107 réponses à ce sujet

[Necrotron]

400+ hours into this game, I'd say yes.  Thankfully, it's been included in the base price and helps keep the population high, which helps multiplayer flourish overall.

Modifié par Bathaius, 06 février 2013 - 02:59 .

[vonSlash]

Unless the DLC released fully customizable classes, no.

And even then, I'd quit paying after two months.

[Variasaber]

Nope. When I play multiplayer games, I want longevity. I have never played a game that required me to pay a subscription fee (unless you count Xbox Live, and even then I can't stand paying for it). If we had DLC every two and a half weeks, it couldn't possibly be as big as the DLC we've been having now. I like the DLC system as it is. We get good content and get to enjoy it for plenty of time.

If I wanted expansions frequently enough that I'd have to play 2 hours a day just to keep up with unlocking the new weapons and such, I'd play Team Fortress 2.

[lightswitch]

I have so much time invested in this game at this point that I'll pretty much go along with whatever Bioware decides they want to do.

Hopefully they don't start beating me.

[Grumpy Old Wizard]

Noperzz.

[Vlark]

Not monthly but every two months or pay directly for the DLC? Maybe , yeah. But many wouldn't and then i would stop paying because there are no players at all.

[CitizenThom]

Yes, if said DLC is on a game that doesn't include anything in the way of perpetual staggerlock or spite spawns.

That said, I've purchased single player DLC for ME2 and ME3 alike in addition to pre-ordering both ME2 and ME3... and buying ME1 the first day it was on PSN.

[orehlol]

 Noooooooo! we would still have to unlock everything

[BayushiPochi]

If I can buy what I want instead of RNG, sure... if not, then no.

[DeadeyeCYclops]

SAY NOPE TO DOPE, and $10 dollar a month bi- monthly DLC

[Mendelevosa]

I would rather pay $10 per month for a better store system and bug fixes.

Modifié par Mendelevosa, 06 février 2013 - 03:34 .

[DoubleHell]

No to paid for DLC - this would fragment the player base.

[.458]

No.

[SafetyShattered]

Hm.....it really depends on how much content I'm getting. If I'm getting a fair amount then yes, I probably would. If it's just like extra skins for weapons or something like that then of course I wouldn't.

[EvoSigma]

With RNG being RNG, no way as there's no guarantee that I'll even get access to the new content that I would have to PAY FOR which would really make no sense. Buy a product and get a slight chance to receive it? No....

[Praxus07]

Nope. First off I wouldn't be able to afford it. Second I didn't buy any of the single player dlc since it was overpriced IMHO, so would def not pay for multiplayer dlc either.

[ISHYGDDT]

No because it would probably be crap.

[wartser]

there's a reason I'm on PSN and not xbox live.

Hint: it has to do with money.

[JerZey CJ]

With the way their "new" classes are? Hell no.

[Syrus101]

No.

I have a passionate hate for Subscriptions... and even from IP's that I have respected in the past... as soon as I see "subscribe" all interest and respect is lost...


unlike some people I dont have the luxury to throw in $10 - $20 on a game that I should OWN and not RENT... I can throw money into a game on occasions like some F2P titles and what not but a Sub? ye-no

[SwizzyR]

No, by my simple maths that's $120USD a year. That's some serious cheese for....a video game...

[GAMEofDEATH-PS3]

Psylis wrote...

Topic says it all.

NO NO NO!!!
Why would you post something like this are you brainless???
Seriously this is taboo talking about paying for something like
a DLC on a forum that only ppl who own the game can post
on....
Not to mention it well never happen.
Fact is you dont ever never never talk about what you would
pay for on a game forum when are ppl gonna wise the hell up.................

[parico]

not anymore they should have charged from beginning. This games on life support right now. Pugs are terrible and many I used to play with have moved on. I myself am pretty much bored to the point I dont even care if we get anymore dlc. I'm just waiting for a couple of games that come out soon before retiring for good.

[khannoir]

No, the Micro transaction model works fine the way it is. Scratch that...IF they had made the Arsenal and Reserves Packs purchase only, then it would have more than well funded more DLC expenditures. Id love to see a purchase pack that had a higher percentage of an UR, but I also likewise know teh game would quickly devolve if that was ever the case...

[crashmatusow]

Just think if you skipped eating out here and there you could support the devs.

I'd rather pay for the dlc than pay for a booster pack.