BioShock Infinite
#601
Posté 05 avril 2013 - 07:30
#605
Posté 05 avril 2013 - 10:12
#606
Posté 05 avril 2013 - 10:15
Royal_Phalanx wrote...
Finished the game a few days ago and am chiming in now. Loved the game, Elizabeth is definitely very, very awesome. The ending really depressed me for a long time afterwards after I understood what it meant. Anyone else feel the same?
People understand different things from the ending.
#607
Posté 05 avril 2013 - 10:15
Of course, whether or not Anna was there is up to you. I choose to believe she was there. Makes it feel like everything was worth it.
#608
Posté 05 avril 2013 - 10:19
LPPrince wrote...
Not me. It was a happy ending because after the credits you see a third timeline Booker going to check on Anna. No baptism choice to be made, so they'll get to live their lives as father and daughter without ever dealing with Comstock or Columbia.
Of course, whether or not Anna was there is up to you. I choose to believe she was there. Makes it feel like everything was worth it.
There's also another interpretation. That Booker's back in a timeline where he's already sold Anna to Comstock and in his drunken stupor tortures himself checking the baby's crib from time to time.
#609
Posté 05 avril 2013 - 10:25
*looking at you Bioware*
#610
Posté 05 avril 2013 - 10:28
LPPrince wrote...
Thats the thing, its whatever you want it to be. I choose happy happy feel goods because too many games these days are lacking happy endings.
*looking at you Bioware*
In the original version, the ending to ME3 was pretty much whatever you wanted it to be.
#611
Posté 05 avril 2013 - 11:52
#612
Posté 05 avril 2013 - 11:57
#613
Posté 06 avril 2013 - 12:13
Thoughts?
#614
Posté 06 avril 2013 - 06:53
OdanUrr wrote...
LPPrince wrote...
Not me. It was a happy ending because after the credits you see a third timeline Booker going to check on Anna. No baptism choice to be made, so they'll get to live their lives as father and daughter without ever dealing with Comstock or Columbia.
Of course, whether or not Anna was there is up to you. I choose to believe she was there. Makes it feel like everything was worth it.
There's also another interpretation. That Booker's back in a timeline where he's already sold Anna to Comstock and in his drunken stupor tortures himself checking the baby's crib from time to time.
That's a wrong interpretation. Comstock is gone, therefore no debt is incurred, therefore no Anna is sold. That interpretation really makes no sense given the previous events.
#615
Posté 06 avril 2013 - 12:28
#616
Posté 06 avril 2013 - 01:44
#617
Posté 06 avril 2013 - 02:01
#618
Posté 06 avril 2013 - 02:11
Modifié par Isichar, 06 avril 2013 - 02:11 .
#619
Posté 06 avril 2013 - 03:03
#620
Posté 06 avril 2013 - 03:27
I love this game.
#621
Posté 06 avril 2013 - 03:36
Gibb_Shepard wrote...
OdanUrr wrote...
LPPrince wrote...
Not me. It was a happy ending because after the credits you see a third timeline Booker going to check on Anna. No baptism choice to be made, so they'll get to live their lives as father and daughter without ever dealing with Comstock or Columbia.
Of course, whether or not Anna was there is up to you. I choose to believe she was there. Makes it feel like everything was worth it.
There's also another interpretation. That Booker's back in a timeline where he's already sold Anna to Comstock and in his drunken stupor tortures himself checking the baby's crib from time to time.
That's a wrong interpretation. Comstock is gone, therefore no debt is incurred, therefore no Anna is sold. That interpretation really makes no sense given the previous events.
Wrong interpretation you say? If it's a wrong interpretation, then it means there's a right one. And if there's a right answer, then there is no interpretation. As it stands, the post-credits scene is pretty vague and it's left entirely up to the player to fill in the blanks of what might've happened. If, for instance, the post-credits scene took place the day after Booker had sold Anna and we were shown Anna was still in her crib, then I'd say it's more than likely that the writers intended for us to interpret that the circle had been broken. Because that's basically what it amounts to, has the circle finally been broken?
You say my interpretation makes no sense given the previous events but I beg to differ. If anything, BioShock Infinite tells us that this is not the first time Booker has tried to save Elizabeth, that this loop has repeated itself hundreds of times and nothing has changed. Isn't it possible then that other Elizabeths might have gotten to the point where they drown Booker at his baptism only for the circle to repeat itself? I don't know if I've said it already but there is a paradox to consider here. After all, if Anna had never been kidnapped by Comstock, she would never have gained the powers that enabled her to drown Booker in the first place (I'm talking about an inter-dimensional paradox here). So, currently, my interpretation is that the circle remains, in fact, unbroken (and I'm trying hard not to think about its dubious use of multiverse theory).
#622
Posté 06 avril 2013 - 03:46
Isichar wrote...
Ending kind of reminds me of the daywatch/nigh****ch movies.
So... "t w a t" is a censored word in these parts. Even when its a part of a word that has no connection to it whatsoever. Waa...
#623
Posté 06 avril 2013 - 04:29
#624
Posté 06 avril 2013 - 04:50
But yes Bioshock Infinite really does have a bittersweet ending, you see Bioware that is how you do BITTERSWEET.
Modifié par DinoSteve, 06 avril 2013 - 04:51 .
#625
Posté 06 avril 2013 - 05:16
Anyway. Everything Bioshock Infinite Gets Wrong. Good watch.
Modifié par Luxorek, 06 avril 2013 - 05:16 .





Retour en haut





