Aller au contenu

Photo

Batarian Vanguard


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
42 réponses à ce sujet

#26
Blind2Society

Blind2Society
  • Members
  • 7 576 messages

megabeast37215 wrote...

Blind2Society wrote...

Still don't think lash is necessary, by any stretch of the imagination, on the batguard.


Without it... it's an extremely bland kit. All you have is charge, shoot and melee... it gets old pretty quick.

Why don't you try it before passing judgement... you might find that you really like it.


So you're just going to assume I haven't tried it are ya?  I have tried it, it's a pointless to spec into it and it's not bland in the slightest.

Modifié par Blind2Society, 11 février 2013 - 03:19 .


#27
Original Twigman

Original Twigman
  • Members
  • 4 363 messages

Blind2Society wrote...

megabeast37215 wrote...

Blind2Society wrote...

Still don't think lash is necessary, by any stretch of the imagination, on the batguard.


Without it... it's an extremely bland kit. All you have is charge, shoot and melee... it gets old pretty quick.

Why don't you try it before passing judgement... you might find that you really like it.


So you're just going to assume I haven't tried it are ya?  I have tried it, it's a pointless to spec into it and it's not bland in the slightest.


Pointless?

Your viewpoint is a bit misinformed

#28
Blind2Society

Blind2Society
  • Members
  • 7 576 messages

Original Stikman wrote...

Pointless?

Your viewpoint is a bit misinformed


"unorthodox" in the first line. Misinformed? I think not. You can keep your build while I destroy everything with falcon punches and baseball bats.

#29
Original Twigman

Original Twigman
  • Members
  • 4 363 messages

Blind2Society wrote...

Original Stikman wrote...

Pointless?

Your viewpoint is a bit misinformed


"unorthodox" in the first line. Misinformed? I think not. You can keep your build while I destroy everything with falcon punches and baseball bats.


you said it was pointless. I have a build that shows its not. It is very useful.

Misinformed, yes, otherwise you wouldn't have said that.

Besides, the build will eliminate enemies faster and in greater quantity. Not sure why the need to brush something off because its "unorthodox"

#30
megabeast37215

megabeast37215
  • Members
  • 13 626 messages

Original Stikman wrote...

Blind2Society wrote...

Original Stikman wrote...

Pointless?

Your viewpoint is a bit misinformed


"unorthodox" in the first line. Misinformed? I think not. You can keep your build while I destroy everything with falcon punches and baseball bats.


you said it was pointless. I have a build that shows its not. It is very useful.

Misinformed, yes, otherwise you wouldn't have said that.

Besides, the build will eliminate enemies faster and in greater quantity. Not sure why the need to brush something off because its "unorthodox"


I can respect someone having a different opinion.... I just don't get why dude is being such a ****** about this. It's a Freakin' Batguard build... how does something so insignificant generate such hateful animosity?

#31
Original Twigman

Original Twigman
  • Members
  • 4 363 messages

megabeast37215 wrote...

Original Stikman wrote...

Blind2Society wrote...

Original Stikman wrote...

Pointless?

Your viewpoint is a bit misinformed


"unorthodox" in the first line. Misinformed? I think not. You can keep your build while I destroy everything with falcon punches and baseball bats.


you said it was pointless. I have a build that shows its not. It is very useful.

Misinformed, yes, otherwise you wouldn't have said that.

Besides, the build will eliminate enemies faster and in greater quantity. Not sure why the need to brush something off because its "unorthodox"


I can respect someone having a different opinion.... I just don't get why dude is being such a ****** about this. It's a Freakin' Batguard build... how does something so insignificant generate such hateful animosity?


i'd say more uptight than hateful. Maybe a bit prudish, too. Ironic, as the build needlessly defened is a Brawler that apparently is solely intended for punching the heads off of enemies

#32
Zorinho20_CRO

Zorinho20_CRO
  • Members
  • 3 252 messages

The Krauser wrote...

I spec out of it entirely and go full melee. Besides, it's awesome to surf with the body and who doesn't like that?



#33
megabeast37215

megabeast37215
  • Members
  • 13 626 messages

Original Stikman wrote...
i'd say more uptight than hateful. Maybe a bit prudish, too. Ironic, as the build needlessly defened is a Brawler that apparently is solely intended for punching the heads off of enemies


Inorite?

He says "I Charge and Punch heads off."

I say "I Charge, Lash and Punch heads off."

He says "That's stupid and that character has no business doing that."

Image IPB

#34
Original Twigman

Original Twigman
  • Members
  • 4 363 messages

megabeast37215 wrote...

Original Stikman wrote...
i'd say more uptight than hateful. Maybe a bit prudish, too. Ironic, as the build needlessly defened is a Brawler that apparently is solely intended for punching the heads off of enemies


Inorite?

He says "I Charge and Punch heads off."

I say "I Charge, Lash and Punch heads off."

He says "That's stupid and that character has no business doing that."

Image IPB


i spent a good amount of time lashing marauders earlier with the sole intention of just watching them fly...

love lash

#35
Blind2Society

Blind2Society
  • Members
  • 7 576 messages
I see no difference between what you're doing and what I'm doing. Lash is pointless in my eyes and that's that. It's clearly not in yours but don't say I'm misinformed because I don't see a need for it.

Different strokes for different folks.

And I have no idea where your getting "hateful", "uptight" or anything else of the sort from. Your posts sound just like mine to me.

Modifié par Blind2Society, 11 février 2013 - 05:29 .


#36
Original Twigman

Original Twigman
  • Members
  • 4 363 messages

Blind2Society wrote...

I see no difference between what you're doing and what I'm doing. Lash is pointless in my eyes and that's that. It's clearly not in yours but don't say I'm misinformed because I don't see a need for it.

Different strokes for different folks.

And I have no idea where your getting "hateful", "uptight" or anything else of the sort from. Your posts sound just like mine to me.


well, if you prefer to have a narrow view, thats fine.

#37
Blind2Society

Blind2Society
  • Members
  • 7 576 messages

Original Stikman wrote...

well, if you prefer to have a narrow view, thats fine.


Call it narrow if you like but health and weapon damage are much more important on a melee character than a power that only deals with one enemy and has a long animation with no invincibility frames.

#38
Original Twigman

Original Twigman
  • Members
  • 4 363 messages

Blind2Society wrote...

Original Stikman wrote...

well, if you prefer to have a narrow view, thats fine.


Call it narrow if you like but health and weapon damage are much more important on a melee character than a power that only deals with one enemy and has a long animation with no invincibility frames.


and this is where the misinformed part comes.

My build wasn't a melee character. I don't do the same thing as you do, not sure where you got that.

Its a narrow view because you rule out something without being willing to accept a possible alternative. You seem engrained in your position (digging your heels in), so i'll just leave it at that unless you want to have more dialogue vs. debate from a very personal premise.

#39
Blind2Society

Blind2Society
  • Members
  • 7 576 messages
Let's have a look back shall we? You called me misinformed yet I use him as a melee character. So apparently you were misinformed. It is, indeedm poitless the way I play him.

Modifié par Blind2Society, 11 février 2013 - 06:16 .


#40
Original Twigman

Original Twigman
  • Members
  • 4 363 messages

Blind2Society wrote...

Let's have a look back shall we? You called me misinformed yet I use him as a melee character. So apparently you were misinformed. It is, indeedm poitless the way I play him.


right

Modifié par Original Stikman, 11 février 2013 - 06:17 .


#41
mistervirginia

mistervirginia
  • Members
  • 775 messages
i run a pure shields/weapons build with a Piranha X. i just recently re-spec'd him this way. wasn't able to take him on Gold before but i can now with ease.
Charge>Piranha to the face. rinse/repeat. just lol fun

#42
kipac

kipac
  • Members
  • 3 350 messages
Just deal everything with BC + Blade Armor + heavy melee hate surf.
That DR is just.. WoW!
I use Wraith.

#43
STRANGE10VE

STRANGE10VE
  • Members
  • 749 messages
I used to run him without lash but I now find a lot of utility in that power.  Blade armor rank 5 is pointless, you don't need shield recharge for a vanguard and melee returned is bugged and kind of retarded.  I can't speak for anyone else but I try very hard not to get meleed.  The choices at rank six, power speed penalty or 10% DR, are ok but unnecessary.  Do you really need 10% more DR on a vanguard that already has 25% DR and big shields/health?  If you skip those two ranks in BA you can put  4 ranks in lash.  Lash helps in dealing with trash mobs, gives you a detonator and allows you to have a lot of fun hatesurfing.  My new build.

Modifié par STRANGE10VE, 11 février 2013 - 07:11 .