280 réponses à ce sujet

[IllusiveManJr]

OP, weren't you pro-Prothean, not pro-Collector? I call shenanigans.

[darthnick427]

 WE ARE HARBINGER!

Oh god I'm going to have far too much fun trolling people if I can make him look like a possesed collector. 

[Justinmiles19]

IllusiveManJr wrote...

OP, weren't you pro-Prothean, not pro-Collector? I call shenanigans.

And so it begins

[xSNPx ZoDiaC]

IllusiveManJr wrote...

OP, weren't you pro-Prothean, not pro-Collector? I call shenanigans.

They're the same thing to me. I always entertained the idea of Collectors being a lore justifiable alternative thanks to Leviathans. 

Modifié par xSNPx ZoDiaC, 25 février 2013 - 03:53 .

[l7986]

Erm... whats going on? Are they releasing a collector character?

[Rip The Reaper]

xSNPx ZoDiaC wrote...

ToLazy4Name wrote...

I don't like it, but it DOES fit the lore, so I can't say anything about it.

Indeed. This has got to be the most logical assertion I have seen.


Just because someone deosn't like Collector Thralls, does not mean they shouldn't be added.  

nope. It doesn't fit. If you played leviathan dlc you'd know that.

[DullahansXMark]

l7986 wrote...

Erm... whats going on? Are they releasing a collector character?

They MIGHT be. It's still not 100% certain.

social.bioware.com/forum/1/topic/343/index/16009593/1

[xSNPx ZoDiaC]

Rip The Reaper wrote...

xSNPx ZoDiaC wrote...

ToLazy4Name wrote...

I don't like it, but it DOES fit the lore, so I can't say anything about it.

Indeed. This has got to be the most logical assertion I have seen.


Just because someone deosn't like Collector Thralls, does not mean they shouldn't be added.  

nope. It doesn't fit. If you played leviathan dlc you'd know that.

Ha Ha primitve.


You amuse me.

[Chi_Mangetsu]

Rip The Reaper wrote...

Bendigoe wrote...

Oh wait, I didn't think of that.
Why would a Leviathan possess a Collector in order to fight the Reapers which it can also possess.

yeah, it doesn't make any since. We learned in leviathan that they can control reapers that are in range of the orbs. So why control one thrall to send in against enemies it is also in range to control? That would be putting the rest of the allied squad in danger for a pointless mission/battle. And wasting recorcess in the war.

Say, Rip, do you like vacuums? How about air locks?

[dreman9999]

Rip The Reaper wrote...

xSNPx ZoDiaC wrote...

ToLazy4Name wrote...

I don't like it, but it DOES fit the lore, so I can't say anything about it.

Indeed. This has got to be the most logical assertion I have seen.


Just because someone deosn't like Collector Thralls, does not mean they shouldn't be added.  

nope. It doesn't fit. If you played leviathan dlc you'd know that.

Why? The dlc stated that leviathan can control reaper thralls.They even show it happen in the dlc.

[Annihilator27]

Harbinger, My body is ready.

[Rip The Reaper]

@dreman9999

Rip The Reaper wrote...

SparkeeLecaro wrote...

Question:

We watched the Leviathans sway a sovereign-class Reaper into throwing itself at the ocean, and turn a unit of Cannibals, Brutes and Husks on their collective hats. Why would they bother taking over a single Collector with their wide radius orb of immense bull****, when they could theoretically seize control of 11 waves of insert-your-preferred-faction-here?

ie; why the massive lapse in judgement?

I'm not saying I don't believe. Just that I have my doubts. Between the poor photoshop mock-up (just when I thought it couldn't get any worse than Tali Face) and the fact that the Leviathans decided that a single, angry glowing zombie was the superior choice over widespread indoctrination, I'm left with a lot to think about.

exacly. So the leviathans are in range to control of this one thrall but not enemies its shooting at with collectors/reapers????

[dreman9999]

Rip The Reaper wrote...

Bendigoe wrote...

Oh wait, I didn't think of that.
Why would a Leviathan possess a Collector in order to fight the Reapers which it can also possess.

yeah, it doesn't make any since. We learned in leviathan that they can control reapers that are in range of the orbs. So why control one thrall to send in against enemies it is also in range to control? That would be putting the rest of the allied squad in danger for a pointless mission/battle. And wasting recorcess in the war.

What's stoping said leviathen from implanting small version of said orb into a thrawl?

[Descy_]

no.

bioware wouldnt do that.



no.








(please no)

[dreman9999]

Rip The Reaper wrote...

@dreman9999

Rip The Reaper wrote...

SparkeeLecaro wrote...

Question:

We watched the Leviathans sway a sovereign-class Reaper into throwing itself at the ocean, and turn a unit of Cannibals, Brutes and Husks on their collective hats. Why would they bother taking over a single Collector with their wide radius orb of immense bull****, when they could theoretically seize control of 11 waves of insert-your-preferred-faction-here?

ie; why the massive lapse in judgement?

I'm not saying I don't believe. Just that I have my doubts. Between the poor photoshop mock-up (just when I thought it couldn't get any worse than Tali Face) and the fact that the Leviathans decided that a single, angry glowing zombie was the superior choice over widespread indoctrination, I'm left with a lot to think about.

exacly. So the leviathans are in range to control of this one thrall but not enemies its shooting at with collectors/reapers????

What's stoping said leviathen from implanting small version of said orb into a thrawl?

[Onyx Reaper]

Annihilator27 wrote...

Harbinger, My body is ready.

YESSSSSssss... 

[Rip The Reaper]

dreman9999 wrote...

Rip The Reaper wrote...

Bendigoe wrote...

Oh wait, I didn't think of that.
Why would a Leviathan possess a Collector in order to fight the Reapers which it can also possess.

yeah, it doesn't make any since. We learned in leviathan that they can control reapers that are in range of the orbs. So why control one thrall to send in against enemies it is also in range to control? That would be putting the rest of the allied squad in danger for a pointless mission/battle. And wasting recorcess in the war.

What's stoping said leviathen from implanting small version of said orb into a thrawl?

see? We'd have to use our imagination for it to make since. As of right now.. It just doesn't work.

[Onyx Reaper]

Does anyone care if it fits or not? This is the finale of the DLCs, Bioware could throw in friggin' Optimus Prime for all they wanted.

[Uchimura]

This upsets me.

Seems like a stupid idea either way.

[J-Reyno]

Rip The Reaper wrote...

see? We'd have to use our imagination for it to make since. As of right now.. It just doesn't work.

Well, characters always come with a description to explain who/what they are and how they contribute to the fight.  So when/if this Collector is released it will have an official lore explanation for its existence.  

We won't really need to justify because BioWare will.

[Chameleonbot]

Descy_ wrote...

no.

bioware wouldnt do that.



no.








(please no)

[dreman9999]

Rip The Reaper wrote...

dreman9999 wrote...

Rip The Reaper wrote...

Bendigoe wrote...

Oh wait, I didn't think of that.
Why would a Leviathan possess a Collector in order to fight the Reapers which it can also possess.

yeah, it doesn't make any since. We learned in leviathan that they can control reapers that are in range of the orbs. So why control one thrall to send in against enemies it is also in range to control? That would be putting the rest of the allied squad in danger for a pointless mission/battle. And wasting recorcess in the war.

What's stoping said leviathen from implanting small version of said orb into a thrawl?

see? We'd have to use our imagination for it to make since. As of right now.. It just doesn't work.

What? Sorry but that isthe mostrational way to make sense of it. Being that theleviathen are a race so old they saw the birth of the dinosaurs, it's not a strachthey know how to manipulate their tech. Nothing say they can't make smaller version of their domination tech.

[Justinmiles19]

Uchimura wrote...

This upsets me.

Seems like a stupid idea either way.

[dreman9999]

IllusiveManJr wrote...

OP, weren't you pro-Prothean, not pro-Collector? I call shenanigans.

Colectors are prothean husks.So techniclly, it is a prothean.

[Versus Omnibus]

This has to be the greatest thing ever.... of all time.