Flemeth/Morrigan's ultimate plan (Serious SPOILER)
#126
Posté 25 février 2010 - 04:25
Im sure creating the demon baby will have a somewhat large impact in DA2
#127
Posté 25 février 2010 - 12:18
#128
Posté 26 février 2010 - 01:45
Oh yes, this should be very interesting indeed.
#129
Posté 27 mars 2010 - 03:11
#130
Posté 27 mars 2010 - 03:44
#131
Posté 27 mars 2010 - 02:34
As others have noted, Morrigan is not exactly good or evil, so when/if she and the old god child reappear, I think her actions will continue to have some redeemable or at least ambiguous characteristics. This injects better conflict into possible expansions/sequels, since the possibility of allying with her would be very interesting.
I think it's pretty dubious whether Morrigan intends to possess the child, let alone if she's actually capable of it. We don't know how powerful the old god really is, and Flemeth's possession techniques may not be strong enough, and might require being an abomination like Flemeth. I also think Morrigan's respect for nature and unique individuals may preclude her even considering possession.
Additionally, whatever Morrigan's long-term goal is, it is, at least initially, unconcerned with immense loss of life and the spreading of the blight. Her choosing to leave immediately if you refuse the ritual makes this pretty clear.
My personal theory is that Morrigan intends to reawaken the remaining Old Gods before the darkspawn taint them, and restore their place in the natural world. I think this presents a more dynamic conflict than her simply possessing her child and becoming some megalomaniacal conqueror or simply taking the child into hiding for the sake of preserving ancient creatures and knowledge. Awakening the remaining Old Gods ties into her disdain and rejection of the chantry's authority, her disregard for most mortals which she views as blinded and confined by society, and her respect for the natural world.
It's also a logical explanation for how cryptically she offers the ritual-- if she were going to live quietly in the woods with her super-baby, she probably wouldn't object to you dropping by occasionally. That her goal is of great consequence (she risks touching off a holy war with the chantry and even repeating the sins of the Tevinter Imperium) explains why she wouldn't trust the warden to help her. And, if her goal is to save the other old gods, it'd make sense for her to abandon the warden immediately if the ritual is refused, so she can focus on saving the last two.
I think my theory draws upon all aspects of her personality, rather than boiling them down to simply immoral or selfish. With Morrigan awakening old gods and so directly assaulting the chantry and Thedan society, she isn't just a villain: she's a force, the response to and anti-thesis of Andraste.
Tell me that wouldn't be cool.
#132
Posté 28 mars 2010 - 11:54
While the arch demons spirits will return to the fade corrupted you cant really get rid of them only alternative is to remove their corruption, since you cant really destroy the elder gods only the maker can that as far as we know.
And the arch demons can always return through the fade by possessing someone.
So initially only to way to remove their threat one be to ban all magic all together, and second is to cleanse them of sin and return them to a godless world. And i suppose Flemeth and morrigan saw the last option as the better of them.
Modifié par Lowenhart, 28 mars 2010 - 11:56 .
#133
Guest_Rob_R_*
Posté 28 mars 2010 - 02:29
Guest_Rob_R_*
Super_Fr33k wrote...
A others have noted, Morrigan is not exactly good or evil, so when/if she and the old god child reappear, I think her actions will continue to have some redeemable or at least ambiguous characteristics. This injects better conflict into possible expansions/sequels, since the possibility of allying with her would be very interesting.
Depends how you define "evil". To my mind, all you have to do is look at the Tevinter slave master. He offers the Warden a way to get more power at the expense of innocent elven lives. Warden refuses. Morrigan protests (!!). Warden persuades Morrigan it's not right. She disapproves -5 (!!). If draining the lives of wretched elves to get some extra power is the not the dictionary definition of evil then ... I don't know what is. She does not do "evil" for pleasure (stereotypilcal sadistic villain) but that's her only mitigating grace.
Example 2 - you promise to help Owen in Redcliffe find his daughter - Morrigan disapproves (-3 I think). She is totally and utterly self serving and has no compassion or pity, there is nothing she would draw the line at to get *her* way. Example 3 - Caradin. His imprisoning of souls to make war machines is "evil" (in my understanding), though never intended to be. Morrigan has no problem trapping endless number of poor souls and preserving the anvil. In fact, if you side with Caradin, you again get -1 or -3 Morrigan. So just to stress - this is not the 'neural' zero, she wants the power, nevermind the misery it must be paid for with.
Arguably, "evil" can sometimes be dressed up as a rational, logical, neutral. Morrigan's "logic" is sort of like - - don't bandage up this dying soldier - if he's so stupid as to get himself in the way of a waraxe, he deserves to die. And if you help him, he'll survive to breed offsping that are equally weak, so they'll die horribly too. That is the way of nature. Also, why give away bandages when they could come in handy for the party. All true, all logical, and all evil.
Then we look at her participation in the whole adventure - Flemeth planned this from day 1. Morrigan was in on it, despite the "innocent show" she puts on for the Warden's benefit at the Korcari Wilds. For most of DA:O, you think Morrigan is helping mother to survive the blight. Instead, she couldn't care less about the blight - as she openly reveals during the Ritual conversation.
This means two things - she *is* evil, and there is no depth she wouldn't stoop to in the name of power. The old god thing is *so* important to her that she'll risk several months of fighting the blight (a cause she cmust surely feel is a fool's errand) to get. Now that is a dangerous mix indeed. Any Warden who did not perform the US made a *big* mistake.
Modifié par Rob_R, 28 mars 2010 - 02:34 .
#134
Posté 28 mars 2010 - 03:18
Rob_R wrote...
This means two things - she *is* evil, and there is no depth she wouldn't stoop to in the name of power. The old god thing is *so* important to her that she'll risk several months of fighting the blight (a cause she cmust surely feel is a fool's errand) to get. Now that is a dangerous mix indeed. Any Warden who did not perform the US made a *big* mistake.
Well, I agree on this bit about Morrigan being evil; to be honest, I thought the expansion "awakening" was about the child =) but it wasnt of course. Going back to Morrigan, she is indeed evil, she is power hungry and definitely has a plot with the power she will have with the child. I would say her feelings for the Warden is real love but however, her ultimate goal goes much further than the Warden and she has chosen to leave to get away from the passion she had for him.
I could only think of a continuation about story of Morrigan with either:
1. Warden's search for Morrigan in stop of arising evil power from her and the child.
2. or the story would be years later and we will be using a totally new character interfering the Warden and Morrigans problem with the child and the new evil power.
or maybe we have nothing =P
Modifié par Marcellion, 28 mars 2010 - 03:18 .
#135
Posté 28 mars 2010 - 03:22
#136
Posté 28 mars 2010 - 08:05
I had never thought of this, but it fits perfectly with Morrigan's character. It would also prevent the last two Blights, which I think would also fit with her respect for the natural world.
"[as long] as the old [god's] tainted spirit [is] sleeping in the black city, there [is] always a chance of a new blight through the fade"
You haven't read the lore correctly, I'm afraid. When a tainted old god is killed by a warden, both souls are destroyed. The tainted soul does NOT return to the Fade. The only connection the Fade has with the darkspawn is the Chantry explanation for them. The Tevinter mages entered the Fade and corrupted the Golden City. The Maker cast the mages out as corrupted, tainted creatures who then created the darkspawn. The old dragon gods are not tainted until the darkspawn find them.
I wouldn't call Morrigan "evil". In order to be evil, you have to know what good is and actively work against it. Morrigan doesn't work against you in any good deed you choose to do. She may not approve, but she doesn't actively try to stop you either. Also, considering Morrigan's upbringing, when would she have had a chance to learn about being good? She was brought up by a mother who did what was expedient and whose personal goal was survival. Also, she understands the lesson of Nature that "...first, you must survive." Morrigan is actually amoral in that she doesn't make a distinction between right and wrong; she doesn't really have a moral code. For her, it's about strength and survival, not right and wrong. Now, we may judge her actions as evil, but that's applying our own morality to her actions.
I don't believe that Morrigan is going to return with an evil child, Alistair's joke about a "demon baby" notwithstanding. Her goal is not to control this old god's soul (I'm not even sure she could if she wanted to do so), but simply to preserve it to allow a magic which has been lost for centuries to return to the world. This preservation is the only reason she uses the Dark Ritual Flemeth taught her. As far as Morrigan is concerned, Flemeth is dead, so what her mother may have wanted is no longer a concern. If the PC didn't kill Flemeth, there may be some interesting complications down the road, although Flemeth herself says that she may just watch Morrigan since, "It will be interesting to see what she does with her freedom."
Modifié par Janni-in-VA, 28 mars 2010 - 08:12 .
#137
Guest_Rob_R_*
Posté 29 mars 2010 - 07:13
Guest_Rob_R_*
Janni-in-VA wrote...
I wouldn't call Morrigan "evil". In order to be evil, you have to know what good is and actively work against it. Morrigan doesn't work against you in any good deed you choose to do. She may not approve, but she doesn't actively try to stop you either.
She doesn't work against you because she wants to be there to perform the dark ritual. Her evil is tempered by pragmatism. How would she get her old god baby, if, when you turn down the Tevinter slaver's offer she turned on you, getting you or herself killed?
We cannot know what Morrigan would actively do or not do, since she is artificially bound to your party and does what you do -- for a while. We can debate her attitude as 'good' or 'evil' only based on her approvals system (and dialogue). Tevinter slave deal -5 is a good enough clue to me. Someone who is actively very upset that you do not leech the life out of poor innocent slaves to get a little extra power is not a moot point subject to interpretation. She is plain nasty.
Your argument is like saying that Wynne is not "good" because she does not actively work against evil while stuck in your party, she just follows the PC and heals up the mess. Ineed if you do not recruit her, she just stays in the circle - hardly "actively working against evil". Yet I think most people would agree Wynne is "good".
#138
Posté 30 mars 2010 - 05:11
Using Rob_R's examples.
Example 1) I don't think she is "evil," she is simply looking at the big picture. As far as killing the slaves to gain more power: killing a few elves to get the power that could tip the scales in your favor against the blight, saving thousands of lives isn't too bad a tradeoff (they would likely die if you lose anyway). Not that I'm condoning their possible death or anything, I'm just rationalizing that decision.
Example 2) Finding Owen's daughter could be a waste of time (and possibly your life) that could be used ending the blight.
Example 3) Caradin same as the slaves, what's a few lives it they can be spent saving the world.
Saying this, I must state that I went against Morrigan on all of this examples man more.
(YES!!! It would be wrong, but if you could kill a handful of innocent people to save a million would it be EVIL ?)
2) On the "demon baby thing"
1) I said this awhile ago on another thread, and I think someone touched on this, but the old gods taught , arguably, the most powerful mages ever, the Tevinter mages "all they knew." This mages made it all the way to the throne of the maker it the once golden city. If the old gods could teach the Tevinter mages that, perhaps they could teach Morrigan/Flemeth the same.
2) (In my understanding the old gods rebelled against the maker, and seduced his people into worshiping them, and even rebelling against him.) Morrigan hates the chantry,(the maker worshiping, mage imprisoning, "all knowing") chantry. (A) Maybe Morrigan wants to "free" the world from the chantry, an all-out holy war. And being the initiator of this war she would be its' greatest benefactor (kind of evil, but more game play). (
#139
Guest_Rob_R_*
Posté 30 mars 2010 - 07:03
Guest_Rob_R_*
Jabraham002 wrote...
1) About Morrigan being evil.
Example 1) I don't think she is "evil," she is simply looking at the big picture. As far as killing the slaves to gain more power: killing a few elves to get the power that could tip the scales in your favor against the blight, saving thousands of lives isn't too bad a tradeoff (they would likely die if you lose anyway). Not that I'm condoning their possible death or anything, I'm just rationalizing that decision.
2) On the "demon baby thing"
1) I said this awhile ago on another thread, and I think someone touched on this, but the old gods taught , arguably, the most powerful mages ever, the Tevinter mages "all they knew." This mages made it all the way to the throne of the maker it the once golden city. If the old gods could teach the Tevinter mages that, perhaps they could teach Morrigan/Flemeth the same.
1) One the "evil" part, as I wrote in an earlier post, hiding behind logic makes almost every evil justified (besides the insane 'bwahaha' Hollywood villain type). Good = what is right for the community, generally at your own expense; evil = what is right for you at the community's expense. So if I fail to help a car crash victim on the grounds that my time would be better spent doing some extra hours in the office, that is "evil". Yet it is logical from my perspecive (I definitely get money from the office, but probably won't from the crash victim).
What you are arguing is the old "means to an end" dilemma. Is killing 1 innocent to save 2 innocents OK, or should the 2 be left to die, so that you are not forced to kill 1? I don't think anyone can answer that. But remember Morrigan is not out to save the world from the blight. She is saving Ferelden as an (unfortunate?) price she has to pay to get the Warden to sleep with her, and give her the soul of the old god. She admits this in the dark ritual conversation ("why did you think mother sent me along with you? For your Blight? (laugh) She planned this moment from the very start"). So when she says kill 1 innocent, it is not for the cause you think. It is for her personal quest to gain more power. And there is nothing morally unequivocal now.
2) I agree completely. Old god + mage = untold power. The added problem is that the untold power is evil. Cue DA2.
#140
Posté 30 mars 2010 - 11:13
BUT if Morrigan truly is evil, and plans to do evil with the child than any good she had accomplished in the process will be undone. If this is the case or not…. We'll just have to wait and see.
#141
Posté 30 mars 2010 - 11:18
#142
Posté 31 mars 2010 - 06:27
This could be a way to challenge the maker, break the circle, and topple the chantry.
Morrigan represents dragon age's story telling. Actions have consequences, and nothing is simply black or white. We don't know her full motives or how it has changed over time or will. What might appear to be evil, could be for a reason some don't understand or agree with.
Modifié par ReViliTy, 31 mars 2010 - 06:32 .
#143
Guest_Rob_R_*
Posté 31 mars 2010 - 06:41
Guest_Rob_R_*
Jabraham002 wrote...
If Morrigan is completely evil, than I would agree with you, Rob, but if she is, why would she not only approve of you saving Sten, but suggest it? And about the car crash, I think it would be more like skipping the car crash and spending that time saving a burning orphanage. Are you "evil" for saving more lives and more likely to get a medal or a prize? (If the medal and prize is the only reason, than perhaps.) That's the way I see Morrigan, by no means is she a "goody-two-shoes" superhero, she is just cruel in the way she looks at the bigger picture. Even if the only reason she "saves Ferelden" is for the old god (which maybe for good or ill), is she evil? It would be like saying a doctor that saves lives only for the paycheck is evil too.
The Sten thing is in line with the "do anything to get the old god" goal. If it involves killing innocent elves, kill innocent elves. If it involves saving a murdering giant who can increase your odds of survival, then save the murderous giant. I am sure that if Sten was crippled and could not swing a blade, saving him would net you a -7 with Morrigan. Probably a quest to just bring him water would get you -1. So she just wants to save him for his power.
I think where we disagree is whether Morrigan's heart is in "the cause", ie the Blight. If it is, then I can accept that - in some people's minds - any means to achieve that end is OK. Sort of like Avernus. The aim is noble, but the means dirty, sometimes so dirty as to throw the baby out with the bathwater.
However Morrigan makes it clear (through actions and dialogue) on a number of occasions that she has no true interest in saving Ferelden. Just look at what happens if you turn down her Dark Ritual. She turns tail and disappears. There is nothing else in it for her, so why hang around for a dangerous battle? Blight be damned -- you can face the Archdemon without magic. If she were truly interested in the Blight, then she would be with you until the end, since the cause means something to her. Otherwise, she is only 'near' you to maximize the chance that the old god's soul hops to the "right" new vehicle (her baby). In that light, killing elven slaves for power makes her pure evil.
Those who say 'you don't understand women if you can't see that spurning that sort of offer would make her leave'. Well, I turned her romance down twice in the camp, and never saw her disappear. It's just if you turn her down on the eve of the archdemon that she decides to throw you and Ferelden to the wolves.
Bioware has said that Morrigan's story is "not finished", so I guess we can bookmark this thread and return in February!
#144
Posté 07 avril 2010 - 07:24
When I romanced Morrigan, I found her to be her mother's daughter at first, but change subtely over time. I think when she first joined she was Flemeth's willing puppet. That as much as she might have distrusted Flemeth, she was still her mother, and Flemeth's view points on power and survival were the only she knew. Then as you adventured along with her and offered her her first compliments, gifts, and true signs of friendship/love, that Morrigan truely valued it. There are a few times when you thank her (like after the dark ritual, before the arch demon fight), and her face contorts as she's pained by the thought of a companion/lover giving her such a heart found statement knowing she will leave them. It's just that throughout the game Morrigan knew what she had to do (leave with the child, for Flemeth at first, for herself later), and that's why she kept shutting you out, to keep you from feeling pain as much as keeping herself from feeling pain when you eventually had to part forever.
As for the plan, I'm going with Morrigan taking a twist on Flemeth's. Either the two of them were Dragon Cult members given the task of retrieving one of the Old Gods, or it was solely Flemeth's plan for a new body (both equally possible). However, I think Morrigan honestly changed. Where I think she was privy to the plan and dark ritual at the beginning (which she admits), and plays her part willingly to do her mother's bidding, I think her learning of her mother's eventual betrayal, and the PC's affection changed how she played things out. When she found out Flemeth planned on kicking her out of her own body (which I believe Morrigan honestly didn't know about, but possibly Flemeth knew she'd find out) Morrigan decided not to do her mother's biddings. I think Morrigan just wanted the kid with no ulterior motive. She just wanted to revive an Old God, raise it to her views of right and wrong, and let it do as it will. I don't think body swapping, or possessions are involved.
That in and of itself is where I think the second game can pick up. Morrigan turns out to be wrong, raised the child in a way that it ends up hating life, and she returns to the PC to seek his help in stopping the child (which she also stipulates you are not to harm). The child raises a Darkspawn army, and is the ultimate threat you deal with in Dragon Age 2. It fits with the moral choice bill as well, do you attempt to redeem your own child with Morrigan at the world's risk? Or do you kill your own child, and kill yourself as it's soul flees towards your Grey Warden taint. I think it's too early to see a returning Flemeth tho, I'd more expect her return for the 3rd game, when she's had time to find a new body and better regain her strength. Tho...there is one teeny tiny problem with my idea...if your not male it kills that idea...unless the game just assumes the other male grey warden had the child and Morrigan seeks out the person she trusts most (if you're a girl) rather than the father (if you're a male).
Modifié par Fading, 07 avril 2010 - 07:29 .
#145
Posté 07 avril 2010 - 10:55
#146
Posté 07 avril 2010 - 11:43
One question remains, what does the dark ritual do? In essense it could remove the taint from the blood but still attract the archdemon, as she said she wanted to have an untainted old god, and unless you don't believe her, she wouldn't have the baby if it was going to be tainted. In essense its a matter of if you believe morrigan in this fact or not.
2. Is it the fact that she didn't get what she wanted? Perhaps it also has a little to do with not wanting to see the person she love die a horrible death (having an old gods soul destroy your own doesn't sound pleasant...).
3. Pure conjecture, neither right nor wrong but there is little reason to believe that outcome over any other.
Your not necessarily wrong, but there are more factors that noone other then the writers at bioware actually know to make a definitive prediction on this issue.
Personally I am hoping that there is a conflict between Morrigans desire for power and her love for, and the influence provided by, the player character, with the possibility of turning her to a better path (ala. Revan + Bastilla). Honestly what I saw in the romance arc with Morrigan was a person with a small flicker of compassion buried under years of psychological abuse from Flemeth.
I believe Morrigan is in conflict with her own feelings for the warden since she tells the warden the night before the battle that
1. she love s the warden
2. she has to do the ritual coz Flemeth told her to do the ritual (she said"i can't let what i feel interfere with what i have to do")
That said i think her feelings for the warden are genuine and sincere but she is Brainwashed by Flemeth and that's why she still continues with the ritual
after all i have never seen her lie (but shes not telling you everything either)
and in the final screens it said that she feels sorrow and regret
wich makes me think she really cares for the warden but for some reason she has to do the ritual
and if you paid attention to what happens in the game and what Morrigan tells you
it is ALL Flemeths plan, just maybe she doesn't know everything either?
and she is basicly flying blind on Flemmeth´s words.
#147
Posté 12 avril 2010 - 05:03
#148
Posté 12 avril 2010 - 05:13
#149
Posté 12 avril 2010 - 05:19
#150
Posté 12 avril 2010 - 05:31





Retour en haut






