One Year Infographic released!
#151
Posté 08 mars 2013 - 01:56
#152
Posté 08 mars 2013 - 02:27
#153
Posté 08 mars 2013 - 02:31
Though these aren't exactlly surprising. Ok, not seeing the Reegar in the top-three weapons used is a little surprising.
#154
Posté 08 mars 2013 - 02:33
The percentage of Infiltrators in Platinum games where the team extracted.
#155
Posté 08 mars 2013 - 02:34
#156
Posté 08 mars 2013 - 02:34
Cheylus wrote...
So it means Adepts and Sentinels are less popular. Good, I feel like an hipster now.Eric Fagnan wrote...
I don't think the infographic is supposed to show the top 3 played classes (they just picked 3 classes), since according to the data Infiltrators are in second place.
Indeed. Assuming Soldier is the most played we now know that Infiltrators are between 22%-16.8%
Since we know the others, that means Adepts and Sentinels combine to be between 22.9% - 28.1%
#157
Posté 08 mars 2013 - 02:49
#158
Posté 08 mars 2013 - 02:52
Original Stikman wrote...
I can't remember the last time i failed platinum
Collector Glacier. Quarian Marksmen. Totally your fault.
Modifié par Arctican, 08 mars 2013 - 02:52 .
#159
Posté 08 mars 2013 - 03:25
#160
Posté 08 mars 2013 - 03:33
#161
Posté 08 mars 2013 - 03:36
1) Before players were bribed with extraction bonuses a LOT of players just layed down after the last cash wave.
2) Experimenting solo games. I've played a lot of games that last a wave or two when I am trying out something new whether it be a weapon or mod or tactic.
#162
Posté 08 mars 2013 - 03:36
Grumpy Old Wizard wrote...
Adepts are the cella dwellas. No surprise there.
you REALLY live up to your name
#163
Posté 08 mars 2013 - 03:50
#164
Posté 08 mars 2013 - 04:13
Chealec wrote...
I don't even understand HOW 41% of missions end in failure?! Especially considering more people play bronze/silver than gold/platinum.
It's rare to see people using equipment in silver. I mostly play silver and the majority of the time the only people who don't go down on a regular basis are the ones using equipment. If they don't have someone using equipment I can easily see lots of games getting wiped because odds are if they're not equipping then they're not gelling either.
#165
Posté 08 mars 2013 - 04:41
But yeah..some of these stats are interesting...would've never thought that the destroyer is the most popular kit...the harrier is a no brainer, and 41% end in failure?...i guess we are winning the war, but just barely!!...
Hazard maps is no surprise, especially since a couple of those maps are very stingy when it comes to those ammo crates...i end up having to use my own ammo stash (i've been close to running out) because those crates don't give out anything...
#166
Posté 08 mars 2013 - 05:44
So basically from what I've seen if people play the soldier class they tend to go with the destroyer, but any other group people chose a wider variety.
#167
Posté 08 mars 2013 - 07:15
#168
Posté 08 mars 2013 - 07:40
"Still looking for Peak 15" made me smile.
#169
Posté 08 mars 2013 - 08:00
Malanek999 wrote...
Cheylus wrote...
So it means Adepts and Sentinels are less popular. Good, I feel like an hipster now.Eric Fagnan wrote...
I don't think the infographic is supposed to show the top 3 played classes (they just picked 3 classes), since according to the data Infiltrators are in second place.
Indeed. Assuming Soldier is the most played we now know that Infiltrators are between 22%-16.8%
Since we know the others, that means Adepts and Sentinels combine to be between 22.9% - 28.1%
Not necessarily, that number does not have to add up to 100, and probably won't. It says "are used in missions." So 22 percent of all matches that start include a Soldier. And we don't know for sure that Adepts and Sents are below Engis/Vanguards. They could be higher.
#170
Posté 08 mars 2013 - 08:17
Zero132132 wrote...
41% of matches fail?
...
...wow.
yeah...that is....BAD.
oh, and destroyer and the ghost are the most popular classes. Never saw that one coming:lol:
#171
Posté 08 mars 2013 - 08:21
llandwynwyn wrote...
I remember some dev saying people weren't failing against the collectors as we thought. Ha!
It was Eric Fagnan, and as I recall what he said was they had the highest failure rate on gold, and the lowest on silver. Or maybe the other way around. Either way it probably averages out into a higher fail percentage.
Not surprised about the Destroyer, they're always around.
dat fail rate
Modifié par lightswitch, 08 mars 2013 - 08:25 .
#172
Posté 08 mars 2013 - 08:28
lightswitch wrote...
llandwynwyn wrote...
I remember some dev saying people weren't failing against the collectors as we thought. Ha!
It was Eric Fagnan, and as I recall what he said was they had the highest failure rate on gold, and the lowest on silver. Or maybe the other way around. Either way it probably averages out into a higher fail percentage.
Not surprised about the Destroyer, they're always around.
dat fail rate
Yeah, but we definitely need to keep asking for nerfs.
#173
Posté 08 mars 2013 - 08:35
leonia42 wrote...
We demand MOAR stats to look at!
Though these aren't exactlly surprising. Ok, not seeing the Reegar in the top-three weapons used is a little surprising.
It's not that surprising for me. Despite it being a monster, I rarely ever see it (I play Gold/Plat). In fact, in my last 100 games, I must have seen a Reegar only 2 times. I know I could just be the exception, but I've played enough games to have some kind of an idea.
P.S. THANK YOU so much for the infographic, BioWare!
Modifié par kaileena_sands, 08 mars 2013 - 08:36 .
#174
Posté 08 mars 2013 - 08:51
#175
Posté 08 mars 2013 - 09:01
Just looking up who's spent the most money, best kits, weapons etc D: I want to know ALL THE STATS @_@ I assume they can know about challenge completion rates and stuff too... D: So much information they are hiding!





Retour en haut






