Honestly, I read this article without the slightest preconception. Never heard of the author, don't have a beef with PC Gamers (on the principle that everyone makes mistake and you shouldn't be held accountable for the faults of your neighbour etc...). I even agree with it on some points.Dorrieb wrote...
Telling a professional writer that his article is indistinguishable from fan feedback is like telling J.K. Rowling that her books aren't any better than your 14-year old niece's fan fiction, or telling an abstract painter that 'your five-year old could do that'. It's a dis. A deliberate one. You know that career you've spent the last 17 years in, that you've dedicated your life to, that you're supposed to be really good at? Well guess what? You're no better than a bored student typing out half-considered thoughts in between bites of cheesy snacks. Whaddya think of that, huh Shakespeare?
But the first thing I thought was that it was anything but professional. There are blatant research failures. Loghain's beard, for instance. I know he corrected it, but after someone pointed it to him in the comments, and his credibility started to plummet from there: The screenie of DAO to illustrate a point about DA2, then the criticism of DA being too manichean, while anyone who played DAO (and DA2), knows it isn't the case, and it went on and on...
It doesn't help that it's presented as an universal opinion ("we"), or at least the one shared by Those Who Know What Good Is, a beautiful crowd of True Gamers in which the author includes himself and his readers.
Each and every point and the corresponding argumentation seem to magically match the more vocal internet posters (again, whether I agree or not), down to the mandatory but oh so tired Witcher 2 comparison, equating the latter's maturity to the amount of sex and violence contained (while the Witcher's maturity lies elsewhere entirely). I'm sorry, but it sounds very much like a "let's please the horde" essay. An exercise in demagogy more than a genuine analysis.
Keep in mind that I (and probably most if not all posters here) criticize the article, not the man who wrote it, so your defensiveness is a bit misplaced. You're perfectly OK with the enormous amount of criticism in this article, why aren't you with ours? Opinions are opinions and should be respected as such, no matter where they come from (as long as they don't disguise themselves as vox populi and try to gain credibility by being an "Article" instead of a list of demands that have already been made a thousand times).
Also comparing a game article with Rowling or Shakespeare is overkill. Seriously.
((And Rowling certainly doesn't write 14-year old's fanfic, but, Maker, that epilogue...
))
Retour en haut
That's about as far from my experience in writing for the magazine, and knowing my colleagues and their work ethic, as a statement could possibly be. But, I wouldn't expect people to get the ins and outs of it. 
