Aller au contenu

Photo

Did BioWare ever actually say that the breath scene was just an "Easter egg"?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
468 réponses à ce sujet

#76
wright1978

wright1978
  • Members
  • 8 116 messages

MegaSovereign wrote...

Shepard's fate =/= entire point of ending

Control and Synthesis had some jarringly ambigious parts to them.


When you have an epilogue and slides that show life well after the battle, not clarifying the fate of the central character in one ending is cheap and nasty.

Control even has an entire epilogue voiced by Shepalyst, dispelling the ambiguity around it.

#77
Steelcan

Steelcan
  • Members
  • 23 292 messages

Ieldra2 wrote...

There are several themes and messages in Destroy I passionately disagree with in the context of the story. Namely "Destroy the abominations and all which is of them, for it will lead us down a path that will destroy what we are" (Romanticism), then "Only organic life is valid life" (sacred nature), and "The Reapers can't get away with this" (karma as justice) and several more. Destroy comes across to me as a choice steeped in traditionalism and Romantic notions about human nature. The EC compromised the thematic integrity of Destroy so that it's now not quite as sharply defined, but it's still very noticeable.

. I don't get that at all.  I see Destroy as rejecting the cycles.  It affirms the galaxy's right to self determinate, synthetics included.  

#78
Peranor

Peranor
  • Members
  • 4 003 messages

EpicBoot2daFace wrote...

Chris Priestly wrote...

I never said it was an Easter Egg (at least, I dont remember ever saying that, and if I did I was wrong, because it is not an Easter egg).

The breath scene is there for fans who want to see Shepard's first breath after the end or his last breath after the end. It is up to the interpretation of the player as to which it is.



:devil:

Bullocks. We all know it means he's alive. Showing his last breath would be a waste of time.


Yeah. As leldra2 said; it's just an inexplicable refusal to admit what it actually means.

#79
dreamgazer

dreamgazer
  • Members
  • 15 752 messages

Argolas wrote...

I consider this post by Tully Ackland and some tweets from Jessica Merizan pretty clear about Shepard's fate in that ending, but I guess I am fine with different interpretations although I may not understand them.


I suppose some people enjoy interpreting it as a last breath in order to make it feel like a "heroic sacrifice", and I'm sure thinking about Shepard's death being unavoidable factors into the decision-making process of some control and synthesis supporters. 

I don't like it, since it is incredibly disappointing storytelling, but I get it.

Modifié par dreamgazer, 07 février 2013 - 11:03 .


#80
TheInquisitor

TheInquisitor
  • Members
  • 757 messages

futurepixels wrote...

Yeah, this is definitive:

"This is meant to suggest that the love interest is not ready to believe Shepard is dead, and the final scene reveals they are correct."


'As the Normandy lifts off, there is hope that the love interest and Shepard will again be together.'

Pity we will never see it.

#81
o Ventus

o Ventus
  • Members
  • 17 275 messages

Steelcan wrote...

Exactly.  There is no reason to show someone who was just blown up dying.  But showing them alive requires something extra.  Like a little scene confirming it.


Which is well and good. 

Except the breath scene is one of the most illogical things to occur in the game. Shepard has:

-Soaked a near miss by Harbinger (possible fragmentation, as well as the immense heat from Harbinger's gun)
-3rd degree burns from his or her armor melting while being worn
-Shot in the shoulder by Marauder Shields (which could lead to Shepard bleeding out due to lack of kinetic barriers)
-Profuse bleeding after the Illusive Man confrontation
-Walking into the explosion after shooting the tube (which is later seen decimating the entire presidium)

He should be more dead than he was when Miranda brought him back with Lazarus. At least then they had tissue to clone. Here, there shouldn't even BE anything left to breathe.

#82
Steelcan

Steelcan
  • Members
  • 23 292 messages
I don't know about you guys but I never said good bye to my LI on the Beam run, and she wasnt at the memorial scene

#83
MegaSovereign

MegaSovereign
  • Members
  • 10 794 messages

Ieldra2 wrote...

MegaSovereign wrote...

Ieldra2 wrote...

CosmicGnosis wrote...

crimzontearz wrote...

In regards to the breath scene




Posted Image

Brenon Holmes
09:40 AM 2012-03-06
So yeah, there's a secret Shepard lives ending - it's not super happy though. It's more like a movie trailer thing where it hints at a sequel (there is no sequel, afaik - I'm just using it to illustrate the type of cinematic).

Take it as you will, this came to me after he spoke to Preston about it AND before the interpretation crap started


Well that's interesting. The thing is... I don't know if the current "Shepard lives" ending is worth accepting certain thematic issues that I have with Destroy.

For me it's not. I can mentally change Shepard's death in my ending, but the thematic issues with Destroy are intrinstic.

It's noteworthy though, that Brenon Holmes called this a "Shepard lives" ending. It was always that to me. I can't imagine that people would actually want their protagonist to die, so this "it's open to interpretation" thing is just an inexplicable refusal to admit what it means.


I'm curious...What thematic issues with Destroy do you speak of?

There are several themes and messages in Destroy I passionately disagree with in the context of the story. Namely "Destroy the abominations and all which is of them, for it will lead us down a path that will destroy what we are" (Romanticism), then "Only organic life is valid life" (sacred nature), and "The Reapers can't get away with this" (karma as justice) and several more. Destroy comes across to me as a choice steeped in traditionalism and Romantic notions about human nature. The EC compromised the thematic integrity of Destroy so that it's now not quite as sharply defined, but it's still very noticeable.


Using the Reapers as galactic tools is validation of their existence.

Romanticism is as much of a "thematic issue" as transcendentalism. I thought you were going to point out objective thematic flaws of the ending.

#84
wright1978

wright1978
  • Members
  • 8 116 messages

Steelcan wrote...

I don't know about you guys but I never said good bye to my LI on the Beam run, and she wasnt at the memorial scene


Don't worry your not alone in that.

#85
Steelcan

Steelcan
  • Members
  • 23 292 messages

o Ventus wrote...
Which is well and good. 

Except the breath scene is one of the most illogical things to occur in the game. Shepard has:

-Soaked a near miss by Harbinger (possible fragmentation, as well as the immense heat from Harbinger's gun)
-3rd degree burns from his or her armor melting while being worn
-Shot in the shoulder by Marauder Shields (which could lead to Shepard bleeding out due to lack of kinetic barriers)
-Profuse bleeding after the Illusive Man confrontation
-Walking into the explosion after shooting the tube (which is later seen decimating the entire presidium)

He should be more dead than he was when Miranda brought him back with Lazarus. At least then they had tissue to clone. Here, there shouldn't even BE anything left to breathe.

. Doesn't matter. there is zero reason to show him dying in a short scene.  It's only purpose is to shoe Shepard's survival, no matter how illogical

#86
TheInquisitor

TheInquisitor
  • Members
  • 757 messages

Steelcan wrote...

I don't know about you guys but I never said good bye to my LI on the Beam run, and she wasnt at the memorial scene


Must be one of the ME2 LI's, Steve or Traynor

#87
Peranor

Peranor
  • Members
  • 4 003 messages

o Ventus wrote...

Steelcan wrote...

Exactly.  There is no reason to show someone who was just blown up dying.  But showing them alive requires something extra.  Like a little scene confirming it.


Which is well and good. 

Except the breath scene is one of the most illogical things to occur in the game. Shepard has:

-Soaked a near miss by Harbinger (possible fragmentation, as well as the immense heat from Harbinger's gun)
-3rd degree burns from his or her armor melting while being worn
-Shot in the shoulder by Marauder Shields (which could lead to Shepard bleeding out due to lack of kinetic barriers)
-Profuse bleeding after the Illusive Man confrontation
-Walking into the explosion after shooting the tube (which is later seen decimating the entire presidium)

He should be more dead than he was when Miranda brought him back with Lazarus. At least then they had tissue to clone. Here, there shouldn't even BE anything left to breathe.



Yepp. The scene is just... Improbable.
It obvious what Bioware wanted to hint at with that scene. That Shepard is alive. (Even though they don't dare admit it). But that doesn't make the scene less ridiculous  ^_^

#88
futurepixels

futurepixels
  • Members
  • 589 messages
The main thing to take away from this thread is... SHEPARD LIVES SUCKERS!

And also, you should feel bad if you picked Synthesis or Control.  Very, very bad.

Modifié par futurepixels, 07 février 2013 - 11:01 .


#89
Chashan

Chashan
  • Members
  • 1 654 messages

Steelcan wrote...

Ieldra2 wrote...

There are several themes and messages in Destroy I passionately disagree with in the context of the story. Namely "Destroy the abominations and all which is of them, for it will lead us down a path that will destroy what we are" (Romanticism), then "Only organic life is valid life" (sacred nature), and "The Reapers can't get away with this" (karma as justice) and several more. Destroy comes across to me as a choice steeped in traditionalism and Romantic notions about human nature. The EC compromised the thematic integrity of Destroy so that it's now not quite as sharply defined, but it's still very noticeable.

. I don't get that at all.  I see Destroy as rejecting the cycles.  It affirms the galaxy's right to self determinate, synthetics included.  


That too, as well as being the only epilogue-narration that felt appropriate to a galactic war, unlike departing into God-Imperium - definitely anything but the "romantic", "good" type - or Kingdom Come. But then again, that may just be me...
Speaking of "Romanticism", does Green not constitute the perfect example of a hopelessly naive, romantic "Golden Age"/Utopia?

I suppose some people enjoy interpreting it as a last breath in order to
make it feel like a "heroic sacrifice", and I'm sure thinking about
Shepard's death being unavoidable factors into the decision-making
process of some control and synthesis supporters. 

I don't like it, since it is incredily disappointing storytelling, but I get it.


Wasn't the EMS-system supposed to cater to that sort of thing: do things just-so and Shepards' fates are sealed, etc?

Insofar, I find clinging to "ambiguity" where there is none to be had to be needlessly defying sense.

#90
ohaithere

ohaithere
  • Members
  • 183 messages
"Pity we'll never see it." is right. I'd definitely have stomached the end better if I knew not to hope in vain for a DLC to give me a conclusion to this trilogy.

#91
Renmiri1

Renmiri1
  • Members
  • 6 009 messages
You are going to have to wait for fan mods

#92
Iakus

Iakus
  • Members
  • 30 349 messages

Chris Priestly wrote...

The breath scene is there for fans who want to see Shepard's first breath after the end or his last breath after the end. It is up to the interpretation of the player as to which it is.


As I've said before, it's a pity that the one ending where Shepard "lives" has to be interpreted as such by the player, when every other ending has Shepard explicitly dying.

#93
cyrslash1974

cyrslash1974
  • Members
  • 646 messages
Regarding breath scene :

http://www.gameranx....-it-s-official/

http://www.dsogaming...-mass-effect-3/

http://social.biowar.../index/12758618

#94
Ieldra

Ieldra
  • Members
  • 25 188 messages

Steelcan wrote...

Ieldra2 wrote...

There are several themes and messages in Destroy I passionately disagree with in the context of the story. Namely "Destroy the abominations and all which is of them, for it will lead us down a path that will destroy what we are" (Romanticism), then "Only organic life is valid life" (sacred nature), and "The Reapers can't get away with this" (karma as justice) and several more. Destroy comes across to me as a choice steeped in traditionalism and Romantic notions about the "natural". The EC compromised the thematic integrity of Destroy so that it's now not quite as sharply defined, but it's still very noticeable.

. I don't get that at all.  I see Destroy as rejecting the cycles.  It affirms the galaxy's right to self determinate, synthetics included.  

All choices end the cycle, so that doesn't count.

As for self-determination, Destroy is indeed the choice that emphasizes this more than the others, but it only applies to organics since there are no more synthetics, and it sacrifices advancement for it. It's like DX1's "New Dark Age", another ending which I would never, ever choose, except that the EC retconned the technological regression which should thematically accompany it. Also, this assertion of self-determination destroys the legacy of past cycles, so it buys its autonomy with death and destruction of knowledge. We are only ever completely autonomous if there is nobody left we must accommodate. As I see it, the "unity in diversity" is meaningless if it isn't prepared to accommodate the truly "other".  

Note that these are thematic concerns. The military rationale of Destroy I can accept as valid. But nothing else.

#95
wright1978

wright1978
  • Members
  • 8 116 messages

iakus wrote...

Chris Priestly wrote...

The breath scene is there for fans who want to see Shepard's first breath after the end or his last breath after the end. It is up to the interpretation of the player as to which it is.


As I've said before, it's a pity that the one ending where Shepard "lives" has to be interpreted as such by the player, when every other ending has Shepard explicitly dying.


This

#96
Auld Wulf

Auld Wulf
  • Members
  • 1 284 messages
It was meant to be his last breath, representing the melancholy of the ending and lamenting Shepard's insanity. That's why you'll only see it as a part of Destroy. The geth are dead, EDI is dead, all of the civilisations preserved by the reaper consensus are dead, the best hope for rebuilding what's been lost has been blown into the aether...

What's left? If people discover Shepard's inclination toward's mass genocide, then he's going to be remembered as a heartless savage, an implacatable monster driven more by his bloodlust than anything else. It's a truly undignified ending, a man dying alone for his sins. And he does die alone. Think about it, it makes sense.

Synthesis Shepard creates a lasting peace, galactic empathy, and a better life and future for all.

Control Shepard ends up leading the reaper consensus.

Destroy Shepard just dies, cold and alone.

Each represents their choice.

#97
MegaSovereign

MegaSovereign
  • Members
  • 10 794 messages

Auld Wulf wrote...

It was meant to be his last breath, representing the melancholy of the ending and lamenting Shepard's insanity. That's why you'll only see it as a part of Destroy. The geth are dead, EDI is dead, all of the civilisations preserved by the reaper consensus are dead, the best hope for rebuilding what's been lost has been blown into the aether...

What's left? If people discover Shepard's inclination toward's mass genocide, then he's going to be remembered as a heartless savage, an implacatable monster driven more by his bloodlust than anything else. It's a truly undignified ending, a man dying alone for his sins. And he does die alone. Think about it, it makes sense.

Synthesis Shepard creates a lasting peace, galactic empathy, and a better life and future for all.

Control Shepard ends up leading the reaper consensus.

Destroy Shepard just dies, cold and alone.

Each represents their choice.


That was really depressing to read.

#98
crimzontearz

crimzontearz
  • Members
  • 16 788 messages

Auld Wulf wrote...

It was meant to be his last breath, representing the melancholy of the ending and lamenting Shepard's insanity. That's why you'll only see it as a part of Destroy. The geth are dead, EDI is dead, all of the civilisations preserved by the reaper consensus are dead, the best hope for rebuilding what's been lost has been blown into the aether...

What's left? If people discover Shepard's inclination toward's mass genocide, then he's going to be remembered as a heartless savage, an implacatable monster driven more by his bloodlust than anything else. It's a truly undignified ending, a man dying alone for his sins. And he does die alone. Think about it, it makes sense.

Synthesis Shepard creates a lasting peace, galactic empathy, and a better life and future for all.

Control Shepard ends up leading the reaper consensus.

Destroy Shepard just dies, cold and alone.

Each represents their choice.

lol no...devs say otherwise....troll harder

#99
Peranor

Peranor
  • Members
  • 4 003 messages

Grubas wrote...

What is the point for a last-breath-scene anyway?


it starts with an S and ends with Peculations

#100
wright1978

wright1978
  • Members
  • 8 116 messages

Steelcan wrote...

 I don't get that at all.  I see Destroy as rejecting the cycles.  It affirms the galaxy's right to self determinate, synthetics included.  


Yeah destroy is choosing freedom to develop for both organics and future synthetics. Loss of current synthetics is a steep price but it pales before the sacrifice that gets made in the other 2 endings.