotov

Miclotov
  • Members
  • 602 messages
8vs8 Salarian Infiltrator only. Who could possibly need more paranoia?