Emzamination wrote...
Could be worse-- the models could be fat with small breast.
That seems so counter-intuitive. I wonder how some people are that way.
Emzamination wrote...
Could be worse-- the models could be fat with small breast.
Barneyk wrote...
Blair Brown wrote...
I don't want to accidently derail the thread, i'm actually interested in where this discussion will end up. I have my own thoughts on this but will wait a bit before posting them.
I don't think that the females are to overly sexualised, they all look fine.
But to put a claim of "different standards of beauty" on it really feels like one is missing the point.
The dward woman might not be slim compared to the others, but that is still what makes her attractive, she has a slim, well defined waist and pretty big boobs, by dwarf standards.
That is the common demoninator for the beauty in all the female characters there, a slim waist and boobs.
I find it sad that it is so one-dimensional.
I wouldn't have reacted if it wasn't for the "different standards of beauty" tag, that is something to really think about.
I will not get into discussion with the other people in this thread, I cannot keep civil when faced with some of the things some people say, so I choose not to.
And really, thanks for listening.
Volus Warlord wrote...
I want a Fatness bar on the character creator.
Barneyk wrote...
Blair Brown wrote...
I don't want to accidently derail the thread, i'm actually interested in where this discussion will end up. I have my own thoughts on this but will wait a bit before posting them.
I don't think that the females are to overly sexualised, they all look fine.
But to put a claim of "different standards of beauty" on it really feels like one is missing the point.
The dward woman might not be slim compared to the others, but that is still what makes her attractive, she has a slim, well defined waist and pretty big boobs, by dwarf standards.
That is the common demoninator for the beauty in all the female characters there, a slim waist and boobs.
I find it sad that it is so one-dimensional.
I wouldn't have reacted if it wasn't for the "different standards of beauty" tag, that is something to really think about.
I will not get into discussion with the other people in this thread, I cannot keep civil when faced with some of the things some people say, so I choose not to.
And really, thanks for listening.
Guest_Lightning Cloud_*
ReallyRue wrote...
The dwarf woman isn't stick thin, the Qunari/Tal-Vashoth woman is athletically built, and none of them have exagerated cleavage. But OP, you haven't actually pointed out what you think they should look like instead.
But where is the part of the OP that goes: Oh Bioware, why are all the men attractive and muscular?!
Swoopdogg wrote...
Do you honestly want an obese LI (or PC)? How about a scrawny one? That's cool if you do, but most people would say no. Bioware is catering to most people, as well they should.
Modifié par Emzamination, 26 février 2013 - 09:39 .
Lightning Cloud wrote...
ReallyRue wrote...
The dwarf woman isn't stick thin, the Qunari/Tal-Vashoth woman is athletically built, and none of them have exagerated cleavage. But OP, you haven't actually pointed out what you think they should look like instead.
But where is the part of the OP that goes: Oh Bioware, why are all the men attractive and muscular?!
I actually would really like to have a smaller-framed male character, if body types become an option in customization. I think it looks better.
ReallyRue wrote...
Smaller than an elf? But he'd disappear from your line of sight the moment he turns sideways!
Swoopdogg wrote...
Volus Warlord wrote...
I want a Fatness bar on the character creator.
This is something that I could actually see hapening, but I'm not sure how well It'd transfer to combat and, well, romance scenes (not because they're fat, but because typically those scenes are built around one body type)
Blair Brown wrote...
This is kind of where I am going on this, and I assume where the artist was as well.
"Different
standards of beauty" or how can we look at something and see the
beauty in it, or work with it and exaggerate/bring out certain
characteristics of the race.
Quick examples if you look closer at
the picture, of things that would be different standards of beauty/not
beauty for different people viewing it.
- Flat face/hunched-elongated neck of the Qunari male (let alone horns)
- How tall and athletic the Qunari female is (let alone grey skin)
- The thin and elongated face and body of the Elven male
- Female elfs thin shoulder width and long arms
- How short the female dwarf is
- The overly broad shoulders of the male dwarf, barrel chest, small height.
When
I look at this I also think to myself about the world of thedas, it's
harsh, most people do hard manual labour all day, war is constant, food
is very healthy, exercise almost constant (theres no cars). So most
people would be in peak physical condition imo.
Also, women have boobs, I don't think any in that picture are overly sexualized or completly out of wack.
Modifié par Barneyk, 26 février 2013 - 09:44 .
Guest_krul2k_*
Modifié par Gill Kaiser, 26 février 2013 - 09:47 .
Barneyk wrote...
Blair Brown wrote...
This is kind of where I am going on this, and I assume where the artist was as well.
"Different
standards of beauty" or how can we look at something and see the
beauty in it, or work with it and exaggerate/bring out certain
characteristics of the race.
Quick examples if you look closer at
the picture, of things that would be different standards of beauty/not
beauty for different people viewing it.
- Flat face/hunched-elongated neck of the Qunari male (let alone horns)
- How tall and athletic the Qunari female is (let alone grey skin)
- The thin and elongated face and body of the Elven male
- Female elfs thin shoulder width and long arms
- How short the female dwarf is
- The overly broad shoulders of the male dwarf, barrel chest, small height.
When
I look at this I also think to myself about the world of thedas, it's
harsh, most people do hard manual labour all day, war is constant, food
is very healthy, exercise almost constant (theres no cars). So most
people would be in peak physical condition imo.
Also, women have boobs, I don't think any in that picture are overly sexualized or completly out of wack.
There are differences, but you miss the point.
Female beauty requires slim waist and boobs, and then there can be differences.
Slim waist and boobs is a prerequisite no matter what race you are, then other details differ in what is beautiful and not. That is the problem I have with this.
And peak physical condition is a valid point, but also misses the point. The kind of well defined slim waist is not a sign of peak physical condition.
And yes, women usually have boobs, more or less. And they are not completly out of whack, I wouldn't have any direct objection to that as an example without the tagline.
But if you wanna pull the card of being in peak physical shape and not eating to much unhealthy stuff, smaller boobs is quite a common result of that.
I think it is worth reflecting about, if you wanna show different standards of beauty but every single female still have a slim waist and big boobs, that says a lot about what "beauty" is since that part doesn't differ.
That standard is constant.
That is what this image says, intentional or not. And that is something worth reflecting over imo.
EDIT: I could analyze this deeper and also get into the male body-image. But that is more in the details, and if I can't get anywhere with the big easy points first, I won't bother going into it deeper.
All I am asking is that one might reflect about things when portraying "different standards of beauty".
I think you'll have to be more specific for your "standards of beauty" comment. Are you talking about those of modern humans in the real world? Are you talking about those of just Westerners? Do you mean what you think should be those held by Thedosians (I mean this seriously)?Barneyk wrote...
How is it different standars of beauty when all the females are thin with big breasts and a well defined slim waist?
Really dissapointing to see Bioware not taking a better and more active stance with this...
Modifié par nightscrawl, 26 février 2013 - 09:55 .
Gill Kaiser wrote...
But complaining about small waists? Its status as a marker of attractiveness is biological and evolutionary in nature. What are you going to be disappointed about next, their symmetry?
Emzamination wrote...
Gill Kaiser wrote...
But complaining about small waists? Its status as a marker of attractiveness is biological and evolutionary in nature. What are you going to be disappointed about next, their symmetry?
^ Seriously. So much this.
Guest_krul2k_*