62 réponses à ce sujet

[internaty inmortelaty]

dont know nor care if this has bin asked befor.
but are you a good kind and humble person in most of your games.
a bad ass everyone dies ashole or somewhere in between.

myself i am rather nice hate being crual not my thing.

p.s if your in between what do you generaly do ingame that makes you in between.

[Herr Uhl]

The magnificent bastard is my favorite.

[Zafireria]

I have been the nice one so far, don't like hurting people. But in my third playthrough (on my second now) I am going to be mean, to see some new dialogues option and to get some achievements. Going to be interested.

[catofnine]

I always play a paragon of virtue in my first playthrough. After that, it's whatever I feel like...

/evil laugh

[Realmzmaster]

I am in between depending on the situation. I play a rogue and I always do Slim's quests which involve pickpocketing and break-ins. But since most of the marks are against Howe or Howe associates I do not care. In my first playthrough as a human noble I killed Connor, because I eliminated the mages (Right of Annulment).
So it depends on the situation.

Modifié par Realmzmaster, 12 janvier 2010 - 08:41 .

[AtreiyaN7]

I try to be good, kind and just. I have this pathetic inability to be mean most of the time anyway, even if I try to RP evil - I just can't do it, like ever - it makes me cringe (unless an author riles me up - then I can get mean IRL, lol). Well, I CAN be mean to Goldanna, but she's an evil harpy & that's probably the only time I was ever nasty towards anyone (the "someone should cut out that tongue of yours" comment).

Modifié par AtreiyaN7, 13 janvier 2010 - 02:55 .

[Xandurpein]

I almost always end up trying to play good, at least as I see it. That poor Blood mage woman in the tower begging for mercy always lives, even if I sometimes thinks my character should decide that it is dangerous to let her live.



One of the few enemies that I almost never let live, even if he begs for mercy is that Tevinter slaver at the end of the alienage quest.

[Ygolnac]

well, on first walkthrough so and so, i don't like to be utterly mean but also enjoy some slaughtering here and there.



But from second walkthrough and on, check this



http://social.biowar.../index/565984/2

[El-Destructo]

In between. My city elf rogue was something of a take from the rich, give to the poor and myself kind of person. She intimidated Lloyd in to making her owner of his tavern before giving it to Bella after the siege, robbed all the nobles in Denerim blind, gave the maximum amount of money possible to every beggar she was able to, and most of all loved to exploit other criminals. Definitely enjoyed the Lyrium smuggling one. Squeezed the supplier for money, then squeezed the customer for money, then extorted him for even MORE money. Ahhhh, life is good. =D

[internaty inmortelaty]

AtreiyaN7 wrote...

I try to be good, kind and just. I have this pathetic inability to be mean most of the time anyway, even if I try to RP evil - I just can't do it, like ever - it makes me cringe (unless an author riles me up - then I can get mean IRL, lol). Well, I CAN be mean to Goldanna, but she's an evil harpy & that's probably the only time I was ever nasty towards anyone (the "someone should cut out that tongue of yours comment").

glad to see i aint the only unable to do evil.

[SusanStoHelit]

I don't enjoy 'evil' characters - but can enjoy a range of 'good' or 'neutral'. Good doesn't necessarily mean being soft, of course, it's just a matter of who you're tough to. Vaughan = dead, every time. Branka likewise. I show mercy where I can or where it's deserved. I help those I can. But those who deserve a knife in the gut - get it.



I just wish some characters I could kill more than once - and that others I can't kill, that I could. Some things just can't be forgiven - ever.

[wwwwowwww]

I generally play a Rogue so when I play I tend to do a little of both, sometimes I'll do or say some not so nice things, and other times I'm the typical knight in shiney armor type. A lot has to do with what I've decided my characters motivations are.



When I play a city elf I truly try to play a character that has disdain for the humans, but it is very hard considering the first 3 companions (not including the dog) you come across are human. I managed to tell the King off using his heritage, but I can't get rid of Alastair.hmmmmm annoying on some play throughs, lol.

[frostajulie]

My favorite character was a Mage and she was in Between. She helped most people and was very respectful, caring, had good manners, except when it came to the chantry and templars. She hates those guys. Her 1 obsession is becoming powerful enough to be free.

She became a blood mage and sacrificed Isolde to do it because she refused to return to the tower.

She put dragon blood on the ashes because she despises the chantry and saw it as a way to strike back at them for keeping her a prisoner for so long. I killed Vaughn but I always do that. I was not friends with Alistair because that guy is a templar and my pc doesn't like those guys although deluded virgin templar that he was he thought something was going on with us when I made him marry Anora. ******.

I saved the elves instead of sacrificing them for Zev but had he not been there I would have sacrificed them to be more powerful in order to to be able to fight should the tenmplars or chantry ever try to get me back. I let Avernus live and study without restriction and drank his potion again I did it for power so I could maintain my freedom I hated going back to the tower and Wynne is not my friend because she is always "oh the tower is proud of you, oh the circle is your home blah blah blah" and my pc is all like "I don't give a flying crap about the circle etc."

Leili left me because of the ashes. I was so mad I spent the rest of the game unable to open any chests. grrrr.

Forgot to add I took Mirrigans offer and thanked her for it. Ali was king, Morri was my best friend, Loghain lived and Zev and I rebuilt the Wardens together.  Never went back to the tower.

I am neither good nor evil, bit I am free.  My PC will do anything to maintain that freedom.

Modifié par frostajulie, 13 janvier 2010 - 01:33 .

[Stuffy38]

I am always good. All the time. Altruistic maybe. But as Susan StoHelit said, good doesn't necessarily mean soft. So for example I will intimidate fatso the barkeep - Lloyd I think his name was - in Redcliffe to fight with the militia. I will release Jowan. I will end the werewolf curse by defeating Zathrian and letting him do his VFX thing. I'll never have the Reaver spec. I'll never unlock that achievement for siding with Branka (like I care about achievements anyway). You get the idea.

[ejoslin]

Heh, just train Zev in lock picking. Problem solved. Oh, Ashes are getting tossed this game; Wynne ratted out my blood mage to Irving, and even though Irving told her it must be gray warden magic, I am not going to let that go. metagaming at times!

Edit: To keep it on topic, this character is practical.  I also listened to Zev and saved the Dalish, but most of my decisions are going to be based on stopping the blight.  And getting even with Wynne of course!  And since Alistair is going to be archdemon food, it means the final part of the game with my character as healer . . . hmmmm . . . I may have to rethink this one.

Modifié par ejoslin, 13 janvier 2010 - 01:47 .

[TagImIt]

I've tried being mean and it bugs me. I don't like being mean. Plus, a lot of the characters just don't "feel" like they would be mean. The Human Noble seems he would be a pretty good kid. So does the dwarf commoner and the Dalish Elf. However, the City Elf, as coming from a story of murder and rape of his people, I can understand being mean and bitter for the playthrough. I can also understand the Dwarf Noble being mean because most dwarves seem to be frakkers anyway. A human mage could be mean as well, but that could go either way. But, to answer the question, I generally play good. Witty, and a bit of a smart ass. But good.

[KnightofPhoenix]

Define "good". Define "evil". Define "in between".

[Gold Dragon]

KnightofPhoenix wrote...

Define "good". Define "evil". Define "in between".

THIS.  Definitely.

Sorta "in-between", but leaning towards "Good".  (Depending on definitions, of course)

I tend to play near paladin-like Characters, but in my first play-thru, as a Human Noblewoman, I killed Connor.  I wasn't willing to risk the Village of Redcliffe further.  At the time, I didn't realise that the Village would remain safe (Lost opportunity, Bioware), and I hadn't done Broken Circle yet.

Plus, it seemed to me that it was a triffle wrong, for the wife of an Arl to give orders to the sister of an un-married Teyrn (which is what it ended up being, altho widower is probably a bit closer to the truth).......

[wwwwowwww]

KnightofPhoenix wrote...

Define "good". Define "evil". Define "in between".

Good = morally excellent; virtuous; righteous; pious

Evil = morally wrong or bad; immoral; wicked

In between = a little of both with one not being more than the other

[tallon1982]

Lets just say I put the "Grey" in Grey Warden kidding lol

[ChaoticBroth]

wwwwowwww wrote...

KnightofPhoenix wrote...

Define "good". Define "evil". Define "in between".

Good = morally excellent; virtuous; righteous; pious

Evil = morally wrong or bad; immoral; wicked

In between = a little of both with one not being more than the other

Define "Moral," define "Virtuous," define "righteous," define "pious, " define "bad," define, "immoral," and define "wicked."

Morality is thoroughly subjective, so what may be good to me may be evil to you. And I don't really see what piety has anything to do with being good. An "impious" (but not sacreligious) person can be a "good" one.

I play through the game with whatever choices seem reasonable, falling into a grey area. I'm sure this is because of my policy that "the ends justify the means, but not to an extreme."

Modifié par ChaoticBroth, 13 janvier 2010 - 03:11 .

[KnightofPhoenix]

ChaoticBroth wrote...

wwwwowwww wrote...

KnightofPhoenix wrote...

Define "good". Define "evil". Define "in between".

Good = morally excellent; virtuous; righteous; pious

Evil = morally wrong or bad; immoral; wicked

In between = a little of both with one not being more than the other

Define "Moral," define "Virtuous," define "righteous," define "pious, " define "bad," define, "immoral," and define "wicked."

Morality is thoroughly subjective, so what may be good to me may be evil to you.

I play through the game with whatever choices seem reasonable, falling into a grey area. I'm sure this is because of my policy that "the ends justify the means, but not to an extreme."

Thank you.

[LaztRezort]

I can usually do pretty much all the nasty things in the game with humor, or at least with RP justification. However, there is a certain nice old man that you can stab in back of the head -- that seemed a bit too harsh, after trying it. Al's comment on doing so was amusing, though.

[SinYang]

Never good, profits first unless the profit has a high price tag. Id say Neutral for the most part.

Though my magi playthrough is beyond redemption, he let Kitty, Sophia dryden go so far, sacrificed Isolde. Taken the death knife option on several occasions over profit - rejoicing in death. Something tells me the party camp will get pretty empty later on.

You miss out on alot of the games content by sticking to one morality, why limit your *game*.

Modifié par SinYang, 13 janvier 2010 - 04:03 .

[Abriael_CG]

Always good, simply because it makes for the best story. Playing evil simply ruins the story, and I find no amusement in playing evil just of the sake of going "booooh i'm so ebil!", in the meanwhile wasting my time on playing a gimped version of the story.