281 réponses à ce sujet

[Enhanced]

Oh oh, people are starting to post unnessary pictures, this thread will end up like the last "I hate EDI's body"  thread.

Modifié par Enhanced, 11 février 2013 - 03:09 .

[hau101]

Enhanced wrote...

Oh oh, people are starting to post unnessary pictures, this thread will end up like the last "I hate EDI's body"  thread.

What, the (admittedly) huge mug of her face I just posted? Too sexy and stereotype for this thread?

[Enhanced]

hau101 wrote...

Enhanced wrote...

Oh oh, people are starting to post unnessary pictures, this thread will end up like the last "I hate EDI's body"  thread.

What, the (admittedly) huge mug of her face I just posted? Too sexy and stereotype for this thread?

Not yours, the other one on that page.

[Clayless]

At the end of the day it's just sexism.

All guys can be incredibly attractive and have perfect bodies because. Girls can't because they're not supposed to be attractive.

Sexism in other words.

[DaosX]

Doesn't really bother me. I recently had a chance to watch the Battlestar Galactica series and Tricia Helfer (EDI's voice actress) has a stunningly gorgeous bod (not to mention she's just phenomenal in it, acting-wise, as well). I think EDI's new duds is like a kudos to it as well.

[ZLurps]

Robosexual wrote...

At the end of the day it's just sexism.

All guys can be incredibly attractive and have perfect bodies because. Girls can't because they're not supposed to be attractive.

Sexism in other words.

That's not the point. The thing is that at some point fan service starts to eat plausibility of setting if setting is not established with such elements (bikini chain mails for example) from the beginning.

Where the line is crossed when immersion breaks, that varies with everone but in general references from real world. Every step away from that brings audience closer to line where immersion breaks. Sexing up characters, male or female is actually more problematic than say, thermal clips or moving Citadel, because how we are wired makes it more difficult audience to process it by head canoning. phys.org/news5763.html

[Clayless]

ZLurps wrote...

Robosexual wrote...

At the end of the day it's just sexism.

All guys can be incredibly attractive and have perfect bodies because. Girls can't because they're not supposed to be attractive.

Sexism in other words.

That's not the point. The thing is that at some point fan service starts to eat plausibility of setting if setting is not established with such elements (bikini chain mails for example) from the beginning.

Where the line is crossed when immersion breaks, that varies with everone but in general references from real world. Every step away from that brings audience closer to line where immersion breaks. Sexing up characters, male or female is actually more problematic than say, thermal clips or moving Citadel, because how we are wired makes it more difficult audience to process it by head canoning. phys.org/news5763.html

Thing is the only person this applies to is Ashley, and even then it's countered by all the females in the Alliance that don't have big boobs, including Shepard, and all the perfect males.

Miranda is genetically perfect, EDI is designed to look like that, and Liara is a civillian who, to be fair, shows no skin and doesn't even wear a skin tight outfit.

Modifié par Robosexual, 11 février 2013 - 07:16 .

[ZLurps]

Robosexual wrote...

ZLurps wrote...

Robosexual wrote...

At the end of the day it's just sexism.

All guys can be incredibly attractive and have perfect bodies because. Girls can't because they're not supposed to be attractive.

Sexism in other words.

That's not the point. The thing is that at some point fan service starts to eat plausibility of setting if setting is not established with such elements (bikini chain mails for example) from the beginning.

Where the line is crossed when immersion breaks, that varies with everone but in general references from real world. Every step away from that brings audience closer to line where immersion breaks. Sexing up characters, male or female is actually more problematic than say, thermal clips or moving Citadel, because how we are wired makes it more difficult audience to process it by head canoning. phys.org/news5763.html

Thing is the only person this applies to is Ashley, and even then it's countered by all the females in the Alliance that don't have big boobs, including Shepard, and all the perfect males.

Miranda is genetically perfect, EDI is designed to look like that, and Liara is a civillian who, to be fair, shows no skin and doesn't even wear a skin tight outfit.

Doesn't matter. Results appear plausible or unplausible, if they appear unplausible in established series, it's a failure on artistic direction department.

[Anthadlas]

Wouldn't have minded her uploading into a Geth platform
Could be fun having interactions with Legion afterwards

[ChurchOfZod]

Eh, I'm happy to laugh every time I see the beach balls bolted on to the ass and ****** robot called EDI. It's just about impossible to take any scene seriously when she has an e-cup hanging precariously to camera left. I always stick her in the white catsuit to ameliorate the effect.

Modifié par ChurchOfZod, 11 février 2013 - 07:37 .

[Anthadlas]

ChurchOfZod wrote...

Eh, I'm happy to laugh every time I see the beach balls bolted on to the ass and ****** robot called EDI. It's just about impossible to take any scene seriously when she has an e-cup hanging precariously to camera left. I always stick her in the white catsuit to ameliorate the effect.

I always found she was impossible to put into clothes as she magically gets a massive ******, who is doing the designs for these characters and why did no one else notice it before it was shipped? xD

[Clayless]

ZLurps wrote...

Robosexual wrote...

Thing is the only person this applies to is Ashley, and even then it's countered by all the females in the Alliance that don't have big boobs, including Shepard, and all the perfect males.

Miranda is genetically perfect, EDI is designed to look like that, and Liara is a civillian who, to be fair, shows no skin and doesn't even wear a skin tight outfit.

Doesn't matter. Results appear plausible or unplausible, if they appear unplausible in established series, it's a failure on artistic direction department.

No it's not, that's subjective, and isn't a fault of the creators.

[Sejborg]

arial wrote...

I hate EDIs "fembot" body, as I am sure many others do.

who else would have liked it more if, instead of the body EDI has, she was just put into a highly upgraded LOKI mech?

The LOKI mech is slow, weak armored, and has puny firepower. It is the easiest enemy to fight. I would hate to have such a weak combat droid in my squad. Terrible suggestion. 

[BleedingUranium]

Oh look, more arguing that big breasts are evil.

[o Ventus]

Sejborg wrote...

arial wrote...

I hate EDIs "fembot" body, as I am sure many others do.

who else would have liked it more if, instead of the body EDI has, she was just put into a highly upgraded LOKI mech?

The LOKI mech is slow, weak armored, and has puny firepower. It is the easiest enemy to fight. I would hate to have such a weak combat droid in my squad. Terrible suggestion. 

The Rampart mech is a modified LOKI. 

Theyre called mods.

[BleedingUranium]

o Ventus wrote...

The Rampart mech is a modified LOKI. 

Theyre called mods.

And they still have nothing on EDI's body. Quite fittingly, EDI's body is basically what the Normandy is compared to other ships: designed for infiltration and the most advanced ever made.

Modifié par BleedingUranium, 11 février 2013 - 08:53 .

[o Ventus]

BleedingUranium wrote...

o Ventus wrote...

The Rampart mech is a modified LOKI. 

Theyre called mods.

And they still have nothing on EDI's body. Quite fittingly, EDI's body is basically what the Normandy is compared to other ships: designed for infiltration and the most advanced ever made.

Except the complete immunity to Cerberus force fields. And impenetrable tank bubbles. And shotguns.

But yeah, nothing on EDI. That functional immortality ain't a thing.

[Clayless]

Sounds like they were designed for combat not infiltration.

[o Ventus]

Robosexual wrote...

Sounds like they were designed for combat not infiltration.

Not that EDI is going to do any infiltrating without skin.

[BleedingUranium]

o Ventus wrote...

Robosexual wrote...

Sounds like they were designed for combat not infiltration.

Not that EDI is going to do any infiltrating without skin.

Because she's using it for combat (in-universe) and because she needs to look synthetic to the player (meta).

[o Ventus]

BleedingUranium wrote...

o Ventus wrote...

Robosexual wrote...

Sounds like they were designed for combat not infiltration.

Not that EDI is going to do any infiltrating without skin.

Because she's using it for combat (in-universe) and because she needs to look synthetic to the player (meta).

How would not having skin affect combat efficiency?

[Wayning_Star]

BleedingUranium wrote...

o Ventus wrote...

Robosexual wrote...

Sounds like they were designed for combat not infiltration.

Not that EDI is going to do any infiltrating without skin.

Because she's using it for combat (in-universe) and because she needs to look synthetic to the player (meta).

Edi's bod is synthethic, so looking like it probably just the way it is, like with Jokers bone supports on his legs.

Joker is still human, mostly and Edi is still human, mostly?

[Wayning_Star]

o Ventus wrote...

BleedingUranium wrote...

o Ventus wrote...

Robosexual wrote...

Sounds like they were designed for combat not infiltration.

Not that EDI is going to do any infiltrating without skin.

Because she's using it for combat (in-universe) and because she needs to look synthetic to the player (meta).

How would not having skin armor affect combat efficiency?

strikethrough for another way to look at it?

[BleedingUranium]

o Ventus wrote...

BleedingUranium wrote...

o Ventus wrote...

Robosexual wrote...

Sounds like they were designed for combat not infiltration.

Not that EDI is going to do any infiltrating without skin.

Because she's using it for combat (in-universe) and because she needs to look synthetic to the player (meta).

How would not having skin affect combat efficiency?

It wouldn't, it's more that she never bothered to get a new one made after the original was burned off.

[Sejborg]

o Ventus wrote...

Sejborg wrote...

arial wrote...

I hate EDIs "fembot" body, as I am sure many others do.

who else would have liked it more if, instead of the body EDI has, she was just put into a highly upgraded LOKI mech?

The LOKI mech is slow, weak armored, and has puny firepower. It is the easiest enemy to fight. I would hate to have such a weak combat droid in my squad. Terrible suggestion. 

The Rampart mech is a modified LOKI. 

Theyre called mods.

So what? The EVA CORE body is fast, has great armor, can wield different kinds of weapon, and it can effortlesly take Ashley by the head and slam it against a wall again and again.

Your puny LOKI mech can't do any of that - mods or no.