LeandroBraz wrote...
JPN17 wrote...
ToLazy4Name wrote...
JPN17 wrote...
I feel your pain OP. I was in deep enough trying to get a lancer, but now they add 5 more guns just to muck up the pool even more. Very disappointing. Nevermind the fact that 80% of these guns aren't even close to being worthy of UR status. I mean come on the eagle? I'd love to hear one of the devs on here justify the eagle being a UR. Of course these are the same guys that thought the Venom and Spitfire were worthy of UR status, so I guess I shouldn't be surprised.
An Eagle with a Heavy Barrel does only 10 less damage than a Harrier with an Extended Barrel.
Congratulations? The Eagle with a 40% damage buff still does less damage than the Harrier with a 25% buff. The HP is also supposed to add 50 points to weight (not sure if that was actually ever fixed for non DLC weapons or not) while the EB adds nothing. So yeah, pretty sure that helps prove my point that the Eagle is not even close to UR worthy. Would probably be better to compare the eagle to other pistols rather than an assault rifle anyway.tevix wrote...
Why does the eagle get so much hate?
I think it's a great pistol.
Your opinion on the Eagle is all well and fine, I don't have a problem with that. The eagle is not worthy of being a UR, that's the only point I'm making. FWIW, I don't believe the Valkyrie, Valiant or Crusader are worthy of being URs either.
So, to be a UR it need to do at leas the same damage as the Harrier?
Seem legit..
I wasn't the one who compared it to the Harrier.




Ce sujet est fermé
Retour en haut







