70 réponses à ce sujet

[liggy002]

   Sovereign and Harbinger.  That would be beyond epic.... like Sovereign was destroyed but managed to upload its intelligence in the Citadel and Harbinger gets involved as well somehow.

  Then I realize that this will probably be a let down and it will just be some indoctrinated Spectre or Council member with neither Harbinger nor Sovereign.  These are dark days indeed for Mass Effect 3.  I wish things could have been different.  Soon enough I'll know the truth.

[Taboo]

But I'm paying for Miranda Lawson.

[Lokiwithrope]

If the Citadel DLC is about relaxing, why bring in the damn Reapers?

[liggy002]

Lokiwithrope wrote...

If the Citadel DLC is about relaxing, why bring in the damn Reapers?

Why bring in anything at all... a threat is still a threat.  And you relax AFTER the mission.

Modifié par liggy002, 03 mars 2013 - 04:39 .

[o Ventus]

Taboo-XX wrote...

But I'm paying for Miranda Lawson.

[Strangewrex]

"like Sovereign was destroyed but managed to upload its intelligence in the Citadel"
And here I thought my "EDI Is Software, she survived the Destroy Ending" theory was Far-Fetched

[liggy002]

o Ventus wrote...

Taboo-XX wrote...

But I'm paying for Miranda Lawson.

Ok, good, but that doesn't have anything to do with my requests.

[Lawrence0294]

Taboo-XX wrote...

But I'm paying for Miranda Lawson.

[BigEvil]

Taboo-XX wrote...

But I'm paying for Miranda Lawson.

This as well, and whatever other content we get with other characters. I'm sure the conspiracy mission will be fun and interesting, but it's the characters I want to see most.

[devSin]

I'd rather the word budget be spent on someone that actually matters.

Sovereign doesn't need to be resurrected without purpose (I do believe John Dombrow could come up with compelling dialogue for him, but I don't see how using the character this way would really achieve anything), and Harbinger is no longer relevant to the story.

Modifié par devSin, 03 mars 2013 - 12:45 .

[Leonardo the Magnificent]

You've got to be joking. Aside from that atrocious bit about Sovvie, how is it in any way intriguing to learn that Harbinger (somehow) plotted your assassination? How could a DLC like that possibly (and satisfyingly) conclude? What would be gained, save from hamfisting a character who has no place outside of his cameo into the narrative?

[IntelligentME3Fanboy]

john_sheparrd wrote...

o Ventus wrote...

Taboo-XX wrote...

But I'm paying for Miranda Lawson.

[Jadebaby]

If this dlc features Lara Croft, I will buy it.

[IntelligentME3Fanboy]

Jadebaby wrote...

If this dlc features Lara Croft, I will buy it.

If this dlc features Nathan Drake,I will buy it

[Strangewrex]

IntelligentME3Fanboy wrote...

Jadebaby wrote...

If this dlc features Lara Croft, I will buy it.

If this dlc features Nathan Drake,I will buy it

If This DLC Features John117, I will buy it

[IntelligentME3Fanboy]

Strangewrex wrote...

IntelligentME3Fanboy wrote...

Jadebaby wrote...

If this dlc features Lara Croft, I will buy it.

If this dlc features Nathan Drake,I will buy it

If This DLC Features John117, I will buy it

If this dlc features John Riccitielo,I will buy it

[liggy002]

Leonardo the Magnificent wrote...

You've got to be joking. Aside from that atrocious bit about Sovvie, how is it in any way intriguing to learn that Harbinger (somehow) plotted your assassination? How could a DLC like that possibly (and satisfyingly) conclude? What would be gained, save from hamfisting a character who has no place outside of his cameo into the narrative?

   So some redundant random spectre assasination plot is more relevant than ME2's key antagonist.... if that's the case, then this game is just unsatisfying on so many levels.  No place outside his cameo in the narrative?  Don't make me laugh.  I doubt you know what a good and coherent narrative even is.  It's a loose plot thread that needs to be resolved.

[Mavqt]

BringBackNihlus wrote...

I'm hoping this DLC will...bring back Nihlus.

+1

[liggy002]

devSin wrote...

I'd rather the word budget be spent on someone that actually matters.

Sovereign doesn't need to be resurrected without purpose (I do believe John Dombrow could come up with compelling dialogue for him, but I don't see how using the character this way would really achieve anything), and Harbinger is no longer relevant to the story.

Harbinger is more revelant than Bioware is willing to admit and if he is not in it, then I can truly agree with that bad writing camp.

[dreamgazer]

I'm paying for nostalgia. That's a lot of potential ground to cover for things to be "brought back".

I'm also paying for this conspiracy. I have my musings, but they're more "it'd be interesting" things than actual predictions, of course.

[bboynexus]

Liggy....didn't you post something recently where you, ah, proclaimed to have 'let go', and that you were proud of the guys and gals at BioWare?

I'm detecting double-standards.

[liggy002]

bboynexus wrote...

Liggy....didn't you post something recently where you, ah, proclaimed to have 'let go', and that you were proud of the guys and gals at BioWare?

I'm detecting double-standards.

They've done good work in the past and I respect that.... but that doesn't mean that I cant post threads speculating on what I'd like to see.  Nowhere in that thread did I ever state that I liked Mass Effect 3 or was excited about the direction it was heading.

Modifié par liggy002, 03 mars 2013 - 01:22 .

[spirosz]

BringBackNihlus wrote...

I'm hoping this DLC will...bring back Nihlus.

Your username predicted this will happen, I bow down.