107 réponses à ce sujet

[Dopy7Dvs]

No.
You wanna play $10/mth for a great game with few bugs...try planetside 2. Thousands of players in a perpetual online world with 3 factions. Where I went from this game...

Modifié par Dopy7Dvs, 05 février 2013 - 11:48 .

[P51Mus7ang]

Depends on the game in question, it`s highly unlikely. I would rather buy a known product or at least know a little about it, subscriptions are not my thing in any area of life and it`s not the money.

[Hengeyokai]

never

[Pyroninja42]

Yes!

C-C-Combo breaker.

In all seriousness, hell no.

[10K]

Nope. MP isn't that awesome.

[solidprice]

Mr SeVerS wrote...

From EA? NOPE.jpg

[CapitateGoose]

Bimonthly DLC  ?!?!?! This would be very boring.

So no.

Modifié par CapitateGoose, 05 février 2013 - 11:58 .

[Qui-Gon Glenn]

lolno

[oknenah]

I would pay for individual DLC or for a Season Pass but not for a monthly subscription. What if they get delayed on a DLC? it would make it $30 or more for one dlc.

[Julian Skies]

If I believed that one could get a flawless DLC in two months, then yes.
However much I love the BW staff, though, they're merely humans and I wouldn't impose that sort of crazy deadline on them.

[Das Rouse]

Nope, that would enforce more deadlines and probably unpolished content. As if there wasn't enough of that last DLC. Let them get it right the first time. An old moral from an Aesop Fable goes "Quality is better than quantity."

[Seducing-Pinata]

Bessy067 wrote...

Do you mean twice a month? If twice a month then maybe.

You're thinking semi-monthly. Bimonthly means it would be once every two months.

And to answer the question, no.

[Charaxan]

Yeah right. Mass Effect 3 mp : 549 characters, 9248 weapons, 192 maps, 127 players (and counting). That would be great.

[Rutxa]

NO.

[Major Mittens]

Depends on the amount of content and for how long. Ten bucks is very low for a Season Pass, so I probably would get it.

[COLZ7R]

Nope, payed dlc is a great way to fracture the playerbase

[crashmatusow]

If they fixed most of the bugs and implemented a more sensible unlock system, yeah i'd pay $10 every other month.

Every other week though? Ugh.

[Steppdaddy2]

Hell yes

[dava6711]

I'd happily pay for each DLC installment if it was a quality/finished product, new factions, maps, objectives etc as it would keep Bioware supporting the game we love!

[oO Stryfe Oo]

Each and every single one would have to be as big as Retaliation and include kits as diverse as Earth. They guarantee that once every two months, I'd gladly pay.

[DrunkenGamerTrae]

No simply because it would split player-base.

[UnRestrikted]

Nope. Not if we have to deal with the store in its current state, excessive stunlock, false difficulty and lack of other game modes.

[skergx120]

Hell no -- Only if the DLC includes HUB worlds, Dynamic missions, god damn boss battles, removed RNG store and improved RPG elements. Oh, and improved melee combat -- I expect my Vanguard to have a giant claymore infused with the power of my biotics, not a wimpy katana... come to think of it, I sort of miss Phantasy Star now.

[palmof40sorrows]

Yes.

[The Makr]

No, but I probably would buy a DLC "Season Pass" type setup, or the equivalent of COD Elite where you receive your content for an overall reduced price. This would of course have to include single and multiplayer content.