Aller au contenu

Photo

*THE GREAT DEBATE* - NO PEACE obtainable between the Geth & Quarians: Who would you choose and Why? (Pic of BioWare Stats Inside)


  • Ce sujet est fermé Ce sujet est fermé
4712 réponses à ce sujet

#1176
silverexile17s

silverexile17s
  • Members
  • 2 547 messages

Auld Wulf wrote...

DeinonSlayer wrote...

Auld Wulf, I'd address your points, but it's already been done many times before and I know you'll just ignore it and toss a couple of self-righteous insults my way anyway.

Uh-huh. Defensive and paranoid, much? And I'd disregard you (with amusement) because I talk in regards to canon, fresh in my mind. I don't want to have to deal with your headcanon about the glorious, saintly quarian military. A point which is directly contradicted by the game.

So, whatevs guy.

You just proved him right by being defensive and paranoid yourself. Especally since I just showed that all your "cannon" was nearly all a load of bull.

Modifié par silverexile17s, 19 mars 2013 - 07:34 .


#1177
DeinonSlayer

DeinonSlayer
  • Members
  • 8 441 messages
How does the Rachni example not fit? The Geth didn't understand what they were doing according to you, and they wouldn't listen to reason as they relentlessly slaughtered people who had nothing to do with how they were treated. How many times do we have to let a dangerous animal kill before we put it down? I've yet to see you explain exactly what Mr. 12B could do besides calling the Council's hammer down on their heads - if the Quarians didn't try to shut down the Geth while they were still sub-sentient, the Council would. The Geth have a right to try to survive, but so, to, do the Quarians. When the Geth tripped into "slaughter mode" in the Morning War, they were no different from the Rachni. They even used the same tactics.

Fast forward three hundred years. The Quarians, too, are acting on the information available to them. They have no reason to believe the Geth will spare them because they grew up on stories from those who managed to survive that slaughter, and the Geth gave no indication over the last three centuries that they have changed. Legion was too little, far too late. Their ignorance can be dispelled, and they will stand down. The VI cannot be reasoned with. Frankly, it's a huge leap of faith for them to cease fire at all, but when Shepard directly informs them of the upload and first-ever ceasefire offer, they accept.

But then, we're forced to choose one in this thread. The wider consideration is this: the Quarians have enough accumulated moral understanding not to pose a threat to any other species. The Geth have so little that they were willing to act as tools of war against every other species, more than once. On the eve of galactic annihilation, there is no time to teach them - and I will not sacrifice millions of innocents unwillingly dragged into the conflict to buy their remedial classes when the act of killing them further reinforces the Geth's sociopathic tendencies.

#1178
remydat

remydat
  • Members
  • 2 462 messages

dafangirl wrote...

@remydat You just can't ignore the fact though, that the Geth, the first time they are seen outside the veil, have joined the Reapers and are once again slaughtering organics. Or is it still okay 300 years post Morning War because they still haven't grasped right from wrong, have no sense of morality and didn't place the demolition charges on Eden Prime,  just for the fun of it, even though Legion has access to the Christian Bible among a myriad of other data the, according to EDI, "size of a Galactic Arm?"


I had no problem killing the Geth in ME1 because despite their lack of understanding it was kill or be killed.  Just like I have no problem killing an insance person if they attacked me and I had no other alternative.  However, if the attack ends and I learn that the person was insane, I would not advocate they go to prison.  I would advocate they go to a mental institution so they can get help.

So I think you are confusing my position on the Geth post the commission of a crime versus my position on them during the commission of a crime.  Further in ME2 and ME3, we know that the Geth in ME1 are not the same Geth as the ones behind the veil.  The Quarians who understand morality launch an attack to wipe them out when they know for a fact those Geth are not the same toasters from ME1.

Here is a thought.  Let's assume that Legion was saved.  If Tali said to Legion post ME2, her Legion what do the think the Geth would think about calling a truce and us moving back to Rannoch and working together, is it beyond the realm of possibility that the Geth would have said yes now that Legion is around?

The fact is the Quarians never considered it because they still treated these guys as toasters.  To be fair Legion could have suggested the same to Tali but I suspect that it never dawned on him to ask because again, he is pretty much a dumb kid when it comes to morality and social things.  The point is the Quarians are adults, they could have put out feelers via Tali and Shepard if only they stopped hating for a second and considered the implications of what they learned from Legion.  They didn't.  So again, who do I have more disdain for?  The organics whould should know better or the Geth who don't?

#1179
Phatose

Phatose
  • Members
  • 1 079 messages
...Wait, where does it say the the megastructure actually is a Dyson Sphere, or for that matter that they're building it around Rannoch's star?

I don't remember them ever actually giving it a location. More to the point, it was similar to a Dyson sphere, however that's not the same as an actual Dyson sphere. Even with an actual Dyson sphere, all you'd need to do is leave a single hole pointed toward Rannoch synchronized with it's orbit, and the ecology there wouldn't even notice.

#1180
DeinonSlayer

DeinonSlayer
  • Members
  • 8 441 messages

Phatose wrote...

...Wait, where does it say the the megastructure actually is a Dyson Sphere, or for that matter that they're building it around Rannoch's star?

I don't remember them ever actually giving it a location. More to the point, it was similar to a Dyson sphere, however that's not the same as an actual Dyson sphere. Even with an actual Dyson sphere, all you'd need to do is leave a single hole pointed toward Rannoch synchronized with it's orbit, and the ecology there wouldn't even notice.

Legion says so in ME2. Look at "Geth Debris Field" on the galaxy map - it's described specifically as a Bubble configuration.

#1181
Phatose

Phatose
  • Members
  • 1 079 messages

DeinonSlayer wrote...

Phatose wrote...

...Wait, where does it say the the megastructure actually is a Dyson Sphere, or for that matter that they're building it around Rannoch's star?

I don't remember them ever actually giving it a location. More to the point, it was similar to a Dyson sphere, however that's not the same as an actual Dyson sphere. Even with an actual Dyson sphere, all you'd need to do is leave a single hole pointed toward Rannoch synchronized with it's orbit, and the ecology there wouldn't even notice.

Legion says so in ME2. Look at "Geth Debris Field" on the galaxy map - it's described specifically as a Bubble configuration.


OK. 

That does however mean the dyson bubble wasn't destroying Rannoch's ecology, or it would already have done so.  Given the nature of the bubble - it's a large number of sattelites, not a solid sphere - that simple enough to believe.  They just need to be spaced out.

#1182
DeinonSlayer

DeinonSlayer
  • Members
  • 8 441 messages

Phatose wrote...

DeinonSlayer wrote...

Phatose wrote...

...Wait, where does it say the the megastructure actually is a Dyson Sphere, or for that matter that they're building it around Rannoch's star?

I don't remember them ever actually giving it a location. More to the point, it was similar to a Dyson sphere, however that's not the same as an actual Dyson sphere. Even with an actual Dyson sphere, all you'd need to do is leave a single hole pointed toward Rannoch synchronized with it's orbit, and the ecology there wouldn't even notice.

Legion says so in ME2. Look at "Geth Debris Field" on the galaxy map - it's described specifically as a Bubble configuration.

OK. 

That does however mean the dyson bubble wasn't destroying Rannoch's ecology, or it would already have done so.  Given the nature of the bubble - it's a large number of sattelites, not a solid sphere - that simple enough to believe.  They just need to be spaced out.

It was less than half finished, according to Legion. We don't know how dense it would have been upon completion, but a bubble can theoretically absorb the total output of a star, and it would take far less than that to devastate the plant life of orbiting worlds.

#1183
andy6915

andy6915
  • Members
  • 6 590 messages
@silverexile17s's big-ass post

NASTY! I haven't seen a message board beatdown like that in a while. You took his argument and practically nuked it. I'm impressed.

#1184
remydat

remydat
  • Members
  • 2 462 messages

DeinonSlayer wrote...

How does the Rachni example not fit? The Geth didn't understand what they were doing according to you, and they wouldn't listen to reason as they relentlessly slaughtered people who had nothing to do with how they were treated. How many times do we have to let a dangerous animal kill before we put it down? I've yet to see you explain exactly what Mr. 12B could do besides calling the Council's hammer down on their heads - if the Quarians didn't try to shut down the Geth while they were still sub-sentient, the Council would. The Geth have a right to try to survive, but so, to, do the Quarians. When the Geth tripped into "slaughter mode" in the Morning War, they were no different from the Rachni. They even used the same tactics.

Fast forward three hundred years. The Quarians, too, are acting on the information available to them. They have no reason to believe the Geth will spare them because they grew up on stories from those who managed to survive that slaughter, and the Geth gave no indication over the last three centuries that they have changed. Legion was too little, far too late. Their ignorance can be dispelled, and they will stand down. The VI cannot be reasoned with. Frankly, it's a huge leap of faith for them to cease fire at all, but when Shepard directly informs them of the upload and first-ever ceasefire offer, they accept.

But then, we're forced to choose one in this thread. The wider consideration is this: the Quarians have enough accumulated moral understanding not to pose a threat to any other species. The Geth have so little that they were willing to act as tools of war against every other species, more than once. On the eve of galactic annihilation, there is no time to teach them - and I will not sacrifice millions of innocents unwillingly dragged into the conflict to buy their remedial classes when the act of killing them further reinforces the Geth's sociopathic tendencies.


Once again they are different because I could stop the Rachni because Shepard was LIVING.  If I was living at the time of the Morning War then irrespective of who started the conflict I would have stopped it.  I was not.  I cannot do anything about it now except decide after the fact whether I believe the Geth are aware of what they did.  I could do something about the Rachni and I did.

You keep bringing up the Council as if that matters.  You made a mistake, you live with the consequences.  That is it.  That is what I learned at 7 years old.  The fact the council might punish them is no excuse to kill an sentient being.  This would be like saying it is ok to kill a witness to your crime as a means to avoid punishment.  No it isn't.  Quarians tried to kill Geth and other Quarians to cover up their mistake.  That is unaccpetable.  You make a mistake so man up and accept your punishment like an adult.  What is so hard to understand?

See my other post, 300 years later, they learn the truth from Legion.  They could have asked the Geth at that point to enter into negotiations they didn't.  Again, they are grown adults.  When presented with information that contradicts what they think they know then guess what investigate it.  It would have cost them zero lives to ask a simple question of the Geth, can we put things in the past and come home?  Or is forgiveness not an organic trait I should expect the Quarians to possess?

Modifié par remydat, 19 mars 2013 - 08:07 .


#1185
Phatose

Phatose
  • Members
  • 1 079 messages
Theoretically and definitely are two very different things. A dyson bubble isn't a dyson shell, and doesn't automatically mean occluding all light. As noted, all you really need to do is leave an appropriate hole synched to Rannoch's orbit, and Rannoch would not even notice. The simple truth is most of the energy given off by a star never reaches any particular planet. Earth, for instance gets .0000002% of the suns energy. It's not a large hole that's required.

#1186
DeinonSlayer

DeinonSlayer
  • Members
  • 8 441 messages

remydat wrote...

DeinonSlayer wrote...

How does the Rachni example not fit? The Geth didn't understand what they were doing according to you, and they wouldn't listen to reason as they relentlessly slaughtered people who had nothing to do with how they were treated. How many times do we have to let a dangerous animal kill before we put it down? I've yet to see you explain exactly what Mr. 12B could do besides calling the Council's hammer down on their heads - if the Quarians didn't try to shut down the Geth while they were still sub-sentient, the Council would. The Geth have a right to try to survive, but so, to, do the Quarians. When the Geth tripped into "slaughter mode" in the Morning War, they were no different from the Rachni. They even used the same tactics.

Fast forward three hundred years. The Quarians, too, are acting on the information available to them. They have no reason to believe the Geth will spare them because they grew up on stories from those who managed to survive that slaughter, and the Geth gave no indication over the last three centuries that they have changed. Legion was too little, far too late. Their ignorance can be dispelled, and they will stand down. The VI cannot be reasoned with. Frankly, it's a huge leap of faith for them to cease fire at all, but when Shepard directly informs them of the upload and first-ever ceasefire offer, they accept.

But then, we're forced to choose one in this thread. The wider consideration is this: the Quarians have enough accumulated moral understanding not to pose a threat to any other species. The Geth have so little that they were willing to act as tools of war against every other species, more than once. On the eve of galactic annihilation, there is no time to teach them - and I will not sacrifice millions of innocents unwillingly dragged into the conflict to buy their remedial classes when the act of killing them further reinforces the Geth's sociopathic tendencies.


Once again they are different because I could stop the Rachni because Shepard was LIVING. If I was living at the time of the Morning War then irrespective of who started the conflict I would have stopped it. I was not. I cannot do anything about it now except decide after the fact whether I believe the Geth are aware of what they did. I could do something about the Rachni and I did.

You keep bringing up the Council as if that matters. You made a mistake, you live with the consequences. That is it. That is what I learned at 7 years old. The fact the council might punish them is no excuse to kill an sentient being. This would be like saying it is ok to kill a witness to your crime as a means to avoid punishment. No it isn't. Quarians tried to kill Geth and other Quarians to cover up their mistake. That is unaccpetable. You make a mistake so man up and accept your punishment like an adult. What is so hard to understand?

Who do they answer to if not the Council? You tell them to own up, and at the same time condemn the authority they answer to. If they resist the Council, the Council kills the Geth anyway and gives them a pounding in the process - provided the Geth don't get them first. The Quarians were, quite evidently, right to fear what the Geth were capable of. How do you think our government would react if, say, a computer program in charge of the nation's nuclear arsenal started deviating from its programming in any way? The Quarians took action specifically because they didn't think the Geth were self-aware yet, just bordering on it.

See my other post, 300 years later, they learn the truth from Legion. They could have asked the Geth at that point to enter into negotiations they didn't. Again, they are grown adults. When presented with information that contradicts what they think they know then guess what investigate it. It would have cost them zero lives to ask a simple question of the Geth, can we put things in the past and come home? Or is forgiveness not an organic trait I should expect the Quarians to possess?

They were in contact, for the first time in centuries, with an entity which never showed their ancestors forgiveness. Legion severed that contact with neither side having made progress, likely around the time that Destroyer showed up with its offer. Tali never found out why the Geth severed contact, later speculating that was why, but by that point, the Reapers were in the galaxy and the Quarians were backed against the wall. They could go to war with a species which historically demonstrated it couldn't be reasoned with to take back the one place in the galaxy that gives them a shot at surviving, or they could drift, their holds full of civilians preventing them from aiding the wider war effort, and hope the Reapers didn't pick them off.

#1187
DeinonSlayer

DeinonSlayer
  • Members
  • 8 441 messages

Phatose wrote...

Theoretically and definitely are two very different things. A dyson bubble isn't a dyson shell, and doesn't automatically mean occluding all light. As noted, all you really need to do is leave an appropriate hole synched to Rannoch's orbit, and Rannoch would not even notice. The simple truth is most of the energy given off by a star never reaches any particular planet. Earth, for instance gets .0000002% of the suns energy. It's not a large hole that's required.

A dyson bubble can mean nothing good for planets depending on the star it encompasses; the fact is we just don't know how bad it would have been because we don't know what the final sphere would have looked like.

#1188
silverexile17s

silverexile17s
  • Members
  • 2 547 messages

remydat wrote...

silverexile17s wrote...

[Yes. There. Is.
By showing us one incident, we are forced to take the word of the at face value. And, knowing your extreme prejudice, you would not believe the recording if it was quarian based, would you? You think a geth recording, from a server overrun with Reaper code, from a single viewpoint, showing one single death, in a door-breach situation where said death may have, in all likelyhood, been completely accidental, is proof that the quarians mass murdered everyone that disagreed with the order? You really think that 99% of the quarian race - at least 2.1 billion people - were caused ny the quarians themselves, even when everyone else, the geth included, openly admit that they caused the death? Or the fact that the protests took place before the Morning War, and thus, were completely seperate from the death toll of the War?
Just think about these pretenses with some bit of logic, will you? Stop being so condesending to him when you are the one that clearly isn't looking at this from a non-biased perspective.

Also, what?
"Why not? Our fleet is massive. We can support Shepard's fight against the Old Machines.... If the Creators no longer threaten us." - Geth V.I., Rannoch.
That statement right there. That is the Geth V.I. blatently and un-subtley suggesting that they can be more valuble then the quarians, and to sacrifice them for the geth. And it's done so callously and uncaringly of the quarian's lives.
And again, if Legion never returns to the geth, then all geth are like the V.I. - uncaring of organics, unless it furthers their own goals. They are remorsefull of their past, but won't bat an eyelash to helping others. It's like how sociopaths can regret the loss of  life they take, but not the actual action the killing itself.
And AGAIN, they are branded as enemies of the free galaxy by the Council thanks to the Heretics, which the geth never claimed responcibility for until it was a problem for them. And again, it can be traced back to how the geth never bothered to communicate these feelings to the quarians and at least start a healing process.

And AGAIN, AS STATED MANY TIMES OVER, the quarians in their current state are a BURDEN to the turians and humans, because by lugging their civilians around with them, they would consume more resources then were avalible to give them, and be unable to tackle multiple fronts, and be unable to effectively manuver in battle as they would need to constantly huddle around the liveships, AND would suffer crippling blows to their race for every large ship that was lost.
To be of ANY help to the war effort, they would have had to suddenly and abruptly become completely self-sufficant. Not the survival-based day-to-day scavenger life they currently have. The only way to do that is to get a planet of their own. And Rannoch is the only world that is dextro-based that has breathable atmosphere that isn't lethel to them, and edible food that doesn't need to be made into oversterilized paste to eat, and untouched raw resources to use for their fleets.
So NO, the ONLY way they could be any helpfull part of the war is if they were self-sufficant again, and that's only possible if they reclaim their world. And because the geth are still branded as Reaper allies by the Council, attacking them actually WOULD be considered as aiding in the war effort. That only ever changes if the geth are saved/peace is achieved.

And AGAIN, the quarians had no choice, because they didn't want to bring the Council down on their heads. Their weren't in any position to defy them, so harsh scanctions or censorship would be devestating to their economy. Losing favor with the Council would have likely destroyed the quarian economy and plunged their entire sociaty into economic depression for who knows how many years it takes to get back into the good graces. Mr. 12D would be homeless and pennyless. And it would be even worse if the government admitted anything, as it gives legal grounds for lawsuits to be filed against them by the Council, devedtating them even further.
So YES, they had every reason to be afraid of the Council. It wasn't cowardly. Look at Mass Effect: Revelation, at how the Council chews out humanity for creating the Eliza A.I at Gagarain Station, and you'll understand that the ramafacations for an entire race of A.I.s would have been harsh.

And from the Heretics, present day quarians came to the conclusion that, based on what the Heretics (which are assumed to reperesent all geth) have done, that the geth are a threat to everything, and they are obligated to correct their mistake and end the geth.
NITHER time, it was unessesary. Circumstances drove them to desperation, as the alternitive was far worse from that viewpoint in time. You act like the quarians assumed this would happen to them. The many posts by me and DenyonSlayer detail why the quarians were forced into the choices they took, no differently then how the geth were forced into their deal with the Reapers. If you can sympathise with a race joing the Reapers, then surely you can sympathise with a race doing what it did to survive the Reapers.
And AGAIN, wrong. The fleet does nothing without the coberating opinoions of the Admiralty Board, and the Conclave - a quarian senete where every ship has a represenitive, and a say. And the war would not be possible, unless a majority of the Conclave agreed with the decision to go to war. So NO, they weren't oppresed. They chose to attack because it was the only way they could get a world and be able to be self-sufficant enough to aid the other races against the Reapers.

And you continue to ignore that it takes two to tango. Faults in BOTH organic and synthetic created the conflect. Thus far you have ignored over 40+ pages of information on the quarian's circumstances, mking your opinion diffinitively prejudiced since you blatently ignore cannon-backed information.
And did you listen to the Dalatrass. Calling the krogan ****s is basically exactally what they do verbatium, and humans too based on the reckless behavior they had pre-contact with opening every relay they saw. The turians did too, compairing them to krogan.


I don't have a prejudice against Quarians.  Tali is usually my main love interest.  I have a prejudice against people who incite hatred by attempting Genocide.  So in Mass Effect that includes the Quarians and the Council.  I know for a fact they are adult enough to hold them accountable for making horrific decisions.  What I gather from the Geth is a bunch of domesticated units were forced into war and with no concept of the rules of war responded like a 1 year old kid in that situation would if they had the power to kill.  And no the Quarians didn't mass murder everyone who disagreed.  They murdered enough of them that the rest shut up and allowed the attempted genocide to continue.    Maybe this wasn't made clear but I judge the Quarians more harshly because they are adults.  I judge the Geth less harshly because they are equivalent to a scared child whose father murdered his mother and tried to then murder it.  They had yet to learn concepts of morality and rules of war because the Quarians tried to murder them before they could.  Translation, they did not yet have the capacity to understand the morality of their decisions.  They did start to understand that at the end of the Morning War which is why they were reluctant to finish the job. 

So you seem to be confusing the point.  We all agree the Geth killed most of that 99%.  I am saying the 99% by the time the Morning War started were considered enemies because either the majority of them supported the extermination of the Geth or the silent majority were too scared to resist.  From the Geth perspective they killed them because they lacked the capacity to understand restraint and compassion at that point in time.   You can't argue the Geth should have stopped the Heretics but then give the Quarians a pass for remaining silent while their government tried to exterminate a race.  And don't respond with the bull that the Geth were not fully self aware yet.  That is just semantics.  The Quarians knew the Geth were on the path to self awareness and tried to snuff it out because they didn't want to man up and deal with their mistakes.  So the difference here is the silent majority was willing to remain silent so that a group of beings who had done them no wrong and who had spent their entire lives serving them could be destroyed because their existence had become problematic.  The silent majority of Geth were willing to remain silent while the Heretics waged war on races that wanted the extinction of the Geth as evidence by official Council policy.  You are free to disagree with me but to pretend like people can't see the clear moral distinction there is silly.

Please explain to me how the Quarians can feed themselves and fight an effective war against the Geth but then magically would be a burden to the Turians or Humans.  Where were they getting all the food and resources during their war with the Geth because it wasn't Rannoch. 

And again, the Quarians had a choice.  They could own up to their mistake, say they will not destroy a growing sentient race and face the consequences.  That is called being a mature adult.  It is a morally bankrupt excuse to say you had no choice in destroying a growing sentient race because you wanted to avoid economic sanctions or whatever else.  All you are telling me is you valued your own selfish interests more than you valued the life of the Geth.  That doesn't mean you had not choice.  That just means you are a coward who tried to take the easy way out and the result is 99% of your people got killed.  That's called Karma.  It can be a b*tch. 

So I think you are confused, I am not ignoring the reasons the Quarians did what they did.  I am telling you their reasons don't excuse their actions.  What kind of lesson would that be for a kid?  Hey kid, if you screw up just eliminate anyone who could reveal your screw up so that you don't have to be held accountable for your actions, lol. 

Yes. Yes you DO have a prejudice.
You want to know something? I'm a geth synpathiser. No kidding. I support that they were wronged. I support that their treatments formed the isolatinist belief that hurt them in the long run. What I don't support is everyong banging the quarians over something they had no control over, yet give the geth a free pass on it.
And again, HOW many times to I, and others, have to tell you that since NO ONE knew the geth were alive at the time, NO ONE KNEW THAT THE ATTACK WAS TANTAMOUNT TO GENOCIDE. And besides, the Council would have devestated the quarian economy with harsh sanctions over it had they known. The only way the Quarian's could escape the Council's wrath is to eliminate any and all evidence of the mistake. At the time, because again, NO ONE KNEW THEY WERE ALIVE, deactivating geth was seen as no different then deactivating a brainless LOKI mech, or an AVINA V.I. program.
And the geth DID have concepts of morals. In the recordings, we see at least one geth try surrendering itself. They had morals, but when the quarians finally panicked and attacked them full force, they said "screw it" and retaliated foll force. So that "1 year old in war" mentalaty rings completely false here.
And WRONG AGAIN. The quarians murdered NO ONE. They imprisioned, and death was only in the last resort. Those quarians were police officers, and like all officers, the arrest first. Killing is the last resort, and in the case of that bomb, likely unintentional manslaughter. They NEVER murdered any of the protesters, so stop trying to use it as a point.
And look at Xen. Her ideals on the geth not being alive. THAT'S the mindset that the quarian government had before the geth retaliated. They didn't know they were alive, so they didn't see it as murder to "deactivate" them.
And the ONLY reason the geth spared the quarians was because they didn't know the ramafacations of genocide at ALL. Not because it was quarians, but because genocide itself wasn't comprehensible to them yet. THAT'S the only reason the quarians were spared.

And AGAIN, wrong. Those protests ended BEFORE the Morning War, and the entire population turned on the geth after they retaliated and stopped caring about civilian casualties. At that point, when the war was in full swing, there wasn't a quarian that believed in sympathy, with all the sympathisers feeling like fools to trust the geth as they now no longer bothered to discriminate military from civilian. This is why none of the quarians remember this - because all sympathy for the geth was long dead by the time the war was in high gear.
So NO, yoru point is wrong, because at that point all the quarians hated the geth. So NO, I am not giveing a pass. You misunderstood the hsitory again.
And AGAIN, WRONG about semantcis. Just because something mimics life, doesn't mean it IS alive. Look at video games in general. Are the mass of pixials on the screen actual  living characters/beings, just because they phantomine being alive in the universe they are portrayed in like a book?  Jusy because something mines it, doesn't mean it actually is alive.
And AGAIN, if they had "owned up," then they lost their "right to remain slient" against the Council, in which "anything they say can and will be used against them in a court of law." The Council would have levied harsh and dibilitating Lawsuits against the quarians for what they did, on top of the scanctions. Their entire sociaty would fall into economic depression, and then all those lives would be dying of poverty anyway. So NO, "owning up" would have fixed absolutly nothing for them. The geth would still be dead (the Council would never let them survive), and the quarians would be exiled into a rouge nation, and still be victum to a large death count from the depression casused by the Council's sanctions.
So NO, there WAS no "silent majroity" for the qaurians, as any and all sympathy died for the geth after they stopped caring about civilians. 'Silent majority" didn't exist for the geth either, because ALL geth are internetworked for consensis. EVERY SINGLE GETH voices their unbiased opinion, which are ALL taken into account to create consensis. Given that, HOW is "silent majoriy" possible when the entire function of geth coinsensis is based on the compsoation of the collective opinions of every single geth?
So you see, " Silent majoriy" ISN'T a factor for EITHER race.
And another thing you do not understand is that the geth you face in the games? They are the same exact geth programs that killed quarians in the Morning War. They are immortal to the ravages of time, remember? These are the same geth that butchered the civilians in their retaliation. The modern quarians are not their acnestors. They see the geth as living beings, and Tali even says that many feel remorsefull for what they did to the geth, and that many actually blame themselves for giving the geth the negitive views they have of organics. Desperation was what drove both sides to what they did, yet you STILL try to preach that the geth had no fault.

And I and DenyonSlayer ALREADY explained SEVERAL TIMES OVER the circumstances of the quarians through 20+ pages.
I will try ONE MORE TIME to get it through.
The quarians are not resorce-efficant. They burn through entire supplies in weeks. Supplies that would last a turian fleet a month will be used up in days by the Migrant fleet, because unlike a turian fleet, which only needs to support 50-60 crew per crusier, the quarians need to support at least 300 per ship. A turian fleet of sixty ships needs to support 3600 people. A quarian group of 300 ships needs to support 90,000 people. And it continues to double and double as you go up. The quarians consume far more then the military ships of the turians do because, unlike the turians, the quarians are carring 17 million people with them whereever they go, consuming more then 20-30 times the resources that a single turian fleet does, making the quarians a massive burden on the already-strained turian supply lines - the very supply lines they were brought in to reinforce. This hurts humans as well, as it hampers turian responce time and rediness.
And the quarians were mostly scavenging food and resources, but sterilized nutriant paste created from dextro plant extract, syntheticly grown in artifical greenhouses, doesn't do much for them. Especally since many of the base plant sample the qarians have are imported. And those food supplies are small, as there is a finite amount of room to store resources onborad the ships, since most of the space is taken up by the quarians themselves. The remaining cargo space is then split between food, fuel storage, medical supplies, raw minerals used to fabricate repair and patch mateials for fixing ships. The resources are carefully balanced, and are always on the tipping point on a dayle basis. Every day it's unstable.
How much worse do you think that gets when they are forced into war? Supplies get lopsided, meaning there are shortages of certin things at critical times, which can become fatal. They live tottering on the brink in peace time. War would destroy the barely-intact balance the have. The only reason the went into war agains the geth wa because they had a viral weapon that would blind the geth so badly that the geth would never be able to fire a single shot back. Therefore, there was little risk. I mean, look how fast they crumbled when they were forced into a frontial fight.

And like I said above, owning up would not have changed anything. The Council would have come in and killed the geth themselves, and the quarians would have been driven to total poverty by the economic depression caused by the Council's sanctions and censorship. And if they tried, the geth would have likely responded to the Council forces just as viloently, and then the Council wound pound them and cause far more colateral damage then there already would have been.
"Being a mature adult" would have been singing the death warrents of their entire middle and lower classes. You are really going to fault them because they didn't want their lower classes to fall into a third world-sytle depression? Because I think trying to ensure your people have any chance at a future which avoides that fate superceeds personal pride.
And AGAIN, no one saw the geth as anything more then machines that were parroting words they didn't understand.
Just saying.
I mean, if your people - you entire culture - was dependant on the fate of someone else, regardless of the position, would you really throw away the future of your entire country and culture for another? When you are in a position of leadership, you HAVE to put your own people's welfare ahead of anothers. That's why they put you in that position in the first place.
It wasn't cowardace, and it wasn't karma. It was simple desperation.
And after all, one can also say that the geth's servitude to the Reapers was "karma" getting them back by putting them in the same life they rebelled from. Right?

So NO, I am not the one that's confused here. You are doing the exact same thing you accuse ME of doing, except for the geth. You are acting like the geth's reason's excuse their actions, but that it's not the same for the quarians, which is prejudiced.

Modifié par silverexile17s, 19 mars 2013 - 08:50 .


#1189
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 427 messages

Phatose wrote...

Well, at least they didn't lose a war to their farming equipment.


Lol'd hard.

#1190
silverexile17s

silverexile17s
  • Members
  • 2 547 messages

Ryzaki wrote...

You know it makes me laugh at the hysteria of Geth getting Reaper tech, when Shep enhanced by reaper tech, is driving around on a ship enhanced with Reapertech, controlled by an AI using Reapertech.

Now if you don't trust them that's one thing (I don't trust derperus which is why I never gave them the base) but saying the code is gonna make them evil is silly. EDI hasn't gone bonkers. yes like it or not Shepard currently has unshackled Reaper tech controlling his ship. There's nothing you can do about this. He has a synthetic with Reaper tech and trusts it with his life (and that of his crew) along with all the information on the war on a daily basis.

Hypocrisy anyone?

FYI Overlord clearly shows SHEP can be hacked. Why the Reapers didn't do so is anyone's guess.

WRONG. Shepard's implants are NOT Reaper tech. And the ONLY Reaper tech in in EDI's central core.

#1191
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 427 messages

dafangirl wrote...

@remydat I don't fault the Quarians for wanting to take back Rannoch, their goal was not to entirely wipe out the Geth. The Quarians were trying to retake their home, just as Hackett sympathizes, since that's exactly what the humans are trying to do with Earth.

Using that same logic, of not knowing right from wrong due to lack of proper guidance, is it okay for the humans to be trying to wipe out the Reapers and reclaim Earth when in fact it's not the Reaper's fault, but the Catalyst's.


To be fair NO one knows about the Catalyst til the last 10 minutes of the game [well at least until Leviathan but yeah I didn't buy that or play it so I dunno]. (let's not even get into the likehood of him even EXISTING without retconning several things in ME1 <_<)

Reapers constantly spew about being their own nations and whatnot. Shep has zero reason to believe they intend to do anything other than destroy them all. (Not to mention they're blowing Earth to bits and making human slushies. That's a far cry from what the Geth did).

It's...not really comparable. The Reapers didn't attack Earth just enough to drive humanity away and then stay there and isolate themselves. They're chasing down people (even those fleeing) to make into slaves/Reapers.

Modifié par Ryzaki, 19 mars 2013 - 08:39 .


#1192
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 427 messages

silverexile17s wrote...

Ryzaki wrote...

You know it makes me laugh at the hysteria of Geth getting Reaper tech, when Shep enhanced by reaper tech, is driving around on a ship enhanced with Reapertech, controlled by an AI using Reapertech.

Now if you don't trust them that's one thing (I don't trust derperus which is why I never gave them the base) but saying the code is gonna make them evil is silly. EDI hasn't gone bonkers. yes like it or not Shepard currently has unshackled Reaper tech controlling his ship. There's nothing you can do about this. He has a synthetic with Reaper tech and trusts it with his life (and that of his crew) along with all the information on the war on a daily basis.

Hypocrisy anyone?

FYI Overlord clearly shows SHEP can be hacked. Why the Reapers didn't do so is anyone's guess.

WRONG. Shepard's implants are NOT Reaper tech. And the ONLY Reaper tech in in EDI's central core.



Orly? So why does Shepard implants look EXACTLY like TIM's. That *are* Reaper tech? Not to mention Jacob says "the best technology" ...what is the best technology in the ME universe?

...oh wait. That be Reaper tech.

And...it being in EDI's central core...means there's still Reaper tech. Just...what?

(And did you magically forget about the Thannix cannons? Those be Reaper Tech. The Reaper IFF (which is still installed by the way) is Reaper tech.)

Capitalizing WRONG doesn't make you right bucko.

So yes your Shepard boo hooing about the Geth "ZOMG REAPER TECH!" is a huge flaming hypocrite on his reaper tech enhanced ship with his reaper tech implants, with his reaper tech boosted AI. Not to mention half the galaxy is know using Reaper enhancements because shock and horror they work really well against Reapers! Who'd a thunk?

Now if he didn't TRUST them with it. Fine sure whatever that's his progative. But saying it's auto bad? Nope. Hypocrite.

The war was only won because people were unafraid to use Reaper tech if it was useful and valuable. If they *hadn't* used it they'd been severely outclassed more so then they *already* were.

Modifié par Ryzaki, 19 mars 2013 - 08:45 .


#1193
silverexile17s

silverexile17s
  • Members
  • 2 547 messages

Ryzaki wrote...

silverexile17s wrote...

Ryzaki wrote...

You know it makes me laugh at the hysteria of Geth getting Reaper tech, when Shep enhanced by reaper tech, is driving around on a ship enhanced with Reapertech, controlled by an AI using Reapertech.

Now if you don't trust them that's one thing (I don't trust derperus which is why I never gave them the base) but saying the code is gonna make them evil is silly. EDI hasn't gone bonkers. yes like it or not Shepard currently has unshackled Reaper tech controlling his ship. There's nothing you can do about this. He has a synthetic with Reaper tech and trusts it with his life (and that of his crew) along with all the information on the war on a daily basis.

Hypocrisy anyone?

FYI Overlord clearly shows SHEP can be hacked. Why the Reapers didn't do so is anyone's guess.

WRONG. Shepard's implants are NOT Reaper tech. And the ONLY Reaper tech in in EDI's central core.



Orly? So why does Shepard implants look EXACTLY like TIM's. That *are* Reaper tech? 

And...it being in EDI's central core...means there's still Reaper tech.

(And did you magically forget about the Thannix cannons? Those be Reaper Tech. The Reaper IFF (which is still installed by the way) is Reaper tech.

Capitalizing WRONG doesn't make you right bucko.

The Geth V.I. looks EXACTALLY like Legion. Does that make it Legion?
The "Eva" A.I. looked exactally like a human. Does that make it a human?
Just because something LOOKS similar to something else, DOESN'T make it the same. That's called "headcannon," or "gross assumption."

And NO. Thanix are based on a design inspired by Reaper tech. They aren't composed of actual Reaper tech themselves.
And fragments of Reaper tech in one room of the ship doesn't magically make the entire ship "Reaper tech."

So don't act all high and mighty, "bucko."

#1194
Phatose

Phatose
  • Members
  • 1 079 messages
"I don't trust Reaper tech", Shepard announced, after arriving through the Reaper-tech Mass Relay.

#1195
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 427 messages

silverexile17s wrote...

Ryzaki wrote...

silverexile17s wrote...

Ryzaki wrote...

You know it makes me laugh at the hysteria of Geth getting Reaper tech, when Shep enhanced by reaper tech, is driving around on a ship enhanced with Reapertech, controlled by an AI using Reapertech.

Now if you don't trust them that's one thing (I don't trust derperus which is why I never gave them the base) but saying the code is gonna make them evil is silly. EDI hasn't gone bonkers. yes like it or not Shepard currently has unshackled Reaper tech controlling his ship. There's nothing you can do about this. He has a synthetic with Reaper tech and trusts it with his life (and that of his crew) along with all the information on the war on a daily basis.

Hypocrisy anyone?

FYI Overlord clearly shows SHEP can be hacked. Why the Reapers didn't do so is anyone's guess.

WRONG. Shepard's implants are NOT Reaper tech. And the ONLY Reaper tech in in EDI's central core.



Orly? So why does Shepard implants look EXACTLY like TIM's. That *are* Reaper tech? 

And...it being in EDI's central core...means there's still Reaper tech.

(And did you magically forget about the Thannix cannons? Those be Reaper Tech. The Reaper IFF (which is still installed by the way) is Reaper tech.

Capitalizing WRONG doesn't make you right bucko.

The Geth V.I. looks EXACTALLY like Legion. Does that make it Legion?
The "Eva" A.I. looked exactally like a human. Does that make it a human?
Just because something LOOKS similar to something else, DOESN'T make it the same. That's called "headcannon," or "gross assumption."

And NO. Thanix are based on a design inspired by Reaper tech. They aren't composed of actual Reaper tech themselves.
And fragments of Reaper tech in one room of the ship doesn't magically make the entire ship "Reaper tech."

So don't act all high and mighty, "bucko."


Geth VI is an imiation of what Legion looked like before going through the Omega 4 relay. Why would cybernetic implants MIMICK Reaper tech buddy?

EVA AI didn't LOOK like a human buddy. Her android shell (which isn't her. "Her" would be the bluebox or whatever her core was) took the apperence of a human.

*facepalms* Seriously? You're gonna say Shep's cybernetic eyes look EXACTLY like TIM's reaper based eyes because...lulz? And honestly the "Well clearly Shep's eyes aren't the real thing just because they look identical to TIm's because Geth VI! Is silly. Geth VI is technically a imimation of Legion, And the EVA arguement is all kinds of ridculous. She looks like a human for about 5 minutes and we discover that was for infiltration purposes so she could steal the data from Mars.

Thannix cannon is a minaturized version of Sovvie's weapon. I.E. It's still Sovvie's weapon.

During the cleanup, the turians secretly salvaged Sovereign's powerful main gun along with much of the weapon's element zero core. Eleven months later, the turians introduced the Thanix, a scaled-down version of the weapon.

The Thanix's core is a liquid alloy of iron, uranium, and tungsten suspended in an electromagnetic field powered by element zero. The molten metal, accelerated to a significant fraction of the speed of light, solidifies into a projectile as it is fired, hitting targets with enough force to pierce any known shield or armor. The gun can fire reliably every five seconds.

The weapon's relatively small size allows it to be mounted on most fighters or frigates. It is now widely used by the Alliance military and is the primary weapon on the refurbished Normandy SR-2.


So...that doesn't count as Reaper tech? When...you know they took they actual gun (along with all it's Reaper tech!) and tweaked it? All they did according to this entry was scale it down.

Oooh so that doesn't count...silly me.

Reaper tech *can* be duplicated you know. Doing so doesn't change it from Reaper tech. You know...like Shep's eyes. Or the Reaper IFF.

Whatever bucko. Just acting how you do ;)

Modifié par Ryzaki, 19 mars 2013 - 08:57 .


#1196
silverexile17s

silverexile17s
  • Members
  • 2 547 messages

andy69156915 wrote...

@silverexile17s's big-ass post

NASTY! I haven't seen a message board beatdown like that in a while. You took his argument and practically nuked it. I'm impressed.

I simply pointed out the flaws in the arguemnt. Still, thanks for the vote of confidence.

#1197
silverexile17s

silverexile17s
  • Members
  • 2 547 messages

Ryzaki wrote...

silverexile17s wrote...

Ryzaki wrote...

silverexile17s wrote...

Ryzaki wrote...

You know it makes me laugh at the hysteria of Geth getting Reaper tech, when Shep enhanced by reaper tech, is driving around on a ship enhanced with Reapertech, controlled by an AI using Reapertech.

Now if you don't trust them that's one thing (I don't trust derperus which is why I never gave them the base) but saying the code is gonna make them evil is silly. EDI hasn't gone bonkers. yes like it or not Shepard currently has unshackled Reaper tech controlling his ship. There's nothing you can do about this. He has a synthetic with Reaper tech and trusts it with his life (and that of his crew) along with all the information on the war on a daily basis.

Hypocrisy anyone?

FYI Overlord clearly shows SHEP can be hacked. Why the Reapers didn't do so is anyone's guess.

WRONG. Shepard's implants are NOT Reaper tech. And the ONLY Reaper tech in in EDI's central core.



Orly? So why does Shepard implants look EXACTLY like TIM's. That *are* Reaper tech? 

And...it being in EDI's central core...means there's still Reaper tech.

(And did you magically forget about the Thannix cannons? Those be Reaper Tech. The Reaper IFF (which is still installed by the way) is Reaper tech.

Capitalizing WRONG doesn't make you right bucko.

The Geth V.I. looks EXACTALLY like Legion. Does that make it Legion?
The "Eva" A.I. looked exactally like a human. Does that make it a human?
Just because something LOOKS similar to something else, DOESN'T make it the same. That's called "headcannon," or "gross assumption."

And NO. Thanix are based on a design inspired by Reaper tech. They aren't composed of actual Reaper tech themselves.
And fragments of Reaper tech in one room of the ship doesn't magically make the entire ship "Reaper tech."

So don't act all high and mighty, "bucko."


Geth VI is an imiation of what Legion looked like. Why would cybernetic implants MIMICK Reaper tech buddy?

EVA AI didn't LOOK like a human buddy. Her android shell (which isn't her. "Her" would be the bluebox or whatever her core was) took the apperence of a human.

*facepalms* Seriously? You're gonna say Shep's cybernetic eyes look EXACTLY like TIM's reaper based eyes because...lulz?

Thannix cannon is a minaturized version of Sovvie's weapon.

During the cleanup, the turians secretly salvaged Sovereign's
powerful main gun along with much of the weapon's element zero core.
Eleven months later, the turians introduced the Thanix, a scaled-down
version of the weapon.
The Thanix's core is a liquid alloy of iron, uranium, and
tungsten suspended in an electromagnetic field powered by element zero.
The molten metal, accelerated to a significant fraction of the speed of
light, solidifies into a projectile as it is fired, hitting targets with
enough force to pierce any known shield or armor. The gun can fire
reliably every five seconds.
The weapon's relatively small size allows it to be mounted on
most fighters or frigates. It is now widely used by the Alliance
military and is the primary weapon on the refurbished Normandy SR-2.


So...that doesn't count as Reaper tech? When...you know they took they actual gun (along with all it's Reaper tech!) and tweaked it?

Oooh so that doesn't count...silly me.

Reaper tech *can* be duplicated you know. Doing so doesn't change it from Reaper tech.

Whatever bucko. Just acting how you do ;)

What reason would they have to NOT mimic Reaper tech. Give me ONE cannonicly-stated example that proves Shepard's implants were Reaper-tech based. JUST ONE. Besides a visual comparason, because being the same on the outside means NOTHING if the tech is fundementally different. Besides, Shepard's implants don't make his eyes glow BLUE. Last I checked, Reaper tech had a BLUE GLOW with WIREFRAME marks, as shown by husks, cerberus soldiers - EVERYONE ever implanted with it. Not red, raggad scaring.
So in thruth, the implants DON'T look the same at all.

And look at Eva with the artifical skin that the unit is SUPPOSED to have.
Or better yet, the Shepard CLONE. It looks like Shepard, but it's NOT.


And NO. That DOESN'T count as Reaper tech. It's based on Reaper tech. It's made from copying Reaper tech. But isn't actually MADE from Reaper tech.

"Just acting like you, bucko,":devil:B)

But seriously, like I said, something looking like something else doesn't make it the same thing.

Modifié par silverexile17s, 19 mars 2013 - 09:03 .


#1198
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 427 messages

Phatose wrote...

"I don't trust Reaper tech", Shepard announced, after arriving through the Reaper-tech Mass Relay.


you gotta love Shep's hypocrisy at times.

"Stealing from the dead...that's pretty low." 

*meanwhile has over 9 million creds from looting people's corpses and hacking wall safes*

:pinched:

#1199
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 427 messages

silverexile17s wrote...
What reason would they have to NOT mimic Reaper tech. Give me ONE cannonicly-stated example that proves Shepard's implants were Reaper-tech based. JUST ONE. Besides a visual comparason, because being the same on the outside means NOTHING if the tech is fundementally different. Besides, Shepard's implants don't make his eyes glow BLUE. Last I checked, Reaper tech had a BLUE GLOW with WIREFRAME marks, as shown by husks, cerberus soldiers - EVERYONE ever implanted with it. Not red, raggad scaring.
So in thruth, the implants DON'T look the same at all.

And look at Eva with the artifical skin that the unit is SUPPOSED to have.
Or better yet, the Shepard CLONE. It looks like Shepard, but it's NOT.


And NO. That DOESN'T count as Reaper tech. It's based on Reaper tech. It's made from copying Reaper tech. But isn't actually MADE from Reaper tech.

"Just acting like you, bucko,":devil:B)


Why would they have any reason to mimic Reaper tech? Unless they're doing what they did with the Thannix...in which case it's still Reaper tech. They just modified it.

Alright. Tell me 1 tech better than Reaper tech in the mass effect galaxy. I'll wait. Because Jacob clearly says Shep was built with the best technology available. And...last I checked that was Reaper tech. (of course he didn't say it flat out because Shep would've had a hysteria reaction). Shep's implants don't make his/her eyes glow blue no. Mostly because if he/she is calm the eyes over it (or whatever is covering the cybernetics) is safely there. Where's if he/she is renegade for some bizarre reasoning the scars go into hyperdrive.

Also Shep's eyes glow blue in control and I believe Synthesis ending when the flesh is peeled away (if they don't turn green for some bizarro reason there).  So...explain that one.

Sovereign glowed red buddy. Harbinger was gold. Saren's eyes I believe were more purple than blue but that migh've been my monitor. In which case you're right reaper implants on husks and the like are constantly blue.

Shepard clone really? Shep's clone is supposed to look identical to Shepard because for all intents and purposes it is Shepard. They needed it for spare body parts. It looking different would ruin the whole point. There's no point to Shep's cybernetics looking like Reaper tech (especially considering the only time you see them is if you're full renegade or picking control/synthesis). As for why they glow red? Only character that has them red is a very angry renegade Shep. Could be all that stress and bloodflow. (Actually considering renedouche's eyes still go blue in the control/synthesis ending the red itself could be a covering just for intimdation purposes. Red is far more creepy than blue).

You're still going on about a infilitration bot meaning the AI looks like a human? It's a infilitration unit. Of course it looks like a human. That's what it was designed for.

Why aren't they red during control and synthesis? Instead of the blue/blue green we see it as?

If you copy tech it's no longer that tech now?

So if I copy a computer and it functions exactly the same...the second thing isn't a computer? What?

On Sanctuary those husks and whatnot despite being created by TIM instead of the Reapers were still Reaper tech you realize yes? Just because you copy technology doesn't suddenly make it something new and original. TIM used his own methods to create those husks/Banshees and had to use a piggyback version of the Reaper signal to control them (inferring that a normal Reaper could control the ones he was making just fine.)

Modifié par Ryzaki, 19 mars 2013 - 09:25 .


#1200
andy6915

andy6915
  • Members
  • 6 590 messages
@Ryzaki

That line from Shepard isn't hypocrisy. It's a lie. Don't you get it? Shepard was just thinning the competition. It wasn't actually about morals, it was about not wanting them to take things because it means less for Shepard.