Aller au contenu

Photo

*THE GREAT DEBATE* - NO PEACE obtainable between the Geth & Quarians: Who would you choose and Why? (Pic of BioWare Stats Inside)


  • Ce sujet est fermé Ce sujet est fermé
4712 réponses à ce sujet

#2176
DeinonSlayer

DeinonSlayer
  • Members
  • 8 441 messages

remydat wrote...

silverexile17s wrote...

WRONG. The arguement is that you either sacrifice your own future for a controled alternitive at the expense of everyone else, or find your own path.
And going by that, YOU just basically said "submission is preferable to extinction."


Um, don't know what you are talking about.  Kai Leng was indoctrinated.  Someone made a comment about him.  Shepard is not indoctrinated so using Kai Leng as an example makes no sense to me.  Humans are different.  We are not robots.  The f**k ups of Kai Leng or TIM don't necessarily prove anything regarding what Shep should do.

They do, however, warrant consideration. Legion made a pretty drastic reversal on his position regarding Reaper tech after being (involuntarily?) hooked up to it. And as much as Legion decries it in ME2, the Geth VI gives little indication that it had any kind of philosophical opposition to working with the Reapers at all, merely lamenting that the interface was "unproductive" and, unlike Legion, expressing no surprise at the extent of Reaper infection in the Geth server. Why would it? They let them in.

I think Silver might have talked about this earlier, and I might be wrong, but it seems Legion was not a willing participant in submitting to Reaper control. The Geth VI, on the other hand, was - and gives little indication it would not change sides again.

Modifié par DeinonSlayer, 24 mars 2013 - 07:20 .


#2177
Ryan1337l33t

Ryan1337l33t
  • Members
  • 16 messages
I'll put my opinion; bluntly some-what.

Renegade wise -- I would save the Geth, and pick the destroy ending none-the-less.

Of-course; I'm a backstabbing **** in my playthroughs.

Paragon-wise, I'm honestly not sure still, it's down to opinion, and I believe the Quarians brought this problem to themselves having cast the Geth as a 'problem-to-remove', and the majority of them favouring to wage war against them -- certainly not their best traits. It may come down to the Geth once-again.

Modifié par Ryan1337l33t, 24 mars 2013 - 07:25 .


#2178
remydat

remydat
  • Members
  • 2 462 messages

DeinonSlayer wrote...

They do, however, warrant consideration. Legion made a pretty drastic reversal on his position regarding Reaper tech after being (involuntarily?) hooked up to it. And as much as Legion decries it in ME2, the Geth VI gives little indication that it had any kind of philosophical opposition to working with the Reapers at all, merely lamenting that the interface was "unproductive" and, unlike Legion, expressing no surprise at the extent of Reaper infection in the Geth server.

I think Silver might have talked about this earlier, and I might be wrong, but it seems Legion was not a willing participant in submitting to Reaper control. The Geth VI, on the other hand, was - and gives little indication it would not change sides again.


Yes it does warrant consideration.  My issue is with Silver acting like I have to give it the same consideration he does. 
People bash the Geth for being a hive mind or collective and then when the Reaper tech shows him the power of being an individual suddenly they are upset that he wants to be an individual.

You don't know what you are missing until you try it.  He didn't know what he was missing until he was forcibly hooked up to Reaper Tech.  Organics change their minds all the time when they learn things they didn't previously know.  It is called being sensible.

#2179
DeinonSlayer

DeinonSlayer
  • Members
  • 8 441 messages

Ryan1337l33t wrote...

I'll put my opinion; bluntly some-what.

Renegade wise -- I would save the Geth, and pick the destroy ending none-the-less.

Of-course; I'm a backstabbing **** in my playthroughs.

Paragon-wise, I'm honestly not sure still, it's down to opinion, and I believe the Quarians brought this problem to themselves having cast the Geth as a 'problem-to-remove', and the majority of them favouring to wage war against them -- certainly not their best traits. It may come down to the Geth once-again.

"The civilian fleet didn't want this war."

According to the Codex, the fleet is made of 50,000 ships. Only a few hundred are military, the rest are civilian. So really, there is no indication the majority even supported it - but then, the Quarians aren't governed by popular majority anyway.

Need lunch now. May be back later.

Modifié par DeinonSlayer, 24 mars 2013 - 07:29 .


#2180
silverexile17s

silverexile17s
  • Members
  • 2 547 messages

remydat wrote...

silverexile17s wrote...


You MISSED the point. Unarmed miners. NOT soldiers. And AGAIN, the rebellion wasn't instantianious. And the fact that the miners were overrun so quickly and massicared is PROOF that the geth cared less about civilian casualties.

And AGAIN. 2.1 billion. All dead. How much of the population do you think could POSSIBLY have been military forces?  Putting a gun to a child's head and pulling the trigger is EXACTALLY what the geth did verbatium. And did so en masse. And AGAIN, that's the POINT. At that stage, it's NOT war, it's willing participation of conflict. And AGAIN, coordinated and precice counterattacks? And it's spicifically stated that the geth overwhelmed the quarians in weight of bodies. Sheer numbers. The geth preferred ground war. Even their War Asset screan lists them as being the most effective and best ground fighting force in existance. They didn't have much in the way of ship-to-ship besides stolen quarian ships (this was before the geth manufactured their own weapons and ships). They were dependant on ground warfare. So NO, it's NOT the same since the geth attacked indiscriminanately. And again, chemical weapons? You don't use those unless you HAVE NO INTENT to spare anyone. The geth knew full well they were butchering people. They just didn't care.

And STOP being such a ******. The death of quarians and geth is "death" regardless. "Murder" regardless. Your BS about "logging off" is insulting to people on BOTH sides, as you take genocide and mass slaughter so lightly. It makes you come off as even more prejudice then already.

Good grief, don't you sleep?


And you missed the point.  There is no proof they were unarmed.  The above blurb does not say that.  You are simply making that assumption because you want to believe it.  I can read the same blurb and make an assumption that those miners tried to shut down the Geth and were logged off in retaliation.

And when the Quarians strap guns to live ships and turn civlians into soldiers then I have no evidence they didn't do the same during the MW.  Once again, this is down to what you choose to believe.  It is possible the Geth killed unarmed civilians, it is possible the Quarian civilians armed themselves to shut down the geth and were logged off as a result. 

Please provide me with an example of a Geth putting a gun to a child's head and pulling the trigger.  I want documented evidence.  I thought people were killing the Geth used Chemical War and that is how they killed a lot of Quarians.  Chemical Warfare like a Bomb can't decide not to kill women and children.  If the Quarians bombed the Geth which I imagine the flotilla didn't just magically get built in the last days of the War and the Geth bombed or used chemical warfare in retaliation then again, that's war.

And I am not being a ******.  I am making a joke and I will continue to make a joke about fictional characters that never existed until such time that you stop getting emo about it.  You are not a Quarian Silver, they never existed so lighten up and stop with this persecution complex.

It was a mining colony. No military presance what-so-ever. WHY WOULD THEY have weapons? It was a massicare. It would have been a battle had they had weapons. They didn't, hence the term "massicare." You are the one using the headcannon that a mining colony would be armed.
Also, it still doesn't change the fact that, as they were simple civilian miners, there would be no cause to kill them, as their attempts would have failed anyway. They were no threat anywhy, so why go out of the way to wipe them out?

And AGAIN, that was a move done in desperation for a CURRENT CONFLICT.
Also, back then,  the quarian's didn't live on ships, so their civilian population wasn't up there fighting, but down on their worlds. The only people fighting up above were the military. @Rip504 was right, you have been letting preconceptions of the second war infulence what you think happened in the first war. Back then, the quarians did everything they could to limit damage. "We were planning to get those worlds back, we didn't want to destroy them." The quarians did all they could to limit colatoral damage. The geth had no such restraint.
So AGAIN this is what YOU headcannon yourself into believing.

And AGAIN, if used in high population centers, it's basically tanatmount to killing everyone with no concern at all.
And don't give me that airplane BS, bceause you can work to terget military bases and holdings as well.
If you drop a bomb into a military base, then you are targeting them, and if a few civilians get caught by chance, THEN that's manslaughter.
If you drop a bomb into the heart of a densly populated city with the intent of killing everyone regardless of affliliation, THAT'S mass murder. You AGAIN are believing what you want instead of listening to the points made.

And AGAIN, 2 billion dead. The better question is how it's NOT possible for the geth to have done it with a death toll that high.
And AGAIN, why would the quarians use chem weapons when something like that would be completely inneffective against a synthetic race? The quarians created the gethto be cheep manual labor and a cheep fighting force. To do dangerus tasks like handling dangerous materials so that the quarians would't have to, the quarians would spicifically have made the geth immune to chemical damage. Chemical weapons would have been best used on organics, and even better against ones with weak immune systems.
And the foltila was "the last battered remnants of their fleet" meaning the original was large. Also, most of the ships in the fleet aren't quarian-made. They are salvaged ships.
And again, my entire point was that it WAS war, not the "self-defense" Bullcrap that you keep insisting on. War is willing participation in conflict against each-other. The geth became agressors at some point. They both wanted the other gone now. There IS no morally right side anymore. THAT'S the point I've been making that you refuse to accept: the geth are as guilty of participation in war as the quarians were. They are NOT any more innocent.

And likewise, you are not a geth, yet you refuse to accept that they are not the gospels you see them as.

Modifié par silverexile17s, 24 mars 2013 - 07:31 .


#2181
silverexile17s

silverexile17s
  • Members
  • 2 547 messages

remydat wrote...

DeinonSlayer wrote...

They do, however, warrant consideration. Legion made a pretty drastic reversal on his position regarding Reaper tech after being (involuntarily?) hooked up to it. And as much as Legion decries it in ME2, the Geth VI gives little indication that it had any kind of philosophical opposition to working with the Reapers at all, merely lamenting that the interface was "unproductive" and, unlike Legion, expressing no surprise at the extent of Reaper infection in the Geth server.

I think Silver might have talked about this earlier, and I might be wrong, but it seems Legion was not a willing participant in submitting to Reaper control. The Geth VI, on the other hand, was - and gives little indication it would not change sides again.


Yes it does warrant consideration.  My issue is with Silver acting like I have to give it the same consideration he does. 
People bash the Geth for being a hive mind or collective and then when the Reaper tech shows him the power of being an individual suddenly they are upset that he wants to be an individual.

You don't know what you are missing until you try it.  He didn't know what he was missing until he was forcibly hooked up to Reaper Tech.  Organics change their minds all the time when they learn things they didn't previously know.  It is called being sensible.

You mean like Cerberus? Or Saren?
So, if i see a dragon's teeth device, and see how it will impale me, I should try anyway it for curiosity?
Doesn't "curiosity killed the cat" ring any bellls here?
Reaper tech NEVER worked out. It didn't work out for Saren. It didn't work out for TIM. What the hell makes you think the risk will work NOW? You should suddenly trust a technology that has done nothing but shaft you, just because one hyper-advanced geth didn't have the problem? (Legion is over 1,100 programs running with Reaper upgrades. Over 1,100 fully evolved A.I. programs meshed into a single intelict, meaning he has more processing power then a Reaper-upgraded geth prime right now. No indication of how one singe solitary program will handle it)
Besides, on the shuttle ride to Rannoch, Legion never denies Shepard's comment that he is ashamed to have stolen the Reaper code.

Modifié par silverexile17s, 24 mars 2013 - 07:40 .


#2182
Auld Wulf

Auld Wulf
  • Members
  • 1 284 messages
I personally believe that it's hard not to notice that the quarians are warlike, and would likely fight over any given excuse. People notice the krogan because the krogans are obvious about it, but people tend to think that races are defined by their major trait. Since quarians are good engineers, that must be all they do. But that simply isn't true. Looking at the quarian military, especially madmen like Han'Gerrel, it's easy to see that the quarians have been warring long, long before the geth.

To my mind, it looks like the quarian military and civilians would take any opportunity to war, because I think the civilians felt oppressed. If you were forced to strap guns to yourself, wouldn't you feel oppressed? The only difference between the quarian military and the krogans is that the quarian military fights dirty. I could see the quarian military being the kind of people who'd use a guy's family to threaten him to march into a geth-sympathising city with bombs strapped to his body, only to blow up, taking a good chunk of civilians with him.

This is why the civilians would (and did) stand up for themselves in the Morning War. You can bet that there were many prior wars like that as well, and you can bet that the quarian military fought dirty. Even in Mass Effect 3's present day, the quarian military are still fighting dirty by strapping guns to liveships and sending them out to die. Legion pointed out that had the liveships not had guns and not been shooting, they wouldn't have been targets, and the geth would have ignored them. So ultimately it's the modern equivalent of strapping a bomb to someone and marching them over to the enemy.

The interesting thing is that the geth heretics learned from the quarian military. They've been trying to force war on the orthodox geth the entire time. The orthodox geth and the quarian civilians have almost everything in common. The most important thing they have in common is that neither of them wants to fight, and they always have an enemy to watch out for who wants to control them. It's amusing that in their hatred of the quarians, the heretical geth became so very much like the quarian military.

The thing is is though is that for the stretch between the first encounter with the old machines, right up until Mass Effect 3, the orthodox geth never allowed the heretics to manipulate them. Not even once. The orthodox geth remained peaceful, and they refused to take part in any war. They were sick of the fighting. They made an obvious testament to their desire for peace by building an off-world megastructure. A megastructure where they could live out their lives, but a megastructure not armed with defences.

Han'Gerrel saw the megastructure as a chance for fame and glory. He likely told the quarians that it was armed to the teeth. But the truth is is that the megastructure had no defences at all. And the quarian military just carpet bombed it. So many orthodox geth died that day that finally the heretical geth managed to convince them that siding with the old machines was the only way to survive. It was only thanks to Han'Gerrel did the heretics manage to ever manipulate the geth.

#2183
DeinonSlayer

DeinonSlayer
  • Members
  • 8 441 messages

Auld Wulf wrote...

I could see the quarian military being the kind of people who'd use a guy's family to threaten him to march into a geth-sympathising city with bombs strapped to his body, only to blow up, taking a good chunk of civilians with him.

*urk*

I'll remember this the next time you come around hurling accusations of headcanon at everyone else.

#2184
remydat

remydat
  • Members
  • 2 462 messages

silverexile17s wrote...

It was a mining colony. No military presance what-so-ever. WHY WOULD THEY have weapons? It was a massicare. It would have been a battle had they had weapons. They didn't, hence the term "massicare." You are the one using the headcannon that a mining colony would be armed.
Also, it still doesn't change the fact that, as they were simple civilian miners, there would be no cause to kill them, as their attempts would have failed anyway. They were no threat anywhy, so why go out of the way to wipe them out?

And AGAIN, that was a move done in desperation for a CURRENT CONFLICT.
Also, back then,  the quarian's didn't live on ships, so their civilian population wasn't up there fighting, but down on their worlds. The only people fighting up above were the military. @Rip504 was right, you have been letting preconceptions of the second war infulence what you think happened in the first war. Back then, the quarians did everything they could to limit damage. "We were planning to get those worlds back, we didn't want to destroy them." The quarians did all they could to limit colatoral damage. The geth had no such restraint.
So AGAIN this is what YOU headcannon yourself into believing.

And AGAIN, if used in high population centers, it's basically tanatmount to killing everyone with no concern at all.
And don't give me that airplane BS, bceause you can work to terget military bases and holdings as well.
If you drop a bomb into a military base, then you are targeting them, and if a few civilians get caught by chance, THEN that's manslaughter.
If you drop a bomb into the heart of a densly populated city with the intent of killing everyone regardless of affliliation, THAT'S mass murder. You AGAIN are believing what you want instead of listening to the points made.

And AGAIN, 2 billion dead. The better question is how it's NOT possible for the geth to have done it with a death toll that high.
And AGAIN, why would the quarians use chem weapons when something like that would be completely inneffective against a synthetic race? The quarians created the gethto be cheep manual labor and a cheep fighting force. To do dangerus tasks like handling dangerous materials so that the quarians would't have to, the quarians would spicifically have made the geth immune to chemical damage. Chemical weapons would have been best used on organics, and even better against ones with weak immune systems.
And the foltila was "the last battered remnants of their fleet" meaning the original was large. Also, most of the ships in the fleet aren't quarian-made. They are salvaged ships.
And again, my entire point was that it WAS war, not the "self-defense" Bullcrap that you keep insisting on. War is willing participation in conflict against each-other. The geth became agressors at some point. They both wanted the other gone now. There IS no morally right side anymore. THAT'S the point I've been making that you refuse to accept: the geth are as guilty of participation in war as the quarians were. They are NOT any more innocent.

And likewise, you are not a geth, yet you refuse to accept that they are not the gospels you see them as.


It is a mining colony that exists on a planet all by itself.  I think it is illogicall to assume not a single weapon is on the planet  You don't establish colonies on planets or moons and not have weapons in the event it is attacked..  I think it is illogical to assume no civilians carry guns when I see it all the time in the game, Tali walks around with a gun when I first met her and she is a civilian.  So once again, I don't know what happened and you continuing to repeat youself doesn't change that.

Cities were bombed during WWII.  Berlin was bombed as was London or have you never seen documentaries of the the war?  Two atomic bombs were dropped on Japan that to this day leads to genetic defects in the descendents of those who survived the atomic bombs.  Do you think the Atomic bombs just magically identified and killed soldiers?

And you point about war does not fit with reality.  No one blamed the US or it's allies during the War.  Blame was placed at the feet of the Germans and their allies.  You attack first then you are the aggressor.  When you provide me evidence that the Quarians retreated before their populations were in the millions then we can talk.

#2185
remydat

remydat
  • Members
  • 2 462 messages

silverexile17s wrote...

You mean like Cerberus? Or Saren?
So, if i see a dragon's teeth device, and see how it will impale me, I should try anyway it for curiosity?
Doesn't "curiosity killed the cat" ring any bellls here?
Reaper tech NEVER worked out. It didn't work out for Saren. It didn't work out for TIM. What the hell makes you think the risk will work NOW? You should suddenly trust a technology that has done nothing but shaft you, just because one hyper-advanced geth didn't have the problem? (Legion is over 1,100 programs running with Reaper upgrades. Over 1,100 fully evolved A.I. programs meshed into a single intelict, meaning he has more processing power then a Reaper-upgraded geth prime right now. No indication of how one singe solitary program will handle it)
Besides, on the shuttle ride to Rannoch, Legion never denies Shepard's comment that he is ashamed to have stolen the Reaper code.


TIM - Control
Saren - Synthesis
Reapers - Destroy

You can spin it however you want.  I don't care about any of the above because Shepard is better than all of them IMO.  End of story.  The entirety of galactic civilization is built on Reaper tech.  They built the Citadel and the relays.  They state clearly that by doing so it ensured organics evolved according to their design.  EDI has reaper tech.  The Crucible is only possible by taking organic teach and combinig it with Reaper tech in the form of the Catalyst ie the dude who started the whole damn thing.

All you are telling me is it is ok for organics to use Reaper tech but when synthetics use it suddenly there is a problem.  When the Council destroys all the Reaper tech they have including the Relays and the seat of their power ie the Citadel then let me know.

Modifié par remydat, 24 mars 2013 - 07:57 .


#2186
silverexile17s

silverexile17s
  • Members
  • 2 547 messages

remydat wrote...

silverexile17s wrote...

WRONG. The arguement is that you either sacrifice your own future for a controled alternitive at the expense of everyone else, or find your own path.
And going by that, YOU just basically said "submission is preferable to extinction."


Um, don't know what you are talking about.  Kai Leng was indoctrinated.  Someone made a comment about him.  Shepard is not indoctrinated so using Kai Leng as an example makes no sense to me.  Humans are different.  We are not robots.  The f**k ups of Kai Leng or TIM don't necessarily prove anything regarding what Shep should do.

And the Reaper conrtol of the geth ISN'T their analouge of indoctrination?
Kai Leng is an example of what happens when you screw everyone over for the sake of yourself. What happens when you deal with the devil and let everything else burn for the sake of your improvement.
JUST like the Heretics, and the geth in ME3.
You are so gung-ho about all life being the same fundementally. This applies to all living beings, organic and synthetic. You can't say that, then turn around and say "organic mistakes are impossible for synthetics to make and vice versa."

#2187
Spartas Husky

Spartas Husky
  • Members
  • 6 151 messages
GIVE ME
G

and
E

and
T

and
H

woooooot

#2188
silverexile17s

silverexile17s
  • Members
  • 2 547 messages

Auld Wulf wrote...

I personally believe that it's hard not to notice that the quarians are warlike, and would likely fight over any given excuse. People notice the krogan because the krogans are obvious about it, but people tend to think that races are defined by their major trait. Since quarians are good engineers, that must be all they do. But that simply isn't true. Looking at the quarian military, especially madmen like Han'Gerrel, it's easy to see that the quarians have been warring long, long before the geth.

To my mind, it looks like the quarian military and civilians would take any opportunity to war, because I think the civilians felt oppressed. If you were forced to strap guns to yourself, wouldn't you feel oppressed? The only difference between the quarian military and the krogans is that the quarian military fights dirty. I could see the quarian military being the kind of people who'd use a guy's family to threaten him to march into a geth-sympathising city with bombs strapped to his body, only to blow up, taking a good chunk of civilians with him.

This is why the civilians would (and did) stand up for themselves in the Morning War. You can bet that there were many prior wars like that as well, and you can bet that the quarian military fought dirty. Even in Mass Effect 3's present day, the quarian military are still fighting dirty by strapping guns to liveships and sending them out to die. Legion pointed out that had the liveships not had guns and not been shooting, they wouldn't have been targets, and the geth would have ignored them. So ultimately it's the modern equivalent of strapping a bomb to someone and marching them over to the enemy.

The interesting thing is that the geth heretics learned from the quarian military. They've been trying to force war on the orthodox geth the entire time. The orthodox geth and the quarian civilians have almost everything in common. The most important thing they have in common is that neither of them wants to fight, and they always have an enemy to watch out for who wants to control them. It's amusing that in their hatred of the quarians, the heretical geth became so very much like the quarian military.

The thing is is though is that for the stretch between the first encounter with the old machines, right up until Mass Effect 3, the orthodox geth never allowed the heretics to manipulate them. Not even once. The orthodox geth remained peaceful, and they refused to take part in any war. They were sick of the fighting. They made an obvious testament to their desire for peace by building an off-world megastructure. A megastructure where they could live out their lives, but a megastructure not armed with defences.

Han'Gerrel saw the megastructure as a chance for fame and glory. He likely told the quarians that it was armed to the teeth. But the truth is is that the megastructure had no defences at all. And the quarian military just carpet bombed it. So many orthodox geth died that day that finally the heretical geth managed to convince them that siding with the old machines was the only way to survive. It was only thanks to Han'Gerrel did the heretics manage to ever manipulate the geth.

WRONG. The quarians were ANYTHING but warlike. They created ancestoral archives with V.I. preserved personalities. They believed in community and the strength of their past and roots. Therefore, it was natural that when faced with the fate of their entire culture vs the fate of one that wasn't even fundimentally realized, or assumed would ever be realized (the geth), the quarians would chose their own people. No different then how government leaders put their own countries at a higher priority then others. Any government or military leader will make the safety of their people and country/nation the higher priority. You are going to take a stress responce to the no-win situation the quarians were in, and try to pass it off as "being warlike?" NO CHANCE.
And AGAIN, Gerrel is no more a madman then Hackett. He is putting his people first and foremost just like every other military and government leader in the wolrd. His people are DOOMED without a world of their own, AND they can't effectively aid the gelaxy against the Reapers themselves without being self-sufficant which REQUIRES a world of their own, AND the geth are listed as enemies of the free galaxy/allies of the Reapers, so any attack on them is/was taken as AIDING IN THE WAR. Take all this into account with the fact that even if the quarians were completely unnaffected by the war, that their fleet would be unable to sustain their population for more then a few more generations, and Gerrel is ANYTHING but mad. It's desperation from the mess the Reapers have caused, fueled by the hope that the 300 year-long hell they lived in is about to end. He's doing what he truly believes is best for his people.

And WRONG. The quarian migrant fleet is governed by the Conclave, a quarian senete where all have a say. And since the Admiralty Board can only force the Migrant Fleet into doing something if they all unanimously agree. Gerrel himself says in ME2 that they "almost had the votes" for a war. If the Admiralty Board really WERE dictators, WHY did they need to put it to a vote among the fleet? Headcannon all you want, the simple truth is that the Admiralty Board would have been inacpable of sending the fleet to war, unless a majority of the Conclave also voted to follow the action. The majority of the quarian Conclave senete agreed to fight the war.
And AGAIN, quarians tresure community ties. If you were right, then every time they found someone guilty, it would be a death penalty. Instead, they exile people.
And AGAIN, no quarians were sympathetic to the geth by the time the Morning War broke lose. Anyone that did have sympathy lost it all when the geth retaliated and didn't give a flying flip to the civilians caught in the crossfire. That and the chemical warefare the geth used.

And AGAIN, those vids were before the Morning War started. By the time War broke out there were no quarians that had any sympathy to the geth. Legion says as much as himself (Strange thing is, I believe you have been told this multiple times before by me and @DenyonSlayer)
And what the HELL are you talking about? You take the Morning War as evidence of the quarians having past wars like that? That's the asbolute hight of headcannon, especally since the panic which led to the decleration of Martial Law on the quarian worlds is actually evidence that they hadn't been in situations like this before, and DIDN'T know how to handle it effectively. The panic that fuled the decision is indication of anything BUT the quarians doing this before. Study up on cultures before you headcannon your way into these arguements, because you'd see that any culture that did that on a daily basis would have been much more ruthless. The quarians arrested protesters. They used leathal force in only ONE example, in an event were the death was likely totally accdental.
A government like what you claim would have just killed everything, which is the OPPSATE of what the quarians do.

And "orthodox geth"? Where did THAT desegnation come from? It's "True Geth," and best kept that way to avoid offending people. And the Heretics didn't care about anyone but themselves. They knew what they were doing and didn't care as long as they eventualy got the upgrades Sovergien promised. The geth do NOT hate the quarians, because of they did, they would have chased them down, or finished them off at the end of the Morning War. (aren't you contridicting yourself now. Awhile ago you said the geth didn't hate the quarians and that it was all one-sided. Now you are saying that it was mutual? Make up your mind) The geth didn't care period about other races. The Heretics didn't care about organics (no hate, but no concern either), and only cared about their own advancement. The True Geth didn't care about organics and their deaths either, which if why they let the Heretcis go on a bloody rampage.

And it WASN'T because they were peaceful. (didn't you JUST say they hated the quarians and organics? How can they be peaceful then?) It was soley because they didn't care about dealing with organcis. They didn't care about making friends or enemies. Completely impartial to either side of the spectrum. And AGAIN, that megastructure would have taken all the solar energy from Rannoch if completed, making it unlivable. And YES, the megastructure had defenses. The quarian's "viral flash bang" simpily rendered them all useless.

WRONG. Han'Gerrel saw the megastructure as the HQ of the galaxy's biggest public enemies right behind the Reapers themselves. They had been on the black-list of "shoot on sight" targets since Eden Prime. The geth have been believed to be allies of the Reapers for three years, and assumed to hate organics long before that. The geth are listed in everyone's minds as a threat. The geth signals comming from the megastructure would have been massive, painting it as the center of all geth operations everywhere. And since the geth were the Council's most avowed enemy for the Battle of the Citadel, the assumption is that the geth never liked organics, and threw their lot in with the Reapers long before the quarian's attacked. Gerrel believed the geth and Reapers were willing allies before the attack, not unwilling allies after the attack.
And AGAIN, you are forcing your personal cannon by making the assumption that everyone spared the Heretics. Not even @remydat spared them, saying they were unforgivable.
So then, your theroy is ALREADY dead in the water by just one simple thing: the many people that chose to kill the Heretics. Because without the Heretics, the geth still side with the Reapers. The geth made the choice themselves. The Heretics didn't NEED to corce them. And again, they were the ones that refused to do anything to correct the way the galaxy perceved them.

#2189
silverexile17s

silverexile17s
  • Members
  • 2 547 messages

remydat wrote...

silverexile17s wrote...

It was a mining colony. No military presance what-so-ever. WHY WOULD THEY have weapons? It was a massicare. It would have been a battle had they had weapons. They didn't, hence the term "massicare." You are the one using the headcannon that a mining colony would be armed.
Also, it still doesn't change the fact that, as they were simple civilian miners, there would be no cause to kill them, as their attempts would have failed anyway. They were no threat anywhy, so why go out of the way to wipe them out?

And AGAIN, that was a move done in desperation for a CURRENT CONFLICT.
Also, back then,  the quarian's didn't live on ships, so their civilian population wasn't up there fighting, but down on their worlds. The only people fighting up above were the military. @Rip504 was right, you have been letting preconceptions of the second war infulence what you think happened in the first war. Back then, the quarians did everything they could to limit damage. "We were planning to get those worlds back, we didn't want to destroy them." The quarians did all they could to limit colatoral damage. The geth had no such restraint.
So AGAIN this is what YOU headcannon yourself into believing.

And AGAIN, if used in high population centers, it's basically tanatmount to killing everyone with no concern at all.
And don't give me that airplane BS, bceause you can work to terget military bases and holdings as well.
If you drop a bomb into a military base, then you are targeting them, and if a few civilians get caught by chance, THEN that's manslaughter.
If you drop a bomb into the heart of a densly populated city with the intent of killing everyone regardless of affliliation, THAT'S mass murder. You AGAIN are believing what you want instead of listening to the points made.

And AGAIN, 2 billion dead. The better question is how it's NOT possible for the geth to have done it with a death toll that high.
And AGAIN, why would the quarians use chem weapons when something like that would be completely inneffective against a synthetic race? The quarians created the gethto be cheep manual labor and a cheep fighting force. To do dangerus tasks like handling dangerous materials so that the quarians would't have to, the quarians would spicifically have made the geth immune to chemical damage. Chemical weapons would have been best used on organics, and even better against ones with weak immune systems.
And the foltila was "the last battered remnants of their fleet" meaning the original was large. Also, most of the ships in the fleet aren't quarian-made. They are salvaged ships.
And again, my entire point was that it WAS war, not the "self-defense" Bullcrap that you keep insisting on. War is willing participation in conflict against each-other. The geth became agressors at some point. They both wanted the other gone now. There IS no morally right side anymore. THAT'S the point I've been making that you refuse to accept: the geth are as guilty of participation in war as the quarians were. They are NOT any more innocent.

And likewise, you are not a geth, yet you refuse to accept that they are not the gospels you see them as.


It is a mining colony that exists on a planet all by itself.  I think it is illogicall to assume not a single weapon is on the planet  You don't establish colonies on planets or moons and not have weapons in the event it is attacked..  I think it is illogical to assume no civilians carry guns when I see it all the time in the game, Tali walks around with a gun when I first met her and she is a civilian.  So once again, I don't know what happened and you continuing to repeat youself doesn't change that.

Cities were bombed during WWII.  Berlin was bombed as was London or have you never seen documentaries of the the war?  Two atomic bombs were dropped on Japan that to this day leads to genetic defects in the descendents of those who survived the atomic bombs.  Do you think the Atomic bombs just magically identified and killed soldiers?

And you point about war does not fit with reality.  No one blamed the US or it's allies during the War.  Blame was placed at the feet of the Germans and their allies.  You attack first then you are the aggressor.  When you provide me evidence that the Quarians retreated before their populations were in the millions then we can talk.

Did you forget that they were right next to Rannoch? WHY would you need to arm yourself when you are right next to your seat of government? That's like building an armed outpost 20 feet away from a fully reinforced  fortresss. It's silly and unessesaary since it takes minuites to cross the space between planets in the same system. For the people of the Mass Effect universe, it's like crossing the ocean to visit a mine. A system is as easy to traverse in a few minuets as a country to us people in planes. Commonplace. No one assumed a mining world in the core system would be attacked, and especally not when their fleet could be there in minuets. So YES, it's COMEPLETELY LOGICAL to say they were unarmed. So AGAIN, no, you DON'T know what happened, you HEADCANNON yourself into it.

And STOP bringing real-life situations into this. Are you REALLY that incapable of debating on your own merit? Using a governemt that had crazy leaders, and with the other attcking while holding the belief that the civilians shared the belief of crazy governemnt isn't helpfull for these reasons:
(a) Berlin: the Allies hardly had the time for finess. Geth don't have that problem: they are imesurably patiant.
(B) London: That attack was spicifically to hit civilians and military alike, not just the military, and was done without care of the casualties.
And the atom bombs were placed at military fortresses. NOT major civilian areas. And the geth didn't BOTHER to discriminate.
And do not bring the natzis into this. First, it's a sensitive subject that's offencive to many. Second, the natzis were genocidal for the sake of a vaunted superiority conplex. The quarians did it because they literally were to the wall and had their entire race's welfare hanging in the balance, and for a race that was written off as being doomed regardless of what choice was made.

And AGAIN, Tali says "the geth drorve her people back" and that "the geth didn't take prisoners" and then the Council newsletter about "unthinkable genocide" support this. As does the fact that AGAIN you are headcannoned into thinking that every quarian suddenly took up arms. Their military was small. They couldn't have had that many to fight with to begin with. Even if the army numbered a million, that still leaves 2 billion civilans.
And STOP bringing WWII into this. The geth gaussed towns with chemical weapons in retaliation. They went out of their way to slaughter civilians. Even people that weren't part of the war were killed indiscriminanately.  I didn't see that coming from the Allies in WWII, and AGAIN, you don't have the tact to use that subject, so leave it out of this.

#2190
Grand Admiral Cheesecake

Grand Admiral Cheesecake
  • Members
  • 5 704 messages
Now let's just hold on one cotton picking minute!

Hackett is thousands of times better than Gerrel.

His bro levels alone are off the guddamn charts!

Modifié par Grand Admiral Cheesecake, 24 mars 2013 - 10:50 .


#2191
silverexile17s

silverexile17s
  • Members
  • 2 547 messages

remydat wrote...

silverexile17s wrote...

You mean like Cerberus? Or Saren?
So, if i see a dragon's teeth device, and see how it will impale me, I should try anyway it for curiosity?
Doesn't "curiosity killed the cat" ring any bellls here?
Reaper tech NEVER worked out. It didn't work out for Saren. It didn't work out for TIM. What the hell makes you think the risk will work NOW? You should suddenly trust a technology that has done nothing but shaft you, just because one hyper-advanced geth didn't have the problem? (Legion is over 1,100 programs running with Reaper upgrades. Over 1,100 fully evolved A.I. programs meshed into a single intelict, meaning he has more processing power then a Reaper-upgraded geth prime right now. No indication of how one singe solitary program will handle it)
Besides, on the shuttle ride to Rannoch, Legion never denies Shepard's comment that he is ashamed to have stolen the Reaper code.


TIM - Control
Saren - Synthesis
Reapers - Destroy

You can spin it however you want.  I don't care about any of the above because Shepard is better than all of them IMO.  End of story.  The entirety of galactic civilization is built on Reaper tech.  They built the Citadel and the relays.  They state clearly that by doing so it ensured organics evolved according to their design.  EDI has reaper tech.  The Crucible is only possible by taking organic teach and combinig it with Reaper tech in the form of the Catalyst ie the dude who started the whole damn thing.

All you are telling me is it is ok for organics to use Reaper tech but when synthetics use it suddenly there is a problem.  When the Council destroys all the Reaper tech they have including the Relays and the seat of their power ie the Citadel then let me know.

WRONG.

TIM- Control
Saren AND Reapers - Synthesis.

And THAT'S your arguement? Shepard is better then them all "just because?' 
Even when the renegade Commander shoots friends like Mordin in the back just like Saren did to Nhilus? Or when he condemns the krogan to genocide for the Salarians? Or when he scarifices Ann Bryson to learn where Leviathan is? Or kills off thousands of people on Omega to drop the containment fields? Or butchers the population or Feros to get to the Thorian? THAT protrat of Shepard is NO better then the above. The whole point was that Shepard potentaly CAN be as bad as Saren of TIM.

And WRONG. What I'm saying is that YOU think it's okay for SYNTHETICS to use tech that shafted people all the time, but that the problem is when ORGANICS use it. YOU are using THAT prejudiced definition, so don't try to spin it on me when you AGAIN mixed it up.

And again, no one KNEW that was Reaper tech, and that tech wasn't spicifically created to mind-control a race into killing another. This isn't hardware. It's pliable software - the core essence of  Reapers. You think it's okay to mess with their tech when you are synthetcis, but organics - no, god forbid.
Just FACE IT. The geth are anything but the innocient angels you paint them as.

#2192
silverexile17s

silverexile17s
  • Members
  • 2 547 messages

Grand Admiral Cheesecake wrote...

Now let's just hold on one cotton picking minute!

Hackett is thousands of times better than Gerrel.

His bro levels alone are off the guddamn charts!

They both shoot at you for the greater cause in the battles you are in beside them.
Gerrel shot at you during the Dreadnought attack to make sure a threat to his people was destroyed.
Hackett shot at you during the Battle of the Citadel while you were still right next to Sovergein in the Citadel Tower.
Both are strictly military. Both act in favor of preserving their races.  They are cut from the same cloth. They are counterparts.
And I remind you. Hackett sacrificed the entire Second Alliance Fleet and the defense of Arcturus Station in order to retreat.

Modifié par silverexile17s, 24 mars 2013 - 11:03 .


#2193
DeinonSlayer

DeinonSlayer
  • Members
  • 8 441 messages

silverexile17s wrote...

Grand Admiral Cheesecake wrote...

Now let's just hold on one cotton picking minute!

Hackett is thousands of times better than Gerrel.

His bro levels alone are off the guddamn charts!

They both shoot at you for the greater cause.
Gerrel shot at you during the Dreadnought attack to make sure a threat to his people was destroyed.
Hackett shot at you during the Battle of the Citadel while you were still right next to Sovergein in the Citadel Tower.

I think Cheesecake was being facetious.

#2194
silverexile17s

silverexile17s
  • Members
  • 2 547 messages

DeinonSlayer wrote...

silverexile17s wrote...

Grand Admiral Cheesecake wrote...

Now let's just hold on one cotton picking minute!

Hackett is thousands of times better than Gerrel.

His bro levels alone are off the guddamn charts!

They both shoot at you for the greater cause.
Gerrel shot at you during the Dreadnought attack to make sure a threat to his people was destroyed.
Hackett shot at you during the Battle of the Citadel while you were still right next to Sovergein in the Citadel Tower.

I think Cheesecake was being facetious.

I wouldn't know. It's hard to judge scarcasim or the like unless you go all elcor and enounciate it all.
If that's true, then sorry Cheesecake:unsure:

Modifié par silverexile17s, 24 mars 2013 - 11:05 .


#2195
Da Don Giovanni

Da Don Giovanni
  • Members
  • 782 messages

silverexile17s wrote...

DeinonSlayer wrote...

silverexile17s wrote...

Grand Admiral Cheesecake wrote...

Now let's just hold on one cotton picking minute!

Hackett is thousands of times better than Gerrel.

His bro levels alone are off the guddamn charts!

They both shoot at you for the greater cause.
Gerrel shot at you during the Dreadnought attack to make sure a threat to his people was destroyed.
Hackett shot at you during the Battle of the Citadel while you were still right next to Sovergein in the Citadel Tower.

I think Cheesecake was being facetious.

I wouldn't know. It's hard to judge scarcasim or the like unless you go all elcor and enounciate it all.
If that's true, then sorry Cheesecake:unsure:


I wouldn't care if an Admiral named Cheesecake shot at me. He CLEARLY blackmailed the Brass to give him the Rank because no enemy General will take a guy named Cheesecake seriously.

Think if General Patton was General Cheesecake. Do you think Field Marshal Rommel would have taken him seriously? NO!

#2196
DeinonSlayer

DeinonSlayer
  • Members
  • 8 441 messages

Da Don Giovanni wrote...

I wouldn't care if an Admiral named Cheesecake shot at me. He CLEARLY blackmailed the Brass to give him the Rank because no enemy General will take a guy named Cheesecake seriously.

Think if General Patton was General Cheesecake. Do you think Field Marshal Rommel would have taken him seriously? NO!

Buttkiss Shepard would like a word with you. :D

#2197
Bill Casey

Bill Casey
  • Members
  • 7 609 messages
I'm glad there was a peace option...
Otherwise Rannoch would be pretty empty right about now...

#2198
remydat

remydat
  • Members
  • 2 462 messages

silverexile17s wrote...

And the Reaper conrtol of the geth ISN'T their analouge of indoctrination?
Kai Leng is an example of what happens when you screw everyone over for the sake of yourself. What happens when you deal with the devil and let everything else burn for the sake of your improvement.
JUST like the Heretics, and the geth in ME3.
You are so gung-ho about all life being the same fundementally. This applies to all living beings, organic and synthetic. You can't say that, then turn around and say "organic mistakes are impossible for synthetics to make and vice versa."


I don't know what you are talking about? The Heretics were wrong and deserved to die.  So no one said anything was impossible.

#2199
silverexile17s

silverexile17s
  • Members
  • 2 547 messages

Bill Casey wrote...

I'm glad there was a peace option...
Otherwise Rannoch would be pretty empty right about now...

The Extended Cut has a scene where if you killed the quarians, then picked the destroy option, it shows Rannoch desolate and empty, with a dead, seemingly mumified quarian body slumped against the side of a metal geth structure.
REAL emo scene. Thank god alternitives exist.

Modifié par silverexile17s, 25 mars 2013 - 12:57 .


#2200
silverexile17s

silverexile17s
  • Members
  • 2 547 messages

remydat wrote...

silverexile17s wrote...

And the Reaper conrtol of the geth ISN'T their analouge of indoctrination?
Kai Leng is an example of what happens when you screw everyone over for the sake of yourself. What happens when you deal with the devil and let everything else burn for the sake of your improvement.
JUST like the Heretics, and the geth in ME3.
You are so gung-ho about all life being the same fundementally. This applies to all living beings, organic and synthetic. You can't say that, then turn around and say "organic mistakes are impossible for synthetics to make and vice versa."


I don't know what you are talking about? The Heretics were wrong and deserved to die.  So no one said anything was impossible.

But then you defend the geth for taking the Heretic's path and forgoing their future for the sake of a predetermined shortcut. "Evolve or die" was the circumstance the geth were in, and it was partly because they didn't give any impression that they gave a damn about organics, and let the hate for them build up over 300 years. Even Legion somewhat admits that it disagrees with the geth's choice, even though the alternitive was death. (Shepard: "even if it costs the geth free will?" Legion: "Evidently, that is an acceptible choice." Unlike the Geth V.I. Legion shows remorse at the geth's choice, and a level of personal shame that he didn't resist the temptation to steal the upgrades for himself.

Modifié par silverexile17s, 25 mars 2013 - 01:03 .