Aller au contenu

Photo

*THE GREAT DEBATE* - NO PEACE obtainable between the Geth & Quarians: Who would you choose and Why? (Pic of BioWare Stats Inside)


  • Ce sujet est fermé Ce sujet est fermé
4712 réponses à ce sujet

#1126
Auld Wulf

Auld Wulf
  • Members
  • 1 284 messages

vonfantasy wrote...

But is there a choice just to kill off the Quarian military? If you choose the geth you also kill off all quarian civilians .

That's exactly it. Unlike Deinon and people like him, I'm not hateful and bitter enough to make that call.

I like the quarian civilians and the geth, so I'd save them both, every time. Thus I can't really take part in a thread that's done nothing but stir up hatred for the geth. Just because the geth are more different to us than the quarians. Hooray for xenophobia!

It must be difficult for them, since I'm a fan of both the quarian civilians and the geth.

So no, I wouldn't kill the quarian civilians. I'm sure they'd love to character assassinate by telling you I would, but my post history supports the notion that I would defend the quarian civilians every bit as much as I would the geth. In fact, in this debate, I'd say that I represent the quarian civilians, and people like Deinon represent the quarian military.

But that's ethics for you. I have them. Sadly sociopathy is more common than ethics.

Modifié par Auld Wulf, 19 mars 2013 - 02:34 .


#1127
Skullheart

Skullheart
  • Members
  • 4 345 messages
Didn't the quarians also use WMD on Rannoch? I'm sure Tali and Legion said something like that on Tuchanka.

#1128
DeinonSlayer

DeinonSlayer
  • Members
  • 8 441 messages

Skullheart wrote...

Didn't the quarians also use WMD on Rannoch? I'm sure Tali and Legion said something like that on Tuchanka.

Legion: "The Krogan bombed their own planet into this condition. The Creators were not so aggressive in the Morning War."
Tali: "We expected to get our worlds back. We didn't want to destroy them!"
Legion: "We are glad you did not. You would not be able to survive the conditions Krogan thrive in."

Modifié par DeinonSlayer, 19 mars 2013 - 02:45 .


#1129
CronoDragoon

CronoDragoon
  • Members
  • 10 413 messages

Auld Wulf wrote...
I like the quarian civilians and the geth, so I'd save them both, every time. Thus I can't really take part in a thread that's done nothing but stir up hatred for the geth. Just because the geth are more different to us than the quarians. Hooray for xenophobia!

It must be difficult for them, since I'm a fan of both the quarian civilians and the geth.

So no, I wouldn't kill the quarian civilians. I'm sure they'd love to character assassinate by telling you I would, but my post history supports the notion that I would defend the quarian civilians every bit as much as I would the geth. In fact, in this debate, I'd say that I represent the quarian civilians, and people like Deinon represent the quarian military.

But that's ethics for you. I have them. Sadly sociopathy is more common than ethics.


Okay, but if you're just going to reject the OP's hypothetical then that's not exactly helpful.

Additionally, the fact that you say this thread has "done nothing but stir up hatred for the geth" shows me you haven't actually read the thread.

Modifié par CronoDragoon, 19 mars 2013 - 02:48 .


#1130
DeinonSlayer

DeinonSlayer
  • Members
  • 8 441 messages
Auld Wulf, are you capable of having a civil discussion without hurling insults at anyone who doesn't categorically agree with you? You call me "hateful" and "bitter," but this has been a persistent problem on your part. You've had threads of yours locked for it before.

Modifié par DeinonSlayer, 19 mars 2013 - 02:52 .


#1131
Steelcan

Steelcan
  • Members
  • 23 296 messages
AuldnWolf, once again I'm going to tell you to take your rantings some place else. No one wants to hear your lunatic dribble

Modifié par Steelcan, 19 mars 2013 - 02:55 .


#1132
remydat

remydat
  • Members
  • 2 462 messages

silverexile17s wrote...

[Yes. There. Is.
By showing us one incident, we are forced to take the word of the at face value. And, knowing your extreme prejudice, you would not believe the recording if it was quarian based, would you? You think a geth recording, from a server overrun with Reaper code, from a single viewpoint, showing one single death, in a door-breach situation where said death may have, in all likelyhood, been completely accidental, is proof that the quarians mass murdered everyone that disagreed with the order? You really think that 99% of the quarian race - at least 2.1 billion people - were caused ny the quarians themselves, even when everyone else, the geth included, openly admit that they caused the death? Or the fact that the protests took place before the Morning War, and thus, were completely seperate from the death toll of the War?
Just think about these pretenses with some bit of logic, will you? Stop being so condesending to him when you are the one that clearly isn't looking at this from a non-biased perspective.

Also, what?
"Why not? Our fleet is massive. We can support Shepard's fight against the Old Machines.... If the Creators no longer threaten us." - Geth V.I., Rannoch.
That statement right there. That is the Geth V.I. blatently and un-subtley suggesting that they can be more valuble then the quarians, and to sacrifice them for the geth. And it's done so callously and uncaringly of the quarian's lives.
And again, if Legion never returns to the geth, then all geth are like the V.I. - uncaring of organics, unless it furthers their own goals. They are remorsefull of their past, but won't bat an eyelash to helping others. It's like how sociopaths can regret the loss of  life they take, but not the actual action the killing itself.
And AGAIN, they are branded as enemies of the free galaxy by the Council thanks to the Heretics, which the geth never claimed responcibility for until it was a problem for them. And again, it can be traced back to how the geth never bothered to communicate these feelings to the quarians and at least start a healing process.

And AGAIN, AS STATED MANY TIMES OVER, the quarians in their current state are a BURDEN to the turians and humans, because by lugging their civilians around with them, they would consume more resources then were avalible to give them, and be unable to tackle multiple fronts, and be unable to effectively manuver in battle as they would need to constantly huddle around the liveships, AND would suffer crippling blows to their race for every large ship that was lost.
To be of ANY help to the war effort, they would have had to suddenly and abruptly become completely self-sufficant. Not the survival-based day-to-day scavenger life they currently have. The only way to do that is to get a planet of their own. And Rannoch is the only world that is dextro-based that has breathable atmosphere that isn't lethel to them, and edible food that doesn't need to be made into oversterilized paste to eat, and untouched raw resources to use for their fleets.
So NO, the ONLY way they could be any helpfull part of the war is if they were self-sufficant again, and that's only possible if they reclaim their world. And because the geth are still branded as Reaper allies by the Council, attacking them actually WOULD be considered as aiding in the war effort. That only ever changes if the geth are saved/peace is achieved.

And AGAIN, the quarians had no choice, because they didn't want to bring the Council down on their heads. Their weren't in any position to defy them, so harsh scanctions or censorship would be devestating to their economy. Losing favor with the Council would have likely destroyed the quarian economy and plunged their entire sociaty into economic depression for who knows how many years it takes to get back into the good graces. Mr. 12D would be homeless and pennyless. And it would be even worse if the government admitted anything, as it gives legal grounds for lawsuits to be filed against them by the Council, devedtating them even further.
So YES, they had every reason to be afraid of the Council. It wasn't cowardly. Look at Mass Effect: Revelation, at how the Council chews out humanity for creating the Eliza A.I at Gagarain Station, and you'll understand that the ramafacations for an entire race of A.I.s would have been harsh.

And from the Heretics, present day quarians came to the conclusion that, based on what the Heretics (which are assumed to reperesent all geth) have done, that the geth are a threat to everything, and they are obligated to correct their mistake and end the geth.
NITHER time, it was unessesary. Circumstances drove them to desperation, as the alternitive was far worse from that viewpoint in time. You act like the quarians assumed this would happen to them. The many posts by me and DenyonSlayer detail why the quarians were forced into the choices they took, no differently then how the geth were forced into their deal with the Reapers. If you can sympathise with a race joing the Reapers, then surely you can sympathise with a race doing what it did to survive the Reapers.
And AGAIN, wrong. The fleet does nothing without the coberating opinoions of the Admiralty Board, and the Conclave - a quarian senete where every ship has a represenitive, and a say. And the war would not be possible, unless a majority of the Conclave agreed with the decision to go to war. So NO, they weren't oppresed. They chose to attack because it was the only way they could get a world and be able to be self-sufficant enough to aid the other races against the Reapers.

And you continue to ignore that it takes two to tango. Faults in BOTH organic and synthetic created the conflect. Thus far you have ignored over 40+ pages of information on the quarian's circumstances, mking your opinion diffinitively prejudiced since you blatently ignore cannon-backed information.
And did you listen to the Dalatrass. Calling the krogan ****s is basically exactally what they do verbatium, and humans too based on the reckless behavior they had pre-contact with opening every relay they saw. The turians did too, compairing them to krogan.


I don't have a prejudice against Quarians.  Tali is usually my main love interest.  I have a prejudice against people who incite hatred by attempting Genocide.  So in Mass Effect that includes the Quarians and the Council.  I know for a fact they are adult enough to hold them accountable for making horrific decisions.  What I gather from the Geth is a bunch of domesticated units were forced into war and with no concept of the rules of war responded like a 1 year old kid in that situation would if they had the power to kill.  And no the Quarians didn't mass murder everyone who disagreed.  They murdered enough of them that the rest shut up and allowed the attempted genocide to continue.    Maybe this wasn't made clear but I judge the Quarians more harshly because they are adults.  I judge the Geth less harshly because they are equivalent to a scared child whose father murdered his mother and tried to then murder it.  They had yet to learn concepts of morality and rules of war because the Quarians tried to murder them before they could.  Translation, they did not yet have the capacity to understand the morality of their decisions.  They did start to understand that at the end of the Morning War which is why they were reluctant to finish the job. 

So you seem to be confusing the point.  We all agree the Geth killed most of that 99%.  I am saying the 99% by the time the Morning War started were considered enemies because either the majority of them supported the extermination of the Geth or the silent majority were too scared to resist.  From the Geth perspective they killed them because they lacked the capacity to understand restraint and compassion at that point in time.   You can't argue the Geth should have stopped the Heretics but then give the Quarians a pass for remaining silent while their government tried to exterminate a race.  And don't respond with the bull that the Geth were not fully self aware yet.  That is just semantics.  The Quarians knew the Geth were on the path to self awareness and tried to snuff it out because they didn't want to man up and deal with their mistakes.  So the difference here is the silent majority was willing to remain silent so that a group of beings who had done them no wrong and who had spent their entire lives serving them could be destroyed because their existence had become problematic.  The silent majority of Geth were willing to remain silent while the Heretics waged war on races that wanted the extinction of the Geth as evidence by official Council policy.  You are free to disagree with me but to pretend like people can't see the clear moral distinction there is silly.

Please explain to me how the Quarians can feed themselves and fight an effective war against the Geth but then magically would be a burden to the Turians or Humans.  Where were they getting all the food and resources during their war with the Geth because it wasn't Rannoch. 

And again, the Quarians had a choice.  They could own up to their mistake, say they will not destroy a growing sentient race and face the consequences.  That is called being a mature adult.  It is a morally bankrupt excuse to say you had no choice in destroying a growing sentient race because you wanted to avoid economic sanctions or whatever else.  All you are telling me is you valued your own selfish interests more than you valued the life of the Geth.  That doesn't mean you had not choice.  That just means you are a coward who tried to take the easy way out and the result is 99% of your people got killed.  That's called Karma.  It can be a b*tch. 

So I think you are confused, I am not ignoring the reasons the Quarians did what they did.  I am telling you their reasons don't excuse their actions.  What kind of lesson would that be for a kid?  Hey kid, if you screw up just eliminate anyone who could reveal your screw up so that you don't have to be held accountable for your actions, lol. 

#1133
DirtySHISN0

DirtySHISN0
  • Members
  • 2 278 messages

dafangirl wrote...

it's hard to put faith in Reaper upgrades for any length of time


All technology in the present cycle of the known Mass effect universe is derived from Reaper tech.

Not everything has to have a malicious or insidious reason behind it, given the fact the reapers were designed i'd say there is a strong chance that there are parts/codes that form the basis for mechanics crucial to their operation and upkeep that the reapers either have no knowledge of/influence over and/or control of.

#1134
remydat

remydat
  • Members
  • 2 462 messages

DeinonSlayer wrote...

NCommand wrote...

Where exactly again is it mentioned that the Geth are cleaning up the after effects of chemical weapon use? Would explain how the Geth managed to reduce the Quarian population from several billion to 17 million

ME2. "We maintain mobile platforms to clear rubble and toxins from the Morning War." This is right before Legion starts describing similar actions taken by humans, at Wadi us-Salaam, Tyne Cot, Rookwood, Arlington, Piskarevskoye... Auschwitz-Birkenau.

The use of present-tense tells us it's an ongoing effort. The war in which these "toxins" were used was three centuries ago.

Also @Remydat, calling on their government to "own up" will simply bring the Council down on their heads to shut the Geth down for them, in all likelihood with more collateral damage than what the Quarian government tried to do by itself. They're a Council Associate race. Even if their government acted in defiance of Council law, they're powerless to change it. Mr. 12D never committed any offense against the Geth. Is he supposed to prioritize the safety of the maybe-AI which could drop his car out of the sky tomorrow just to see what it looks like over the safety of his own family? You act like the Quarians categorically deserved death unless they found a sword to throw themselves on for the sake of the accidental AI which ultimately, mercilessly, slaughtered them with no regard for those who made the effort on their behalf.


Don't you want the Geth to prioritize the safety of organics that want them exterminated by fighting the Heretics.  Again, this is a double edged sword. 

And no he 12D dude doesn't have to prioritize the safety of the maybe AI but then the Geth don't have to prioritize the safety of the genocidal Council Races who don't think they have the right to exist.  My point is be consistent with your opinion.  You can't allow organics to rationalize massacre as well they are just toasters but then get mad at the Geth for saying well they are just organics who want us dead anyway.  The Geth are not obligated to act based on organic notions of moraltiy.  If it is ok for the Quarians to kill toasters then from the Geth perspective it is ok to use chemical warfare against organics trying to exterminate them. 

Here is the problem with the Quarian and your position.  You want to argue it is ok to kill the Geth for being toasters and not yet alive but then want to judge them based on organic morality.  Well they can't be judged on organic morality if you claim there are just toasters.  So which is it?

And not the Quarians don't deserve death which is why I never choose to kill them except that one time I did it just to see the dialogue.  Once again, I always choose peace and Tali is my main love interest in most of my play throughs.  However, the OP said make a choice and if I am forced to make a choice then the ones that die are the ones that started the conflict.  You are free to decide otherwise based on whatever you want.  I am merely explaining my position and also pointing out what I consider to be a double standard.

#1135
Khelish

Khelish
  • Members
  • 589 messages
This is fun!

Posted Image

#1136
remydat

remydat
  • Members
  • 2 462 messages

Finn the Jakey wrote...

Red Dust wrote...

You destroy the Geth, you destroy a bunch of 1's and 0's.
You destroy the Quarians, you destroy ships full of frightened women and children.

Geth may have a soul, but Quarins definitely do have one.

I was just going to say this.

We can all agree the Quarians are 'alive'
Whether or not the Geth however, are 'alive' is still highly debatable.

Quarians, by default, have the greater right to life in this situation. Yes its entirely possible the Geth are alive, but we have absolutely nothing in real life to compare them to, so we can never know.




The problem is that it is not your call to make.  I think therefore I am.  Once an AI starts questioning it's existence then you lose the right to arbitrarily decide for it whether it is alive or not. 

Put another way, suppose we are just some dumb mistake by the entity we call God.  If God showed up said you are to me what a machine is to you and thus you deserve to die, would you accept that?  Or would you argue that despite what this superior being says, you are in fact alive and worthy of deciding for yourself.

The fundamental problem is organics in their role as creators are fu*king a**holes.  We sit around imagining that we were made in the image of our creator and that ultimately we can attain a similar status as our Gods but then treat our creations like sh*t when they aspire for the same thing. 

#1137
DirtySHISN0

DirtySHISN0
  • Members
  • 2 278 messages

dafangirl wrote...

@DirtySHISNO Well everything Reaper related in the trilogy had a malicious/insidious reason until very late in the game.

And my intent, here, was to respond to the OP. If no peace is possible, I would not side with the Geth for the very reason that up until that point I do indeed view the Reapers as malicious and their intentions insidious.


Thats not true, reaper tech provided a basis for galactic life and a greater standard of living. Despite the overall scheme, small parts provided great leaps forward and branched off into others areas to be researched.

Yes, the macro effect was the galaxy being guided towards the reapers, but the micro effects were no more malicious out of context than the single pieces of a mechanism are on their own.

Modifié par DirtySHISN0, 19 mars 2013 - 03:49 .


#1138
Da Don Giovanni

Da Don Giovanni
  • Members
  • 782 messages

dafangirl wrote...

@DirtySHISNO Well everything Reaper related in the trilogy had a malicious/insidious reason until very late in the game.

And my intent, here, was to respond to the OP. If no peace is possible, I would not side with the Geth for the very reason that up until that point I do indeed view the Reapers as malicious and their intentions insidious.


Are their intentions that bad? Think about it. We create Geth. Geth kill us (without reaper upgrades, and after we try to kill them) Organics die. Synthetics self destruct b/c of boredom. /Galaxy

With Reapers you become a, Reaper!

Sign me up!

/Sarcasm

The Illusive Man has the best idea yet. Control the Reapers and make them do Humanity's bidding. Talk about an Army...

#1139
Martyrlord629ME3

Martyrlord629ME3
  • Members
  • 18 messages
I would choose Geth, but only if Tali died in ME2.

#1140
o Ventus

o Ventus
  • Members
  • 17 275 messages

Auld Wulf wrote...

DeinonSlayer wrote...

Auld Wulf, I'd address your points, but it's already been done many times before and I know you'll just ignore it and toss a couple of self-righteous insults my way anyway.

Uh-huh. Defensive and paranoid, much? And I'd disregard you (with amusement) because I talk in regards to canon, fresh in my mind. I don't want to have to deal with your headcanon about the glorious, saintly quarian military. A point which is directly contradicted by the game.

So, whatevs guy.


You're the guy who says that biotics are killed in the Destroy ending.

I don't think you're allowed to use the word "canon".

#1141
vonfantasy

vonfantasy
  • Members
  • 75 messages

remydat wrote...

Finn the Jakey wrote...

Red Dust wrote...

You destroy the Geth, you destroy a bunch of 1's and 0's.
You destroy the Quarians, you destroy ships full of frightened women and children.

Geth may have a soul, but Quarins definitely do have one.

I was just going to say this.

We can all agree the Quarians are 'alive'
Whether or not the Geth however, are 'alive' is still highly debatable.

Quarians, by default, have the greater right to life in this situation. Yes its entirely possible the Geth are alive, but we have absolutely nothing in real life to compare them to, so we can never know.




The problem is that it is not your call to make.  I think therefore I am.  Once an AI starts questioning it's existence then you lose the right to arbitrarily decide for it whether it is alive or not. 

Put another way, suppose we are just some dumb mistake by the entity we call God.  If God showed up said you are to me what a machine is to you and thus you deserve to die, would you accept that?  Or would you argue that despite what this superior being says, you are in fact alive and worthy of deciding for yourself.

The fundamental problem is organics in their role as creators are fu*king a**holes.  We sit around imagining that we were made in the image of our creator and that ultimately we can attain a similar status as our Gods but then treat our creations like sh*t when they aspire for the same thing. 


But isn't it Shepards call to make since he's in the front of saving the whole galaxy and the future of everything we (incl. alien races) know?

Also your text suggests there's an entity we call God, what if there's no creator to organic races? What if we're not a dumb mistake by a creator but by evolution? Religious people and similar believe we were "made in the image of our creator", not everyone is religious or have such beliefs. The creators of the geth are known, the reason for their existance is know. Ours is not.

Modifié par vonfantasy, 19 mars 2013 - 04:08 .


#1142
DeinonSlayer

DeinonSlayer
  • Members
  • 8 441 messages
Fair enough, Remy. This argument has grown far more heated than it ever needed to. I understand why the Geth did what they did in the Morning War, but that doesn't mean I forgive them for it. It goes back to the Asari/Salarian example from before. If they learned from it and demonstrated a willingness to atone, I'll make peace, but I have to metagame that the code won't make them go Rachni Breeder on us to even allow for that. I'm going very far out on a limb by trusting the Geth after the killings, the lies, the Reaper alliance, the reversal of their philosophy on Reaper tech.

At the dawn of the Morning War, the Geth's intellect and actions were more on the level of the Noverian Rachni. Organic standards couldn't be applied to them, but they were still an aimless threat who killed many, many innocent people. It was wrong that they were initially attacked. While I can sympathize with their situation, while I believe defense against direct aggression was justified, the indiscriminate, mindless, and total slaughter of the Quarian race which followed was not, and if put in that situation, the Quarians were within their rights to defend themselves from the Geth onslaught.

Centuries later, even the Geth VI has advanced to the point where more organic standards are applicable. Its reasoning has matured into that of a sociopath. They've persisted in the same behavior they displayed in the Morning War. They make no apologies for siding with the Reapers and give little indication that they would not do so again, express no remorse about the innocents they know they'll be killing, and insist on uploading code I don't trust at all for the express purpose of adding to their body count. I cannot allow this. Even though I understand its actions, I would never trust such an entity to watch my back in a galactic war of extermination.

Mix Legion's experiences into that cauldron, and you get a remorseful entity mindful of what it's doing, and what it's done. One which is still guilty of these crimes over the centuries, but is aware of them, and seeks atonement. That, I find worth saving - and despite my own misgivings about the code, the lies, et al - I do when I can.

Modifié par DeinonSlayer, 19 mars 2013 - 04:13 .


#1143
remydat

remydat
  • Members
  • 2 462 messages

vonfantasy wrote...

But isn't it Shepards call to make since he's in the front of saving the whole galaxy and the future of everything we (incl. alien races) know?

Also your text suggests there's an entity we call God, what if there's no creator to organic races? What if we're not a dumb mistake by a creator but by evolution? Religous people believe we were "made in the image of our creator", not everyone is religious or have such beliefs. The creators of the geth are known, the reason for their existance is know. Ours is not.


I was referring to the general philosophical question raised not the specific decision Shepard makes.  It doesn't matter if there is a God or not.  The question was more about how would you view your creator if it decided that your existence was unworthy because that creator considered itself superior to you?  You can answer that thought experiment without actually believe said entity exists.  

It is fine if organics think the Geth are just toasters.  However, the Geth reached a point where they could question their existence and they could refuse a request to shutdown.  Organics act like their creations are eternally indebted to them and remain their property.  It doesn't matter if their free will was intended or a mistake, they now have it and are no longer just slaves or machinery to do with as you please.

So this whole true VI question is just semantics.  When I hit the shutdown button on my computer, it doesn't beg me to stop.  If it did, my first instinct would not be to kill it no matter what the Council says.  My first instinct would be excitement because I don't have an irrational hatred of anything foreign to me.

Modifié par remydat, 19 mars 2013 - 04:26 .


#1144
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 426 messages
You know it makes me laugh at the hysteria of Geth getting Reaper tech, when Shep enhanced by reaper tech, is driving around on a ship enhanced with Reapertech, controlled by an AI using Reapertech.

Now if you don't trust them that's one thing (I don't trust derperus which is why I never gave them the base) but saying the code is gonna make them evil is silly. EDI hasn't gone bonkers. yes like it or not Shepard currently has unshackled Reaper tech controlling his ship. There's nothing you can do about this. He has a synthetic with Reaper tech and trusts it with his life (and that of his crew) along with all the information on the war on a daily basis.

Hypocrisy anyone?

FYI Overlord clearly shows SHEP can be hacked. Why the Reapers didn't do so is anyone's guess.

Modifié par Ryzaki, 19 mars 2013 - 04:39 .


#1145
o Ventus

o Ventus
  • Members
  • 17 275 messages
Is it actually confirmed that Shepard has Reaper technology inside him/her? S/he Wouldn't be alive after Destroy if that were the case.

#1146
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 426 messages

o Ventus wrote...

Is it actually confirmed that Shepard has Reaper technology inside him/her? S/he Wouldn't be alive after Destroy if that were the case.


Probably why originally he/she only dies with high EMS (save that breathe scene like "lol could almost be a final breathe.") That and Mass Relays and stuff are simply reaper tech and are only deactivated not destroyed it's possible Shep could live (even if not for very long or very well) without the cybernetic reapertech bits. (Note Shep's TIM like eyes if Renegade and during the Control/Synthesis scenes).

Plus I'm pretty sure any tech that would be able to bring someone back from the dead would have to be some form of Reaper tech (Plus technically just about everything in ME universe is Reaper tech). And Cerberus clearly has no qualms with using it (seen by EDI).

Modifié par Ryzaki, 19 mars 2013 - 04:33 .


#1147
Only-Twin

Only-Twin
  • Members
  • 356 messages

Khelish wrote...

This is fun!

Posted Image


I'm with you there, Khelish ;)

#1148
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 426 messages

dafangirl wrote...

It isn't just about the Geth getting Reaper tech. It's about the Geth siding with the Reapers, twice, and then wanting the Reaper upgrades. All of which, in my Shepard's mind, harkens back to Saren's preference of joining the Reapers being preferable to total annihilation. My Shepard didn't agree with Saren in ME1 and would not, in the absence of the possibility peace, agree with the Geth in ME3.


See that I can understand.

That said I don't see how wanting the Reaper upgrades (to enhance their own intelligence) is showing a preference to JOINING the Reapers. Becoming more like them in independence? Sure. But joining? Not so much.

And yeah I get you on the disagreeing but my Shep sides with the Geth. Even with peace.

Then he picks Destroy. :lol:  (Though he'd rather not but he's not pikcing anything that keeps the Reapers alive).

That's one way to end a war I guess? :D

Modifié par Ryzaki, 19 mars 2013 - 05:00 .


#1149
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 426 messages

dafangirl wrote...

@Ryzaki Agreed. It's not wanting the upgrades as in joining the Reapers. I meant their agreeing to join with them as their answer to Quarian aggression in ME3 because of their fear of annihilation. Also, while I realize Legion's Geth are not the same Geth that chose to join Saren and the Reapers in ME1, there does seem to be a siding-with-the-Reapers pattern emerging.


Ah I can sympathize with that since for the most part everyone in galatic society hates them. (And does hate them if you let  the Admiral and Tali die while playing a non-geth sympathetic Shep).

Also screw the Geth-VI. I never see that abomination Legion fake in my games. In that case I would blow them up because that VI is a douchecanoe and I don't trust him as far as I can throw him. And I believe Legion's experiences helped change the Geth as a whole for the better (least allowing them to see all organics don't blindly hate them and want them experience a synthetic and organic coexisting (even with her unshackled!) and there's no "OMG KILL EACH OTHER NAOW!" undertone). Don't see that with VI. That and Legion has attachment to the crew where the VI just doesn't GAF.

But why would you let Legion die? :crying:

As for siding with Reaper pattern, I can forgive it because they were dumb the second time and were pretty much between a rock and a hard place. Slavery over death isn't really a fair choice.

Modifié par Ryzaki, 19 mars 2013 - 05:17 .


#1150
DoodlyDangus

DoodlyDangus
  • Members
  • 257 messages
I'd sacrifice the Geth, mostly due to my sympathy for the Quarians. I'd prefer to keep both alive, but as stated in the title, such a situation is not possible. Unlike the Quarians, the Geth are not truly alive. Besides, their whole collective thing rubs me wrong. As a staunch individualist, I myself would rather be dead than forced to serve a consensus. In all honesty, the Quarians would have never had their issues if they never invented AI, but as they say, "better late than never."