My shep is 100% paragon and I chose Destroy!
Modifié par KevShep, 21 février 2013 - 07:49 .
Modifié par KevShep, 21 février 2013 - 07:49 .
Bill Casey wrote...
Refuse is winning...Auintus wrote...
Because you gave up. In standing on the Crucible, one has the Reapers in the palm of their hand. All you need to do is choose. And instead you choose to lose on your terms, rather than win on his. It's quitting.
But I would rather lose and save as much of the universe as I can...
And I hate myself for it...
The few times I refused are the only times I've truly felt like I wasn't a complete monster...
KevShep wrote...
The fact that so many people are against synthesis is proof that the chaos will continue STILL! Therefor the catalyst is dead wrong about synthesis ending chaos!
My shep is 100% paragon and I chose Destroy!
Bill Casey wrote...
Refuse is winning...
But I would rather lose and save as much of the universe as I can...
And I hate myself for it...
The few times I refused are the only times I've truly felt like I wasn't a complete monster...
DKJaigen wrote...
Thats not proof as humans are very difficult to move away from what their comfortable with. But that doesnt mean its not good for them. You can only judge synthesis after it happend not before.
Yes, but that's because of the empathetic scale. On one end of the scale you have empathy, empathy implies a high level of overall intellect and emotional intelligence. On the other end of the scale you have sociopathy, which implies that the person has no ability to relate to any other human. Sociopathy often leads to widespread hate, and we have a lot of omnicidal maniacs here (since, after all, Destroy is basically Control plus genocide).KevShep wrote...
The fact that so many people are against synthesis is proof that the chaos will continue STILL! Therefor the catalyst is dead wrong about synthesis ending chaos!
My shep is 100% paragon and I chose Destroy!
Auld Wulf wrote...
Yes, but that's because of the empathetic scale. On one end of the scale you have empathy, empathy implies a high level of overall intellect and emotional intelligence. On the other end of the scale you have sociopathy, which implies that the person has no ability to relate to any other human. Sociopathy often leads to widespread hate, and we have a lot of omnicidal maniacs here (since, after all, Destroy is basically Control plus genocide).KevShep wrote...
The fact that so many people are against synthesis is proof that the chaos will continue STILL! Therefor the catalyst is dead wrong about synthesis ending chaos!
My shep is 100% paragon and I chose Destroy!
However, an infusion of empathy would fix that. It's like fixing an illness. If you have someone who's psychopathic then the right cocktail of brain chemicals can sometimes restore the neurological balance and return to them some level of empathy. Both psychopathy and sociopathy stem from the inability to feel as others do, to understand their feelings, their pain, their joy, or anything about them. And it makes people see others, such as ethnic minorities, those of lifestyle choies, or whatever else as innately inferior. Sometimes all other beings as innately inferior.
This is what creates chaos and war. Sociopathy implies a complete absence of guilt, the sociopath is broken in that he or she is completely unable to feel guilt. In other words, a sociopath can kill a person (like all of the geth) and not even feel remotely bad about it. There are far too many people who shot Mordin and felt nothing, that scares me. Even though it's a story, it's a story that should evoke emotions and guilt. Guilt is nature's modifier towards ethical behavioour, and thus those able to feel guilt tend to pick Control or Synthesis.
Synthesis would end the chaos because it would provide that "fix" that so many people need. It would flip their sociopathy scale to the opposite end, they'd suddenly start feeling. They'd have guilt, and they'd want to attone for past acts. They'd understand how others feel. And likely, via the galactic consensus that comes about with Synthesis, they will even be able to directly feel the feelings of their victims. How easy would it be to pull a gun on someone if they could feel what the victim was feeling?
So Synthesis is necessary, it's necessary because sociopathy and the inability to feel any form of guilt whatsoever is a modern day cancer. If all sociopathy was replaced with empathy, we'd (for the first time ever) have a damn good shot at lasting peace. Not an absolute, but it provides the best statistical chance for lasting any amount of time. If you're not afraid of other people, if you don't see them as different, and/or vile, and/or inferior, then you're less likely to kill them.
Thus, I choose what I saw as a necessity.
GethPrimeMKII wrote...
So, you openly admit that synthesis will alter the minds of all sentient beings and this alteration will allow them to empathize and accept even the reapers. Thanks. Thats all anyone needs to know to realize how wrong synthesis is. There is no solution and no freedom in forcing acceptance.
Modifié par Auintus, 21 février 2013 - 04:50 .
Sc2mashimaro wrote...
Hadeedak wrote...
My suggestion, Sc2, is to have Shepards with different personalities as much as you can. I found I had a Shep who suited each ending. Though I still haven't gotten to renegade control.... It's kind of opened my mind to each option, and how I can see someone going for them.
I agree with that. There is a certain kind of Shepard that would do each of the endings, paragon or renegade and whether you think, personally, that one of the choices is smarter or better than the others.