Aller au contenu

Photo

Bioware, Let's Talk About... Lore (Pt. 1 - Religion)


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
307 réponses à ce sujet

#226
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 989 messages

KiddDaBeauty wrote...

Looking forward to a long list of possibilities that may or may not be mostly overanalysed pieces of far-reaching! ^^ If I've done anything in this thread, it's raise a thousand questions where there really isn't room for many.


Alright, here goes.

So we know the Primeval Thaig predates the First Blight and all other Thaigs themselves. It's 10,000 years old, pointing to Dwarves having existed for eons before the Memories recorded the First Thaig. We also know that the Primeval Thaig is not the only one out there, as the codex tells us of an Orzammar King's order to seal away all records of the PTs that were discovered by a tainted Dwarf's rantings and findings. Logistically, no Dwarf would be able to travel from Orzammar to Kirkwall and back again and survive.

We can deduce that the Primeval Thaig we explored is not the only one. This is supported by the lyrium idol's ability to bypass the necessary soul requirement to make Golems -- as seen in DAII -- and the presence of Golems in the Primeval Thaig itself. Why do I mention this? Well, Caridin never says he built the Anvil. He just accredits his rise to Paragon status to the Anvil, and even his journal says that the dreams and visions the Ancestors gave him led him to the Anvil. So we can assume that the Primeval Thaig near Orzammar made use of the Anvil of the Void.

And why call it the Anvil of the Void? The Void is a name given to the abyss that the wicked explore in the Fade upon death. It's the Thedosian equivalent of Hell. Well, if the Dwarves were once Mages -- and the Nexus Golem's comments point to this, what with the "We were once more then we are" line -- perhaps they used the term "Void" for something else. But it could just as easily be a name prescribed to it by today's Dwarves in reference to it being amidst a sea of Darkspawn -- an endless void, if you will.

Now, the age of the Primeval Thaigs would allow the Darkspawn the necessary time to build up their numbers to be able to assault the Deep Roads and Tevinter, which the Chantry's version does not.

It's known that the very first Darkspawn encountered were Genlocks. We know this from Shaper Czibor's account of how the Darkspawn were "beasts in our own image, with no more intelligence then tezpadam" (deepstalkers). This further supports how the PT may have been responsible for the emergence of the Darkspawn. 

Then we have the Profane, a name the Rock Wraiths ascribe to themselves. Let's examine the codex on that:

We who are forgotten, remember,
We clawed at rock until our fingers bled,
We cried out for justice, but were unheard.
Our children wept in hunger,
And so we feasted upon the gods.
Here we wait, in aeons of silence.
We few, we profane.—Found scrawled on a wall in the lost Revann Thaig by explorer Faruma Helmi, 5:10 Exalted. Unknown author.


This indicates that the Dwarves were trapped somewhere, crying out for help as they starved and tried to freed themselves. It's possible that the Darkspawn -- when they first emerged -- caused the PT Dwarves to be lost in their own Thaig and unable to flee. They wanted help, they wanted food, they wanted salvation. And so they prayed to the gods.

But the gods would not answer. So they ate the gods. It seems that they ate lyrium, pointing to them worshipping it. This worship is something we'd see Bartrand do and it's implied that Meredith and House Valdasine did the same.

And so, for their crimes and the lack of an answer, they consider themselves to be profane. They are outside the fane (temple), held in contempt by the gods.

And what of the Thaig itself? The Veil there is thin, which happens when there is much death or workings of magic. Or both. And we regularly fight Demons throughout, as opposed to Darkspawn. Again, this points to something weird afoot. We know the Lyrium Idol thins the Veil by its very presence, but is this a trait of all red lyrium everywhere? I do not know.

Whatever the cause of the thin Veil in the PT, we know that it has allowed Demons passage into those forlorn crypts. Such Demons prey upon the needs of the Profane, some even possessing them. The Hunger Demon was drawn to there by way of their desire to feast upon the lyrium. And it seems that their hunger gives him power, else why would he defend them so as if they were his own people?

Now for the lyrium idol itself. It causes madness in those that touch it -- save for plot-protected Hawke and Sandal who's.... out there -- and causes the people to remark upon a "song". Bartrand says he needs to hear it for just a minute. His desire to re-hear it is akin to the Mother's mad desire to hear the Song again. And who sings? The Old Gods/Archdemons. The Stone also sings, as does normal lyrium to Dwarves and Spirits.

And what else does it do? It has a strange whispering noise. Not just any whispering noise, but the same one that you hear when the Darkspawn emerge from the Wilds at Ostagar. The same one you hear when you become a Warden. And the same one you hear when you become a Reaver.

What's the common factor between the Darkspawn, Wardens, and Reavers? Dragons.

Bartrand says that it refers to itself as an idol and wants to be worshipped, and that Meredith will not do this. And he apparently "feeds it". What does he feed it? Lyrium? People? 

And as said earlier, it allows those to bypass the need for souls for Golems. If Bartrand was feeding it people, this could account for why. And when it thinned the Veil, it allowed an Ethereal Golem to come through.

And finally -- in the sense that it's the last thing that I can recall, not that it's the last thing to be true -- we have the fact that the Darkspawn actively avoid entering the Primeval Thaigs but will defend it to the death. Curious, no?

And as an aside, Malvernis the Pestilent One carries with him abilities similar to the Darkspawn. He taints, he corrupts, he destroys. And the Dwarves were the ones who found him, bound him, carried him to the surface, and stood vigil.

And what do they call such a task? "The sacred duty that cannot be forsworn". Hmmm, where have we heard that before? The Grey Wardens.

Also, the Gangue Shade talks about the Stone bearing a corruption as old as balance. Now, it's really just referring to bad rocks rather then Darkspawn, but isn't it strange that the bad rocks form into a Demon? 

There's more to my theories on the PT being the source of the Darkspawn, undoubtedly. But it requires a careful examination of Dwarven lore. And by careful, I mean "go mad from the revelation".

Modifié par The Ethereal Writer Redux, 23 février 2013 - 03:19 .


#227
Riverdaleswhiteflash

Riverdaleswhiteflash
  • Members
  • 7 936 messages

Youth4Ever wrote...

Riverdaleswhiteflash wrote...

He's portrayed as passive aggressive as hell, capable of playing favorites for a mortal (that he created) in ways that even Zeus might have called out of line, and it states that he's the one who created the first darkspawn out of defiant creations. So, it doesn't call him evil so much as it shows him acting the part.

Point to a verse.


That one they recite in Lothering for the first part, the second one basically forms the basis of the Chantry even if I don't think Bioware wrote a verse for it... though I guess the Chant technically says the Tevinters brought their fate on themselves with regards to the darkspawn.

Modifié par Riverdaleswhiteflash, 23 février 2013 - 02:42 .


#228
Xilizhra

Xilizhra
  • Members
  • 30 873 messages

It could just be that shoul anyone with sin in their hearts step foot in the Golden City, the corruption occurs imediatelly and involuntarely much like what happens if you add gas and fire.

Then what he should have done is obliterate the darkspawn, not allow them to return to Thedas.

#229
Reznore57

Reznore57
  • Members
  • 6 144 messages
Maybe he can't destroy his creations...being the maker.
That would explain all those demons he left behind...

#230
TheJediSaint

TheJediSaint
  • Members
  • 6 637 messages

Reznore57 wrote...

Maybe he can't destroy his creations...being the maker.
That would explain all those demons he left behind...


Or that he didn't create the Darkspawn, but rather they were a result of the Magisters corrupting the Golden City.

#231
MisterJB

MisterJB
  • Members
  • 15 587 messages

Xilizhra wrote...
Then what he should have done is obliterate the darkspawn, not allow them to return to Thedas.

That's just the old conundrum. If God is real and good and omnipotent, then why do bad things happen?

I don't know. And I don't think that should the Maker really exist, we are capable of understanding the thougth process of an eternal, limitless, omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent being.
Maybe the Maker feels very strongly about free will. "You created this problem, you deal with it. I'll be here to catch the souls of the worthy and end their suffering."

#232
Reznore57

Reznore57
  • Members
  • 6 144 messages
I don't really think the maker created Darkspawn.
I think the citadel was tainted for x reason that had nothing to do with humans.
And the magister were send there looking for the "light" because they have been tricked.


Now I just need more information to make sense of this mess.^^

#233
Xilizhra

Xilizhra
  • Members
  • 30 873 messages

That's just the old conundrum. If God is real and good and omnipotent, then why do bad things happen?

There's no conundrum; the three are mutually exclusive. It's only a conundrum if one insists on three incompatible things being true.

Maybe the Maker feels very strongly about free will. "You created this problem, you deal with it. I'll be here to catch the souls of the worthy and end their suffering."

Bingo. Such a thing is not good.

#234
Riverdaleswhiteflash

Riverdaleswhiteflash
  • Members
  • 7 936 messages
I thought this might be relevant to the argument about killing the Maker allowing the existence of darkspawn.

Modifié par Riverdaleswhiteflash, 23 février 2013 - 03:09 .


#235
dragonflight288

dragonflight288
  • Members
  • 8 852 messages
@ Etheral

Very good assessment. And better put than I could've done...and you saved me the time typing it all out.

#236
shepard1038

shepard1038
  • Members
  • 1 960 messages

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

KiddDaBeauty wrote...

Looking forward to a long list of possibilities that may or may not be mostly overanalysed pieces of far-reaching! ^^ If I've done anything in this thread, it's raise a thousand questions where there really isn't room for many.


Alright, here goes.

So we know the Primeval Thaig predates the First Blight and all other Thaigs themselves. It's 10,000 years old, pointing to Dwarves having existed for eons before the Memories recorded the First Thaig. We also know that the Primeval Thaig is not the only one out there, as the codex tells us of an Orzammar King's order to seal away all records of the PTs that were discovered by a tainted Dwarf's rantings and findings. Logistically, no Dwarf would be able to travel from Orzammar to Kirkwall and back again and survive.

We can deduce that the Primeval Thaig we explored is not the only one. This is supported by the lyrium idol's ability to bypass the necessary soul requirement to make Golems -- as seen in DAII -- and the presence of Golems in the Primeval Thaig itself. Why do I mention this? Well, Caridin never says he built the Anvil. He just accredits his rise to Paragon status to the Anvil, and even his journal says that the dreams and visions the Ancestors gave him led him to the Anvil. So we can assume that the Primeval Thaig near Orzammar made use of the Anvil of the Void.

And why call it the Anvil of the Void? The Void is a name given to the abyss that the wicked explore in the Fade upon death. It's the Thedosian equivalent of Hell. Well, if the Dwarves were once Mages -- and the Nexus Golem's comments point to this, what with the "We were once more then we are" line -- perhaps they used the term "Void" for something else. But it could just as easily be a name prescribed to it by today's Dwarves in reference to it being amidst a sea of Darkspawn -- an endless void, if you will.

Now, the age of the Primeval Thaigs would allow the Darkspawn the necessary time to build up their numbers to be able to assault the Deep Roads and Tevinter, which the Chantry's version does not.

It's known that the very first Darkspawn encountered were Genlocks. We know this from Shaper Czibor's account of how the Darkspawn were "beasts in our own image, with no more intelligence then tezpadam" (deepstalkers). This further supports how the PT may have been responsible for the emergence of the Darkspawn. 

Then we have the Profane, a name the Rock Wraiths ascribe to themselves. Let's examine the codex on that:

We who are forgotten, remember,
We clawed at rock until our fingers bled,
We cried out for justice, but were unheard.
Our children wept in hunger,
And so we feasted upon the gods.
Here we wait, in aeons of silence.
We few, we profane.—Found scrawled on a wall in the lost Revann Thaig by explorer Faruma Helmi, 5:10 Exalted. Unknown author.


This indicates that the Dwarves were trapped somewhere, crying out for help as they starved and tried to freed themselves. It's possible that the Darkspawn -- when they first emerged -- caused the PT Dwarves to be lost in their own Thaig and unable to flee. They wanted help, they wanted food, they wanted salvation. And so they prayed to the gods.

But the gods would not answer. So they ate the gods. It seems that they ate lyrium, pointing to them worshipping it. This worship is something we'd see Bartrand do and it's implied that Meredith and House Valdasine did the same.

And so, for their crimes and the lack of an answer, they consider themselves to be profane. They are outside the fane (temple), held in contempt by the gods.

And what of the Thaig itself? The Veil there is thin, which happens when there is much death or workings of magic. Or both. And we regularly fight Demons throughout, as opposed to Darkspawn. Again, this points to something weird afoot. We know the Lyrium Idol thins the Veil by its very presence, but is this a trait of all red lyrium everywhere? I do not know.

Whatever the cause of the thin Veil in the PT, we know that it has allowed Demons passage into those forlorn crypts. Such Demons prey upon the needs of the Profane, some even possessing them. The Hunger Demon was drawn to there by way of their desire to feast upon the lyrium. And it seems that their hunger gives him power, else why would he defend them so as if they were his own people?

Now for the lyrium idol itself. It causes madness in those that touch it -- save for plot-protected Hawke and Sandal who's.... out there -- and causes the people to remark upon a "song". Bartrand says he needs to hear it for just a minute. His desire to re-hear it is akin to the Mother's mad desire to hear the Song again. And who sings? The Old Gods/Archdemons. The Stone also sings, as does normal lyrium to Dwarves and Spirits.

Bartrand says that it refers to itself as an idol and wants to be worshipped, and that Meredith will not do this. And he apparently "feeds it". What does he feed it? Lyrium? People? 

And as said earlier, it allows those to bypass the need for souls for Golems. If Bartrand was feeding it people, this could account for why. And when it thinned the Veil, it allowed an Ethereal Golem to come through.

And finally -- in the sense that it's the last thing that I can recall, not that it's the last thing to be true -- we have the fact that the Darkspawn actively avoid entering the Primeval Thaigs but will defend it to the death. Curious, no?

And as an aside, Malvernis the Pestilent One carries with him abilities similar to the Darkspawn. He taints, he corrupts, he destroys. And the Dwarves were the ones who found him, bound him, carried him to the surface, and stood vigil.

And what do they call such a task? "The sacred duty that cannot be forsworn". Hmmm, where have we heard that before? The Grey Wardens.

Also, the Gangue Shade talks about the Stone bearing a corruption as old as balance. Now, it's really just referring to bad rocks rather then Darkspawn, but isn't it strange that the bad rocks form into a Demon? 

There's more to my theories on the PT being the source of the Darkspawn, undoubtedly. But it requires a careful examination of Dwarven lore. And by careful, I mean "go mad from the revelation".










Then why do even the most powerful demons seem to avoid the place? Why do demons fear the taint? Why do Avernus says: "In my dreams I see the Black City, and I am drawn towards it. There is something there, an answer to what the taint is."

#237
Plaintiff

Plaintiff
  • Members
  • 6 998 messages

Youth4Ever wrote...

Plaintiff wrote...

Again, the Maker Xilizhra is talking about is not the "real" Maker, who may or may not exist, but the character of the Maker as he is presented in the Chant of Light. They are two separate concepts.

Xilizhra is saying that, if the Maker truly exists as he is represented in the chant, then he is a cruel and petty tyrant that needs to be destroyed for the sake of everyone else's safety. Not the loving and forgiving god the Chantry would have us believe he is.

Where does the Chant say the Maker is evil?

It doesn't. That's the problem. In much the same way that Twilight portrays the creepy behaviour of Edward Cullen as romantic, the Chant of Light portrays the Maker as a "good" being. But unleashing the Darkspawn on mankind is totally unacceptable, no matter what the circumstances. Any deity who would actually do that cannot truly be a good and loving one

#238
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 989 messages

dragonflight288 wrote...

@ Etheral

Very good assessment. And better put than I could've done...and you saved me the time typing it all out.


Aw shucks, you flatter me.

http://t3.gstatic.co...3FM3_p0JYwZcIJ7

#239
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 989 messages

Then why do even the most powerful demons seem to avoid the place? Why do demons fear the taint? Why do Avernus says: "In my dreams I see the Black City, and I am drawn towards it. There is something there, an answer to what the taint is."


Where did I ever say the Primeval Thaig couldn't be related to the Black City? I never did. I even said a page or two ago that the PT and BC might be related. 

Corypheus himself states that they were promised a Golden City, but upon their arrival it was already black. What I'm arguing is that there's more to suggest the PT was the source of all the Darkspawn in Thedas. Who knows whether or not the PT and BC are related, but they might be. Given what we know of the BC, I'd say it is related to the PT which also suggests a link to the Darkspawn.

I take issue with the idea that the Awakened Darkspawn Corypheus and his ilk are the source of the mindless Darkspawn because evidence tells us that they are not. They are the first Awakened Darkspawn and nothing more.

And Demons don't fear the Taint. They just don't know anything about it. Avernus says the Darkspawn Taint is alien to them. It's unknown to them. As for avoiding the Black City, I'd take what a Mage says about Demons and the Black City with a grain of salt. Can we truly know whether they avoid it or not, when we cannot enter said place? When the Chantry claims the Maker banished the spirits he created from there, thus meaning that they're not so much "avoiding" it as they are "living in its shadow, unable to go there"?

Ooh! I just remembered something else about the PT.

Modifié par The Ethereal Writer Redux, 23 février 2013 - 03:26 .


#240
Medhia Nox

Medhia Nox
  • Members
  • 5 066 messages
@Plaintiff: You do realize that a Maker that wouldn't allow you to do stupid **** like become Darkspawn... also wouldn't allow you to have Free Will - yes?

If the Chant is to be believed at all - it wasn't innocent men the Maker just randomly cursed to become Darkspawn.

At any rate - people want a Maker who is a micromanaging caretaker to wipe their ass and put powder on it every time they get a rash... AND they still want to be able to be stupid dip****s and do ****** things.  And when that doesn't happen - either the Maker isn't good - or doesn't exist.  Conditional "reason" isn't reason at all.

The only way to stop humans (or dwarves, or elves, or Qunari - or whoever became Darkspawn) from being completely self-destructive idiots... is to remove Free Will.  The Qunari are trying this actually.

Modifié par Medhia Nox, 23 février 2013 - 03:18 .


#241
MisterJB

MisterJB
  • Members
  • 15 587 messages

Xilizhra wrote...
Bingo. Such a thing is not good.

Morality, by itself, is extremely subjective and varies wildly from person to person. We can't even objectivelly determine the morality or lack thereof of our own actions and you want to apply it to an actual God.
It's like calling a human evil for "killing" millions of living cells every day just by existing or smashing an ant-hill. It's not applicable.

Modifié par MisterJB, 23 février 2013 - 03:17 .


#242
Reznore57

Reznore57
  • Members
  • 6 144 messages
There is something about human/dwarves/elves.
They all lost their gods at one point , elven gods and maker went on holidays somewhere.

Arlathan was sunk underground , the dwarves seems to have lost a big part of their history too...
Human , well the blight/ the Imperium downfall directly linked to a god via Andraste...

Don't know it's a bit strange.

#243
TEWR

TEWR
  • Members
  • 16 989 messages

Riverdaleswhiteflash wrote...

I thought this might be relevant to the argument about killing the Maker allowing the existence of darkspawn.


Might? That's incredibly relevant, man.

#244
Riverdaleswhiteflash

Riverdaleswhiteflash
  • Members
  • 7 936 messages

Medhia Nox wrote...

@Plaintiff: You do realize that a Maker that wouldn't allow you to do stupid **** like become Darkspawn... also wouldn't allow you to have Free Will - yes?

If the Chant is to be believed at all - it wasn't innocent men the Maker just randomly cursed to become Darkspawn.

At any rate - people want a Maker who is a micromanaging caretaker to wipe their ass and put powder on it every time they get a rash... AND they still want to be able to be stupid dip****s and do ****** things.  And when that doesn't happen - either the Maker isn't good - or doesn't exist.  Conditional "reason" isn't reason at all.

The only way to stop humans from being completely self-destructive idiots... is to remove Free Will.


That's not the same as letting other people pay for the Magisters' mistakes. If the Maker had simply killed or permanently sequestered them, that would answer both your objection and Plaintiff's.

Not to mention the part where the Maker wrote Thedas off as a complete failure due to those few Magisters, at least according to the Chantry.

Modifié par Riverdaleswhiteflash, 23 février 2013 - 03:20 .


#245
Riverdaleswhiteflash

Riverdaleswhiteflash
  • Members
  • 7 936 messages

The Ethereal Writer Redux wrote...

Riverdaleswhiteflash wrote...

I thought this might be relevant to the argument about killing the Maker allowing the existence of darkspawn.


Might? That's incredibly relevant, man.


Good. Maybe that means I didn't just get the thread locked for posting a picture that calls Him God instead of the Maker.

#246
Medhia Nox

Medhia Nox
  • Members
  • 5 066 messages
@Riverdaleswhiteflash: Why does the Maker let anyone else pay for anything else ever?

Why not strike down Loghain? How about Zathrina? How about destroy demons/spirits forever? Why not stop Anders?

The Maker might not exist - but if it does, Free Will is the reason why it "allows" mortals to do anything.

And that comic is flawed... but that's not about Dragon Age 3

Modifié par Medhia Nox, 23 février 2013 - 03:22 .


#247
Riverdaleswhiteflash

Riverdaleswhiteflash
  • Members
  • 7 936 messages
The picture above is relevant, then. At any rate, the Black City thing is different, at least according to the Chantry. One, it nearly ended the world four times over, and is supposed to get two more chances. Two, at least according to the Chantry, this one directly involved the Maker.

#248
Xilizhra

Xilizhra
  • Members
  • 30 873 messages

Morality, by itself, is extremely subjective and varies wildly from person to person. We can't even objectivelly determine the morality or lack thereof of our own actions and you want to apply it to an actual God.
It's like calling a human evil for "killing" millions of living cells every day just by existing or smashing an ant-hill. It's not applicable.

Ah, so the Chantry position here is "might makes right?" I suspected as much, but it's nice to have it confirmed. In any case, single cells lack any consciousness that might be disrupted by death, and I don't smash anthills.

If the Chant is to be believed at all - it wasn't innocent men the Maker just randomly cursed to become Darkspawn.

But it was innocents who were randomly cursed to live with the darkspawn. In fact, given that the ur-darkspawn have retained their minds and magic powers, I'd say they actually got the better part of the deal.

At any rate - people want a Maker who is a micromanaging caretaker to wipe their ass and put powder on it every time they get a rash... AND they still want to be able to be stupid dip****s and do ****** things. And when that doesn't happen - either the Maker isn't good - or doesn't exist. Conditional "reason" isn't reason at all.

It's perfectly applicable reason. We should have no cause to want to do stupid things if we're sufficiently provided for by any omnipotent god.

#249
Medhia Nox

Medhia Nox
  • Members
  • 5 066 messages
@Riverdaleswhiteflash: What's so bad about ending the world? You think a universe with no Maker won't end? Why anthropomorphize the action by calling it an "evil"?  ((You didn't actually call it evil - but you're "blaming" the Maker - implying it is certainly a wrong))

@Xilizhra:  Again - you want a babysitter - if I were to believe in the Maker, I'd expect no such caretaking.  I see such an attitude as selfish and lazy.

Modifié par Medhia Nox, 23 février 2013 - 03:30 .


#250
shepard1038

shepard1038
  • Members
  • 1 960 messages
This might be relevant:

The children that populated this new realm had the spark of the divine within them, which pleased the Maker. While their world was more solid than that of the spirits, these creatures were able to imagine, and dream new things because of it. But then the First Sin was committed. Malevolent beings whispered to men from across the Veil, and turned them to the worship of the Old Gods. After imprisoning the Old Gods underground, the Maker turned away from mankind, and left the Golden City. But the Old Gods still whispered to men, taught them blood magic. The magisters of the Tevinter Imperium found a way to enter the Golden City, believing that they were superior to the Maker. But they instead blackened the Golden City and were cast back to earth by the Maker, transforming them into monsters, known as the darkspawn. Much later on, Andraste managed to convince the Maker to forgive his creations, but Andraste was betrayed by her mortal husband Maferath, and burned at the stake. The Maker turned away from mankind once more.

Now the Maker has left the world.

Modifié par shepard1038, 23 février 2013 - 03:30 .