Aller au contenu

Photo

bioware I beg of you tellme if DA3 will be for xbox 360


119 réponses à ce sujet

#101
Fiacre

Fiacre
  • Members
  • 501 messages

mahditaghvar wrote...

Emzamination wrote...

mahditaghvar wrote...

the priority should be PC . Console versions of both DA games were terrible as the PC version of Dark Souls was terrible . and also we saw what happened to DA2 because Bioware wanted to consolize the game .


Not going to ever happen, mate. Bioware has already stated it's far to difficult porting from pc > console, rather than console > pc.


then it would be better if they don't release it on consoles at all . good reasons for that . I'm pretty sure no one enjoyed DA:O on consoles and no one enjoyed DA2 on anything


I have no idea where this idea that either DA game was absolutely terrible on consoles comes from. I have four complete playthroughs of each, two of Awakening, one of GoA and two of WH as well as a bunch of unfinished ones on my 360, and I've never been bothered by the controls or UI or... pretty mcuh anything. The only thing controls wise I really prefer now that I play on PC is the quickbar. But the radial menu isn't that terrible either.

#102
mahditaghvar

mahditaghvar
  • Members
  • 21 messages

Fiacre wrote...

mahditaghvar wrote...

Emzamination wrote...

mahditaghvar wrote...

the priority should be PC . Console versions of both DA games were terrible as the PC version of Dark Souls was terrible . and also we saw what happened to DA2 because Bioware wanted to consolize the game .


Not going to ever happen, mate. Bioware has already stated it's far to difficult porting from pc > console, rather than console > pc.


then it would be better if they don't release it on consoles at all . good reasons for that . I'm pretty sure no one enjoyed DA:O on consoles and no one enjoyed DA2 on anything


I have no idea where this idea that either DA game was absolutely terrible on consoles comes from. I have four complete playthroughs of each, two of Awakening, one of GoA and two of WH as well as a bunch of unfinished ones on my 360, and I've never been bothered by the controls or UI or... pretty mcuh anything. The only thing controls wise I really prefer now that I play on PC is the quickbar. But the radial menu isn't that terrible either.

have you tried them on PC at all ? if you do , you'd notice how annoying the whole game becomes when you are playing it with a controller : there is no tactical camera (which makes playing the game harder , not in a good way at all) and using spells and Items like potions is an absolute pain . the first thing I noticed in DA2 (even before noticing how stupid new darkspawns look alike) was the lack of tactical / isometric camera and it was such a feeling of disappointment because I understood Bioware has "Consolized" the game to sell more coppies on consoles , and thus ruined the PC version . so I ask you again : have you played DA:O on the PC ?

Modifié par mahditaghvar, 12 mars 2013 - 01:58 .


#103
mahditaghvar

mahditaghvar
  • Members
  • 21 messages

mahditaghvar wrote...

Fiacre wrote...

mahditaghvar wrote...

Emzamination wrote...

mahditaghvar wrote...

the priority should be PC . Console versions of both DA games were terrible as the PC version of Dark Souls was terrible . and also we saw what happened to DA2 because Bioware wanted to consolize the game .


Not going to ever happen, mate. Bioware has already stated it's far to difficult porting from pc > console, rather than console > pc.


then it would be better if they don't release it on consoles at all . good reasons for that . I'm pretty sure no one enjoyed DA:O on consoles and no one enjoyed DA2 on anything


I have no idea where this idea that either DA game was absolutely terrible on consoles comes from. I have four complete playthroughs of each, two of Awakening, one of GoA and two of WH as well as a bunch of unfinished ones on my 360, and I've never been bothered by the controls or UI or... pretty mcuh anything. The only thing controls wise I really prefer now that I play on PC is the quickbar. But the radial menu isn't that terrible either.

have you tried them on PC at all ? if you do , you'd notice how annoying the whole game becomes when you are playing it with a controller : there is no tactical camera (which makes playing the game harder , not in a good way at all) and using spells and Items like potions is an absolute pain . the first thing I noticed in DA2 (even before noticing how stupid new darkspawns look alike) was the lack of tactical / isometric camera and it was such a feeling of disappointment because I understood Bioware has "Consolized" the game to sell more coppies on consoles , and thus they had ruined the PC version . so I ask you again : have you played DA:O on the PC ?



#104
Fiacre

Fiacre
  • Members
  • 501 messages

mahditaghvar wrote...

Fiacre wrote...

mahditaghvar wrote...

Emzamination wrote...

mahditaghvar wrote...

the priority should be PC . Console versions of both DA games were terrible as the PC version of Dark Souls was terrible . and also we saw what happened to DA2 because Bioware wanted to consolize the game .


Not going to ever happen, mate. Bioware has already stated it's far to difficult porting from pc > console, rather than console > pc.


then it would be better if they don't release it on consoles at all . good reasons for that . I'm pretty sure no one enjoyed DA:O on consoles and no one enjoyed DA2 on anything


I have no idea where this idea that either DA game was absolutely terrible on consoles comes from. I have four complete playthroughs of each, two of Awakening, one of GoA and two of WH as well as a bunch of unfinished ones on my 360, and I've never been bothered by the controls or UI or... pretty mcuh anything. The only thing controls wise I really prefer now that I play on PC is the quickbar. But the radial menu isn't that terrible either.

have you tried them on PC at all ? if you do , you'd notice how annoying the whole game becomes when you are playing it with a controller : there is no tactical camera (which makes playing the game harder , not in a good way at all) and using spells and Items like potions is an absolute pain . the first thing I noticed in DA2 (even before noticing how stupid new darkspawns look alike) was the lack of tactical / isometric camera and it was such a feeling of disappointment because I understood Bioware has "Consolized" the game to sell more coppies on consoles , and thus ruined the PC version . so I ask you again : have you played DA:O on the PC ?


Reread the part I bolded and notice that yes, I even stated that I play the game on PC now (or at least DA:O -- haven't had the money to get DA2 + DLC for PC as well, yet.) And as I said, yes, the quickbar is better than the radial menu, there's no doubt about it. But the radial menu wasn't unusable or anything; in fact, I thought it worked well enough for both my DA2 mages and my DAO ones (and my warriors and rogues as well, but it's not quite as important for them).

And meh, I barely use the tactical camera, I've been doing quite well without it. Maybe I'd be more impressed by it if I did, but considering that the game is easily playable without it (and I have never had problems with the camera either on PC or on the 360), I wouldn't see that as something that made the console version terrible. (Though bringing it back for PC would be nice, I suppose.)

#105
mahditaghvar

mahditaghvar
  • Members
  • 21 messages

Fiacre wrote...

mahditaghvar wrote...

Fiacre wrote...

mahditaghvar wrote...

Emzamination wrote...

mahditaghvar wrote...

the priority should be PC . Console versions of both DA games were terrible as the PC version of Dark Souls was terrible . and also we saw what happened to DA2 because Bioware wanted to consolize the game .


Not going to ever happen, mate. Bioware has already stated it's far to difficult porting from pc > console, rather than console > pc.


then it would be better if they don't release it on consoles at all . good reasons for that . I'm pretty sure no one enjoyed DA:O on consoles and no one enjoyed DA2 on anything


I have no idea where this idea that either DA game was absolutely terrible on consoles comes from. I have four complete playthroughs of each, two of Awakening, one of GoA and two of WH as well as a bunch of unfinished ones on my 360, and I've never been bothered by the controls or UI or... pretty mcuh anything. The only thing controls wise I really prefer now that I play on PC is the quickbar. But the radial menu isn't that terrible either.

have you tried them on PC at all ? if you do , you'd notice how annoying the whole game becomes when you are playing it with a controller : there is no tactical camera (which makes playing the game harder , not in a good way at all) and using spells and Items like potions is an absolute pain . the first thing I noticed in DA2 (even before noticing how stupid new darkspawns look alike) was the lack of tactical / isometric camera and it was such a feeling of disappointment because I understood Bioware has "Consolized" the game to sell more coppies on consoles , and thus ruined the PC version . so I ask you again : have you played DA:O on the PC ?


Reread the part I bolded and notice that yes, I even stated that I play the game on PC now (or at least DA:O -- haven't had the money to get DA2 + DLC for PC as well, yet.) And as I said, yes, the quickbar is better than the radial menu, there's no doubt about it. But the radial menu wasn't unusable or anything; in fact, I thought it worked well enough for both my DA2 mages and my DAO ones (and my warriors and rogues as well, but it's not quite as important for them).

And meh, I barely use the tactical camera, I've been doing quite well without it. Maybe I'd be more impressed by it if I did, but considering that the game is easily playable without it (and I have never had problems with the camera either on PC or on the 360), I wouldn't see that as something that made the console version terrible. (Though bringing it back for PC would be nice, I suppose.)

in case you didn't notice most of us used the tactical camera and were disappointed by the absense of it in DA2 . I don't want to go through what I have already said but know that every great game Bioware has made before had tactical camera and was PC exclusive . tactical camera is the heart of games like this

#106
Guest_Rubios_*

Guest_Rubios_*
  • Guests

nedpepper wrote...
That price would be a little easier to swallow.  But I'm guessing $399 or more.  They are apparently putting a DVR  and a 3D projector in the damn thing.  It's got half a grand written all over it, IF rumors are true.  Granted, there could be a couple versions of it.  The extra loaded version with all of the other stuff that has nothing to do with, you know, GAMING. and maybe a bare bones version for people who just want it to play next gen games. We'll see.

I don't know about the proyector thing but the DVR capability should cost less than 3€/console (BOM), they already have a hard drive on the system and dedicated h.264 encoding chips are dirt cheap afaik.

Modifié par Rubios, 12 mars 2013 - 04:43 .


#107
mahditaghvar

mahditaghvar
  • Members
  • 21 messages

Emzamination wrote...

mahditaghvar wrote...

Emzamination wrote...

mahditaghvar wrote...

the priority should be PC . Console versions of both DA games were terrible as the PC version of Dark Souls was terrible . and also we saw what happened to DA2 because Bioware wanted to consolize the game .


Not going to ever happen, mate. Bioware has already stated it's far to difficult porting from pc > console, rather than console > pc.


then it would be better if they don't release it on consoles at all . good reasons for that . I'm pretty sure no one enjoyed DA:O on consoles and no one enjoyed DA2 on anything


You'd be wrong. You do realize both games had far more sales on console, yes?
And Dragon age 3 sales will be no different. What you're suggesting is just bad business. There just isn't a large enough pc market to heed such a request. Best get used to the fact that pc design will be dictated by console. :P

hmmm ... bad business . tell me , were games like Baldur's gate or NWN bad business as well ? what about Metal Gear Solid 4 on PS3 ? or Diablo series ? or Warcraft 3 ? or Witcher 2 before being released on X360 ? you see , none of them were multiplatform , yet they were some of the most successful games ever . and I don't think I need to talk about PC version of Dark Souls again . and do you remember Bioware before EA ? did they have a bad business ?

#108
Eco1988

Eco1988
  • Members
  • 7 messages

mahditaghvar wrote...

Emzamination wrote...

mahditaghvar wrote...

Emzamination wrote...

mahditaghvar wrote...

the priority should be PC . Console versions of both DA games were terrible as the PC version of Dark Souls was terrible . and also we saw what happened to DA2 because Bioware wanted to consolize the game .


Not going to ever happen, mate. Bioware has already stated it's far to difficult porting from pc > console, rather than console > pc.


then it would be better if they don't release it on consoles at all . good reasons for that . I'm pretty sure no one enjoyed DA:O on consoles and no one enjoyed DA2 on anything


You'd be wrong. You do realize both games had far more sales on console, yes?
And Dragon age 3 sales will be no different. What you're suggesting is just bad business. There just isn't a large enough pc market to heed such a request. Best get used to the fact that pc design will be dictated by console. :P

hmmm ... bad business . tell me , were games like Baldur's gate or NWN bad business as well ? what about Metal Gear Solid 4 on PS3 ? or Diablo series ? or Warcraft 3 ? or Witcher 2 before being released on X360 ? you see , none of them were multiplatform , yet they were some of the most successful games ever . and I don't think I need to talk about PC version of Dark Souls again . and do you remember Bioware before EA ? did they have a bad business ?


Yeah, so about that whole Diablo and Witcher not being multiplatform thing. They are. Also the Metal Gear series has started going multiplatform and with Blizzard having partnered with Sony you'd better believe there's going to be a lot more than just Diablo on the PS4. Also the Mass Effect franchise is fantastic and the entire franchise benefitted from them taking a console approach to the series and creating the masterpiece that is Mass Effect 2. That game is just chocolate coated awesome with sex thrown in because yes. Dragon Age 3 is going to be built with consoles in mind, just like Witcher 3 and Diablo 4 and probably a lot of other games that are going to be console focused and ridiculously good. Here's the good news though, you're gonna get to play those games too. So, on behalf of console owners everywhere, you're welcome. :kissing:

#109
Boiny Bunny

Boiny Bunny
  • Members
  • 1 731 messages
IMO, this 'new generation' of consoles may be the last we ever see, in the format that we are used to. Game budgets have become too large - AAA titles need to sell millions of copies to just break even. I think you'll find (and this is almost completely unprecedented) that a great deal of launch (or close to launch) multiplatform games for the 'next gen' will also launch on the current gen - the install base simply won't be anywhere near large enough to get the millions of copies sold that are required otherwise.

So, by that logic, I think we'll be seeing DA:I on:
360, PS3, PC, WiiU, PS4, 720

#110
SwordofMercy1

SwordofMercy1
  • Members
  • 279 messages

Ninja Stan wrote...

Fast Jimmy wrote...

^

Well, some people have to save for a long time to shell out ~$600 for a new console.The sooner notice, the better. If it is going to be cross-generational or not is going to result in some serious planning on the part of many people.

No, we don't know. But it would be nice to know sooner rather than later.

Then start saving your money now, just in case. If the game doesn't require a new console, at worst you'll have $600 dollars saved, which is never a bad thing.


I actaully talked to a manager at Gamestop, and he told me that Microsoft (or somebody!) was doing some sort of contract with several game companies to keep games in development for the 360 for several more years, instead of making people buy the 720. I guess they realized with this faulty economy, it is completely unrealistic to make people buy a new console just to get a new game... Plus, they still earn a lot of money. Then again, I don't know if this is true so please don't bite my head off. I'm just repeating what he said. 

#111
mahditaghvar

mahditaghvar
  • Members
  • 21 messages

Eco1988 wrote...

mahditaghvar wrote...

Emzamination wrote...

mahditaghvar wrote...

Emzamination wrote...

mahditaghvar wrote...

the priority should be PC . Console versions of both DA games were terrible as the PC version of Dark Souls was terrible . and also we saw what happened to DA2 because Bioware wanted to consolize the game .


Not going to ever happen, mate. Bioware has already stated it's far to difficult porting from pc > console, rather than console > pc.


then it would be better if they don't release it on consoles at all . good reasons for that . I'm pretty sure no one enjoyed DA:O on consoles and no one enjoyed DA2 on anything


You'd be wrong. You do realize both games had far more sales on console, yes?
And Dragon age 3 sales will be no different. What you're suggesting is just bad business. There just isn't a large enough pc market to heed such a request. Best get used to the fact that pc design will be dictated by console. :P

hmmm ... bad business . tell me , were games like Baldur's gate or NWN bad business as well ? what about Metal Gear Solid 4 on PS3 ? or Diablo series ? or Warcraft 3 ? or Witcher 2 before being released on X360 ? you see , none of them were multiplatform , yet they were some of the most successful games ever . and I don't think I need to talk about PC version of Dark Souls again . and do you remember Bioware before EA ? did they have a bad business ?


Yeah, so about that whole Diablo and Witcher not being multiplatform thing. They are. Also the Metal Gear series has started going multiplatform and with Blizzard having partnered with Sony you'd better believe there's going to be a lot more than just Diablo on the PS4. Also the Mass Effect franchise is fantastic and the entire franchise benefitted from them taking a console approach to the series and creating the masterpiece that is Mass Effect 2. That game is just chocolate coated awesome with sex thrown in because yes. Dragon Age 3 is going to be built with consoles in mind, just like Witcher 3 and Diablo 4 and probably a lot of other games that are going to be console focused and ridiculously good. Here's the good news though, you're gonna get to play those games too. So, on behalf of console owners everywhere, you're welcome. :kissing:


Diablo series were a PC exclusive and were very succesful at that . so was NWN & Baldurs Gate (hello Bioware...) . and I alredy said "Witcher 2 before X360" . I own a X360 and yes games like Mass Effect and Witcher 2 are great to play with a controler , but not a RPG D&D game : IT NEEDS MOUSE & KEYBORD .

by the way , just saw this one in the meme thread :
Posted Image
doesn't this give any of you a clue of the horror of "consolization" ? hang on a second ... is everyone here a console fan ? no old-fashion PC gamers ? :sick:

Modifié par mahditaghvar, 15 mars 2013 - 05:46 .


#112
FieryDove

FieryDove
  • Members
  • 2 637 messages

mahditaghvar wrote...

doesn't this give any of you a clue of the horror of "consolization" ? hang on a second ... is everyone here a console fan ? no old-fashion PC gamers ? :sick:


What is the defintion of old fashioned pc gamer? Posted Image

I very much enjoy RPG's. Party-based are my favs. I also like rts, tbs and life sims...simcity etc.

But above all that I am a gamer. We are all gamers. Can't we all just get along? sigh

#113
mahditaghvar

mahditaghvar
  • Members
  • 21 messages

FieryDove wrote...

What is the defintion of old fashioned pc gamer? Posted Image

I very much enjoy RPG's. Party-based are my favs. I also like rts, tbs and life sims...simcity etc.

But above all that I am a gamer. We are all gamers. Can't we all just get along? sigh


an old fashioned PC gamer likes games (gems , specifically) like Baldurs Gate 2 or Diablo 1 , not a multy-purposed non RPG excuse for a game . and we can get along till we now where we are : "Bioware" Social Network and not "Dice" Social Network . personally , I'm blamig Bioware themselves for this situation : bisexual carchters and multiplatform games ? dear God ...:crying:

#114
cindercatz

cindercatz
  • Members
  • 1 354 messages
... wth does bisexual characters have to do with consoles or PC? (not that I don't prefer defined sexualities, bi- or otherwise)

I love BioWare's games and have since the nineties (though I never really followed them as a company until KoTOR.. on console). I much prefer to play their party based RPGs on console and always have. I don't like the isometric camera or point and click mouse controls (though I support their inclusion for PC versions). I never really have. Combine that with the price of PC gaming, which has already forced me out of that market, and I sincerely hope BioWare never makes another PC-only AAA game. Because I want to play those games, and in order to do that, they have to be on console.

#115
mahditaghvar

mahditaghvar
  • Members
  • 21 messages

cindercatz wrote...

... wth does bisexual characters have to do with consoles or PC? (not that I don't prefer defined sexualities, bi- or otherwise)

I love BioWare's games and have since the nineties (though I never really followed them as a company until KoTOR.. on console). I much prefer to play their party based RPGs on console and always have. I don't like the isometric camera or point and click mouse controls (though I support their inclusion for PC versions). I never really have. Combine that with the price of PC gaming, which has already forced me out of that market, and I sincerely hope BioWare never makes another PC-only AAA game. Because I want to play those games, and in order to do that, they have to be on console.

first : bi characters have nothing to do with it , Bioware's new style however has . second , KotOR was a good example : a game that was built with consoles in mind where DA:O was not . If I'd want to play an Action-RPG I would go to Witcher series which are built with heavy action in mind , so does Dues Ex , and even Dark Souls a little bit . but where else I'd find a proper tactilcal point & click RPG other than DA:O ? oh and one more thing : DA series have never needed a high-end PC . I have played both of them and all their DLCs on a 4 years old Laptop and I'm sure I'll buy a new one by the time DA:I comes out , or even before it cause this thing is becoming a little bit knackered . thing is , you have to have a job (and be single ;)) to pay for games . by the way as I said this thread is for console fans of DA series , whom
fortunately are not many (like bi-characters fans) .

Modifié par mahditaghvar, 19 mars 2013 - 10:35 .


#116
DragonMage95

DragonMage95
  • Members
  • 515 messages
I've always wanted to try PC gaming but i've never had the money to get a proper PC and my old PC no longer works so now I only play on consoles. I might get crap for this, but I wish more games were available for MAC.

#117
cindercatz

cindercatz
  • Members
  • 1 354 messages

mahditaghvar wrote...

first : bi characters have nothing to do with it , Bioware's new style however has . second , KotOR was a good example : a game that was built with consoles in mind where DA:O was not . If I'd want to play an Action-RPG I would go to Witcher series which are built with heavy action in mind , so does Dues Ex , and even Dark Souls a little bit . but where else I'd find a proper tactilcal point & click RPG other than DA:O ? oh and one more thing : DA series have never needed a high-end PC . I have played both of them and all their DLCs on a 4 years old Laptop and I'm sure I'll buy a new one by the time DA:I comes out , or even before it cause this thing is becoming a little bit knackered . thing is , you have to have a jub (and be single ;)) to pay for games . by the way as I said this thread is for console fans of DA series , whom
fortunately are not many (like bi-characters fans) .


Man, I've got other things to think about with my money, limitations and expenses I'll not go into here. My entire family, which is solidly middle class, with all our income, are not able to support modern PC gaming. I used to be a PC gamer. I flat love Total War, with a passion, pretty close to how much I love DA (on console) with a passion. But real life, my life, says PC gaming is no longer an option, except for very low end games and old games that don't require me to go out and get a new PC every year or practically by replacing the entire thing piece by piece over and over again. PC gaming is great if you've got the disposable income you're not spending elsewhere and don't mind the hassle, and all power to anybody that prefers it for themselves, but it's just not practical for me and a lot of people.

Then also consider that I love this kind of game too, and there really aren't other games out there of this sort. I'm playing Witcher now that it's on console, but it's an entirely different kind of game franchise, and I don't enjoy the combat (or your alternative to point and click) at all really. I liked Deus Ex (not nearly as much as DA:O), but that's again a completely different kind of game. For me, it's functionally a stealth game with an interesting conversation system. I have limited interest in Dark Souls or Demon Souls before it because they're basically action games, and I have less interest in action games. I'm an RPG guy primarily, definitely not an action-RPG guy. I skip those for the most part. I skipped KoAmulur, as a recent example. I skip the vast majority of them. I don't care all that much for aRPG mechanics or their (usual) lack of depth. I specifically love this particular kind of game that BioWare makes, which is why I'm on these boards, and I prefer them on console. I love this kind of game. I just don't love the actual point and click control scheme that you typically use on PC (though I absolutely support it's presense for PC gamers that want it). And don't take that for any opinion on auto-attack. I can't play DA without auto-attack. I don't generally like button mashers. Thankfully I do love the alternate style controls in DA:O, KoTOR, etc. Same game, different way of interacting with it.

The only, and I mean only, thing better about PC versions of these games are the modding communities and how that's allowed on PC. I dream of that being adopted by consoles. I used to enjoy modding games myself. I was a skinner, and I loved playing or working on modded games. If that was your arguement, I'd agree with the point. But it's not.

And please don't pull out DA2 as some kind of console nirvana. I love DA:O and I'm probably as critical of DA2 as you are, if not more. The things I do like about it have nothing to do with whether it's console or PC. Your idea of DA:O being loved en masse on PC and generally not liked so much by console players is a myth, pure and simple, and just browsing the boards here should inform you to that effect. And their "new style" is a shifting, changing thing. The only given is the "cinematic" trend, and that really doesn't have much to do with whether it's a console or PC thing.

I hope you get your isometric view back as a PC option. I just prefer to play in third person. I like looking around the battlefield and making decisions from that perspective. When I played Total War (once they started zooming in with Rome), I'd constantly zoom in and out of the isometric and cinematic views, with all the activity on display, and that only made the games better, much as I loved Shogun and Medieval. But that was directing the flow of a battle from a god's eye view. Zooming out for Dragon Age to choose a special move doesn't appeal to me at all, and I can manage and control the party and the battlefield just fine in third person.

I hope you can see how your console game/gamer assumptions just plain don't apply to me, or to a lot of console gamers. We can all co-exist and get games for all platforms and get the best possible games in the offing. Consoles aren't killing your games. Removing them from console would kill them for me.

#118
Robhuzz

Robhuzz
  • Members
  • 4 976 messages

And Dragon age 3 sales will be no different. What you're suggesting is just bad business. There just isn't a large enough pc market to heed such a request. Best get used to the fact that pc design will be dictated by console.

Not the best example maybe but Diablo 3 says hello.

ETA: With PS4 essentially using mid range pc hardware it makes ports between PC and PS4 and vice versa that much easier. There's no reason they couldn't spend a bit of the time they just saved on making a seperate interface for consoles and pc. That would solves most of the porting issues and would increased sales that would've otherwise been lost due to bad porting.

Microsoft would have to be stupid not to follow suit or the PS4 and pc will become the next gen's biggest platforms with the xbox as an outsider.

Modifié par Robhuzz, 19 mars 2013 - 08:16 .


#119
mahditaghvar

mahditaghvar
  • Members
  • 21 messages

cindercatz wrote...

mahditaghvar wrote...

first : bi characters have nothing to do with it , Bioware's new style however has . second , KotOR was a good example : a game that was built with consoles in mind where DA:O was not . If I'd want to play an Action-RPG I would go to Witcher series which are built with heavy action in mind , so does Dues Ex , and even Dark Souls a little bit . but where else I'd find a proper tactilcal point & click RPG other than DA:O ? oh and one more thing : DA series have never needed a high-end PC . I have played both of them and all their DLCs on a 4 years old Laptop and I'm sure I'll buy a new one by the time DA:I comes out , or even before it cause this thing is becoming a little bit knackered . thing is , you have to have a jub (and be single ;)) to pay for games . by the way as I said this thread is for console fans of DA series , whom
fortunately are not many (like bi-characters fans) .


Man, I've got other things to think about with my money, limitations and expenses I'll not go into here. My entire family, which is solidly middle class, with all our income, are not able to support modern PC gaming. I used to be a PC gamer. I flat love Total War, with a passion, pretty close to how much I love DA (on console) with a passion. But real life, my life, says PC gaming is no longer an option, except for very low end games and old games that don't require me to go out and get a new PC every year or practically by replacing the entire thing piece by piece over and over again. PC gaming is great if you've got the disposable income you're not spending elsewhere and don't mind the hassle, and all power to anybody that prefers it for themselves, but it's just not practical for me and a lot of people.

Then also consider that I love this kind of game too, and there really aren't other games out there of this sort. I'm playing Witcher now that it's on console, but it's an entirely different kind of game franchise, and I don't enjoy the combat (or your alternative to point and click) at all really. I liked Deus Ex (not nearly as much as DA:O), but that's again a completely different kind of game. For me, it's functionally a stealth game with an interesting conversation system. I have limited interest in Dark Souls or Demon Souls before it because they're basically action games, and I have less interest in action games. I'm an RPG guy primarily, definitely not an action-RPG guy. I skip those for the most part. I skipped KoAmulur, as a recent example. I skip the vast majority of them. I don't care all that much for aRPG mechanics or their (usual) lack of depth. I specifically love this particular kind of game that BioWare makes, which is why I'm on these boards, and I prefer them on console. I love this kind of game. I just don't love the actual point and click control scheme that you typically use on PC (though I absolutely support it's presense for PC gamers that want it). And don't take that for any opinion on auto-attack. I can't play DA without auto-attack. I don't generally like button mashers. Thankfully I do love the alternate style controls in DA:O, KoTOR, etc. Same game, different way of interacting with it.

The only, and I mean only, thing better about PC versions of these games are the modding communities and how that's allowed on PC. I dream of that being adopted by consoles. I used to enjoy modding games myself. I was a skinner, and I loved playing or working on modded games. If that was your arguement, I'd agree with the point. But it's not.

And please don't pull out DA2 as some kind of console nirvana. I love DA:O and I'm probably as critical of DA2 as you are, if not more. The things I do like about it have nothing to do with whether it's console or PC. Your idea of DA:O being loved en masse on PC and generally not liked so much by console players is a myth, pure and simple, and just browsing the boards here should inform you to that effect. And their "new style" is a shifting, changing thing. The only given is the "cinematic" trend, and that really doesn't have much to do with whether it's a console or PC thing.

I hope you get your isometric view back as a PC option. I just prefer to play in third person. I like looking around the battlefield and making decisions from that perspective. When I played Total War (once they started zooming in with Rome), I'd constantly zoom in and out of the isometric and cinematic views, with all the activity on display, and that only made the games better, much as I loved Shogun and Medieval. But that was directing the flow of a battle from a god's eye view. Zooming out for Dragon Age to choose a special move doesn't appeal to me at all, and I can manage and control the party and the battlefield just fine in third person.

I hope you can see how your console game/gamer assumptions just plain don't apply to me, or to a lot of console gamers. We can all co-exist and get games for all platforms and get the best possible games in the offing. Consoles aren't killing your games. Removing them from console would kill them for me.

got your point completely , although it's a liitle odd about witcher & Souls series :blink: . then again , much of the old Bioware lovers are used to tactical camera . it realy makes the game like chess sometimes : you see the whole battlefield from tactical perspective and have to decide which move you should make . it was somehow stupid to play DA2 by point & click but without isometric camera , and I still believe Bioware put aside tactical view so it would be easier to be built on consoles . I told you about my non-high end 4 year old laptop and I have a X360 as well . I use the laptop mostly to work and play the majority of games on X360 , but play some (like strategy genre and games like DA:O) on laptop . now thing is the console game must remain the console game and the PC game must remain the PC game . DA:O had that balance pretty well , where DA2 didn't . so I hope DA3:I will restore that balance like you said .

#120
Zaalbar

Zaalbar
  • Members
  • 845 messages
Well I`m certainly not gonna be buying a next gen console on launch just for DA3. Everytime I`ve done that i`ve always been disapointed.

If DA3 arrives on the next gen consoles then I`ll simply go without at least for a time until I get a better idea of which console best to go for. It will most likely be a good year after launch before I`ll make the decision.