Darth Obvious wrote...
Obtusifolius wrote...
I'm not sure I really get the gist of this argument as it is meant to be gotten, but I don't think it is unreasonable to use either/or. Any accent where the speaker is native to Britain is British. Welsh accents are British, as are Northern Irish and Scottish (and of course English). I cannot see how it is offensive or incorrect to call an English accent a British accent, since it is one.
Exactly. It's just a descriptive term to describe that accent. I think I can speak for most Americans in that we would find it odd that anyone could possibly take offense at something so benign.
Having read his subsequent posts, however, I can see why he would get irritated by southern English being described as 'British' whereas Scottish is called 'Scottish'. So yes, in that instance his country is being excluded.
However, it would be silly to be offended at someone's description of any British accent as 'British'.
Edit: I can see why people use 'British' for ease of expression, though, and why there is a need to be more specific when other countries, such as Scottish/Welsh/N.Irish are being referred to, since English accents are likely more familiar to Americans than the others. Why the English must be described as 'British', really, is probably the main problem, and I can see how confusion between the language and the country might arise.
Modifié par Obtusifolius, 12 janvier 2010 - 04:43 .





Guest_Obtusifolius_*
Retour en haut







