Steelcan wrote...
Ieldra2 wrote...
There are several themes and messages in Destroy I passionately disagree with in the context of the story. Namely "Destroy the abominations and all which is of them, for it will lead us down a path that will destroy what we are" (Romanticism), then "Only organic life is valid life" (sacred nature), and "The Reapers can't get away with this" (karma as justice) and several more. Destroy comes across to me as a choice steeped in traditionalism and Romantic notions about human nature. The EC compromised the thematic integrity of Destroy so that it's now not quite as sharply defined, but it's still very noticeable.
. I don't get that at all. I see Destroy as rejecting the cycles. It affirms the galaxy's right to self determinate, synthetics included.
That too, as well as being the only epilogue-narration that felt appropriate to a galactic war, unlike departing into God-Imperium - definitely anything but the "romantic", "good" type - or Kingdom Come. But then again, that may just be me...
Speaking of "Romanticism", does Green not constitute the perfect example of a hopelessly naive, romantic "Golden Age"
/Utopia?
I suppose some people enjoy interpreting it as a last breath in order to
make it feel like a "heroic sacrifice", and I'm sure thinking about
Shepard's death being unavoidable factors into the decision-making
process of some control and synthesis supporters.
I don't like it, since it is incredily disappointing storytelling, but I get it.
Wasn't the EMS-system supposed to cater to that sort of thing: do things just-so and Shepards' fates are sealed, etc?
Insofar, I find clinging to "ambiguity" where there is none to be had to be needlessly defying sense.