Aller au contenu

Photo

Mass Effect 4: Should the destruction of the Geth be canonised?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
81 réponses à ce sujet

#1
stysiaq

stysiaq
  • Members
  • 8 480 messages
Posted Image

Yeah, yeah, I know, paragon choices and stuff.

Title.

Reasons are obvious.

I'm thinking about both Rannoch mission and Destroy ending, because you can never be sure.

I think that we, the MP community should start lobbying for canonising these SP options. Let's tell everyone that it fits all the Mass Effect themes better :devil:.

#2
Deerber

Deerber
  • Members
  • 16 834 messages
Absolutely. Destroy is the only answer.

Modifié par Deerber, 11 février 2013 - 03:37 .


#3
HolyAvenger

HolyAvenger
  • Members
  • 13 848 messages
No GI, GSol or GE?

GTFO.

#4
shnig_1

shnig_1
  • Members
  • 763 messages
Ummmm wrong forum possibly?

Anyway, no it shouldn't, I like geth

#5
Leonia

Leonia
  • Members
  • 9 496 messages
It probably won't matter what the canon ending is in terms of how it affects the future of MP, we did get Collectors after all.

Modifié par leonia42, 11 février 2013 - 03:40 .


#6
megabeast37215

megabeast37215
  • Members
  • 13 626 messages
The Geth have inpenetrable plot armor... they aren't going anywhere.

#7
mastero87

mastero87
  • Members
  • 173 messages
Only to make the ME3 ending completely and utterly meaningless. I would rather not.
Or... are you a troll?

#8
blue water

blue water
  • Members
  • 675 messages
Well....maybe the bombers and prime turrets.

#9
Athanis

Athanis
  • Members
  • 118 messages
Why u no like Synthesis? :(

Hands off of my Geth boyo. I couldn't live without that p*ssed-off sound they make when stunlocked by their indoctrinated brethren. :D

#10
Guest_Flaming Snake_*

Guest_Flaming Snake_*
  • Guests
What choices you make in SP should affect what characters you have available in MP.

trollface.jpg

#11
Fredvdp

Fredvdp
  • Members
  • 6 186 messages
In multiplayer, it doesn't matter. ME3's co-op doesn't always make sense (for instance, volus fighting geth on Earth).

In single player, I think it's best to just barely mention the geth. If they were destroyed, they're gone. If not, they may have finally isolated themselves as originally planned.

#12
White Flag

White Flag
  • Members
  • 669 messages
Yes. Tali can recreate them.

#13
Bechter

Bechter
  • Members
  • 1 483 messages
They are machines they can be rebuilt or bioware can just be lame again and have them be in 4 no matter what you did just like the Rachni.

#14
NuclearTech76

NuclearTech76
  • Members
  • 16 229 messages

Deerber wrote...

Absolutely. Destroy is the only answer.

Yes. They've already sideways screwed Legion. ****** on the rest of the Geth. Destroy them all.

#15
Rinzler

Rinzler
  • Members
  • 254 messages
I kept the geth and the quarians alive. canon that

#16
stysiaq

stysiaq
  • Members
  • 8 480 messages

HolyAvenger wrote...

No GI, GSol or GE?

GTFO.


But the Greater Good.

#17
Ziegrif

Ziegrif
  • Members
  • 10 095 messages
NO!
I want ALL the endings to get canonised!
Destroy manages to destroy part of the reapers and some geth, driving a huge wrench into the politics of machines and organics due to a last chance message from the reapers to the heretics explaining that whatever happened to shepard was the cause of the metallic genocide.

Control side would make 1/3rds of the reaper forces into a absolute force of order protecting teh relays and for some odd reason the center of the galaxy. Where a small planet survives in a sea of blackholes and on that planet there's something powerful and mysterious. OOOOOOOOH!~

Then the Synthesis side of the whole shebang takes control of 1/3rd of the whole population of the galaxy. Turning them into a force of essentially Borg with emotions.

Then we got the survivors being attacked by the borg and the mechanized forces and exploring the great unknown of the center.

Also on topic. I'd rather keep my GI thank you very much SO NO!!

stysiaq wrote...

But the Greater Good.


But I want to watch the galaxy burn.

Modifié par Ziegrif, 11 février 2013 - 03:50 .


#18
N7Dropout1

N7Dropout1
  • Members
  • 942 messages
Regardless what ending you choose, if they ever chose to make an ME sequal that takes place after ME3 they could simply have the quarians decide to re-make the Geth. The big problem with taking the Destruction option is that the Reapers are no longer present to maintain the cycle and prevent synthetic life from eventually going ape**** and destroying organics. At least that's what I got from the "interesting" direction of ME3's ending.

Or they'll just retcon something.

Modifié par N7Dropout1, 11 février 2013 - 03:56 .


#19
FateNeverEnds

FateNeverEnds
  • Members
  • 2 065 messages

HolyAvenger wrote...

No GI, GSol or GE?

GTFO.

You can always put one or two to sleep and bury them somewhere in Eden Prime just in case.:whistle:

#20
Pyroninja42

Pyroninja42
  • Members
  • 3 834 messages

stysiaq wrote...

HolyAvenger wrote...

No GI, GSol or GE?

GTFO.


But the Greater Good.

I see your "The Greater Good" and raise you one "Suffer not the unclean to live".

#21
HolyAvenger

HolyAvenger
  • Members
  • 13 848 messages

stysiaq wrote...

HolyAvenger wrote...

No GI, GSol or GE?

GTFO.


But the Greater Good.


Listen to yourself, you're indoctrinated!

#22
Miclotov

Miclotov
  • Members
  • 602 messages
Shush, go back to the singleplayer forums with your bad trolling attempts.

#23
Kinom001

Kinom001
  • Members
  • 2 568 messages
Canon in a multi-choice game is simply a hilarious concept.

#24
3XT3RM1N4TUS

3XT3RM1N4TUS
  • Members
  • 2 443 messages
I chose to destroy Geth stunlock.

#25
White Flag

White Flag
  • Members
  • 669 messages

Kinom001 wrote...

Canon in a multi-choice game is simply a hilarious concept.


True, but they will have to pick a fixed starting point for logistical reasons