Rawgrim wrote...
Harle Cerulean wrote...
Rawgrim wrote...
sarakirrer wrote...
Xilizhra wrote...
Um, all elves look like that? Marethari has the exact same body type. So either all elves are 12, or you're just being incredibly silly. Hell, you don't even need in-game information, just enough knowledge of Bioware that they wouldn't put someone in who was only twelve.
I also thought Merrill was very childlike. While you're correct that all elves do have that body type, her body type combined with her general naivete about the world and the things in it made her seem very young.
Exactly. It was abit off-putting.
While it may have been offputting, you're missing the point. You had a choice, and you chose Isabela because Merrill wasn't to your taste, despite being female. Your tastes said she seemed too young to be appealing.
Now imagine Isabela wasn't romanceable by your male Hawke, only Merrill was. Then you have no choice if you want to play a het romance with your male Hawke. This is the situation people who wanted to play a gay romance with their male Warden were faced with in DA:O if they didn't like Zevran. Meanwhile, people who wanted to play a het romance with a male Warden, if they didn't care for Morrigan's attitude, could romance Leliana. And if they didn't like Leliana's devoutness, they could romance Morrigan.
DA2's system is more fair, because there are two options if you want to play straight, and two if you want to play gay. Plaintiff doesn't like Fenris (I believe - I could be wronf), but he had the option to go for Anders. I don't care for Anders, but I had the option to go for Fenris. If one of those two was straight, one of us would have been unhappy at having no choice except the one we don't like. You didn't like Merrill (as a romance), so you went for Isabela. Fair!
Ohh i have played plenty games where straight ones also only get 1 choice. Been there done that. Sometimes the romance has even been forced.
And I've played plenty like that, too. In fact, Bioware's games are the only games I've played with romance that lets you pick who you go for (I'm not counting Skyrim, because Skyrim's marriage system is about as romantic as an economics textbook). Bioware's games are also the only games I've played that let you not only choose who to romance, but choose to have a romance with someone of the same sex as your PC (again, Skyrim is not romance; it's for a material benefit (store proceeds, special food item) rather than an emotional/story benefit).
But that doesn't change the fact that the number of romances should be fair. Bioware has taken a great step in giving us these romances, but if one group (people who play het romances) gets a choice of romances, so should the other group (people who play gay romances).
Like others (and even you, I believe?) I'd also be happy with a sexuality spread of one straight, one gay, and one bi of each sex. But the key there is that it's still even. Without the resources to do that spread, Bioware has chosen to rule on the side of fairness, rather than the side of people who think bisexuals like me are rare and special unicorns who appear only once in a blue moon.