Aller au contenu

Photo

*THE GREAT DEBATE* - NO PEACE obtainable between the Geth & Quarians: Who would you choose and Why? (Pic of BioWare Stats Inside)


  • Ce sujet est fermé Ce sujet est fermé
4712 réponses à ce sujet

#1851
KiwiQuiche

KiwiQuiche
  • Members
  • 4 410 messages

Grand Admiral Cheesecake wrote...

I'm fairly certain siding with the mecha-cuttlefish twice crosses into too dumb to live territory...


Yeah and trying to kill a whole race for asking a question, killing any sympathizers, getting kicked in the nuts then b!tching about their fcukups while trying to blame the ones who defended themselves for 300 years, trying to colonize a world without asking permission from the galactic government, never trying to fix their sh!t immune systems, sticking guns on ships which are for civilians then dragging said civilians into a stupid 'retake my planet' war while said mecha-cuttlefish are eating everyone and even if they won the Reapers would kill their moronic asses a few weeks later, and trying to blown up a ship while Commander Shepard is aboard means the quarians have gone and made a few cities in the too dumb to live terriorty.

#1852
Grand Admiral Cheesecake

Grand Admiral Cheesecake
  • Members
  • 5 704 messages
At least the Quarians never sided with the Reapers.

That's pretty much the only criteria that matters in a "No peace" scenario.

Modifié par Grand Admiral Cheesecake, 23 mars 2013 - 11:05 .


#1853
KiwiQuiche

KiwiQuiche
  • Members
  • 4 410 messages

Grand Admiral Cheesecake wrote...

At least the Quarians never sided with the Reapers.

That's pretty much the only criteria that matters in a "No peace" scenario.


Posted Image

#1854
magnuskn

magnuskn
  • Members
  • 1 056 messages
If I have to choose between a race of organics and a race of synthetics, I'll take organics every time.

#1855
ReptileSmile

ReptileSmile
  • Members
  • 61 messages

KiwiQuiche wrote...

Yeah and trying to kill a whole race for asking a question, killing any sympathizers, getting kicked in the nuts then b!tching about their fcukups while trying to blame the ones who defended themselves for 300 years, trying to colonize a world without asking permission from the galactic government, never trying to fix their sh!t immune systems, sticking guns on ships which are for civilians then dragging said civilians into a stupid 'retake my planet' war while said mecha-cuttlefish are eating everyone and even if they won the Reapers would kill their moronic asses a few weeks later, and trying to blown up a ship while Commander Shepard is aboard means the quarians have gone and made a few cities in the too dumb to live terriorty.


Agreed wholeheartedly!

As much as I like Tali, and as much as male quarians look like they could be kinda hot, the quarians are a tad on the "act now, think never" side.

I will always pick the geth if peace is not an option.

#1856
Rip504

Rip504
  • Members
  • 3 259 messages
Q U A R I A N S

Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image Posted Image

Modifié par Rip504, 23 mars 2013 - 11:55 .


#1857
remydat

remydat
  • Members
  • 2 462 messages

silverexile17s wrote...

[The True Geth certinly didn't come out of the Veil. They abandoned anything to do with organics either way. No attampt, no risk.
And technically, their WAS an agreement. The Council imposed a non-agression treaty on the quarians, which they upheld (Until the Heretcis attacked and got the title of public enenmy #1 branded on all geth, which the true geth did squat to fix). And the geth, again, wanted nothing to do with perpetuating conflict of any kind, so long as they were left to their own mechinations. So, if one side doesn't want to attack, and the other side has signed an agreement not to attack, HOW is that not a peace agreement?

And look at the batarians. They explisitly blame humans for all their troubles. NOT the Council, humans. And despite the feelings, they still maintain trade relations (albiet discreat ones) with the hanar. Meaning that NO, being part of an overreaching sociaty does NOT mean the entire sociaty is involved in continued conflict. The Alliance were not part of the Council when the Morning War tool place. They have ideals that are completely opposate of the majority of Council policy. Therefore, they are NOT part of the conflict (which ended with the Morning War. ) You have confused the scars left by the end of the conflict as being a continuation of the Conflict.

And the batarians aren't. The vorcha aren't.  The krogan. The rachni. These races AREN'T allied with the Council, or respect/reconize it's athourity and rules.

And again, the geth show no signs of wanting to continue the fighting as it is inneficant and wasteful to them. They don't develop any form of moral till much later. By ME1, the True Geth are stated by Legion to feel a kind of remorse for the masive death they wrought (although it doesn't stop them from killing more if it means their survival). The True Geth are done with war and conflict. They "stopped devoting processing power to it" long ago, and to dealing with organics in general. They completely let go of any form of care about organics.
So YES, the conflict was LONG OVER from the geth POV. Therefore, the conflict the Heretics perpetuated with the Alliance (a faction that nothing to do with the Morning War at all) was a completely different conflict entirely, and perpetuated by the selfishness of the Heretics, who didn't care about organics, or living beings in general because they placed self-improvement over valuing life in general - including other synthetic life, as shown by the Heretics instigating agression against the True Geth with the plan to brainwash them into joining the Heretics.

So, WRONG. Different conflict AND different battle.



Do you understand what an agreement is?  It is when BOTH sides agree.  The Geth never agreed to anything.  Is there a peace treaty between the two in your version of the game?  From the Geth perspective all organics are enemies.

In any event, you think it was a different conflict.  Feel free to believe it.  I don't and  I never will so there is point using going on about it.

#1858
remydat

remydat
  • Members
  • 2 462 messages

Grand Admiral Cheesecake wrote...

I'm fairly certain siding with the mecha-cuttlefish twice crosses into too dumb to live territory...


THere Heretics sided with the Reapers.  Holding the other Geth accountable for that is no different than the Geth blaming all organics for what the Quarians did.  Either both sides have the right to be seen as separate or both sides have the right to treat the crimes of a subsection of the other side as the crimes of all.

And the second time the option was Reapers or ceasing to exist because the Quarians attacked and no organics race tried to stop them  So you want the Geth to just quietly accept oblivion so that the Quarians and all those organics who didn't lift a finger to stop them can live.  I believe among organic societies they would probably call you a traitor and try you for treason for chosing the enemy of the survival of your species.

So you are free to kill them but you are oversimplyfying the decision.

#1859
remydat

remydat
  • Members
  • 2 462 messages

magnuskn wrote...

If I have to choose between a race of organics and a race of synthetics, I'll take organics every time.


Which is why making a choice on that basis is prejudiced. 

#1860
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 427 messages

KiwiQuiche wrote...

Grand Admiral Cheesecake wrote...

I'm fairly certain siding with the mecha-cuttlefish twice crosses into too dumb to live territory...


Yeah and trying to kill a whole race for asking a question, killing any sympathizers, getting kicked in the nuts then b!tching about their fcukups while trying to blame the ones who defended themselves for 300 years, trying to colonize a world without asking permission from the galactic government, never trying to fix their sh!t immune systems, sticking guns on ships which are for civilians then dragging said civilians into a stupid 'retake my planet' war while said mecha-cuttlefish are eating everyone and even if they won the Reapers would kill their moronic asses a few weeks later, and trying to blown up a ship while Commander Shepard is aboard means the quarians have gone and made a few cities in the too dumb to live terriorty.


I love you.

<3

#1861
CronoDragoon

CronoDragoon
  • Members
  • 10 413 messages

remydat wrote...

And the second time the option was Reapers or ceasing to exist because the Quarians attacked and no organics race tried to stop them  So you want the Geth to just quietly accept oblivion so that the Quarians and all those organics who didn't lift a finger to stop them can live.  I believe among organic societies they would probably call you a traitor and try you for treason for chosing the enemy of the survival of your species.

So you are free to kill them but you are oversimplyfying the decision.


The decision is actually "cease to exist" or "side with the Reapers and then cease to exist."

It's an objectively stupid decision. Legion himself says that the only reason they made it was because their intelligence was lowered by the destruction of the Dyson sphere.

Survivalist decisions are understandable, but understandable and acceptable are not the same thing.

Edit: By the way, I feel the same about the quarians going to war right as the Reapers are coming. It's understandable that they'd want their homeworld back, but ultimately unacceptable to me. Neither the quarians or the geth are in the right, in my opinion. The entire situation is an exercise in frustration.

Modifié par CronoDragoon, 23 mars 2013 - 04:02 .


#1862
remydat

remydat
  • Members
  • 2 462 messages

Da Don Giovanni wrote...

2 Things:

1) Peace could end with one side being Vanquished.

2) Heretics deserve to be re-written so they can SERVE AS MY MINIONS!!

MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!

/Sarcasm



Well yes you can achieve peace by wiping out the person that doesn't agree with you but I find that solution morally objectionable.

The only reason I ever re-write Heretics is because I am playing paragon.  Other than that, those toasters can die.

Although remind me does rewriting the Heretics necessary for being able to choose peace on Rannoch?

#1863
Ryzaki

Ryzaki
  • Members
  • 34 427 messages
No.

I always pick destroy and I almost always get the peace option.

Plus I find brainwashing utterly detestable. Just no.One of the few things I agree with Jack on.

"If you screw with my head, made me nod and smile at everything... I'd rather you blew my head off. Let me die as me."

Modifié par Ryzaki, 23 mars 2013 - 04:15 .


#1864
remydat

remydat
  • Members
  • 2 462 messages

CronoDragoon wrote...

[The decision is actually "cease to exist" or "side with the Reapers and then cease to exist."

It's an objectively stupid decision. Legion himself says that the only reason they made it was because their intelligence was lowered by the destruction of the Dyson sphere.

Survivalist decisions are understandable, but understandable and acceptable are not the same thing.

Edit: By the way, I feel the same about the quarians going to war right as the Reapers are coming. It's understandable that they'd want their homeworld back, but ultimately unacceptable to me. Neither the quarians or the geth are in the right, in my opinion. The entire situation is an exercise in frustration.


Dying today is worse than dying tomorrow.  Dying today means there is no chance that something might happen tomorrow to prevent my death.

Case in point, if the Geth accepted their fate, they die.  By aligning with the Reapers, it means they are alive long enough for Shpeard to decide what to do with them.  Translation, delying one's death provides hope that your alleged future deah will not come to pass.

This is further the case when the Reapers may take centuries to harvest which gives you centuries to figure out a way not to end up dead.

#1865
silverexile17s

silverexile17s
  • Members
  • 2 547 messages

KiwiQuiche wrote...

Geth. At least the geth occasionally show some intelligence, the quarians are consistently stupid and by the time ME3 came around and I found they had stupidly decided to attack the geth while the freaking Reapers were gonna start eating everyone, I had had enough.

Um.... there are about 70+ pages that detail reasons why that's not true about the quarians.

First off, the entire galaxy sees the geth as enemies for the Battle of the Citadel, in which no one but Shepard and Co know that there was a Heretic split to begin with. And nobody is going to believe Shepard because of the Alpha Relay, the Cerberus ties, and the many criminals (Thane, Jack, Kasumi), rouges (Mordin, Samara, Zaeed, Garrus), Terrorist cell members (Jacob, Miranda, entire Cerberus crew of the SR-2), and exiled race members (Tali, Grunt) and to top it off, association with then-Public enemy #1: the Geth (Legion). All this, plus continued insistance on the Reaper's existance, makes Shepard's word inadmissable as any form of evidence that the geth are even neutral, let alone non-hostile.

And second, there was no choice for the quarians. As they are, they are incapable of fighting against the Reapers effectively. They cannot split their fleet to tackle multiple fronts, as the military and civilian ships are interdependant on each-other to the point that one can't function without being near the other constantly (civilian ships need constant protection, and military ships need constant re-supply, re-fuel, and the raw materials needed for ship repair). Also, since they have to carry their entire population with them, the quarians are both a massive target, and they consume a month's worth of supplies in days (An avarage turian crusier has 40 - 50 crew. An avarage quarian ship has at least 300 crew.).
To be have any hope of contributing to the war effort without dragging it down, they must become completely self-sufficant, and do so in a moment's notcie. To do that, they need a planet. One that is (a) dextro-based, (B) is in the "shirt-sleeves" habitable terperature zone, © has an oxygen-based atmosphere, (d) has airborne particles that don't kill when inhailed, (e) has food sources that don't need to be reduced into oversterilized paste to consume safetly, (f) has tolerible gravity levels, (g) has abundant resources that haven't been harvested (the geth say all their resources came from asteroids), and (h) has the same insect-free symbiotic ecology that they evolved beside.
How many worlds do you think have that cirteria? Any that come close are turian-owned, and now, no colony that isn't under Reaper attack would be actively willing and able to take 16 million refugees that have strict health and diatery needs - a commodity not regularry avalible in all-out war. The quarians tried settling worlds that would normally be inhospitable to them, like Ekuna, but the Council foced them off the world at gunpoint when the quarians asked for the rights to it. (And Ekuna WASN'T Council owned. The quarians discovered it, and when they asked the Council for settling rights, they were shafted by them.)
Take all this into account, and there is only one world that can secure their future, in both the long and short terms: Rannoch.
Which is conviently being held by a faction that is still listed as being an enemy of the free galaxy. Thanks to this, any hostile action against the geth is not only allowed, but enciuraged, as everyone thinks the geth already hate organics, and have been Reaper allies since Eden Prime.

Therefore, based on how no one thought the geth were peacefull, the quarians attack isn't as sensless as one would think.

Modifié par silverexile17s, 23 mars 2013 - 06:33 .


#1866
silverexile17s

silverexile17s
  • Members
  • 2 547 messages

remydat wrote...

silverexile17s wrote...

[The True Geth certinly didn't come out of the Veil. They abandoned anything to do with organics either way. No attampt, no risk.
And technically, their WAS an agreement. The Council imposed a non-agression treaty on the quarians, which they upheld (Until the Heretcis attacked and got the title of public enenmy #1 branded on all geth, which the true geth did squat to fix). And the geth, again, wanted nothing to do with perpetuating conflict of any kind, so long as they were left to their own mechinations. So, if one side doesn't want to attack, and the other side has signed an agreement not to attack, HOW is that not a peace agreement?

And look at the batarians. They explisitly blame humans for all their troubles. NOT the Council, humans. And despite the feelings, they still maintain trade relations (albiet discreat ones) with the hanar. Meaning that NO, being part of an overreaching sociaty does NOT mean the entire sociaty is involved in continued conflict. The Alliance were not part of the Council when the Morning War tool place. They have ideals that are completely opposate of the majority of Council policy. Therefore, they are NOT part of the conflict (which ended with the Morning War. ) You have confused the scars left by the end of the conflict as being a continuation of the Conflict.

And the batarians aren't. The vorcha aren't.  The krogan. The rachni. These races AREN'T allied with the Council, or respect/reconize it's athourity and rules.

And again, the geth show no signs of wanting to continue the fighting as it is inneficant and wasteful to them. They don't develop any form of moral till much later. By ME1, the True Geth are stated by Legion to feel a kind of remorse for the masive death they wrought (although it doesn't stop them from killing more if it means their survival). The True Geth are done with war and conflict. They "stopped devoting processing power to it" long ago, and to dealing with organics in general. They completely let go of any form of care about organics.
So YES, the conflict was LONG OVER from the geth POV. Therefore, the conflict the Heretics perpetuated with the Alliance (a faction that nothing to do with the Morning War at all) was a completely different conflict entirely, and perpetuated by the selfishness of the Heretics, who didn't care about organics, or living beings in general because they placed self-improvement over valuing life in general - including other synthetic life, as shown by the Heretics instigating agression against the True Geth with the plan to brainwash them into joining the Heretics.

So, WRONG. Different conflict AND different battle.



Do you understand what an agreement is?  It is when BOTH sides agree.  The Geth never agreed to anything.  Is there a peace treaty between the two in your version of the game?  From the Geth perspective all organics are enemies.

In any event, you think it was a different conflict.  Feel free to believe it.  I don't and  I never will so there is point using going on about it.

I don't think YOU understand, which is expected.
If one side DOESN'T want to fight, and the other SIGNED AN AGREEMENT not to fight, THAT'S a peace agreement. Nither side will fight the other. The quarians explisitly signed a non-agression treaty. And the geth had no intentions of perpetuating a conflict at all. So by extension, that IS a peace agreement if nither side is willing or able to take part in hostilities.
And WRONG. From the geth perspective, all organics are an annoyance. A factor not worth devoting processing power to. If they DID consider all organics enemies, then they would have come out of the Veil and attacked the fleet the Council had on their borders. Or ALL the geth would have joined Sovergein, not just 7% of them. They stopped caring either way. They let go of all concerns, AND all grudges.
The Heretics didn't martch to war because they disliked organics. That's a mistake to believe. They ONLY followed Sovergien for the oppertunity to self-improve. The entire POINT was the Heretics - they DIDN'T care about organics, and put themselves ahead of all life in general, including other geth, as evidenced by their split from the True Geth.

Therefore, the Heretics started an entirely different conflict, as none of the past grudges existed on the organic side, and the geth themselves don't hold grudges to begin with.
So, regardless of what you say, your belief that the Heretics were continuing the Morning War is patently false, as nither side had grudges against each-other, or each-other's forms of life. The Heretics perpetuated a new conflict.
Nothing you say out of headcannon will change that.

#1867
silverexile17s

silverexile17s
  • Members
  • 2 547 messages

remydat wrote...

Grand Admiral Cheesecake wrote...

I'm fairly certain siding with the mecha-cuttlefish twice crosses into too dumb to live territory...


THere Heretics sided with the Reapers.  Holding the other Geth accountable for that is no different than the Geth blaming all organics for what the Quarians did.  Either both sides have the right to be seen as separate or both sides have the right to treat the crimes of a subsection of the other side as the crimes of all.

And the second time the option was Reapers or ceasing to exist because the Quarians attacked and no organics race tried to stop them  So you want the Geth to just quietly accept oblivion so that the Quarians and all those organics who didn't lift a finger to stop them can live.  I believe among organic societies they would probably call you a traitor and try you for treason for chosing the enemy of the survival of your species.

So you are free to kill them but you are oversimplyfying the decision.

But look how the Alliance was blamed for not handling Cerberus. And the Alliance DID work to take care of it's rouge factions. No one is holding the geth respincible for the creation of the Heretics. They are holding the geth responcible for not DOING ANYTHING about the Heretcis.
The salarians did something about their rouge "Leauge of One" faction
The Alliance took responcibility for bringing down Cerberus.
Why exactally do the geth get a free pass on taking responcibility for the Heretics?

#1868
silverexile17s

silverexile17s
  • Members
  • 2 547 messages

KiwiQuiche wrote...

Grand Admiral Cheesecake wrote...

I'm fairly certain siding with the mecha-cuttlefish twice crosses into too dumb to live territory...


Yeah and trying to kill a whole race for asking a question, killing any sympathizers, getting kicked in the nuts then b!tching about their fcukups while trying to blame the ones who defended themselves for 300 years, trying to colonize a world without asking permission from the galactic government, never trying to fix their sh!t immune systems, sticking guns on ships which are for civilians then dragging said civilians into a stupid 'retake my planet' war while said mecha-cuttlefish are eating everyone and even if they won the Reapers would kill their moronic asses a few weeks later, and trying to blown up a ship while Commander Shepard is aboard means the quarians have gone and made a few cities in the too dumb to live terriorty.

WRONG. First off, all those vids of the protesters?
They all took place before the Morning War. NOT durning. BEFORE. Legion makes an explisit point of saying that by the time war broke out, the protesters were disbanded.
Also, you are going to take ONE death as an example of how things were done, when, by the fact that it was a bomb in a door breach, Magara's death may have been a complete accident? And jugding an entire race of 2.1 billion based on images of, what, less then a dozen people? Especally since no footage of the actual war was shown? That makes no sense.
And the other recording showed a quarian getting arrested, and "thrown in with the others," meaning that the quarian police arrested everyone, and only resorted to lethal force when forced, like when someone refuses to turn in beings wanted by the state?

And as for trying to destroy the geth, the quarians figured that if they didn't do it, the Council would send in an army of their own to do it, once they caught on. The punsihment for a single shackled A.I. is harsh scanctions. What do you think the punishment for thousands of unshackled A.I.s is? The quarian economy was too small to handle something like the scanctions the Council would levy against them.
Not to mention that the Council would have also gone in guns blazing, thinking that, like the quarians also believed, the geth were nothing but docile, malefunctioning mechs. They would have been unprepared for retaliation, been embarresed that they got their asses handed to them, and having to defend their pride now, would then have launched all out war against the geth, which would have likely spilled into the Terminus, which would have esclated further and further.
And on top of all this, no one knew the geth were actually sapiant at that point. They intitially thought that the geth were little more then machines when they attacked. And since the quarian government thinks the geth are going to die either way, by their hand or the Council, they figure that they should "turn their attentions to those they can still save." Which is the 2.1 billion people they look over. The geth are assumed to be dead anyway, so there is no reason the quarians should suffer for it too. They were simply putting their people and welfare first, like governments are supposed to do for their people.

And AGAIN, since they intended to fight the Reapers after reclaiming Rannoch, of COURSE they armed their civilians ships. Hackett and Udina wasted no time ordering all human civilian ships to be armed in light of galactic crisis, but quarians arming ships? Nope. Not good.<_<
Are you for real? Given what the Reapers are doing, I'm supprised that they aren't outfitting BIKES with guns at this point. And since the Migrant fleet is unable to be split, as in their current state of interdependancy, the military ships can't fight in sustained conflict without the re-supply of the civilians ships, this means that they would have had no choice to bring the civilians ships with them into the Perceus Vail. And being unarmed never stopped the geth from obliterating those diplomatic peace envoys, did it? So not arming the ships would have done jack-squat to protect them from geth notice, as the geth have showen repeatedly that they destroy anything that enters the Perceus Veil, unarmed or not.

And let me put this another way: 17 million people representing an entire species vs three people.
This isn't that hard a choice. Gerrel is lifeling military, and lifelong military of any kind teaches you to put the needs of the many ahead of the needs of the few. It's 17 million  (an entire race) vs three people. Hackett did the exact same thing in ME1 when he fired on Sovergein, despite the Commander and two squadmates being right next to it in the Citadel Tower. (And Hackett KNEW Shepard was there. The relays could only be unlocked to allow the fleet in from the control unit in the Tower.) If the roles were switched and you had to risk 17 million for three people, you would take the shot too.

And AGAIN, unable to help the war effort unless they lose the civilians and become completely self-sufficant. Rannoch is the only place that's possible. And also, geth are listed as Reaper allies, and have been for three years, so attacking the geth DOES constitue helping the war effort, as everyone thinks the geth are with the Reapers already.

#1869
CHARK19

CHARK19
  • Members
  • 267 messages
"Shepar'ld, my people!"
"Shepard, Commander- MY people."
My Shepard saved both. "Keelah 'selai."

Then chose Destroy, because.

#1870
silverexile17s

silverexile17s
  • Members
  • 2 547 messages

CronoDragoon wrote...

remydat wrote...

And the second time the option was Reapers or ceasing to exist because the Quarians attacked and no organics race tried to stop them  So you want the Geth to just quietly accept oblivion so that the Quarians and all those organics who didn't lift a finger to stop them can live.  I believe among organic societies they would probably call you a traitor and try you for treason for chosing the enemy of the survival of your species.

So you are free to kill them but you are oversimplyfying the decision.


The decision is actually "cease to exist" or "side with the Reapers and then cease to exist."

It's an objectively stupid decision. Legion himself says that the only reason they made it was because their intelligence was lowered by the destruction of the Dyson sphere.

Survivalist decisions are understandable, but understandable and acceptable are not the same thing.

Edit: By the way, I feel the same about the quarians going to war right as the Reapers are coming. It's understandable that they'd want their homeworld back, but ultimately unacceptable to me. Neither the quarians or the geth are in the right, in my opinion. The entire situation is an exercise in frustration.

Also, IDK if you noticed, but all throughout, Legion displayes a patent disagreement with what the geth have done. When Shepard asks if the geth thought that working with the Reapers to live was worth independance, Legion says "evidently, that is an acceptible choice." Also, on the geth dreadnought, when Shepard asks Legion about the geth siding with the Reapers, Legion says "the geth wished to live." Not "we wished to live." And finally, on Rannoch, when Shepard says "the geth are better then this," Legion, rather solemly responds with "....No. Based on empirical evidence.... they are not."
They are not? Insetad of "we are not?" These things indicate that Legion is not only in disagreement with the actions the geth took, but would have rather the geth died then side with the Reapers. The fact that the geth restrianed Legion in the dreadnought is further proof if this. In in truth, even Legion admits that the geth siding with the Reapers was a bad move.

#1871
4stringwizard

4stringwizard
  • Members
  • 652 messages

Grand Admiral Cheesecake wrote...

I'm fairly certain siding with the mecha-cuttlefish twice crosses into too dumb to live territory...

Don't forget siding with the Reapers AND hiding things from Shepard at the same time, which is what Legion does. 

Personally, I think Bioware should have made it so that if you side with the Geth, they end up betraying you if the Geth VI is in charge rather than Legion.  Yeah it would have pi**ed the Geth fanboys off, but it would have been a lot more realistic given the VI's attidue toward organics.  Unlike Legion, the Geth VI seemed like something that would betray Shepard in a heartbeat if it felt like the Reapers still had the advantage. 

#1872
S.A.K

S.A.K
  • Members
  • 2 741 messages

Grand Admiral Cheesecake wrote...

At least the Quarians never sided with the Reapers.

That's pretty much the only criteria that matters in a "No peace" scenario.

Yep.

#1873
Guest_Imperium Alpha_*

Guest_Imperium Alpha_*
  • Guests
Kill the Geth.

They are fracking toaster and I don't trust their kind from all my years of experience in Stargate and Battlestar Galactica.

Modifié par Imperium Alpha, 23 mars 2013 - 08:14 .


#1874
Isichar

Isichar
  • Members
  • 10 125 messages

Grand Admiral Cheesecake wrote...

I'm fairly certain siding with the mecha-cuttlefish twice crosses into too dumb to live territory...


Well seems like humanity works just as much with the reapers as the Geth do. Between Cerberus helping them out and Shepard acting as a tool for the Catalyst just so everyone does not die I would say unless you chose refuse you basically have no right to judge the Geth on those terms.

#1875
Isichar

Isichar
  • Members
  • 10 125 messages

S.A.K wrote...

Grand Admiral Cheesecake wrote...

At least the Quarians never sided with the Reapers.

That's pretty much the only criteria that matters in a "No peace" scenario.

Yep.


No they just decided to go to war to reclaim a planet they lost 300 years ago, to a race they created and tried to destroy because "we r afraedz" full well knowing that god like machines were coming to wipe them AND the Geth out.

So you have an impossible war coming, and instead you choose to wage war against possible allies because after 300 years this is now the best possible time to reclaim your planet? Best possible outcome: They beat the Geth, reclaimed their planet and shortly after get wiped out by the Reapers they were so keen to ignore. Qurians win the award for most suicidal race.

The Qurians deciding to go to war with the Geth caused more harm then the Geth accepting help from the Reapers. Difference is Geth made the choice based on survival, Qurians just got selfish at the worse possible time.

Modifié par Isichar, 23 mars 2013 - 08:56 .