1800 réponses à ce sujet

[Zjarcal]

ISHYGDDT wrote...

Face it: aesthetic preference is what leads everyone to select the Claymore. 

Agreed.

Mind you, I do not blame people one bit for choosing aesthetics over performance... I do it too. 

But about dem Claymoars and Wraiths, I love dem both equally.

I do hate the idea of running the Claymore on every kit, talk about BORING.





P.S. Shush about dat Talon... don't want to bring unwanted attention to its OPness.

Modifié par Zjarcal, 20 février 2013 - 09:57 .

[PoetryAvenger]

Ashen Earth wrote...

And now my work here is done.

Now I will go back to Dark Souls where I will grief players in Sen's Fortress with a Lightning Claymore +5. It's been fun BSN

:happy:

You're doing God's work Ashen, and for that I salute you.

(Personally I'm partial to spawning atop the pendulum girder and plunging with Smough's Hammer. You get so  many hate messages.)

[Yosuke]

I have a pretty good excuse, the store has denied me a wraith.

Also, I care nothing for cooldowns.

[WaffleCrab]

It all depends on the user, and what level weapons they have, honestly, i never have gotten wraith high enough to justify ditching the claymore away, plus reload cancel is so ludicrously easy to pull off. on the other hand, as far as shotguns go, i prefer the Reegar carbine and piranha over others. and if i want a truly powerfull shotgun but need versitility, meh ill slap on my talon for good measure.

[BridgeBurner]

oXTheReverendXo wrote...

Annomander wrote...

Ronnie Blastoff wrote...

Most likely the same thing that leads PC players to think they are in any shape or form "more" awesome because shooting is tough as hell when you point and click.

I don't need to point and click, I just press my aimbot auto-target key and it cycles through the enemies.

But, you console scrubs with your aim assist are no stranger to having the computer aim for you, are you?

How else could we kill so many Swarmers?

It's not half as terrible as you all like to say it is. It helps a lot more than it hinders, otherwise it wouldn't be included in EVERY console shooter ever.

Training yourself to make twitch shots, is an entirely different story.

Pointing and clicking is easy. Pointing and clicking with 10-15 pixel precision, at twitch-speeds - required for calling yourself even semi-competent at PC shooters - is a different story.

Unfortunately, getting an xbox to aim for you by pressing 1 button (aim botting, in other words) is not even close to the skill required to play twitch PC shooters, and saying otherwise is just silly, and quite frankly wrong.

[masleslie]

Any weapon that can only get one shot out of a clip when i am regularly surrounded by hoards of enemies is asking to be shelved, i don`t care how much damage it does. Give me the Wraith any day.

[BACON4BREAKFAST]

How did this go back to talking about wraiths and claymores. Wut happened?

I say again

Claymore is not as effective on console.
Wriath better for console
Claymore better for PC

Also Wraith is an Ultra-rare and not everyone has been blessed with a Wraith X.

[Zjarcal]

BACON4BREAKFAST wrote...

How did this go back to talking about wraiths and claymores. Wut happened?

I say again

Claymore is not as effective on console.
Wriath better for console
Claymore better for PC

Also Wraith is an Ultra-rare and not everyone has been blessed with a Wraith X.

Needs moar gifs and less sensible posts.

POST A GIF INSTEAD OF BEING SENSIBLE 

[Saints]

When I saw this thread I thought

[Crimson Vanguard]

When is the last time u saw a Krogan bash something dead with a Wraith?

[stysiaq]

Crimson Vanguard wrote...

When is the last time u saw a Krogan bash something dead with a Wraith?

I've seen a Krogan pwning some Rachni with just an Eviscerator.

But Wrex is the ultimate argument, so I guess that's not relevant.

[BridgeBurner]

Crimson Vanguard wrote...

When is the last time u saw a Krogan bash something dead with a Wraith?

It didn't happen, ever.

[BACON4BREAKFAST]

*replace Battlefield 3 with Mass Effect 3*

Modifié par BACON4BREAKFAST, 20 février 2013 - 10:20 .

[WaffleCrab]

I want to say this to everyone who is saying that <enter weapon name here> is any better than the other, they all have their uses so get over it.

Modifié par WaffleCrab, 20 février 2013 - 10:24 .

[k1ngl1ves]

Maybe, but can a Wraith take down an unshielded Atlas in a single shot?


(has this been asked already? tl/dr)

[bondiboy]

The Talon is better than the Wraith because...oh wait -wrong thread..

[BridgeBurner]

k1ngl1ves wrote...

Maybe, but can a Wraith take down an unshielded Atlas in a single shot?


(has this been asked already? tl/dr)

We already lol'd at ashen for not being able to take down an atlas in a single cast of flamer.

[Dimlor]

Ramsutin wrote...

So you say my Wraith III is better than my Claymore X? I think you should get down from your high horses every once in a while and realize what an average player has and doesn't have.

So quoting this...even thought I have both at I XD.

[oXTheReverendXo]

Annomander wrote...

oXTheReverendXo wrote...

Annomander wrote...

Ronnie Blastoff wrote...

Most likely the same thing that leads PC players to think they are in any shape or form "more" awesome because shooting is tough as hell when you point and click.

I don't need to point and click, I just press my aimbot auto-target key and it cycles through the enemies.

But, you console scrubs with your aim assist are no stranger to having the computer aim for you, are you?

How else could we kill so many Swarmers?

It's not half as terrible as you all like to say it is. It helps a lot more than it hinders, otherwise it wouldn't be included in EVERY console shooter ever.

Training yourself to make twitch shots, is an entirely different story.

Pointing and clicking is easy. Pointing and clicking with 10-15 pixel precision, at twitch-speeds - required for calling yourself even semi-competent at PC shooters - is a different story.

Unfortunately, getting an xbox to aim for you by pressing 1 button (aim botting, in other words) is not even close to the skill required to play twitch PC shooters, and saying otherwise is just silly, and quite frankly wrong.

It was just a little humor, but since you responded with an actual argument, I'll put in my two cents.

Aim-assist is definitely helpful in console shooters, but this game's version is a little over-zealous. It can shift your point of aim quite a bit when you ADS, which can lead to some nasty situations. It's not the only game that does this, but it's the only one I know of without an option to turn it off or dumb it down a bit.

Better implementations only shift your point of aim ever-so-slightly, taking better account of where your crosshairs actually were before adjusting your sights for you. I don't think we need to get rid of aim-assist in ME3 for consoles, but it would be nice if it was implemented a little better.

Also, I've played many a PC shooter and I totally agree with you. Clicking easy, but twitch shooting is a whole different matter. Sure you can aim with more precision, but how quickly you can do it becomes far more important, PvP or otherwise. I still think it's easier to get headshots on PC than console (and auto-aim actually works against us here a bit), but getting 20 headshots before 25 kills is no mean feat no matter what platform you're using.

OT: Nerf the Scimitar.

[UnknownMercenary]

Annomander wrote...

k1ngl1ves wrote...

Maybe, but can a Wraith take down an unshielded Atlas in a single shot?


(has this been asked already? tl/dr)

We already lol'd at ashen for not being able to take down an atlas in a single cast of flamer.

Hmm.. what if... with a full damage spec GI, Warp IV, primed by a biotic power, prox mine, tac scan and recon mine?