166 réponses à ce sujet

[Shephard-Commander909]

SavagelyEpic wrote...

thewalrusx wrote...

And why would that be i wonder? I should believe things without evidence should I? well then shouldn't you? Then i tell you I am god and infalable, and you should believe that without evidence.

But really I'm sick of dealing with your angsty cries for attention, learn to act like an adult or stay home kid. 

Have a nice day^_^

Wow. Man up and admit your mistakes already. You remind me of a twelve year old on the playground.

I'm insulted, think more 9 year old, or younger.:innocent:

I don't know what 12 year olds you people talk to.

[Adragalus]

Shephard-Commander909 wrote...

SavagelyEpic wrote...

thewalrusx wrote...

And why would that be i wonder? I should believe things without evidence should I? well then shouldn't you? Then i tell you I am god and infalable, and you should believe that without evidence.

But really I'm sick of dealing with your angsty cries for attention, learn to act like an adult or stay home kid. 

Have a nice day^_^

Wow. Man up and admit your mistakes already. You remind me of a twelve year old on the playground.

I'm insulted, think more 9 year old, or younger.:innocent:

I don't know what 12 year olds you people talk to.

By this logic the god-like, infallible, perfect Stardusk is a useless, immature moron for claiming back in the day that Tac Scan was gonna be an overpowered aimbot power. He was, of course, wrong, and maybe have jumped the gun a little, but it was just a thought when we had no other evidence.

I hate this cult of personality that springs up around BNFs like OTS. There is no need for an "apology" for disagreeing with someone's unproven predictions.

Reasonable doubt, people. Jesus.

[Dr-Rai1]

Annomander wrote...

Hey walrusx, you owe BSN an apology - and more importantly - OTS an apology for denying the existence of reckoning.

You are bad, and you should feel bad.

You're also not allowed to download the new DLC, because reckoning DLC doesn't exist according to you,  remember?

[Heldarion]

What teh f*** happened to this thread o.O

[khannoir]

Fastest Climbing thread on the Citadel...

Evidently somewhere there was proof, because OTS was right. again. for like what the fifth time?
Sooooo even though he didnt show it, it was there...

[ISHYGDDT]

ichyscrachy wrote...

Children. The lot of you. OP for being a troll, the rest for taking the bait.

You must be able to see so far from up there on that high horse.

[HolyAvenger]

OP isn't a troll, simply...not very intelligent.

[LordBagardo]

So, that Geth Juggernaut, eh?

[Descy_]

LordBagardo wrote...

So, that Geth Juggernaut, eh?

So, how 'bout those knicks?

[Omnifarious Nef]

Draining Dragon wrote...

Oh look, we've got the typical BSN maturity.

That is, cupping OneTrueShot's balls and demanding that people apologize for doubting him.

Grow up. Demanding an apology on the internet is about as immature as you can get.

Then why, while growing up, did every adult I ever did something wrong in front of, ranging from the ages of 30 to 80, (80 being my late great grandpa) DEMAND that I apologize for what I did, if it's childish to do so? "You go over there RIGHT NOW, and apologize to him!" *Angry look*

[Omnifarious Nef]

Descy_ wrote...

LordBagardo wrote...

So, that Geth Juggernaut, eh?

So, how 'bout those knicks?

Knicks eh? Well, how about dem der tacos I just had? Delicious them were.

[LordBagardo]

NeferiusXji wrote...

Descy_ wrote...

LordBagardo wrote...

So, that Geth Juggernaut, eh?

So, how 'bout those knicks?

Knicks eh? Well, how about dem der tacos I just had? Delicious them were.

Not as delicious as Salarian liver, I bet 

[Auras_Mendalla]

https://fbexternal-a...e.me/3t3tr3.jpg


...by all of these completely relevant to the topic posts? Incidentally I'm really looking forward to this op. :happy:

[Omnifarious Nef]

Annnd, think I'm done trolling for tonight. Bon voyage, adios, arrivederci, Do svidanya, oyasumanasi, etc, etc.

Modifié par NeferiusXji, 23 février 2013 - 01:15 .

[cgtrfghj7]

^ I'm entertained 

lol @ people actually putting OTS on a pedestal and trying to get an apology out. If anything, an apology should be due not for him doubing the existence of Reckoning (as there was ZERO empirical evidence but rather only hope) but because he didn't go about it in a mature manner. 

[SavagelyEpic]

saints 944 wrote...

SavagelyEpic wrote...

lightswitch wrote...

Yo Credit...Annomanders just yanking your chain. In fact they all are. Just disengage man, you can't win at this point.

Also...

thewalrusx wrote...
any claim that is unsupported by facts and evidence must be dissmised

No. Wrong in every way. You must assume that you don't know. Completely different than assuming and asserting the claim is false.

"AH YES, REAPERS"...

You sir have great timing.