Jadebaby wrote...
Believe what you want, Sheps a space monster, and honestly. They should have killed Shepard in the Destroy ending like they originally planned. Because allowing him/her to survive, just says to people "hey, genocide is okay."
Realistically, trying to paint the Destroy ending as a genocide is biased to say the least. Who do you mean genocide of? If its the geth, then yeah, its a massive loss... but genocide implies an intent to destroy an entire people, whereas the loss of the Geth in destroy is more a side-effect of the lack of direction of the crucible. Its basically the same choice you make back on virmire, only this time, an entire species is sacrificed for the greater good. Shepard didn't 'murder' his squadmate back on Virmire, and he doesn't 'commit genocide' here.
If you're talking about the Reapers, then... well, I hate terrible jokes but the Reap what the sow.
And purely logistical reasons? Oh yea because it had NOTHING to do with the burn, blunt force and gunshot traumas s/he underwent. No, if anything that would help her/him survive right?
Hey, I'm not the one claiming a scene with a man breathing is supposed to be an indication that he's dead.
Modifié par JaegerBane, 10 mars 2013 - 06:47 .