-TC1989- wrote...
Autocrat wrote...
My question is simple. Since the greywardens allow the admission of both sexes and even allows marriage and owning titles and land then what happens when a situation arises when one must choose between duty to the wardens at one hand, and those whom he love at another?
The Nights Watch (The inspiration for the greywardens) deal with this by saying the following oath "I shall take no wife, hold no lands, father no children. I shall wear no crowns and win no glory. I shall live and die at my post."
What is more, there appears to be no penalty for desertion in the Greywardens. Anders the rebel warden was greeted "casually" by another member despite desertion. So whats preventing a criminal from simply passing the joining and then going "bye suckers" and living his next 30 years carefree?
They do have some similarities when you view them both, but their actually quite different. The Rangers have to stay on the Wall unless they are given specific instructions to leave and settle a situation. The Wardens are free (if they choose) to branch out and explore their own path. And really there isn't anything stopping them from joining the Wardens, and then yelling "SEE YA". All they have to do is pass the joining ritual, and I believe they wouldn't be held nearly as strictly to do their duty like the rangers do. Of course I guess the joke would be on the criminal too, having to deal with all those nightmares, and being a target for darkspawn occasionally.
Another thing too I guess I just realized is that both factions arent really respected. Wardens are praised and loved when they fight darkspawn, and then pretty much looked down upon any other time. The Rangers are looked at as basically incest, disgusting wastes of life that are clinging to their last shred of dignity, freezing their hide on a huge wall, sadly...
Very well said. One of the things that always bugs me about the comparision between the Night's Watch and the Wardens is the assumption that "being inspired by" equates to "utterly identical". The Wardens are significantly different from the Watch, partly due to the fact that while the Watch only faces a threat in one direction most of the time, the Wardens have to be prepared for the darkspawn to strike literally anywhere. I also don't think it's fair to judge the entirety of the Wardens by Anders' example as well; the grand majority of Wardens aren't mad terrorist $&@#.
Going back to the question posed by the OP, everything that we've seen in the games suggest that the Wardens don't really have a problem either with fraternization within the ranks, or with maintaining an established romantic relationship outside of the Order. Jory, Kristoff and Keegan all had wives (the latter two while they were still on active duty), and I didn't seem to recall anything about my Warden getting an angry letter from Weisshaupt about having a relationship with Leliana during the Blight. One gets the impression that the Wardens aren't really interested in micromanaging the personal lives; as long as they can fight the darkspawn, that's all that matters. Lots of people in the military today have spouses and families, and while it is a trial for them to be seperated while on active duty, they endure and deal with it. Why should the Wardens be any different?





Retour en haut







