MprezdNZ wrote...
KCFender wrote...
knight5923 wrote...
KCFender wrote...
A bunch of stuff
Your heart is in the right place, but the whole carelessness on priestly's part is extremely unfair. He's a single cog in the machine that is Bioware. He was forced into an unfortunate situation with the unexpected xbox release, then had to scramble to pick up the pieces when everything fell apart. I think a donation made by Bioware would be an excellent idea, but putting all of the blame squarely on Chris' shoulders simply because he posted the bad news is cruel.
That's the price the spokesperson pays.
In my mock-Chris statement, I did try to word it so that Chris wasn't completely taking the blame. I don't blame him solely. Well... maybe I do. But that's because it was his name on the post that told me it was safe to assume that RtO would be available in a matter of hours. Sucks to be the spokesperson, but most spokespersons understand the levity of their job and take precautions, rather than throwing out information into the wind that could result in people feeling ripped-off.
I agreed with your original sentiment that it would be a nice gesture. Now you just come off as a head in the clouds, dreaming, imbecile. Honestly. the majority of people know that Chris would be being told what/what not to say. If I was in his position and got fired because I was the spokesperson you better believe I would make sure that the company that fired me got royally ****ed in the ass to the point of not being able to afford to produce games anymore.
Seriously, find some kind of clue
Chris "would" be told what/what not to say? "Would"? My head may be in the clouds and my word-choice not always perfect, but I'm having difficulty even understanding you post.
And if you're suggesting Chris is not at ALL responsible for the posts he makes, I think thats being a bit naive as well.
But, to address your anger: Did I ever even suggest Chris get fired? Hell no.
Am I suggesting he personally pay these donations, and not the company? No.
Seriously, wtf are you talking about? I understand Chris isn't solely responsible, but he has been the spokesperson thus far, and so, as a spokesperson, would it not be him to make such an announcement about such a donation?
All I'm suggesting is that Chris, as a spokesperson for his company, make a statement saying that BIOWARE, not CHRIS, will be making a donation.
Good lord. You think I was asking for the man's execution and torture, when all I'm suggesting is that the company do something nice and he be the one, as usual, to announce it (along with, perhaps, a personal apology).
Y'know nevermind. It was just a thought, and naturally, someone misinterprets it completely and goes uber-argumentative.
Way to be. You really got me off the clouds but good.
Modifié par KCFender, 15 janvier 2010 - 06:42 .