173 réponses à ce sujet

[hadrain77]

I felt bad for Imothet, the woman he loved and betrayed his Pharoh for didn't come to his aid, not so much for the clone.

[CHARK19]

hadrain77 wrote...

I felt bad for Imothet, the woman he loved and betrayed his Pharoh for didn't come to his aid, not so much for the clone.

I understood that reference!

[Calibrations Expert]

I realized, in hindsight, after stomping on his hands and watching him fall to his death, what a dick I was to him.

My very first reaction to finding out I had a clone was "Well, f*ck you clone." I guess it was the educated guess that he was going to be an arse trying to take my place. Granted I didn't say I would mount his head on my wall like Renegade Shep, but maybe I should have been nicer...

Still deserved to be a mess on that window in the Wards for touching my hamster, though.

[SirDoctorofTARDIS]

I felt bad for the clone, she was manipulated by Brooks for her whole (very short) life and in the end the one ally she had that wasn't there for the pay abandoned her.

[Wayning_Star]

[quote]oh great terminator humor..lol[/quote]
Pre-mortem one-liners are the best!!!
If Mordin was still with us, he'd have said something like, "Human evolution- no wings...your survivability....Problematic."

[/quote]

actually I was being sacastic.. sorry..lol

If the catalyst were meant to fly, the Leviathan would of been created with wings...they'll be back..

((shiver))

[xBUMMx]

o Ventus wrote...

Billea wrote...

I think it was kinder to kill her because theoretically, if she had survived, she would have lived in the real Shepard's shadow all her life. That's no way to live.  

Not necessarily. They would be in Shepard's shadow in the same sense that Shepard's crew is in his/her shadow, and the crew isn't seen like that. Brooks (as much a backstabbing liar she is) even says that the Normandy and her crew are legends in the galaxy. 

The Shepard clone would have a lot to contribute. I know my own Shepard would share in the glory wih him.

It was made for spare parts, then spent three years training to be the ultimate racist hero who was capable of replacing Shepard. It wasn't even needed for its first purpose, and it utterly failed in its second. If it loved it would only to be the real Shep's little double. I think it would be worse then being part of the crew.

Modifié par xBUMMx, 11 mars 2013 - 01:38 .

[Stella-Arc]

Yeah, I felt bad for the clone. Imagine waking up with no memory. Then finding out you were only created to be a "donor" (and I use that loosely). You get brainwashed by the ****** who uses you and then you realize that your original is this god-like being who saved the galaxy...twice.

*shakes head*

I'll be messed up in the head. I was pissed that I couldn't save the clone. It would have been cool for Shepard to have a "sibling".

Modifié par Stella-Arc, 11 mars 2013 - 01:39 .

[What a Succulent Ass]

Tongue-in-cheek or not, it was literally the second most ridiculous sh*t to come out of the ME canon.

"FOR WHAT!!!"

*Commits suicide*

Modifié par Random Jerkface, 11 mars 2013 - 02:12 .

[Strangewrex]

I would have, had she not decided Amateur skydiving from a Moving Space Cruiser was a good idea...

[Wayning_Star]

xBUMMx wrote...

o Ventus wrote...

Billea wrote...

I think it was kinder to kill her because theoretically, if she had survived, she would have lived in the real Shepard's shadow all her life. That's no way to live.  

Not necessarily. They would be in Shepard's shadow in the same sense that Shepard's crew is in his/her shadow, and the crew isn't seen like that. Brooks (as much a backstabbing liar she is) even says that the Normandy and her crew are legends in the galaxy. 

The Shepard clone would have a lot to contribute. I know my own Shepard would share in the glory wih him.

It was made for spare parts, then spent three years training to be the ultimate racist hero who was capable of replacing Shepard. It wasn't even needed for its first purpose, and it utterly failed in its second. If it loved it would only to be the real Shep's little double. I think it would be worse then being part of the crew.

made for spare parts..ugh. someone didn't get a chance to visit A Planet Called Treason

[MacroSpamMK]

I felt kinda bad for the clone, but then I kicked him in the face. It put me at a little ease knowing he'll die either way.
Brooks on the other hand, **** was so smug when I got trapped in that vault. She forgot that no one messes with Harbinger Shepard.
Long story short, Javik fired her out of the airlock.

[Calibrations Expert]

Strangewrex wrote...

I would have, had she not decided Amateur skydiving from a Moving Space Cruiser was a good idea...

For some reason I just got a vision of Clone parachuting down to the surface to meet up with Gay Tony.

[Wayning_Star]

Random Jerkface wrote...

Tongue-in-cheek or not, it was literally the second most ridiculous sh*t to come out of the ME canon.

"FOR WHAT!!!"

*Commits suicide*

that lady seems to hope the stargazer is OK...

[o Ventus]

xBUMMx wrote...

It was made for spare parts, then spent three years training to be the ultimate racist hero who was capable of replacing Shepard. It wasn't even needed for its first purpose, and it utterly failed in its second. If it loved it would only to be the real Shep's little double. I think it would be worse then being part of the crew.

The clone isn't even a year old.

The clone behaves like that because it was being manipulated by Brooks.

It wouldn't be Shepard's double. It would be Shepard, only now twice over.

[AlexMBrennan]

I'd feel bad for anyone manipulated/indoctrinated/brainwashed by Cerberus or any other extremist terrorist organisation, regardless of whether they happen to have the same DNA as me.

[What a Succulent Ass]

o Ventus wrote...

It would be Shepard, only now twice over.

But it wouldn't be. That's like saying identical twins are the same person.

[Wayning_Star]

o Ventus wrote...

xBUMMx wrote...

It was made for spare parts, then spent three years training to be the ultimate racist hero who was capable of replacing Shepard. It wasn't even needed for its first purpose, and it utterly failed in its second. If it loved it would only to be the real Shep's little double. I think it would be worse then being part of the crew.

The clone isn't even a year old.

The clone behaves like that because it was being manipulated by Brooks.

It wouldn't be Shepard's double. It would be Shepard, only now twice over.

actually the age of a clone is based on inception date, and it's incubation period. Grunt was more by genetics than what it's mentor/medical crew invisioned for it/him...

the genes were there, as Shepclwone was caparitive to Shep other than motive, but his intellect was intact. As originalshep was after resurrection..

of course they could of altered codes'n stuff genetically, but that could alter Shepclwone to the point it couldn't function for mental reasons, as it alread appears insane. That in of it's self ruins the viablity of character. imho

[Wayning_Star]

Random Jerkface wrote...

o Ventus wrote...

It would be Shepard, only now twice over.

But it wouldn't be. That's like saying identical twins are the same person.

Identical twins are NOT clones..

[o Ventus]

Random Jerkface wrote...

o Ventus wrote...

It would be Shepard, only now twice over.

But it wouldn't be. That's like saying identical twins are the same person.

But it isn't. Clones are distinctly different from identical twins. Identical twins don't even share identical genetics. A clone of me would share my genetics as well as my tastes and interest (unless otherwise conditioned).

A clone is a direct copy.

[Calibrations Expert]

Identical twins don't even share identical genetics. 

Might want to brush up on your science, bro.

Modifié par Calibrations Expert, 11 mars 2013 - 01:59 .

[xBUMMx]

Wayning_Star wrote...

Random Jerkface wrote...

o Ventus wrote...

It would be Shepard, only now twice over.

But it wouldn't be. That's like saying identical twins are the same person.

Identical twins are NOT clones..

No, they're not. But they are.

Clones are created from DNA. The new being has the same exact DNA as the original. Twins are the same exact genetic composition, but accidentally got doubled. Theoretically, they are the same. Realistically, they aren't. 

[What a Succulent Ass]

Wayning_Star wrote...

Random Jerkface wrote...

o Ventus wrote...

It would be Shepard, only now twice over.

But it wouldn't be. That's like saying identical twins are the same person.

Identical twins are NOT clones..

Genetically speaking, yes, they are. There would be no difference between a pair of monozygotic humans and a pair of cloned doubles.

But that wasn't my point. The point is that having identical genes does not make you interchangeable with another person, especially if you have radically different life experiences and formative environments.

[Arisugawa]

CHARK19 wrote...

hadrain77 wrote...

I felt bad for Imothet, the woman he loved and betrayed his Pharoh for didn't come to his aid, not so much for the clone.

I understood that reference!

That's the exact same thing I groaned about the first time I played it.

Right out of The Mummy Returns, no less.

I hated the clone story enough as it was without it ending like that.

[o Ventus]

Calibrations Expert wrote...

Might want to brush up on your science, bro.

Might want to brush up on some research studies, bro.

[What a Succulent Ass]

Calibrations Expert wrote...

Identical twins don't even share identical genetics. 

Might want to brush up on your science, bro.

Actually, it depends. MZ twins aren't always technical duplicates of one another due to TTTS, differences in mtDNA, and uneven distribution during separation. They may further differ if there are insertions in one (or both) genomes because of viral or bacterial vectors. They're only completely "identical" for practicality's sake.

On the other hand, genes can only determine proclivities. Two people, even if they are exact copies of each other, will not have identical personalities even if raised in identical environments.