192 réponses à ce sujet

[GeneralMoskvin_2.0]

 http://t0.gstatic.co...t4k15FZFtigg4pp

http://t3.gstatic.co...hIZTmvaJOPvq8Ew

http://t1.gstatic.co...0Sy4_3LIIMo6akU

Seriously, I am fed up with this. This gun really spoils people, once they use it, they won't ever use a weapon that is harder to use, even if it deals more damage (doesn't apply to all of course). And it is supposed to be heavy. Quit using it on Adepts and Engineers.

Bioware, nerf please. For serious. Or just remove this IPod gun.

http://t1.gstatic.co...M0ws0XkmFS4pMw 

[mumba]

[Pyroninja42]

I'd prefer they just buff everything else instead.

[Crimson Vanguard]

Falcon is more OP than Harrier if you know how to use.

[GeneralMoskvin_2.0]

Yes, I mad. Certainly.

[hawgwild5757]

It's fine the way it is. I don't even use it that much since it has such a small ammo supply. There are a half a dozen guns, if not more, that I'd rather use than the Harrier.

[Katya Nadanova]

I need one of those "Not sure if serious..." pics.

If serious, I prefer the PR, over the Harrier.

Modifié par BristowJ, 12 février 2013 - 09:21 .

[Cyonan]

My reaction:

Oh look they didn't do exactly what they said they had no plans of doing.

You're a sneaky one, BioWare. I got my eye on you.

Modifié par Cyonan, 12 février 2013 - 09:20 .

[JackieLee13]

Yes, quit using a gun, you Adepts! BW needs to nerf Adepts so that they are not allowed to use guns, especially decent guns since this game has very little to do with guns! ... you Adepts!

[UKStory135]

The harrier is great, but there are guns and combinations that could arguably be better. The Harrier also has to innate nerfs in Condor and Hazard Dagger.

[Arppis]

I'm happy they didn't nerf it. Game needs some real assault rifles. And guns that are easier to use.

[GeneralMoskvin_2.0]

Crimson Vanguard wrote...

Falcon is more OP than Harrier if you know how to use.

If you know how to use it. Learning curve, this disqualifies. Pick Harrier instead.

[Crimson Vanguard]

GeneralMoskvin_2.0 wrote...

Crimson Vanguard wrote...

Falcon is more OP than Harrier if you know how to use.

If you know how to use it. Learning curve, this disqualifies. Pick Harrier instead.

Too bad I mastered the Falcon to the point I can shoot down a Reaper Capital Ship with it so nerfing the Harrier won't affect me at all. But I hate to see a real ARs in game that is good got ruined just because a minor group don't want to use it and feel that others shouldn't use it.

[Darth Malice113]

Enters thread, reads OPs nonsense..........

http://replygif.net/i/891

[SierraGHOSTN7]

another jealous child crying around for not having harrier

[Riot Inducer]

Pyroninja42 wrote...

I'd prefer they just buff everything else instead.

More or less agree, the Harrier isn't the problem it's the massive gulf in effectiveness between it and most of the other AR's that is the problem.

[GeneralMoskvin_2.0]

Crimson Vanguard wrote...

GeneralMoskvin_2.0 wrote...

Crimson Vanguard wrote...

Falcon is more OP than Harrier if you know how to use.

If you know how to use it. Learning curve, this disqualifies. Pick Harrier instead.

Too bad I mastered the Falcon to the point I can shoot down a Reaper Capital Ship with it so nerfing the Harrier won't affect me at all. But I hate to see a real ARs in game that is good got ruined just because a minor group don't want to use it and feel that others shouldn't use it.

*sigh*

It just spoils the entire weapon section. Why use a Saber when you have a Harrier that does OMFGWTFBBQ damage on bodyshots while you have a marksman rifle that requires lots of precision and has buttloads of recoil? This is what bugs me. For instance.

[Uchimura]

I rarely use it anymore. What's the big deal?

[UnknownMercenary]

I'm just more annoyed at idiots who hold the Harrier as the standard.

Let them make the game boring for themselves by overusing it.

[ISHYGDDT]

I hope that in Reckoning there's a character that can dual-wield, so that I can equip two Harriers. One for myself, and one in your name for the one you're not using.  I'll nickname it 'The General.'

Modifié par ISHYGDDT, 12 février 2013 - 09:27 .

[SilentStep79]

Cyonan wrote...

My reaction:

Oh look they didn't do exactly what they said they had no plans of doing.

You're a sneaky one, BioWare. I got my eye on you.

lol!

[KiraTsukasa]

Eh, I prefer the Mattock anyway.

[lazysundae]

Taking the Harrier means your entire game revolves around visiting ammo boxes. For ultimate lulz put it on a Volus so that you have trouble getting to boxes behind counters.

Limited ammo is plenty balancing.

[AznInvazion]

I personally don't use the Harrier that much. There are many kits I use that require a fast recharge. The harrier is somewhat heavy and requires you to either camp near an ammo box or run to ammo boxes all the time. For this I don't use it that much. Only kit I love to equip a harrier with are the batarians since they give the ammo bonuses or demolisher with the supply pylon.

Harrier is fine as it is...