DKJaigen wrote...
I dont want Flemeth to teach mages i want mages to teach themselves. They cannot do that when the chantry promotes ignorance. And you confuse strenght with defiance. Only defiant mages will get to leave the circle weak or strong. Or do you consider anders to be a strong mage?
I dont believe in a perfect world i do believe that mages can create a world where humans can survive. The chantry will not survive . It will not be destroyed by the circle mages but they will be destroyed by factions from the outside. From what i gather from the DA3 plot this is already happening. And if they are responsible for the mage-templar war they just crippeld the best defenses.
Teaching themselves is different than your first comment that they should turn to mages like Flemeth. I do agree that they should teach themselves but in a controlled environment, like a school. As for defiance and strength. No I don't consider Anders himself a strong mage but he became strong because of Justice. Anders proves that a mage can be as defiant as they like but if they are weak then they will always get caught and put back into the circle. Anders also had a stroke of luck being taken to Vigil's Keep during a crisis.
I have a problem with the part I bolded. I get the impression from it that mages should be the ones in power and it is up to them to create a world fit for human survival. I just see this as a reversal of the current system. Instead of mundanes calling the shots, let's let the mages call the shots. I think neither should be calling all the shots. They need to learn to work together. Mundanes can't keep mages locked up like that forever and mages need to get over the fact that they can't just run around zapping whomever they please, banging demons, and spraying blood all over the place(as fun as that sounds lol!), there need to be restrictions in place...just not the Chantry's current restrictions.
Its not the duty of the strong to carry the weak. Its the duty of the weak to grow stronger. I would not shed a
single tear if every chantrist was killed. They chose to be weak. And yes humanity survives for now. It doesnt mean it will continue to survive if it continues the chantrys backward policies and to ignore several major threats around them.
So you also don't shed a tear for any mage killed during the RoA as they are weak and allowed themselves to be imprisoned in the first place?
I have to agree with Mister JB about your views. They are very mage superiority centered where the Chantry and everyone involved needs to just die so that mages can rule. Because quite honestly, that is the only way your points make any sense. If the Chantry has held power for centuries and oppressed mages just as long, then they are the strong, have determined what is fit for human survival, and have no obligation to weak mages.
Now if mages overthrow mundanes and the Chantry and become the new power. Does that mean they get to just hold on to it with no one challenging them for it?
Why should mundanes rely on them to determine what is fit for their own survivial? If humans grow stronger and unite to overthrow them and succeed then what next? Mages get stronger and defeat them again? :pinched:I just see it as an endless cycle of war that helps no one in the end. There needs to be some compromise.
Because an Imperium where the weak (both mundane and mage) are murdered and enslaved is not the perfect example of a fitting place to live. No thanks to that and If that is what is happening then I hope the Chantry fights with everything they have to prevent this type of society worldwide.
Modifié par Hazegurl, 24 mars 2013 - 08:35 .