Aller au contenu

Photo

This is not the Greatest Weekend Challenge in the world...


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
166 réponses à ce sujet

#51
Pee Jae

Pee Jae
  • Members
  • 4 085 messages

Maklupin77 wrote...

This is a Challenge in memory of Mr. Robin Sachs......


And that is why it is the greatest weekend challenge in the world. Your thread title is bad and you should feel bad.

Modifié par t_skwerl, 22 février 2013 - 08:46 .


#52
JediHarbinger

JediHarbinger
  • Members
  • 2 464 messages
Well, the OP insulted my mother not to long ago!

He better apologize for that at least!

#53
Tokenusername

Tokenusername
  • Members
  • 11 157 messages

thewalrusx wrote...

Ledgend1221 wrote...

OP, you better get ready to deal with this until you apologise.
No one will ever take you seriously until you do.


by "this" do you mean harrasment? No i don't forum rules are very clear on that. People who harrass others will get banned. If you'd like to find that out the hard way, be my guest. :)

You made rude and callous remarks toward OTS because you didn't believe that his leak was legitimate. You even demanded that he should publicly apologize when there was no DLC released.
You have completly lost any respect on these fourms, and you will likely continue to be "harassed" on every post you make until you apologize.

Trying to deflect the issue by threatening people only serves to make you look petty.

Get over it or get used to it. ;)

#54
Javo2357

Javo2357
  • Members
  • 1 409 messages
cantwealljustgetalong.jpg

EDIT: but lol @ OP for doubting OTS :P:P

Modifié par Javo2357, 22 février 2013 - 08:48 .


#55
Credit2team

Credit2team
  • Members
  • 5 582 messages

MegaIllusiveMan wrote...

I didn't doubt OTS, but I didn't know about his activities on the forum. Only when Reckoning was rumored. Also, I(Note: I'm saying I, I'm not talking for anyone else) don't think that he OP needs to apologize, because if he doubted it, it was his problem, if you guys believed in OTS, sure, you can believe what he was saying. But if this OP was talking like this:

Fvck you OTS, then I really think that OP needs to make apology to OTS.


never did I say anything so hostile, I simply stated that his claims were unsuported by facts

#56
BridgeBurner

BridgeBurner
  • Members
  • 7 317 messages
Adding "thewalrusx" to my list of people on BSN who's jimmies are easily rustled.

>Attempt to insult people, calling them liars and "kids"

>Then expect people to not call you out on your attempts to insult.

>claims OTS had no evidence that reckoning was real.... when it's just been proven it was real, and he did have evidence...

>Then state other people are being immature and must adhere to a standard that you yourself are failng to uphold.

Heh, Friday nights on BSN almost rival Friday nights spent helping a young lady out of her underwear.

#57
LeinadSemrig

LeinadSemrig
  • Members
  • 93 messages

t_skwerl wrote...

Maklupin77 wrote...

This is a Challenge in memory of Mr. Robin Sachs......


And that is why it is the greatest weekend challenge in the world. Your thread title is bad and you should feel bad.


He's trying to reference "Tribute" by Tenaciosu D.  Seems that his forum cred isn't helping.

#58
rabidchipmunk

rabidchipmunk
  • Members
  • 43 messages

thewalrusx wrote...

Ledgend1221 wrote...

thewalrusx wrote...

Ledgend1221 wrote...

OP, you better get ready to deal with this until you apologise.
No one will ever take you seriously until you do.


by "this" do you mean harrasment? No i don't forum rules are very clear on that. People who harrass others will get banned. If you'd like to find that out the hard way, be my guest. 

No, I mean karma.
What goes around comes around.


exactly, you harrass others you will have your just deserts


We're going to get our fair vast expanses of sand in an arid environment?

Modifié par rabidchipmunk, 22 février 2013 - 08:49 .


#59
ndw542

ndw542
  • Members
  • 1 825 messages
The funny thing is that, as an empiricist, I agree with Walrus' basic position, but I'm still enjoying this because he's conducting himself in the least sympathetic manner possible.

Doing it right: "Hey, I didn't see anything reliably corroborative, so I don't think I was wrong to assume another poster wasn't simply pulling the whole thing out of his ass. Turns out he knew what he was talking about, but again, it was empirically unverifiable at the time. Perhaps I could've conducted myself in a more couth manner before, but what's done is done." The whole matter wouldn't have gone past page one.

Doing it wrong: "Screw you all and get out of my thread or I'll call Stan. I was right then, and I'm still right now." Flamewar, GO!

#60
Heggy

Heggy
  • Members
  • 1 201 messages

OneTrueShot wrote...

herculeswill22 wrote...

OneTrueShot wrote...

saints 944 wrote...

Didn't that one guy "Thewalrusx" constantly said you were full of ****? I wonder where he is now....


Eh. It's not a big deal. I'm not gonna give him any grief over his sense of disbelief. He's allowed to believe what he wants. I never did what I did for those who wanted to grief me (And yes, there ARE lots, Google has brought up many a laugh.)

I did it to give people hope and keep some hype burning in the hearts of those that fought for this game all the way, through the good (DLC!), the bad (Nerfin' USA) and the ugly. (Chris P-...I mean Geth.) :lol:

Ima wait on that apology he owes you:whistle:


He doesn't owe me anything. I -genuinely- hope he enjoys it as much as everyone else.


Modifié par Heggy, 22 février 2013 - 08:56 .


#61
Credit2team

Credit2team
  • Members
  • 5 582 messages

Javo2357 wrote...

cantwealljustgetalong.jpg


I agree. I'd rather hug and be friends with Anomander and OTS to be honest. But I'm not going to take harrassment lightly nor appologize for holding firm to my values (which is never believe anything without evidence)

#62
Stimpo

Stimpo
  • Members
  • 468 messages

thewalrusx wrote...

 Then i tell you I am god and infalable, and you should believe that without evidence.



I-N-F-A-L-L-I-B-L-E....my lord.:innocent:

#63
Credit2team

Credit2team
  • Members
  • 5 582 messages

Annomander wrote...

Adding "thewalrusx" to my list of people on BSN who's jimmies are easily rustled.

>Attempt to insult people, calling them liars and "kids"

>Then expect people to not call you out on your attempts to insult.

>claims OTS had no evidence that reckoning was real.... when it's just been proven it was real, and he did have evidence...

>Then state other people are being immature and must adhere to a standard that you yourself are failng to uphold.

Heh, Friday nights on BSN almost rival Friday nights spent helping a young lady out of her underwear.


how was your sandwich?:)

#64
Omnifarious Nef

Omnifarious Nef
  • Members
  • 3 896 messages
I'm eager to see the moment when everyone on BSN has been banned, and only Walrus remains, now that would be a sight to see. Walrus topic and responses, Walrus topic and responses everywhere.

#65
Das Rouse

Das Rouse
  • Members
  • 3 518 messages
It took me 2 gold matches to get it done, not even 2 full matches. First match, I got the inferno nades. Second match, I took the TSol to wrap up my avenger points. I think I got it in wave 1 or 2 of that 2nd match.

#66
Credit2team

Credit2team
  • Members
  • 5 582 messages

Stimpo wrote...

thewalrusx wrote...

 Then i tell you I am god and infalable, and you should believe that without evidence.



I-N-F-A-L-L-I-B-L-E....my lord.:innocent:


thank you. I make spelling erors all the time:)

#67
LeinadSemrig

LeinadSemrig
  • Members
  • 93 messages

Annomander wrote...

Adding "thewalrusx" to my list of people on BSN who's jimmies are easily rustled.

>Attempt to insult people, calling them liars and "kids"

>Then expect people to not call you out on your attempts to insult.

>claims OTS had no evidence that reckoning was real.... when it's just been proven it was real, and he did have evidence...

>Then state other people are being immature and must adhere to a standard that you yourself are failng to uphold.

Heh, Friday nights on BSN almost rival Friday nights spent helping a young lady out of her underwear.


how young we talkin' here?  That could be a bannable offense.:D

#68
Credit2team

Credit2team
  • Members
  • 5 582 messages

Das Rouse wrote...

It took me 2 gold matches to get it done, not even 2 full matches. First match, I got the inferno nades. Second match, I took the TSol to wrap up my avenger points. I think I got it in wave 1 or 2 of that 2nd match.


Nice:happy:

#69
Shepard of Shepards

Shepard of Shepards
  • Members
  • 47 messages
People, have not we learned that arguing on the internet makes everyone look bad?

#70
BridgeBurner

BridgeBurner
  • Members
  • 7 317 messages

LeinadSemrig wrote...

Annomander wrote...

Adding "thewalrusx" to my list of people on BSN who's jimmies are easily rustled.

>Attempt to insult people, calling them liars and "kids"

>Then expect people to not call you out on your attempts to insult.

>claims OTS had no evidence that reckoning was real.... when it's just been proven it was real, and he did have evidence...

>Then state other people are being immature and must adhere to a standard that you yourself are failng to uphold.

Heh, Friday nights on BSN almost rival Friday nights spent helping a young lady out of her underwear.


how young we talkin' here?  That could be a bannable offense.:D


:innocent:

#71
Javo2357

Javo2357
  • Members
  • 1 409 messages
Look, I don't personally recall what thewalrusx exactly said about OTS, but he is right that OTS had never provided evidence for his predictions.The thing is, nearly everyone on this forum knew he'd been right about all the other DLC's...

ndw542 wrote...

The funny thing is that, as an empiricist, I agree with Walrus' basic position, but I'm still enjoying this because he's conducting himself in the least sympathetic manner possible.

Doing it right: "Hey, I didn't see anything reliably corroborative, so I don't think I was wrong to assume another poster wasn't simply pulling the whole thing out of his ass. Turns out he knew what he was talking about, but again, it was empirically unverifiable at the time. Perhaps I could've conducted myself in a more couth manner before, but what's done is done." The whole matter wouldn't have gone past page one.

Doing it wrong: "Screw you all and get out of my thread or I'll call Stan. I was right then, and I'm still right now." Flamewar, GO!

Basically this^

OT: Weekend challenge was meh, Avenger is not deadly on full auto <_<

Modifié par Javo2357, 22 février 2013 - 08:55 .


#72
Credit2team

Credit2team
  • Members
  • 5 582 messages

Shepard of Shepards wrote...

People, have not we learned that arguing on the internet makes everyone look bad?


True, and i'm sure I look bad for getting so upset, but I do love a good argument even if its frustraiting:lol:

#73
Bhatair

Bhatair
  • Members
  • 3 749 messages
Nice reference :)

I did this with a Ksol, one silver solo got me the inferno grenades portion and two thrids of the avenger, joined a pug as a GI with avenger to fill out the rest.

#74
Gornok

Gornok
  • Members
  • 720 messages
now if the rest of you keyboard gangsters had enough...

OTS says that no apology is warranted... even though he has been basically spot on all his answers... while listening to the jist of the OP...

but in all due respect... frack the OP.. frack an apology... and hurray for the DLC which is coming out...

plus... most of you argue like chickens in a coop.

#75
solidprice

solidprice
  • Members
  • 2 146 messages
.......>ots was right. but yeah did it with a krogan.
felt good man.