132 réponses à ce sujet

[schebobo]

Female please, and it would be great if the writers make her as mind numbingly nasty as possible, kinda like a Cersie Lannister (in the books).

It would also be great if no stupid mind control were involved and if she didn't have any 'logical' reason for her actions (cough* reapers *cough). Sometimes the best villains are the simplest, people that just want to start some ****.

[TheButterflyEffect]

Male, because female villains invariably are stereotypical skanks with huge melons who just wanna jump the male hero's bones. Which I find highly offensive, especially since girl heroes never seem to get to jump hot male villain's bones, so I'd rather avoid it altogether.

Modifié par TheButterflyEffect, 21 mars 2013 - 02:43 .

[Urazz]

I really don't care about the gender of the villain as long as it's a well made one. Meredith was a potentially good villain but you only ever really find out her past and motivations if you support the Templars if I recall.

[HolyAvenger]

TheButterflyEffect wrote...

Male, because female villains invariably are stereotypical skanks with huge melons who just wanna jump the male hero's bones. Which I find highly offensive, especially since girl heroes never seem to get to jump hot male villain's bones, so I'd rather avoid it altogether.

 

Yeessssssssss...Kreia, Meredith, Branka, Tela Vasir, Bodhi, Brooks were all exactly like this:mellow:

[TheButterflyEffect]

...As long as there's no villains raping heroes, I'm cool.

FEAR 2 was absolutely nauseating. Like, 1145252435667 times more nauseating then that crap with Morrigan in DAO. GODDAMN IT ALL TO HELL. Stupid horny pregnant ghosts....

[efrgfhnm_]

As long as the villain is good, the gender is not important... The gender should be whatever the writers decide will suit the story they are writing best