Aller au contenu

Photo

How come the Claymore is not a popular weapon on the Fury ?


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
180 réponses à ce sujet

#176
Trontor

Trontor
  • Members
  • 542 messages

Feneckus wrote...
And let's face it, it's 500 times more badass than the Acolyte/Hurricane/Talon/Whatever.


Now you only need to solo Platinum in less than 21 minutes to actually prove that. :P

#177
MasterPeras

MasterPeras
  • Members
  • 1 261 messages
Not to mention the significant loss of dps. By the time you squeeze of 2 shots and one BE with claymore, you can do 3 booms with a 200% CD and hurry.
If the claymore did splash dmg then we could discuss this but it doesn't.

#178
avenging_teabag

avenging_teabag
  • Members
  • 927 messages
The straight answer is that 90, make it 95 per cent of the player base lack the skill to consistently land Claymore headshots point blank. OP can, good for him; I definitely can't, actively hate that brick, so i stick to weapons which are easier for me to handle.

#179
TheKillerAngel

TheKillerAngel
  • Members
  • 3 608 messages
Acolyte/Hurricane is more versatile. The Claymore Fury isn't very good at dealing with large shielded enemies.

#180
Guest_Paynez_*

Guest_Paynez_*
  • Guests
And to all the XBox players in this thread complaining about auto-aim, stop please.

I've played ME3 on XBox much longer than I have on PC and I can say Auto-Aim isn't that bad.

The game would be much harder without it.

#181
Feneckus

Feneckus
  • Members
  • 3 076 messages

MasterPeras wrote...

Not to mention the significant loss of dps.


Significant loss of dps ? :blink:

How about, next time you actually watch the video instead of talking out of your ass ?