Aller au contenu

Photo

The role of women in the Dragon Age series


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
491 réponses à ce sujet

#476
cindercatz

cindercatz
  • Members
  • 1 351 messages

Xilizhra wrote...

I think this has more to do with your personal standards than anything to do with male characters in the DA series.


I don't think so. Like I said, I like the characters, but let's consider the other male companions I didn't mention.

You've got Oghren, basically a drunken lout who consistently messes up with his, well, both his wives that we see, leaves his family, and gives up left and right.

There's Alistair, who's charming in that effete sort of way, but whose main defining trait is his basic underlying insecurity. He's an odd duck because of the way he interacts with different Wardens, though. I played a female city elf first and he was my final romance. Then I played a few different males, and each time he comes off as this overly insecure backbiter. So as much as I liked him playing female, I can't think of him as a strong male character, quite the opposite. Multifaceted with depth and nuance, yes, which is why I like him, but not a strong character, and not somebody I particularly like playing male.

There's Zevran, who has a stronger core, but also consistently moves from one master to the next, and is very comfortable doing it.

There's Sten, who's very interesting, and I like him too, but he's essentially a conformist zealot, except that he conforms to the Qun.

There's the guys from Leliana's Song, who we learn very little about.

There's Anders, whose great talent is running away, escaping, and otherwise is a great scoundrel type until he becomes a bit unhinged along with..

Justice, a very interesting but single minded fade spirit, who Anders joins with basically to make up for his lack of conviction up until that point.

There's Finn, who's a lovable languange nerd, great, but also a lovable scaredycat. Not a problem. He's a great character, just not a strong one.

Then there's Fenris, who I already described why I don't like. Also, he's very smug, and I despise smug. And as much as this list might look otherwise, he's really the only one I'm not fond of. But for this point, no character that's mostly defined by their prejudices and fears (apart from his inexplicable exception granted to Hawke) can be classed a strong personality.

There's Sebastian, who's such a zealot he'll turn around and vow revenge on his best friends for an act of mercy, so entitled he'd burn down the world to claim what's his and then throw those who supported him aside in his hubris.

Finally there's potentially Hawke, who I found basically accepted failure at every turn and then walked away in disillusionment.

And for male NPCs, I doubt anybody can find one in DA2 that would honestly classify for strong. There were a few in DA:O. One I forgot to mention would be your aid if you were a Dwarven Noble, forget his name. And there's Duncan, but you learn very little about him and he's around for only a couple hours. Kristoff was in DA: Warden's Fall, but he doesn't actually appear alive in the games. Riordan was definitely a strong character, again in DA:O.

****
My conclusion? Every character has virtues and faults. I think my problem with most of the male characters is that their faults are their most defining character traits. They tend to be about overcoming their own foibles, which they never do on their own or with any real grace. By contrasts, the female characters are more defined by their strengths, and their personal arcs tend to be about overcoming outside pressures and expectations while deciding for themselves what kind of person they want to be, which means their faults come into play, but as personal factors rather than intrinsic failings.

I find most of them, all but one, interesting and enjoyable, but I'm left with a sense that the males are on the whole weaker individuals than the females in this series. I'd like to see it evened up a bit. There should also be strong male characters, whose personalities balance out better like the females do.

#477
Guest_krul2k_*

Guest_krul2k_*
  • Guests
yeah have to agree with you in that the females have been the more interesting characters, but for me that has been a breath of fresh air

btw i'll point out the Arishok but no doubt you got problems with him lol

#478
Nightdragon8

Nightdragon8
  • Members
  • 2 734 messages
ok can someone tell me what this topic is really about.... is this about the "womens" role in the video game. Or are we talking about IRL here.

Or is this about how companies use more males than females in game as NPC's

because honestly I'm not sure what everyone is ranting about anymore

Modifié par Nightdragon8, 02 mars 2013 - 03:17 .


#479
CrystaJ

CrystaJ
  • Members
  • 160 messages
I think Nathaniel may be my favorite male companion, next to Varric and Sten.

But of course I'll probably never see him again. >(

And there's everyone's favorite graduated NPC, Cullen, who I imagine may be going through a bit of angst in the upcoming chapter.

Modifié par CrystaJ, 02 mars 2013 - 04:51 .


#480
Hadeedak

Hadeedak
  • Members
  • 3 623 messages
I really like Nate myself. Ok, so yeah, the banner gave it away. But he kind of reminds me of my boyfriend.... And even considering his daddy issues, he seems fairly cool with them.

(I really hope we get Nate again.)

#481
karushna5

karushna5
  • Members
  • 1 620 messages
@cidercatz
You can do the same thing with the female characters if you try. Like all characters they have their strengths and weaknesses, you seem to be pointing out the weaknesses and ignoring their strengths, which is possible with every good character because all good ones have both. Most of the characters you mentioned are very strong, but like Aveline, Isabela, Merrill, Leliana, Morrigan, Meridith, and Bethany they have weaknesses which you very well put out.

Only character I strongly disagree with is Sebastian. He mentions the church a lot but is hardly a Zealot and on the most part much more accepting of other views than the other characters. He doesn't swear revenge because of the Chantry, he swears revenge because Elthina was practically a mother to him. If you side with the mages, he will back you up quite a bit against the Templars. He just wanted revenge for someone he loved, maybe not the best trait but still. It would be similar to Hawke killing Aveline if she stood between you and the person who made your mother a zombie. Perhaps not the best decision but at least an understandable one.

#482
SilentK

SilentK
  • Members
  • 2 618 messages
Hmm... I did not see the downside to Varric mentioned among the males with strong characteristic faults ;-)

I have read quite a few threads focusing in on why Merill was right or wrong in her pursuit of more knowledge. Morrigan is not exactly one that easily let's people get close, and she can be so harsh, personally don't like her too much. Leliana, please stop ninjamancing me =) let's try to be friendly but not too friendly. And too much emphasis on maker and visions is a complaint I've read in a few threads here when people were mentioning things they found irritating. Wynne, I just wanted to chat a little not get a lecture... again. Isabella is perhaps too much into getting things for herself and not thinking about the people around her. Aveline only thinks about the people around her
Varric: So, what do you do on your freetime?
Aveline: This is my freetime.
Varric: And the trend of you scaring me ****less continues
(banter goes something like that..)


And the friendly person that is such a great bromance, good sense of humor and always on your side Varric and Garrus. Often guys in movies as well. All of them have their ups and downs. That is why we like them.

Modifié par SilentK, 02 mars 2013 - 10:41 .


#483
Zkyire

Zkyire
  • Members
  • 3 449 messages

krul2k wrote...

btw i'll point out the Arishok but no doubt you got problems with him lol


Best all-round character in the series.

#484
Zkyire

Zkyire
  • Members
  • 3 449 messages

cindercatz wrote...

If anything, they should work to introduce more male characters that are just as strong (not stronger, but as strong) as the female cast. Other than potentially the Warden, Loghain (to a point), Arl Eamon (to a point), and maybe Varric, I can't think of a strong masculine character. Lots of good multi-faceted, interesting characters, but not many that don't make me cringe if they're brought up as good examples of strong male characters. I guess you could throw Nathaniel Howe in there, but then he kind of has to make up for his dad's failings to earn his place. I like them all except Fenris (for his judgementalism, closedmindedness, and basic level of spite, not the 'oh he's emo' reasons people seem to excuse), but there's very little there I can look at and say 'That's a character I admire', or reminds me of myself, or reflects who I want to be. I love Dragon Age, but this is not one of its strengths.


I agree with the rest of your post, but for this part specifically, there's:

- Male Warden.
- Duncan. Because Duncan.
- Fergus (he's a good man, a good father and he's also doing his duty by going to fight the Darkspawn).
- Loghain had the balls to betray his King and start a civil war because he truly believed it was the right thing to do (and likely would have won if not for you meddling kids and your dogthe Warden).
- Cullen starts out as a brat, but by the end of DA2 he has stepped up to the plate to do the right thing and openly defy his superior officer.
- Sten. He butchered that family, but instead of whining about it, he quietly accepts his fate and lets the people imprison him so he can starve to death. And outside of that instance he's generally a total badass.
- Varric is not a hardass, but he is extremely confident, skilled in combat and gets crap done.
- Ser Gregoir. He called for the Rite of Annulment to be sure, but he wasn't some blind fanatic, and was willing to listen to reason. He seemed to have a lot of respect for Irving, despite the whole "Mage! Grr!" attitude many people think Templars have.
- Ser Otto. Dude was blind and still did his job, alone.
- The God damned Arishok.
- Riordan. Jumped off a tower onto the Archdemon's back, ultimately fell to his death. He didn't scream.

Modifié par Zkyire, 02 mars 2013 - 02:01 .


#485
cindercatz

cindercatz
  • Members
  • 1 351 messages
final edit: Ok, caught up. :-)

krul2k wrote...

yeah have to agree with you in that the females have been the more interesting characters, but for me that has been a breath of fresh air

btw i'll point out the Arishok but no doubt you got problems with him lol


I think the females are a fantastic breath of fresh air absolutely. I think those characters more than anything are why I'm still in love with the series despite my love/hate relationship with how it's evolved (..but I'm really looking forward to DA3:I, absolutely).

I love the Arishok, but he doesn't think for himself. Or he does so very little. That's kind of a thing with the Qun. It lays out your entire life and prescribes what you do and what you should do, rather than asking you to figure it out yourself. So as I see it, unless a character is questioning and challenging, no upright Qunari can class as a strong individual character. Good, interesting characters, yes, but they don't meet the criteria we're talking about compared to female characters.

karushna5 wrote...

@cidercatz
You can do the same thing with the female characters if you try. Like all characters they have their strengths and weaknesses, you seem to be pointing out the weaknesses and ignoring their strengths, which is possible with every good character because all good ones have both. Most of the characters you mentioned are very strong, but like Aveline, Isabela, Merrill, Leliana, Morrigan, Meridith, and Bethany they have weaknesses which you very well put out.

Only character I strongly disagree with is Sebastian. He mentions the church a lot but is hardly a Zealot and on the most part much more accepting of other views than the other characters. He doesn't swear revenge because of the Chantry, he swears revenge because Elthina was practically a mother to him. If you side with the mages, he will back you up quite a bit against the Templars. He just wanted revenge for someone he loved, maybe not the best trait but still. It would be similar to Hawke killing Aveline if she stood between you and the person who made your mother a zombie. Perhaps not the best decision but at least an understandable one.


They all have faults, which I agree is part of what makes them interesting, but I'm not ignoring strengths. It's just that those characters (and a long list of NPCs) are more defined by their failings than their strengths. I was just pointing out how central their weaknesses are to them, as opposed to the females having flaws or negatively effecting aspects (to some people), but not being greatly defined by them. Alistair, for instance, he's a lot of people's favorite, but his primary arc is about grudgingly accepting some measure of responsibility or doing what he wants and shirking it. Even in the resolution where he accepts his title, his kingship is more about his wife running the kingdom while he continues to get by on charm. His weakness as a king is one of the main deliberations you have to balance as a player in that choice. It's great, but he's not strong. In both games, I'm left feeling that the male characters are consistently weaker individuals than the females, with some exceptions I mentioned. The females in both games are far more impressive to me to this point, though I do absolutely also enjoy the male characters. I think Zevran could potentially grow into a strong character in the future, but he hasn't quite got there yet, and it's likely to be in cameo. They're very interesting, strong in the sense of having a lot of ground to explore in the narrative, but not in the personal sense we're talking about.

Sebastion, you have a point. He's not quite the zealot throughout that he resolves himself to at different points in the game. He's a stronger character than the Arishok, to me. So I might concede the point, with the caveat that he still is more prone to zealotry, less to self actualization.

SilentK wrote...

Hmm... I did not see the downside to Varric mentioned among the males with strong characteristic faults ;-)

I have read quite a few threads focusing in on why Merill was right or wrong in her pursuit of more knowledge. Morrigan is not exactly one that easily let's people get close, and she can be so harsh, personally don't like her too much. Leliana, please stop ninjamancing me =) let's try to be friendly but not too friendly. And too much emphasis on maker and visions is a complaint I've read in a few threads here when people were mentioning things they found irritating. Wynne, I just wanted to chat a little not get a lecture... again. Isabella is perhaps too much into getting things for herself and not thinking about the people around her. Aveline only thinks about the people around her
Varric: So, what do you do on your freetime?
Aveline: This is my freetime.
Varric: And the trend of you scaring me ****less continues
(banter goes something like that..)


And the friendly person that is such a great bromance, good sense of humor and always on your side Varric and Garrus. Often guys in movies as well. All of them have their ups and downs. That is why we like them.


I think Varric is a strong character. He's the buddy yes, but his strength is in his initiative. He's the one going out of his way to make the city livable for the rest of the companions. He's also a bit subservient in that he'll go along with whatever, but overall, I think he qualifies.

With the females, I think you can see that each of them, right or wrong, is pursuing something of their own choosing, and each of them is succeeding of their own accord. Their dilemmas tend to be about deciding what they want to do, doing it, and then living with the repercussions. The males I mentioned are more concerned with being pushed into overcoming their own central defining faults. See my point? Morrigan's my favorite character in the games, and her arc is about overcoming an outside influence, her mother, and then deciding, for herself, what kind of person she wants to be and how she's going to meet the coming challenges we're a bit in the dark about. Each of the other female characters you mentioned is acting of their own volition and according to their own will, with input from the player, sure, but they're pursuing something, persevering through obstacles, rather than being pulled along. They're all strong characters.

Zkyire wrote...

I agree with the rest of your post, but for this part specifically, there's:

- Male Warden.
- Duncan. Because Duncan.
- Fergus (he's a good man, a good father and he's also doing his duty by going to fight the Darkspawn).
- Loghain had the balls to betray his King and start a civil war because he truly believed it was the right thing to do (and likely would have won if not for you meddling kids and your dogthe Warden).
- Cullen starts out as a brat, but by the end of DA2 he has stepped up to the plate to do the right thing and openly defy his superior officer.
- Sten. He butchered that family, but instead of whining about it, he quietly accepts his fate and lets the people imprison him so he can starve to death. And outside of that instance he's generally a total badass.
- Varric is not a hardass, but he is extremely confident, skilled in combat and gets crap done.
- Ser Gregoir. He called for the Rite of Annulment to be sure, but he wasn't some blind fanatic, and was willing to listen to reason. He seemed to have a lot of respect for Irving, despite the whole "Mage! Grr!" attitude many people think Templars have.
- Ser Otto. Dude was blind and still did his job, alone.
- The God damned Arishok.
- Riordan. Jumped off a tower onto the Archdemon's back, ultimately fell to his death. He didn't scream.


Warden, Loghain, Varric, Gregoir (good call), Otto (also good call), and Riordan I agree with, and they're all DA:O except Varric.

Sten is acting according to the Qun, though he's still my favorite Qunari. Fergus I honestly don't remember right now, unless he's the human noble's brother, to which I'd agree, except that he disappears for all but a few minutes in the game, and in those few minutes, he's ineffectual, and then simply shows up in support of the Warden after all's said and done. Or if he's the dwarven noble's aide, agreed. I just forgot to mention him in my first post (and forgot the name). Image IPB

Modifié par cindercatz, 02 mars 2013 - 03:04 .


#486
Sutekh

Sutekh
  • Members
  • 1 089 messages

krul2k wrote...

yeah have to agree with you in that the females have been the more interesting characters, but for me that has been a breath of fresh air

btw i'll point out the Arishok but no doubt you got problems with him lol

Kinda late, but I just wanted to point out that interesting and strong are two different things. You can have interesting weak characters and boring strong ones. i.e. Howe is weak (although he's somewhat strong in the ultimate moment), but interesting. Orana (the DA2 elven slave) is weak, but interesting, Oghren is very weak (although he has his moments), but interesting etc...

I don't have any example in mind of strong and boring in DA proper, but in general, any stereotyped alpha with an iron-will and a pristine / horrible moral compass would do (for me).

#487
cindercatz

cindercatz
  • Members
  • 1 351 messages
Agreed, exactly.

Modifié par cindercatz, 02 mars 2013 - 03:05 .


#488
SilentK

SilentK
  • Members
  • 2 618 messages

cindercatz wrote...

SilentK wrote...

Hmm... I did not see the downside to Varric mentioned among the males with strong characteristic faults ;-)

I
have read quite a few threads focusing in on why Merill was right or
wrong in her pursuit of more knowledge. Morrigan is not exactly one that
easily let's people get close, and she can be so harsh, personally
don't like her too much. Leliana, please stop ninjamancing me =) let's
try to be friendly but not too friendly. And too much emphasis on maker
and visions is a complaint I've read in a few threads here when people
were mentioning things they found irritating. Wynne, I just wanted to
chat a little not get a lecture... again. Isabella is perhaps too much
into getting things for herself and not thinking about the people around
her. Aveline only thinks about the people around her
Varric: So, what do you do on your freetime?
Aveline: This is my freetime.
Varric: And the trend of you scaring me ****less continues
(banter goes something like that..)


And
the friendly person that is such a great bromance, good sense of humor
and always on your side Varric and Garrus. Often guys in movies as well.
All of them have their ups and downs. That is why we like them.


I
think Varric is a strong character. He's the buddy yes, but his
strength is in his initiative. He's the one going out of his way to make
the city livable for the rest of the companions. He's also a bit
subservient in that he'll go along with whatever, but overall, I think
he qualifies.

With the females, I think you can see that each of
them, right or wrong, is pursuing something of their own choosing, and
each of them is succeeding of their own accord. Their dilemmas tend to
be about deciding what they want to do, doing it, and then living with
the repercussions. The males I mentioned are more concerned with being
pushed into overcoming their own central defining faults. See my point?
Morrigan's my favorite character in the games, and her arc is about
overcoming an outside influence, her mother, and then deciding, for
herself, what kind of person she wants to be and how she's going to meet
the coming challenges we're a bit in the dark about. Each of the other
female characters you mentioned is acting of their own volition and
according to their own will, with input from the player, sure, but
they're pursuing something, persevering through obstacles, rather than
being pulled along. They're all strong characters.


My, it must have taken you quite some time to get that post in order  :P

Hmm... I didn't really agree with your list of weak points for the guys earlier, but think that is so subjective so I did not want to prod you about it. Just listed a few things that I've thought about with the girls. For example Anders I do not see his weak point as running away, rather running straight into conflict with the templars concerning mages. If he had hightailed out of Kirkwall after the incident with his friend in Act 1 never to be seen again I would perhaps have said that he was running away. But he in DAII I feel as he is far from it. As the story progresses he get's more and more confrontational, he burns with a passion for his cause. That he follows. It is his choice. Well, perhaps his and Justice's choice would be a better way to put it. But he is following this path of his own volition, indeed my Hawke who romanced him had no way of talking him out of it. For me his weak side would be just how black and white he sees the world. I see him as very driven, but his uncompromising nature after merging with Justice puts him in trouble. But that's just his "bad side" as I see it. Never played awakening so I have never really seen the running away side of him. It was just a reason for him having a link to the Wardens but it didn't really come up again. And so on for the rest of the guys. I do not really see them having the same bad sides as you so it's difficult to come to some ultimate answer.

So, I don't agree with you but it is interesting to see how differently other people can read these characters that we meet in these games  :)

#489
cindercatz

cindercatz
  • Members
  • 1 351 messages

SilentK wrote...

My, it must have taken you quite some time to get that post in order  :P


Image IPB Yeah, a little bit. Image IPB

SilentK wrote...


Hmm... I didn't really agree with your list of weak points for the guys earlier, but think that is so subjective so I did not want to prod you about it. Just listed a few things that I've thought about with the girls. For example Anders I do not see his weak point as running away, rather running straight into conflict with the templars concerning mages. If he had hightailed out of Kirkwall after the incident with his friend in Act 1 never to be seen again I would perhaps have said that he was running away. But he in DAII I feel as he is far from it. As the story progresses he get's more and more confrontational, he burns with a passion for his cause. That he follows. It is his choice. Well, perhaps his and Justice's choice would be a better way to put it. But he is following this path of his own volition, indeed my Hawke who romanced him had no way of talking him out of it. For me his weak side would be just how black and white he sees the world. I see him as very driven, but his uncompromising nature after merging with Justice puts him in trouble. But that's just his "bad side" as I see it. Never played awakening so I have never really seen the running away side of him. It was just a reason for him having a link to the Wardens but it didn't really come up again. And so on for the rest of the guys. I do not really see them having the same bad sides as you so it's difficult to come to some ultimate answer.

So, I don't agree with you but it is interesting to see how differently other people can read these characters that we meet in these games  :)


Oh definitely. That's why it's fun to talk about them, for sure. Image IPB

Anders particularly in DA:A, he generally holds the kind of proto version of his views in DA2, and will show some darker shades under the right circumstances, but they're not carmelised, and Anders has no ambition to do anything about it. He basically is very averse to confinement and is very good at getting out and running, not so great at successfully staying out, and he's starting to boil over a little bit. I agree that as an abomination or however one would describe what he and Justice, Wynne and her spirit, were, he becomes very singleminded. Where I don't think that can be called strength is that he's never really in control, and neither is Justice. Anders doesn't have a choice except to pursue justice, or vengeance depending on how you look at the extent of what he was doing. He and Justice/Vengeance are also constantly in and out of, sort of a sane place, so he's not in a great deal of personal control either. I think he makes a lot of strong character choices, he does some dangerous things, starting with his merger with justice in the first place, or having the pluck to keep escaping his tower, but they come from a weak place in his core. Justice he would see as covering his deficiencies, but with consequences he didn't foresee at the time.

If you can't tell, Anders is actually one of my favorite DA characters. I just don't think he's a strong one in the sense of self determination and motivation, which is what this thread's talking about more with the female characters. Justice is too. ;) They're very interesting characters.

#490
karushna5

karushna5
  • Members
  • 1 620 messages
Yes, but a similar list can equally be made for the females, and a claim it was as central their faults as the men. As three dimensional characters, their faults are as big part as their virtues both male and female.

Oghren is a drunk fallen man, but also despite his rude behavior and drunkeness, he is an old warrior who can be very determined and frees himself from a political hierarchy and finds he is happy on the surface, and adjusts happily to his new life without so many restrictions, although he and Merrill are the most single faceted in the game.

Alistair can be insecure, true, but I would hardly call him effete, a manly charm if a gentle one. His strength lies though in his kindness and love which admittedly gets him into trouble, when love turns to revenge. His strength lies in much of Morrigans weakness and her strength lies much in his weakness. I think one reason they do not get along.

Sten is noble, and his ignominy troubles him. He is definitely a zealot as you say, but he is troubled by the men under him and cares about honor. Perhaps too much, and in the end he learns to respect and understand another person in a way he had not before outside the Qun. I find Sten quite strong in how he deals with his world. Accepting he has done wrong, and then earning back his honor.

Zevran, where do I start? He has an inner kindness but doesn't let it rule over him, he realizes he did a great wrong and seeks death. He doesn't moan about it or even dwells on it too much. He finds a good reason to live with purpose, with the Grey Warden making a new life for himself the only way he knows how. I never found him working for the Warden was switching masters he doesn't treat the Warden like a master but a chance at a new life and there is a lot of strength in that.

Fenris and Anders are practically the same person but on different sides. Although Fenris can admit some mages are good and his real hurt lies in slavery and that those slavers were mages than all mages. Anders only conversation was about mages and Templars and like Fenris was done wrong and prejudiced because of it. I like Fenris more because he is more accepting of fighting the Templars than Anders is fighting mages, and at least some topics were about Slavery than the Mage/Templar conflict, but honestly I see them as inverted pictures of each other. Opposite mirrors. All the same, Fenris grows to fight his bigotry a little, and Anders has a deep compassionate soul and it is even possible to get him to realize all his wrongs, and fight it.

those are just a few, but naming a character by their faults alone is hardly fair, and as I said could be done as easily with female characters as male

#491
cindercatz

cindercatz
  • Members
  • 1 351 messages
They all have faults and virtues, yes, which I agree is what makes them interesting and likable in the first place, but that doesn't make them strong or self determinant.

Ohgren is pulled into all those positive circumstances. His choice to go after Branka is a strong one, but his weakness led to the situation in the first place. His choice to then continue to fight the darkspawn is another. Like all the characters (or most anyway), he has his moments, but his weak qualities are the more defining, persistent traits. He doesn't reject the caste system or leave with some great sacrifice. He basically has two options. Go wallow in self pity and social exile, without a house, or take the oppurtunity to try and regain some self respect. And then once on the surface, he continues to repeat the same pattern in his new life. I don't think he or Merrill are single faceted at all, or similar in any way, really.

Alistair is definitely effete, not at the exteme end of the scale, but definitely there. That's not a weakness, though, just a personal quality. His kindness and love are both fickle when outside pressure is a factor, and he has a great tendency to backbite, to gossip with intent to harm. He prefers to snipe with comments rather than engage in direct confrontation. Like I said though, it's odd how different his interactions feel when you roleplay a male or a female Warden. With a female (more if you romance him, I guess), it feels more like you're supporting him in his personal growth (until he can fail to take responsibility for his own relationship at the end, if you're not a human noble), but with a male, it feels like he's just riding your coat tails. Regardless, how much he's likeable or not, whether that's his charm or his humor or what have you, those traits are not relevant to strength.

Morrigan, by contrast, is strong whether you like her or not. Her personal faults are not weak traits, whether they make her insufferable to a particular player or not. Getting along with others is not a strong/weak factor. She's one of the strongest characters in the games, if not the strongest. Everything she does is on her terms. Every goal she pursues is something she decides to pursue of her own volition. Even the initial task set out by her mother, she subverts that and decides to pursue the DR of her own accord, for her own reasons, after she proactively discovers her mother's purpose of her own free will. Her primary defining character trait is willfulness. She has the greatest potential personal arc, the most available change, of any companion character, and all according to her own will.

Morrigan and Leliana, both of their personal character arcs are about deciding what they want to believe and who they want to be, then pursuing it, which is the definition of personal strength. Morrigan moreso. As a player, you don't send her down a path, you challenge her to choose her own.

Sten is noble in his ability to think more for himself than most other Qunari, but he still defers to the Qun whenever the Qun has a say about anything. Zealotry is a weak character trait by definition, because it removes free will, and Sten still always defers to zealotry.

Zevran actually does treat the Warden like a master, and he even has a conversation about when the Warden might consider his debt paid. His personal quest is about whether he's personally invested in the Warden enough as a friend/lover to continue supporting them, or whether he's going to just betray you at the behest, again, of his old master, the Crows. Otherwise, I see Zevran as a character with the potential for more strength in the storyline, as per his quest in DA2, but I don't know that we'll get to see it in more than cameos, considering he's one of those characters with multiple oppurtunities to die. As for his personal qualities, he floats. He adapts to his present situation very well, which is one thing that helps him as an assassin. But while that's advantageous, it's not strength like people mean when it's refered to in the way that this thread does. It's not self determination.

Fenris and Anders are very, very different. One is a mage who has no ability to change his course, and had no original intent to set out upon it. The other is an anti-mage cipher to the player character.

Fenris, I'm convinced, doesn't really care all that much about slavery, which makes no sense, because he'll forgive Hawke's potential slavery. Fenris is full of spite towards mages for his own slavery, but makes an exception for Hawke no matter what Hawke does, if he likes you enough.. which is a problem with the meter system in DA2, but Fenris is the prime example of that failing. Fenris doesn't really care about the Elves, any of them. I don't think Fenris even cares about his sister all that much, or else why hang around Kirkwall spitting venom all day long, especially once his freedom is secured. He had some fun stories, my favorite being the one about being sent behind enemy lines and how well he embraced that, but he has no real convictions or motivations. He has no spine as a character.

(Not to bring this next point up because of our discussion, but it's been gnawing at me, so I need to say this. I've enjoyed the debate. :-) So, short rant ahoy.. Image IPB)

I know DG got flat out indignant on his blog about this with the "TFB" bit that somebody linked earlier in the thread, but when I say "I don't like Fenris, and not in a good way," this is what I mean. Certain characters have unlikable traits to some people, like it seems you don't like Morrigan, but they work as complete characters in their own right and have a higher function in the story than fan service. Y'know, like I don't like Howe, I don't particularly like Alistair personally, but I love them as characters in the story because they are well rounded characters that move the story forward in satisfying ways. Fenris is neither well rounded or story effectual in a character consistent way. He's just a cipher with a neat personal power and a snappy pre-love scene for the ladies. There is no female character equivalent, none. There's also no male equivalent. I can't think of another BioWare character that's ever been an outright cipher like Fenris is. I see him as the perfect example of what not to do, and I hope we can avoid things like this in future DA and BioWare games. He's a devolution of the art form. If we see him again, and we probably should entirely because he's a LI and I'm not fond of excluding content just for that group of fans, then I hope he grows a character spine.

(end rant, thanks for your patience Image IPB )

Modifié par cindercatz, 05 mars 2013 - 02:52 .


#492
Demarco09

Demarco09
  • Members
  • 488 messages

Gandalf-the-Fabulous wrote...

Wulfram wrote...

I don't believe Mr Gaider is a woman


Seriously? Guess I was confused by the fact he wrote Alistair who was obviously there to fill the role of the cute, goofy romancable guy you see in all those romantic comedies the ladies like.


Me loves some Alistair :)  He did Alistair extremelly well, he was loved by alot of gamers.... what is wrong with that? I am a girl gamer and honestly as long as they don't make it just too over the top I don't really care. Isabella was annoying to me. There is a difference between being a strong woman versus a ****.
But honestly why are you calling them male feminists? It is a fact that more and more girls are playing video games and that they need to keep up with that, but calling them feminists is quite...strong. Does this make you sexist?

Just take a look www.theesa.com/facts/gameplayer.asp

I really haven't seen Bioware do anything really wrong with the women, the only ones I had annoyances with were EDI (blatently a sex appeal) but it didn't overall change my views of the game or devs  and Isabella who pretty much would sleep with anyone at any time. (Isabella was probably my least favorite character Bioware has done).