Aller au contenu

Photo

*THE GREAT DEBATE* - NO PEACE obtainable between the Geth & Quarians: Who would you choose and Why? (Pic of BioWare Stats Inside)


  • Ce sujet est fermé Ce sujet est fermé
4712 réponses à ce sujet

#1601
remydat

remydat
  • Members
  • 2 462 messages

tevix wrote...

The WW2 referance is not to draw a parallel between that and the MW.

It's to draw a parallel to Remys argument that because some quarians voted for a certain leader 100% of them deserve death.

That's a ridiculous reason to vote in favor of the geth.


This is misleading.  I have no choice in the example the OP set up.  I have to choose the Geth or Quarians and I choose who I deem to be the aggressors.  There is nothing I can do about the other Quarians and I am not condemning the Geth because the Quarians can't properly manage thier government.

#1602
justafan

justafan
  • Members
  • 2 408 messages

remydat wrote...

justafan wrote...

remydat wrote...

tevix wrote...

@Remy

Oh yeah, here's another one I felt like throwing out.

You say the quarians die because the civlians made the mistake of accepting their leadership.

Do you believe all germans should be eliminated because of the rule of the **** back in WW2?


Tevix, did you honestly take the time to think about what my response would be?  Seriously.  Did you?  The flaw in your logic is so obvious it is sad but here goes.

If I have to choose between the Germans (Quarians) who elected leaders that tried to exterminate the Jews (Geth) then I guess I will have to live with out Frankfurthers and my new BMW.  But I guess a hot dog and a car are the sacrifices I am willing to make to save the people who sufferred a holocaust.


Ironic since the Quarians as a species seems to draw a lot of parrallels to the Jews of WWII seeking refuge (among many other inspirations).  But still, do we really need to keep calling in Godwin?  Talking about the natzys never gets a conversation anywhere.  This is a work of fiction, the holocaust was a totally different (and real) case.  

Now comparing the Cylon genocide in Battlestar Galactica on the other hand....


Why are you taking me to task about Godwin when Tevix posed the question and I simply asked.  Please take that up with him.

And yes, the Quarians ironically have elements of both the Germans and the Jews.  They are at times horrifically amoral and yet tragic at the same time in their quest for a homeworld.  This is precisely why Tali is my love interest and I opt for peace in my ACTUAL playthrough.  They all don't deserve to do but once again, what do you want me to do when the OP asks me to choose.  I chose.


I am taking you to task in particular, your quote was simply the most recent when I decided to post and conveniently had Tevix quoted as well.  Yet Godwin is Godwin, and it deminishes the conversation, just like that little back and forth about real life racism ten pages back.

#1603
tevix

tevix
  • Members
  • 1 363 messages
@Remy

1)Tali doesn't tell Gerrel about the code because she's dumb, not because it's a mechanic. Tali is young and naive, and lousy at getting her point across. This is proven to be part of her character since day 1. Same with Raan.

2) Gerrel needs a place for his people NOW to offload civilians and begin war prep to support his fleet (which is old and falling apart and never seen proper repair). No one knows how long the reaper war will last, and it's desperation forces them to need a more compatible quarian world. The quarians also can't support evac operations or other war stations while having to basically tend to his own millions of civilians at the same time.

And before you say they should have attempted peace, consider this: Even if you bring Legion to speak with Gerrel in ME2, what happens when Gerrel asks Legion if the geth would actually consider peace?

Legion says pretty much: "No, we need to see you earn it first. We need to see siginifcant long term evidence before we will even speak to you." Translation: "No, F--- you. Get on your knees and BEG BI---!"

Gerrel's response: "Well, worth a try. Back to blowing them up then, I guess". Pretty reasonable I think.

3) How in the hell is stating an objective fact sugar coating? I didn't say she was right. I didn't say I agreed with her. I said "Xen is doing this because she said she wants ---". So what, because I don't slug insults around and try to use facts my arguments are invalid?

4) Telling Gerrel to stand down "just cause" is a lousy reason. He needs a REASON to stand down. Tali and Raan are dumb, but this is consistant with their character. If the geth want to be perceived at merciful beings of peace then yes, I damn well DO expect them to take the hit to spare innocent quarians. They choose genocide on them. That's a mark against them, mutually with the quarians.

5) The geth changed in that they perceived organics as an entertaining experiment. Talk to Legion enough in ME2 and this becomes evident.

6) Gerrel's own bridge crew requests retreat. Gerrel denied it. We can assume other ship crews requested retreat, and at least a few captains granted it. Gerrel's bridge crew attempts to abandon ship. No quarians survive. We can assume thus the geth eliminated all ships, and all escape pods. This point is not an argument for either side, just stating facts.

7) Um...that's basically the debate of this entire thread. Read other points.

8) To draw off of your anology here, America would have had to actually ally with the n---s. They were the only force at the time trying to commit genocide against the rest of the world.

The geth ALWAYS have a choice. They always had the ability to say "No, we will not take place in galactic genocide to save ourselves." They chose TO take part in genocide. GALACTIC...genocide. Far worse than the quarians.

If a gunman comes up to you and says he will kill you or 100 other people including children, would you say "Sure, as long as I live"?

Course not, that'd be crazy. That IS what the geth did though.

#1604
justafan

justafan
  • Members
  • 2 408 messages
^ Hey hey, Tali is not dumb. She just lacks confidence, political skills, public speaking skills, and the ability to stand up to her superiors. Not to mention the situation she finds herself in is not conducive to rational thought.

Modifié par justafan, 21 mars 2013 - 09:52 .


#1605
Phatose

Phatose
  • Members
  • 1 079 messages
She's an admiral of the fleet and she's well aware that the Geth are about to come back on line. Unlike Shepard, it's actually her job to tell them things like that.

#1606
justafan

justafan
  • Members
  • 2 408 messages

Phatose wrote...

She's an admiral of the fleet and she's well aware that the Geth are about to come back on line. Unlike Shepard, it's actually her job to tell them things like that.


Like I said, she doesn't know the right things to say to make Gerrel stop.  She tells him to call off the attack, yet it is such a moment of stress that she neglects to tell him exactly why.  It would be like someone calling the police in a panic, and only able to plead for help instead of articulating what is going on. 

#1607
tevix

tevix
  • Members
  • 1 363 messages
@Justafan

It would be incredible levels of fail if that person were say...a Naval Admiral....

#1608
justafan

justafan
  • Members
  • 2 408 messages

tevix wrote...

@Justafan

It would be incredible levels of fail if that person were say...a Naval Admiral....


Haha, I never said she was qualified to be an admiral.

She can fix an engine like it's nobody's business, but when her specie's is fighting for its life and both her friend and the person she trust the most are just standing there to let them die, one can't help but recall she is barely an adult and not in the most healthy state of mind.

Modifié par justafan, 21 mars 2013 - 10:21 .


#1609
DeinonSlayer

DeinonSlayer
  • Members
  • 8 441 messages

tevix wrote...

@Justafan

It would be incredible levels of fail if that person were say...a Naval Admiral....

She herself says she doesn't deserve the position. She was more assertive in the original script, offering to kill Gerrel, trying to stop Legion/VI and getting punched in the stomach while Shepard stands by and watches... they cut the content of that scene down quite a bit. It plays out as-is because this is Mass Effect, and as such, Shepard must be the deciding factor in everything.

One must question how articulate they would be if it were dropped on them that their entire culture, species, everyone and everything they knew growing up was now sixty seconds from extinction.

#1610
CronoDragoon

CronoDragoon
  • Members
  • 10 413 messages

remydat wrote...
If I have to choose between the Germans (Quarians) who elected leaders that tried to exterminate the Jews (Geth) then I guess I will have to live with out Frankfurthers and my new BMW.  But I guess a hot dog and a car are the sacrifices I am willing to make to save the people who sufferred a holocaust.


I know you don't really think the geth's situation is comparable to the Jews philosophically. I'm just going to assume you were doing the best you could with a bad analogy.

#1611
Iamjdr

Iamjdr
  • Members
  • 476 messages
Tali was still exiled in my playthrough so she isn't always an admiral

#1612
Auld Wulf

Auld Wulf
  • Members
  • 1 284 messages
I think remydat is my hero at this point.

What we're dealing with here is essentially the trope of fantastic racism carried over to the mindset of the player. The simple fact is is that humans are designed by natural factory default conditions to latch onto things which are familiar in unfamiliar scenarios. The overturning of this is what we call a paradigm shift -- it alters perceptions and allows the human to realise that their instinctive response was just that, instinctive, and not an intellectual one. This has been used as a literary device in almost every form of media and damn near every genre that relies on fictional settings.

Star Trek has used this as well. In some plots we have had a monstrous race and a very human-looking race. The writer expects people to side with the more human-looking race because of the desire for familiarity. The instinctive response is that something that looks human would possess more qualities with the viewer than the other, more unusual looking species. Essentially: The less human something is in mindset and physical appearance, the less we are able to relate to it. Even something as mild as different skin colours originally resulted in this kind of thinking, until we culturally reprogrammed ourselves to realise that just because a person has a different skin tone, they're not actually different than someone who has the same skin tone. And even still -- we have a lot of racism in modern society, as not everyone has accepted this cultural reprogramming.

The intellectual effort here is to look at something objectively and without instinctive bias. This also involves a lot of emotional maturity as you have to be able to sympathise with both sides, you can't just allow instinct to order you to side with those whom are more familiar. But not everyone realises this, because not everyone understands the importance of reprogramming ourselves to not automatically believe that familiar is good, and unfamiliar is bad. As such, because the quarians seem more "human" to the player, and the geth seem "less human" to the player (because of their synthetic appearance and collective consciousness), the quarians must therefore also be "more good," as "more familiar" is equatable with "more good."

Therefore people side with the quarians on an instinctive level without questioning this intellectually and will ignore logic in favour of taking the instinctive option. So there's no objective analysis going on, and no one is actually stopping to think about the situation beyond that initial instinctive response. It's a very protective response, you protect things which are familiar against things which are less familiar. This is why we have a common over-protection of the quarians, even when that over-protection seems illogical when considered objectively.

If you look at literary tricks used by authors of many mediums -- you'll note that familiarity is also used to make a hero character more appealing. Spider-Man was made out to be overly nerdy and geeky because Marvel felt that this made him more relatable, more familiar. And to this day, Spider-Man continues to be in the top 5 of most popular Marvel heroes. The other kind of trick to use is to use cultural/societal power fantasies. Often exceedingly masculine and "kick-ass," so heroes like Batman and Deadpool are also very common.

So when a story presents a paradigm shift where, perhaps, you have one unfamiliar group which is equal in morality or even superior in morality, then first the player will try to relate to the group which is more familiar even if they aren't superior in morality (if they are either equal or lesser in morality). And the reaction to this is often railing against it, because it turns instinct on its head to attempt to appeal to intellectual and emotional intelligence. And some will appreciate that, and others will not. Just as some have managed to cast racism almost entirely out of their psyche, and others are still extremely racist.

So ultimately, it does come down to fantastic racism. And a lot of this argument is trying to get people to put instinct aside in order to think differently. That's what remydat is actually trying to do. I genuinely hope it works, because we need more people accepting paradigm shifts. Paradigm shifts are, after all, essentially what involves our culture and society as a whole.

#1613
justafan

justafan
  • Members
  • 2 408 messages

Auld Wulf wrote...
Snip.


Right, because God forbid BOTH sides have pros and cons.  Clearly the Geth are superior, and all who disagree are racist. <_<

#1614
Iamjdr

Iamjdr
  • Members
  • 476 messages
Clearly

#1615
remydat

remydat
  • Members
  • 2 462 messages

tevix wrote...

@Finn

How is it a lousy analogy?

Remy's argument: 100% of quarians should die because some voted for lousy leadership

100% of germans should die to save the jewish because some voted for lousy leadership.

Seems pretty parallel to me....


Are you going to kill all the Jews then so that the Germans should live?  I answered your question now man up and answer mine.  In the scenario the OP set up. 100% of one group has to die.  This is the dumbest comparison ever when the Jews never killed the Germans in retaliation.  They just died by the millions and you want me to kill the rest of them because Germans didn't stand up to Hitler.  F**king insane.

Finn the Jakey wrote...

No, I was talking about Remy's argument.


Please answer the same question above.  Are you killing 100% of Jews because not all Germans voted for the Holocaust?  You have no choice but to kill 100% of one of the groups as the OP posed the question.

Let me see all the dodging that will ensue.

Modifié par remydat, 21 mars 2013 - 10:58 .


#1616
Khelish

Khelish
  • Members
  • 589 messages

Auld Wulf wrote...

Posted Image

#1617
XXIceColdXX

XXIceColdXX
  • Members
  • 1 230 messages

crimzontearz wrote...

Uhhhh...nope I would pick the Quarians and be rewarded by a harem of nubile Quarian girls...being the man who just won you your world back has its perks

 Now that's some perks that the geth just cant offer. 

#1618
CronoDragoon

CronoDragoon
  • Members
  • 10 413 messages

tevix wrote...

@Finn

How is it a lousy analogy?

Remy's argument: 100% of quarians should die because some voted for lousy leadership

100% of germans should die to save the jewish because some voted for lousy leadership.

Seems pretty parallel to me....


I'll give you at least one reason why the analogy doesn't fit: the Jews, in response to the Holocaust, didn't turn around and kill 95% of German civilians and then, when the Germans retaliated with war, didn't ally themselves with an alien race bent on wiping out all humanity on the planet to save themselves.

#1619
remydat

remydat
  • Members
  • 2 462 messages

CronoDragoon wrote...

remydat wrote...
If I have to choose between the Germans (Quarians) who elected leaders that tried to exterminate the Jews (Geth) then I guess I will have to live with out Frankfurthers and my new BMW.  But I guess a hot dog and a car are the sacrifices I am willing to make to save the people who sufferred a holocaust.


I know you don't really think the geth's situation is comparable to the Jews philosophically. I'm just going to assume you were doing the best you could with a bad analogy.


Of course I don't.  It was not my analogy.  I just find it funy these dudes think that my saying I would kill 100% of Germans is wrong when if they disagree they by extension are saying no they will kill 100% of Jews when the Jews situation is the most tragic of any group we have discussed.  They unequivocally lost millions of people, did not have a real chance to fight but Tevix and Finny are apparently mad at me for saying I will kill 100% of Germans if I had no choice to save them.

To choose the Germans in this scenario is basically a vote for finishing the holocaust.

Modifié par remydat, 21 mars 2013 - 11:01 .


#1620
Iamjdr

Iamjdr
  • Members
  • 476 messages
How about we just stop with the ww2 comparisons cause these situations are not even remotely similar.

#1621
CronoDragoon

CronoDragoon
  • Members
  • 10 413 messages

remydat wrote...

To choose the Germans in this scenario is basically a vote for finishing the holocaust.


Yeah, if someone warped down during WW2 and made me choose the answer has to be bye bye to the Germans.

Anyway, like a few of us are saying, terrible analogy that blurs the issues.

Modifié par CronoDragoon, 21 mars 2013 - 11:03 .


#1622
silverexile17s

silverexile17s
  • Members
  • 2 547 messages
 

Auld Wulf wrote...

I think remydat is my hero at this point.

What we're dealing with here is essentially the trope of fantastic racism carried over to the mindset of the player. The simple fact is is that humans are designed by natural factory default conditions to latch onto things which are familiar in unfamiliar scenarios. The overturning of this is what we call a paradigm shift -- it alters perceptions and allows the human to realise that their instinctive response was just that, instinctive, and not an intellectual one. This has been used as a literary device in almost every form of media and damn near every genre that relies on fictional settings.

Star Trek has used this as well. In some plots we have had a monstrous race and a very human-looking race. The writer expects people to side with the more human-looking race because of the desire for familiarity. The instinctive response is that something that looks human would possess more qualities with the viewer than the other, more unusual looking species. Essentially: The less human something is in mindset and physical appearance, the less we are able to relate to it. Even something as mild as different skin colours originally resulted in this kind of thinking, until we culturally reprogrammed ourselves to realise that just because a person has a different skin tone, they're not actually different than someone who has the same skin tone. And even still -- we have a lot of racism in modern society, as not everyone has accepted this cultural reprogramming.

The intellectual effort here is to look at something objectively and without instinctive bias. This also involves a lot of emotional maturity as you have to be able to sympathise with both sides, you can't just allow instinct to order you to side with those whom are more familiar. But not everyone realises this, because not everyone understands the importance of reprogramming ourselves to not automatically believe that familiar is good, and unfamiliar is bad. As such, because the quarians seem more "human" to the player, and the geth seem "less human" to the player (because of their synthetic appearance and collective consciousness), the quarians must therefore also be "more good," as "more familiar" is equatable with "more good."

Therefore people side with the quarians on an instinctive level without questioning this intellectually and will ignore logic in favour of taking the instinctive option. So there's no objective analysis going on, and no one is actually stopping to think about the situation beyond that initial instinctive response. It's a very protective response, you protect things which are familiar against things which are less familiar. This is why we have a common over-protection of the quarians, even when that over-protection seems illogical when considered objectively.

If you look at literary tricks used by authors of many mediums -- you'll note that familiarity is also used to make a hero character more appealing. Spider-Man was made out to be overly nerdy and geeky because Marvel felt that this made him more relatable, more familiar. And to this day, Spider-Man continues to be in the top 5 of most popular Marvel heroes. The other kind of trick to use is to use cultural/societal power fantasies. Often exceedingly masculine and "kick-ass," so heroes like Batman and Deadpool are also very common.

So when a story presents a paradigm shift where, perhaps, you have one unfamiliar group which is equal in morality or even superior in morality, then first the player will try to relate to the group which is more familiar even if they aren't superior in morality (if they are either equal or lesser in morality). And the reaction to this is often railing against it, because it turns instinct on its head to attempt to appeal to intellectual and emotional intelligence. And some will appreciate that, and others will not. Just as some have managed to cast racism almost entirely out of their psyche, and others are still extremely racist.

So ultimately, it does come down to fantastic racism. And a lot of this argument is trying to get people to put instinct aside in order to think differently. That's what remydat is actually trying to do. I genuinely hope it works, because we need more people accepting paradigm shifts. Paradigm shifts are, after all, essentially what involves our culture and society as a whole.

Of course he is, because he uses headcannon. Just like YOU.

The SAME is true of the geth. They have made mistakes that are no better then orgaincs. They stayed severely isolationsit to the point that it encouraged hatred of them and allowed negitive feelings to fester against them. The geth were JUST has hostile against what they didn't understand (the quarian's motivations), to the point that self-preservation transformed into slaughter. Wiping out someone in self-defense is forgivable. Wiping out countless civilians -men,  woman, childerern, and forgien visitors - ISN'T. The GETH are the ones guilty if this "paradigm shift", NOT the quarians. THEY are the ones that spared no one but other geth. The quarians were thinking long-term about THEIR race too. The geth were escentally dead either way thanks to Council Laws. Why let the entire quarian race go down if they can do something about it? Doing nothing but sitting back and letting these two cultures go down when the chance to save at least ONE is avalible - THAT'S an amoral action.

And that's the  COMPLETE OPPOSATE of the intention. The point is to show that we are all the same DESPITE those appearances. To show that ALL life is sympathetic REGARDLESS of the outward appearance. To show that there IS NO SUCH THING as an unrelatable lifeform, and that outward appearance HAS NO BEARING on it. For someone who claims to hate racisim, that was a very favortist and prejuidced remark.
And again, leave racisim OUT of this, since it has NO BEARING on the quarian/geth war. They are both fueled by desperation by the state of affairs that they wroght on each-other and themselves. And the galaxy's views of the geth are NOT racisim. Racisim is hating something because they are different. The galaxy hates the geth because they attacked the Citadel and nearly ended galactic life as we know it. And since the geth never tried to fix that opinion, alot of the blame is on THEIR shoulders.

And that's rich, since YOU look at everything with a bias against organic rights. When have you EVER sympathised with the hard choices the Admiralty Borad had to make to survive. You really think the choice to attack the geth was EASY? They were driven to it because there was NO OTHER CHOICE. If they don't have Rannoch as a stable power base for their people, they cannot aid the wider galaxy against the  Reapers. They consume a month's worth of supplies in DAYS. Unless they became self-sufficant in an instant, they could nither help the wider galaxy against the Reapers, or be sure they would even have  a future to move on to afterward like most of the other races would. When have you EVER considered that? The outward appearance has ABSOLUTLY NOTHING to do with the debate - the underling morals and motivations DO. YOU are the one making racist remarks by bringing the appearance of the quarians and geth into this, SINCE NO ONE ELSE BUT YOU brought it up.

The reason people side with the quarians has NOTHING to do with outward appearace. It's because they were shafted by circumstance and by Council policy. They were driven by their homes and spent 300 years as nomads scavenging for scraps. Likewise, the geth are sided with because people sympathise with them in how they would have been wiped out just for asking if they were alive. Both made mistakes. Both have faults.
Outward appearace has NOTHING to do with the debate. You are the only one that brought it up, meaning YOU think it nessessary criteria, meaning YOUR views are the racist and prejudiced ones, NOT ours.

Personalaty is the defining factor, NOT the appearance. People sympathise with the Wrex and the Krogan's situation regarding the genopage, and THEY look nothing like humans. Nor do the salarians, who patently argue that the the krogan will never get past their ingrained social responces. Yet the Krogan DO get past them. That right there also invaladates your ENTIRE ARGUMENT - the krogan moved past their ingrained social responces, th esame ones you say are naturally impossible to get past. So the krogan can do it, but not the quarians and geth? Sure....<_<

Both groups are alien, and great pains are taken to keep them that way. WHY do you think they never unmasked the quarians? They go to great lengths to PREVENT that same "social attachment" from forming between the two sides andc prevent bias (at least till Mac Walters got ahold of the script).
So NO, this is NOTHING to do with outward appearacne. It WAS NEVER A FACTOR. It was the beliefs that we are argueing about. And why so many people naturally bash the quarians for their choices. No one takes the time to look at the desperation that festered for 300 years in the Migrant Fleet while they looked and failed to find a new home. No one sees the fact that 300 years of desperation added with the desperation caused by the Reaper invasion. They had their ONE chance to have a future again. And had no knowledge that the geth were not instinctiual Reaper Allies. That had NOTHING to do with appearance.

So, ultimately, racisim has ABSOLUTLY NOTHING TO DO WITH IT AT ALL.  You act like you are knowledgible using words that you don't even BEGIN to understant, and concepts that you have NO comprehension of.  remydat is just like you, in that he has NO intrest in seeing both sides of the arguement. He looks at evrything from the geth's perspective and not the quarians. You can't build an accurate description of the quarian's side of things from the GETH's POV.  So NO, you are blatently and patently wrong because you COMPLETELY misplaced the idea of where the "paradigm shift" was. The GETH were the one's this applied to, NOT the quarians. So levae your headcannon out of this until you actually UNDERSTAND the concepts you try to use instead of PRETENDING to understand them.

#1623
remydat

remydat
  • Members
  • 2 462 messages
Yep because claiming the Quarians would have gone back to the dark ages if they hadn't killed the Geth because the Council would have pulled their mass relay card is stated clearly in the game. No head cannon involved.

Likewise claiming the council would 100% have wiped out the harmless Geth if the Quarians told them about them when that is never stated in the game is not headcannon esepecialy when we know 100% that after they killed billions, the alleged response by the Council was to send diplomatic vessels.

Apparently Council Law is harmless synethtic dies. Synthetic after it kills a billion organics invitation to join the council.

Drew and Casey wrote or told Silver about this in secret and tasked him with spreading this cannon across the Cosmos, lol.

Look dude believe what you want but please stop pretending like what you are saying is cannon. It f**king isn't and never will be until it is in the game. You have your theories based on your interpretation and other people have theirs.  You sound like someone on the Council trying to imposing their views on everyone.

Modifié par remydat, 21 mars 2013 - 11:18 .


#1624
NCommand

NCommand
  • Members
  • 190 messages
Am I the only one finding the holocaust comparison hilariously of target, it's made even more fun by the fact that the Quarians are pretty much space jews

#1625
tevix

tevix
  • Members
  • 1 363 messages
*Sigh*

I'm gonna say this ONE MORE TIME.

@Remy

My n--- comparison was NOT to draw a parallel between WW2 and the MW. It was PURELY to draw a comparison for your argument of:

"Some of them voted for bad leadership, so 100% should die."

I'm glad you have other arguments to back up your choice. I'm NOT trying to debunk those or draw a parallel in this argument.

I am ONLY using this analogy to depose the "All die because some made a bad choice". That, IMO, is not a valid reason to choose one side over another.

I said this earlier, but apparently people forgot how to read halfway through that post.

Moving ON from that point.

The geth is a consensus, meaning ALL of them accepted the choice to eliminate the quarians, and take part in galactic genocide after they were gone. I find that unacceptable. The quarians tried to kill one race.

The geth tried to kill EVERY person of EVERY race.