From
Hardcoresalmon's weapon test:
Hardcoresalmon wrote...
Reload Canceling:
47. Katana X: 16.0s (SC/HVB)
46. Scimitar X: 15.2s (SC/HVB)
43. Eviscerator X: 14.0s (SC/HVB)
36. Disciple X: 12.2s (SC/HVB)
20. Graal X: 9.2s (SC/D)
17. Reegar X: 8.5s (P/HVB)
16. GPS X: 8.4s (C/D)
12. Wraith X: 7.0s (SC/HVB)
9. Claymore X: 6.8s (SC/HVB)
6. Crusader V: 6.7s (P/HVB)
2. Raider X: 5.4s (SC/HVB)
1. Piranha X: 5.2s (SC/HVB)
... doesn't really look OP, does it?
Though that test was done without using ammo - which is the real problem: Incendiary stacking is pretty broken, even more so if combined with Warp. This effect can trivialize boss mobs, though it does so with other rapid firing weapons, too.
Still, considering that a Hurricane can one-clip an Atlas, and the Harrier, PPR, Typhoon and Piranha also trivialize bosses, and at a higher effective range ...
Considering that the Reegar is just as bad at ammo consumption as the Harrier ...
I'd really like to see a good argument for why the Reegar needs to be singled out.
And no, "ease of use" is no valid argument here - for those people for whom this is a noticeable difference, the need to CQC completely nullifies it.
Yeah, Reegar's paper DPS looks OP. But the paper DPS doesn't seem to translate very well to actual use in game.