Thats the issue I have with a sequel. In a direct ME4 sequel, they have to either cannonize it, which would be lame, or make everything too similar. The impacts of a lot of ME3's decsions are Galaxy changing variables. By the way, why is this in the MP section?White Flag wrote...
Kinom001 wrote...
Canon in a multi-choice game is simply a hilarious concept.
True, but they will have to pick a fixed starting point for logistical reasons
Mass Effect 4: Should the destruction of the Geth be canonised?
#76
Posté 11 février 2013 - 08:11
#77
Posté 11 février 2013 - 08:13
Make new geth that don't act like Geth. So... Make Not-Geth.
Not-Geth are new Geth.
For Science.
#78
Posté 11 février 2013 - 08:17
Broganisity wrote...
Destroy the Geth.
Make new geth that don't act like Geth. So... Make Not-Geth.
Not-Geth are new Geth.
For Science.
Can we make them hell bent on galaxy domination?
I dunno... Heretics and the other Geth seemed more like a journey of self discovery kind of deal. Only fighting because they had to.
Where's my insane murder bots?
#79
Posté 05 avril 2016 - 08:29
no the geth need to survive for the end of the fighting between synthetic and organic, if you destroy the geth. that won't stop the creation of new synthetic, and what about edi, if you go off the destroyer ending she will be dead too. that is why I choose to have Shepard sacrifice his/her life. because the lives of the many are greater then the lives of a few.
#80
Posté 05 avril 2016 - 08:32
the moment i saw stysiaq i knew this was a revival thread
and yet i'm still disappointed
#81
Posté 05 avril 2016 - 08:37
Destroy the Geth by hacking them and filling their optics with videos of funny cats on loop until they destroy themselves.
#82
Posté 05 avril 2016 - 08:48
stysiaq did nothing wrong.
Bring back stysiaq!





Retour en haut






