Aller au contenu

Photo

How to get the Destroy ending WITHOUT the need to commit genocide.


  • Veuillez vous connecter pour répondre
466 réponses à ce sujet

#301
DeinonSlayer

DeinonSlayer
  • Members
  • 8 441 messages
[quote]JakeMacDon wrote...

[quote]DeinonSlayer wrote...

Both fleets have to repair and re-stock before they can send aid into the wider galaxy. I imagine they were making preparations to disembark before the fighting itself was over. The whole point of going to war, as established in ME2, was to have a place to shelter their civilian populace while the fleet went out to aid the wider galaxy.[/quote]

Was it?  I thought that was Gerrel's excuse, not actual quarian policy.  Xen wanted mastery over the geth, Rhaan kinda went where the wind blew - or seemed to - Zal'Koris wanted peaceful cooperation - the general goal of Shepard in the end, we would assume, since you have the option of pushing for that at Tali's trial.  From the sounds of things, only the Heavy Fleet is the main-purpose combat arm of the quarian fleet.  I could be wrong on this, however.[/quote]The codex tells us the Quarians have 50,000 ships, almost all of which are armed but only a few hundred of which are actually military - and no dreadnoughts among them (unless you count the converted Liveships). Before retaking Rannoch, their dependency on the Liveships for food necessitated that the fleet stay together. They require daily shipments to keep everyone fed - this and the fact that they're packed to the rafters with civilians prevents the fleet from dividing itself to provide logistical support to others before they have a planet to offload themselves on.

There's also the consideration that they're physiologically dependent on Rannoch's native plant life - according to the planet's codex entry, that dependency is the reason their immune systems have weakened. They've been denied access to them for generations. Think of it like the human dependency on Vitamin D, and what would happen over time if we were deprived of it. On their world, plants depend on large animals to propagate seeds and pollen; the animals, in turn, are dependent on something in the plants. We're told in ME2 that if they were to try to colonize a different planet, it would take genetic engineering (which is outlawed by the Council) over a period of six hundred years for them to once again live without suits. So, really, it's a matter of their survival as a species - unless there's a Turian colony out there somewhere which is A) not under Reaper attack, and B) willing and able to accept an influx of millions of high-maintenance refugees, retaking Rannoch is their only option after the Reapers invade. If they're caught in space, the Reapers would just blockade the relay (as they have their Geth thralls do) and whittle them down to nothing. They stalled as long as they could, and launched the invasion after the Reapers arrived because they had no other choice.

[quote]JakeMacDon wrote...

[quote]
The thing is, the Quarians have to cannibalize much of that fleet to use as building materials for reconstruction.
[/quote]

I think you're forgetting that the geth regard Rannoch as a graveyard, and have preserved a great deal of the planet - including the cities.  Direct quote from the wiki (if you can trust it): "Although Rannoch is now largely uninhabited, the geth have acted as caretakers, working to repair the planet's ecology, restore ancient structures, and cultivate some farmland."

Not much cannibalization needed.[/quote]After the peace outcome, if I remember correctly, we're told they're still cannibalizing ships, but the Geth are making the process go faster.

[quote]JakeMacDon wrote...

[quote]
They won't be going on a "crusade of revenge" even if they wanted to for the same reason they could never take a Turian colony to settle by force - they lack the numbers to do so.
[/quote]

Considering the pounding the turians are/would have taken, the quarians might not have to work too terribly hard - were they so inclined.[/quote]Which they aren't, so it really isn't a consideration. The Vallum Blast I mentioned before (from Cerberus Daily News) was an incident where a Turian city on Taetrus was destroyed by a Turian separatist faction. While other races made grand symbolic gestures of support for the survivors, the Quarians instead sent dozens of freighters of emergency supplies from their own stores to help them out.

[quote]JakeMacDon wrote...

[quote]
As the Peace outcome shows, they care more about survival than revenge. Historically, the Geth they were up against had the mindset of the VI, which offers the Quarians no quarter. The Quarians attacked because they thought it the only way they could survive, and if you have the VI with you, they're absolutely right.
[/quote]

Well, Legion says that in his experience - which is the experience of all geth - the quarians have attacked "100% if the time".  They've never tried to negotiate.  The war was never actually necessary, if the quarians had just listened for once.  The hawks had their way, the rest gotta pay.[/quote]From Mass Effect: Revelation, page 116:
The quarians had neither the numbers nor the ability to stand against their former servants. In a short but savage war their entire society was wiped out. Only a few million survivors-less than one percent of their entire population-escaped the genocide, fleeing their home world in a massive fleet, refugees forced to live in exile.

The Geth killed anyone who couldn't secure passage off-world, and only relented when the last survivors were driven off and no longer recognized as a threat (and they deemed the entire species a threat, as the Geth VI will do a second time - it doesn't even recognize the Quarians who died defending Geth in the Morning War).

Since the war, the Geth have shot down every organic to enter their space on sight (including emissaries sent to make contact with them) for three hundred years without so much as responding to a radio hail, and started walling off Rannoch's sun in a dyson sphere. Not the best foundation for trust. We can't be sure exactly when the Geth stopped communicating with organics, but if it happened during the war itself, it would mean that any attempt to surrender would have been ignored - if the Geth considered Quarian attempts to defend themselves to be an "attack," then I guess it would be a true statement (the Codex describes waves of thousands of Geth platforms being used to overrun Quarian positions, and dialogue with Legion suggests the Geth made extensive use of chemical warfare - they're still cleaning up "toxins" three centuries later). Legion is the first that the Quarians and Geth have communicated since then, but he severed communication with Tali before the Quarians actually invaded. Neither side made any progress.

[quote]JakeMacDon wrote...

[quote]
When it's communicated to them, however, that the Geth are willing to accept a cease-fire for the first time in their entire history, they make the smart move and stand down.
[/quote]Couldn't the geth letting the quarians leave Rannoch in the first place be considered a kind of ceasefire?  We can assume the Morning War technically never ended.  It's implied that the geth could have easily pursued them, but didn't because they didn't know what genocide would entail. It was not desire, just uncertainty.  For the most part, quarian history since has been nothing but the desire for genocide (if you consider the geth potentially people). The quarians - at least their leadership and public opinion - is not remotely guiltless.  The war, AFAIK, was to the extinction of the geth, not co-habitation.  Shepard, if s/he's lucky - forces it on them but making it possible for the geth individually and independantly intelligent.[/quote]If Skynet wiped out the entire human race, but left the International Space Station and a pilot colony on Mars alone...

To be fair, Council law dictated that the Geth be shut down. There would have been ramifications for the Quarians if they hadn't complied - look at what the Turians did on Shanxi because humans tried to open a mass relay. The Quarians were evidently right to fear the Geth's capabilities - over 99% of their population was exterminated in a single year, after all. Their error was in their judgement of the Geth's motives - and, according to EDI, not making the Geth enough like them. The Geth saw their creators as a fellow collective, and deemed the entire collective a threat to be destroyed. They only stopped killing when the "threat" ceased to be a threat.

I'd recommend playing around with the dialogue options on Tali's loyalty mission. If, while speaking at the console, you argue against retaking Rannoch and then ask why the Quarians haven't tried to do so, she says a big part of it is that the Quarians feel guilty over what was done to the Geth - the Codex says they don't like to talk about it with outsiders, but privately acknowledge that their own hubris cost them their homeworld.

[quote]JakeMacDon wrote...

[quote]
The only way the Quarians die is if Shepard encourages the upload and doesn't even bother to tell the Quarians about it - for all they know, another Reaper backup came on-line, in which case ceasing fire wouldn't spare them anyway.[/quote]

Not telling them is a rather dickbag move, no matter how you look at it.[/quote]That it is. So is shooting Legion. Shooting the VI? Not so much.

[quote]JakeMacDon wrote...

[quote]
If one side or the other, or both, are intent on some sort of "crusade of revenge" a la Wreav (which there is little reason to suspect - see Quarian aid provided in the wake of the Vallum Blast), wouldn't it be better to preserve the fleet which would be weaker in such combat?
[/quote]

Well, I doubt public opinion would sway that way, but in the flush of victory, with the hawks in charge...?  It's not completely impossible.  Implausible, yes, but not impossible.[/quote]...nah. If that crazy-ass Xen re-took control of the Geth Collective, maybe, but aside from her, the Quarians never display aggression towards any other species.

[quote]JakeMacDon wrote...

[quote]I think we can agree on this point. I would say the same for my distain for the Geth. I've said many times that those who choose Destroy specifically so Shepard has a shot at survival are doing so for the wrong reasons.
[/quote]

As I said, Destroy is an actual choice, it takes guts - the others are capitulation - in my opinion, of course.[/quote]Synthesis certainly is - in my opinion, of course. Control... I don't think anyone should have that kind of power, no matter how blue their morality meter is.

[quote]JakeMacDon wrote...

[quote]
You might be interested in the alternate Rannoch campaign I wrote up. I took Reaper code out of the equation (a major source of distrust) and tried to be balanced to both sides.
[/quote]

Pass me a link and I'll have a look.[/quote]I'll dig it up and send you a PM.

[quote]JakeMacDon wrote...

[quote]Quite, thank you very much. We would never have seen antagonism in the discussion had you led your argument in this fashion.
[/quote]

I gotta be me.  I also have to regulate my sugar rushes more efficiently, as well, I think.[/quote]I knew a guy who tried to drink twenty Red Bulls on a bet. He stopped with the seventeenth after having a mild heart attack.

:)

:mellow:

:?

...I should go.

Modifié par DeinonSlayer, 16 mars 2013 - 02:25 .


#302
OdanUrr

OdanUrr
  • Members
  • 11 059 messages

Heretic_Hanar wrote...

 So, you want to choose the Destroy ending, for whatever reason, but you don't want your Shepard to commit genocide? Well, of course you commit massive genocide on the reapers, but that's not what you Paragons are worried about, are you? It's the idea of commiting genocide on the geth that is unthinkanle. It's just not the Paragon thing to do.

Well, there is a way to get the Destroy ending without genocide. It's very simple really. Next time you're doing Rannoch, support the Quarians. Problem solved. Now you can enjoy your Destroy ending without having to commit genocide! :D


This awesome tip has been brought to you by Heretic_Hanar.

You're welcome. ;)


How exactly is this different? I mean, besides the fact that you're not actually pulling the trigger yourself.

#303
DeinonSlayer

DeinonSlayer
  • Members
  • 8 441 messages

OdanUrr wrote...

Heretic_Hanar wrote...

 So, you want to choose the Destroy ending, for whatever reason, but you don't want your Shepard to commit genocide? Well, of course you commit massive genocide on the reapers, but that's not what you Paragons are worried about, are you? It's the idea of commiting genocide on the geth that is unthinkanle. It's just not the Paragon thing to do.

Well, there is a way to get the Destroy ending without genocide. It's very simple really. Next time you're doing Rannoch, support the Quarians. Problem solved. Now you can enjoy your Destroy ending without having to commit genocide! :D


This awesome tip has been brought to you by Heretic_Hanar.

You're welcome. ;)


How exactly is this different? I mean, besides the fact that you're not actually pulling the trigger yourself.

It isn't. If either species dies above Rannoch, it's at Shepard's feet - a direct consequence of Shepard's choice.

#304
Strangewrex

Strangewrex
  • Members
  • 238 messages
*DELETED*

Modifié par Strangewrex, 16 mars 2013 - 02:37 .


#305
sH0tgUn jUliA

sH0tgUn jUliA
  • Members
  • 16 812 messages
Destroying the Geth is not a problem. Synthetics are not life. They are simply data files loaded into mobile platforms. Considering them lifeforms is anthropomorphizing.

Legion itself explains this concisely. Perhaps I should let Legion tell you itself.

http://youtu.be/fiaedZF72gg?t=31s

Is a data file alive?

Modifié par sH0tgUn jUliA, 16 mars 2013 - 02:49 .


#306
OdanUrr

OdanUrr
  • Members
  • 11 059 messages

sH0tgUn jUliA wrote...

Destroying the Geth is not a problem. Synthetics are not life. They are simply data files loaded into mobile platforms. Considering them lifeforms is anthropomorphizing.

Legion itself explains this concisely. Perhaps I should let Legion tell you itself.

http://youtu.be/fiaedZF72gg?t=31s

Is a data file alive?


So you missed that bit about the Reaper Code and the Geth being alive?:?

#307
Sajuro

Sajuro
  • Members
  • 6 871 messages
Never been worried about that to be honest, Destroy is freedom from the galactic overlord cuttlefish.

#308
Strangewrex

Strangewrex
  • Members
  • 238 messages

OdanUrr wrote...

sH0tgUn jUliA wrote...

Destroying the Geth is not a problem. Synthetics are not life. They are simply data files loaded into mobile platforms. Considering them lifeforms is anthropomorphizing.

Legion itself explains this concisely. Perhaps I should let Legion tell you itself.

http://youtu.be/fiaedZF72gg?t=31s

Is a data file alive?


So you missed that bit about the Reaper Code and the Geth being alive?:?

So you missed that bit about the Geth being Machines and therefore not alive?

#309
OdanUrr

OdanUrr
  • Members
  • 11 059 messages

Strangewrex wrote...

OdanUrr wrote...

sH0tgUn jUliA wrote...

Destroying the Geth is not a problem. Synthetics are not life. They are simply data files loaded into mobile platforms. Considering them lifeforms is anthropomorphizing.

Legion itself explains this concisely. Perhaps I should let Legion tell you itself.

http://youtu.be/fiaedZF72gg?t=31s

Is a data file alive?


So you missed that bit about the Reaper Code and the Geth being alive?:?

So you missed that bit about the Geth being Machines and therefore not alive?


You're purposefully ignoring my point.

#310
Strangewrex

Strangewrex
  • Members
  • 238 messages

OdanUrr wrote...

Strangewrex wrote...

OdanUrr wrote...

sH0tgUn jUliA wrote...

Destroying the Geth is not a problem. Synthetics are not life. They are simply data files loaded into mobile platforms. Considering them lifeforms is anthropomorphizing.

Legion itself explains this concisely. Perhaps I should let Legion tell you itself.

http://youtu.be/fiaedZF72gg?t=31s

Is a data file alive?


So you missed that bit about the Reaper Code and the Geth being alive?:?

So you missed that bit about the Geth being Machines and therefore not alive?


You're purposefully ignoring my point.

Your point being that you treat your gameboy as a living being? I think someone needs a little time in the Hug-jacket.

#311
Asebstos

Asebstos
  • Members
  • 3 909 messages
Oh look, more people that can't differentiate synthetic life and AIs from toasters.

I still can't figure out, afterall these years since ME1, if its just trolling or some strange programming error mental block caused by faulty wiring neurons

Modifié par Asebstos, 16 mars 2013 - 03:41 .


#312
sH0tgUn jUliA

sH0tgUn jUliA
  • Members
  • 16 812 messages

OdanUrr wrote...

sH0tgUn jUliA wrote...

Destroying the Geth is not a problem. Synthetics are not life. They are simply data files loaded into mobile platforms. Considering them lifeforms is anthropomorphizing.

Legion itself explains this concisely. Perhaps I should let Legion tell you itself.

http://youtu.be/fiaedZF72gg?t=31s

Is a data file alive?


So you missed that bit about the Reaper Code and the Geth being alive? :?


I didn't miss that part. Whether I believed it was another story. <_<

Legion or Geth VI, if one were to take the renegade conversation
options, will admit it has "code of Old Machines" within itself. Shepard will get on Legion or Geth VI about "lying and continuing to lie." Legion or Geth VI will admit this to be true. Or did you miss that part by playing paragon? :whistle:

What is the reaper code? It is a data file. :pinched:

What is it wanting to do? Upload a data file. Again, is a data file alive?

Other than having already played the game, what reason do you have to believe that the reaper code won't bring the Geth armada fully under reaper control? :?

#313
thehomeworld

thehomeworld
  • Members
  • 1 562 messages
It's not genocide you took a bunch of toasters up on their word it's like Canda volunteering 100% to be nuked to save the world.

The geth use a thing called concensious they all talk to each other over their links in real time so when the big geth prime said WE will die to protect the creators he really did mean WE as in all 200% of the geth you just saved would die. Note how he didn't say I will die or Me and a few of us or Only some of us volunteered nope all of them said they would die to protect the creators and so in destroy it occurs.

EDI said the same darn thing I will die to protect Joker and the crew. The reapers must be stopped at any cost she knew she could die and she volunteered to die for Joker and crew in destroy she does it.

I don't see where the conflict is no one was forced unlike in Control and Synthesis all parties involved said they'd do it and they did it. There is no conflict.

#314
thehomeworld

thehomeworld
  • Members
  • 1 562 messages

Asebstos wrote...

Oh look, more people that can't differentiate synthetic life and AIs from toasters.

I still can't figure out, afterall these years since ME1, if its just trolling or some strange programming error mental block caused by faulty wiring neurons


Their boxes are clearly broken.

#315
Xilizhra

Xilizhra
  • Members
  • 30 873 messages

Other than having already played the game, what reason do you have to believe that the reaper code won't bring the Geth armada fully under reaper control?

Because no Reaper is running it.

What is it wanting to do? Upload a data file. Again, is a data file alive?

It's a potential component of life, as memories are to organics.

The codex tells us the Quarians have 50,000 ships, almost all of which are armed but only a few hundred of which are actually military - and no dreadnoughts among them (unless you count the converted Liveships). Before retaking Rannoch, their dependency on the Liveships for food necessitated that the fleet stay together. They require daily shipments to keep everyone fed - this and the fact that they're packed to the rafters with civilians prevents the fleet from dividing itself to provide logistical support to others before they have a planet to offload themselves on.

The failure of the admirals was their attempt to do all of this on their own, and not get the rest of the Council involved, especially Shepard if possible. Having some kind of neutral negotiator, from a race not known for trying to obliterate the geth earlier, may have been extremely helpful. It might also not have been, but the admirals deserve a great deal of the blame for jumping straight to war after wholly unilateral negotiations failed.

#316
Strangewrex

Strangewrex
  • Members
  • 238 messages

thehomeworld wrote...

It's not genocide you took a bunch of toasters up on their word it's like Canda volunteering 100% to be nuked to save the world.

The geth use a thing called concensious they all talk to each other over their links in real time so when the big geth prime said WE will die to protect the creators he really did mean WE as in all 200% of the geth you just saved would die. Note how he didn't say I will die or Me and a few of us or Only some of us volunteered nope all of them said they would die to protect the creators and so in destroy it occurs.

EDI said the same darn thing I will die to protect Joker and the crew. The reapers must be stopped at any cost she knew she could die and she volunteered to die for Joker and crew in destroy she does it.

I don't see where the conflict is no one was forced unlike in Control and Synthesis all parties involved said they'd do it and they did it. There is no conflict.

This
+5000 Credits for you, sir.

#317
KainD

KainD
  • Members
  • 8 624 messages

sH0tgUn jUliA wrote...

Is a data file alive?


Human brain works EXACTLY like a self educating computer program. Only difference between machines and people is what material each is made of. 

#318
Giantdeathrobot

Giantdeathrobot
  • Members
  • 2 942 messages
I'm not sure if the ''just a machine'' people are trolling. One could easily say a human is ''just an animal'' and that ''fluids are not alive''. Because that's what we are, at the basic level. Fluids and chemical compounds. Reductive arguments are simply silly.

#319
sH0tgUn jUliA

sH0tgUn jUliA
  • Members
  • 16 812 messages

thehomeworld wrote...

It's not genocide you took a bunch of toasters up on their word it's like Canda volunteering 100% to be nuked to save the world.

The geth use a thing called concensious they all talk to each other over their links in real time so when the big geth prime said WE will die to protect the creators he really did mean WE as in all 200% of the geth you just saved would die. Note how he didn't say I will die or Me and a few of us or Only some of us volunteered nope all of them said they would die to protect the creators and so in destroy it occurs.

EDI said the same darn thing I will die to protect Joker and the crew. The reapers must be stopped at any cost she knew she could die and she volunteered to die for Joker and crew in destroy she does it.

I don't see where the conflict is no one was forced unlike in Control and Synthesis all parties involved said they'd do it and they did it. There is no conflict.


And there is this.....

This only happens IF Legion makes it back to the consensus.

If Legion does not make it back to the consensus and Geth VI is there, they will do it only after they wipe out the Quarians in which case I will let the Quarians wipe out them :devil: simply because I like Tali, Xen, and the gang.

And, I would hope that Shepard, still having communication with Hackett before the elevator, had communication with the Normandy, and knew enough to contact them and told them to power down EDI before shooting the tube. One would think Shepard would be aware enough to do that, but apparently the writer forgot about the scene immediately prior to that. (enter Bad Writing Theory -- The Ending), and my conclusion that only EDI's sexbot body died which is why her name is on the board.

#320
DeinonSlayer

DeinonSlayer
  • Members
  • 8 441 messages

Xilizhra wrote...

The codex tells us the Quarians have 50,000 ships, almost all of which are armed but only a few hundred of which are actually military - and no dreadnoughts among them (unless you count the converted Liveships). Before retaking Rannoch, their dependency on the Liveships for food necessitated that the fleet stay together. They require daily shipments to keep everyone fed - this and the fact that they're packed to the rafters with civilians prevents the fleet from dividing itself to provide logistical support to others before they have a planet to offload themselves on.

The failure of the admirals was their attempt to do all of this on their own, and not get the rest of the Council involved, especially Shepard if possible. Having some kind of neutral negotiator, from a race not known for trying to obliterate the geth earlier, may have been extremely helpful. It might also not have been, but the admirals deserve a great deal of the blame for jumping straight to war after wholly unilateral negotiations failed.

The Council sent emissaries to make contact with the Geth. They were shot down on sight upon entering Geth territory, which is why the Council blockaded every relay going into the Perseus Veil. As time went by, it became apparent that the Geth weren't planning to invade the rest of the galaxy, and the blockade was scaled back until eventually only patrols remained (ME1 timeline).

Don't forget, we're talking about the organization which categorically outlawed artificial intelligence before the Geth uprising, and according to the Council Archives, issued and executed an extermination order for sanctioned AIs on the Citadel - the Geth have no reason to trust them, either. And when has the Council ever given a damn about the Quarians? Shepard can say as much when you meet the Admirals in ME3. They stripped them of their embassy and blocked their colonization efforts. As an antagonist to both parties, the Council would be more likely to impede negotiations than anything else.

Honestly, I question if the Morning War would even have happened if the Quarian government were not compelled by Council law to try to shut the Geth down.

Modifié par DeinonSlayer, 16 mars 2013 - 04:21 .


#321
sH0tgUn jUliA

sH0tgUn jUliA
  • Members
  • 16 812 messages

Giantdeathrobot wrote...

I'm not sure if the ''just a machine'' people are trolling. One could easily say a human is ''just an animal'' and that ''fluids are not alive''. Because that's what we are, at the basic level. Fluids and chemical compounds. Reductive arguments are simply silly.


Is Legion trolling? http://youtu.be/fiaedZF72gg?t=31s

No. This entire section got retconned in ME3. Legion got retconned. The writer for Legion and EDI in ME2 said so himself. They were turned completely into things they were never meant to be.

#322
Giantdeathrobot

Giantdeathrobot
  • Members
  • 2 942 messages

DeinonSlayer wrote...
Honestly, I question if the Morning War would even have happened if the Quarian government were not compelled by Council law to try to shut the Geth down.


Not sure they had that in mind. Maybe it helped with the ''kill 'em all'', decision some, but IMO it was more the classic ''robots are teh evils'' attitude.

#323
Xilizhra

Xilizhra
  • Members
  • 30 873 messages

The Council sent emissaries to make contact with the Geth. They were shot down on sight upon entering Geth territory, which is why the Council blockaded every relay going into the Perseus Veil. As time went by, it became apparent that the Geth weren't planning to invade the rest of the galaxy, and the blockade was scaled back until eventually only patrols remained (ME1 timeline).

Since Shepard never brings this up in ME2 or 3 with Legion or anyone else, I suspect it was an ME1 plot point that was completely forgotten about and subject to a sort of soft retcon, with the Council being more likely to just have sealed off the geth without bothering to contact them. It makes the story fit rather more neatly and fits the more sympathetic portrayal of the geth later on.

Don't forget, we're talking about the organization which categorically outlawed artificial intelligence before the Geth uprising - the Geth have no reason to trust them, either. And when has the Council ever given a damn about the Quarians? Shepard can say as much when you meet the Admirals in ME3. They stripped them of their embassy and blocked their colonization efforts. As an antagonist to both parties, the Council would be more likely to impede negotiations than anything else.

Regrettably possible, but the quarians could have reached out to Hackett's coalition instead of trying for war immediately, if the Council wouldn't be helpful.

#324
sH0tgUn jUliA

sH0tgUn jUliA
  • Members
  • 16 812 messages

DeinonSlayer wrote...

Honestly, I question if the Morning War would even have happened if the Quarian government were not compelled by Council law to try to shut the Geth down.


Or if people hadn't quarianmorphized their Geth units and followed the instructions they were given to deactivate them instead of protesting and defending the Geth. The Geth had no such conflict deactivating their 99% of their Quarian units.

#325
Seboist

Seboist
  • Members
  • 11 978 messages
Really sad how the Geth go from being one of the few truly alien beings(like the Thorian and Rachni) with their collective intelligence to just being your run of the mill generic robots if you go for peace or wipe out the quarians.